近10年来改变政策承认双重国籍的新兴国家

[mooncake]

Really? At least India had a woman prime minister, Indira Gandhi, in recent history. China still has a male dominated regime. Can't see a woman successor to Hu Jin Tao coming soon.

India wouldn't have a woman prime minister if she had a brother. She was elected as prime minister simply because her dad, not herself.

 

[Buckwheattobe]

You are really 抬杠。 The U.S.A never had a female president, can't see a woman successor to Obama coming soon (Palin is just a clown she doesn't have a change). Are you saying USA is a "male dominated regime"?

Don't change the topic, I was talking about the unfairness in India citizenship law. Why only children or grandchildren of an Indian MAN can get the citizenship? What about the children of Indian women (with non-indian husbands)?

Yes I am 抬杠. And yes, the US is a male-dominated regime and same with China. History shows that.

No, it is not right to deprive descendants of the female side of Indian citizenship. Indian women should fight for that. But the dis-refutable fact is they did have woman prime minister and that alone was a breakthrough for womanhood.

I hope people in this forum do not underestimate the potential of India. To me, what impedes their growth is their antiquated caste system.

Going back to the question of the case for or against dual citizenship: really, there is no good data or analysis to back up either choice. Everyone here voices his/her opinion based on emotion or some gut feeling.

I think what China is afraid of is those 'citizens' overseas, if dual citizenship is allowed, may exert too much of an influence on those citizens in China by knowing too much. China cannot impose censorship/news blackout on those citizens and thereby lose the tight control they like to have.

 

[SuanNiHen]

Yes I am 抬杠. And yes, the US is a male-dominated regime and same with China. History shows that.

No, it is not right to deprive descendants of the female side of Indian citizenship. Indian women should fight for that. But the dis-refutable fact is they did have woman prime minister and that alone was a breakthrough for womanhood.

I hope people in this forum do not underestimate the potential of India. To me, what impedes their growth is their antiquated caste system.

Going back to the question of the case for or against dual citizenship: really, there is no good data or analysis to back up either choice. Everyone here voices his/her opinion based on emotion or some gut feeling.

I think what China is afraid of is those 'citizens' overseas, if dual citizenship is allowed, may exert too much of an influence on those citizens in China by knowing too much. China cannot impose censorship/news blackout on those citizens and thereby lose the tight control they like to have.

 

[wwwgty]

国籍怎么可以双重，犯罪后用什么法律制裁？

 

[Buckwheattobe]

国籍怎么可以双重，犯罪后用什么法律制裁？

Criminal law is independent of nationality. You are subjected to the law of the land whether you are a citizen or not.

 

[ccc]

看看利弊吧:

http://www.voyage.gc.ca/publications/dual-citizenship_double-citoyennete-eng.asp

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiple_citizenship

 

[dsss]

我并没有说要小瞧印度，这个存在性别歧视和各种歧视，民族矛盾、宗教斗争家常便饭的国家，能造出核武器，而且是除了5个合法核国家之外，唯一被美国和西方支持的核国家，中印早晚有事。。。

双重国籍嘛，对中国这个新兴国家，弊大于利。就说一件，国家实力达到能保护海外侨民，给予海外中国人国籍才有意义，比如再发生印尼排华事件，你有能力派船必要时派军舰把7百万“我国侨民”接回来安置好吗？没有那个金刚钻，就别给人开“侨民”空头支票，也好让人家遇到骚乱，早作抵抗的准备，否则空等“祖国”来船接，反而误事。

根据楼主贴的，菲利斌修改法律，只解决350万海外飞礼宾人的国籍，咱海外华人可是有四五千万的数量级，给人国籍，人家有事找你你能解决吗？其他发展中国家，印度越南，双重国籍都带着条件的，韩国那是“将在未来”的计划。其他那几个西方世界的“新兴国家”，国力与海外侨民数量相比，费用已经可以支付了，才改变承认双重国籍。

现阶段，我看难。

 

[Buckwheattobe]

I see no big conflict between China and India in the foreseeable future. The two so called major issues currently in the way of more cordial relationship between the two nations are Kashmir/Himalaya border issue and China-Pakistan alignment. There is so much to gain if the 2 biggest nations in Asia band together. (Americans would be so much more worried. )

dsss: What you are concerned about dual citizenship issue is the policy towards protecting the big increase of oversea nationals. I agree it would be a huge task if an emergency evacuation is required for example.
But it is already a huge task now since Chinese nationals overseas nowadays number in millions (Those holding a Chinese passport.) That is only my estimate, not substantiated. My position is: as a nation, you do the best you can to provide a safe passage to your own citizens anyway. You can do no better than what you are capable of. To me that is good enough. But that is only a side issue.