用过Green Bin的,效果怎么样?

就算是有了利润,市政府还有很多其他的用钱的地方呢。如果不需要我们纳税人交钱,那么经查证后,应该降低我们的税率。发东西,我是不赞成的,浪费太多。
 
夏天发生过几次蛆的问题以后我们就暂停使用了,天气凉下来又开始用了。

家里的垃圾大量减少,通常我都要到星期四晚上(我家星期五收垃圾)才开始往垃圾桶里面放两袋(购物塑料袋)垃圾
 

附件

  • laji.jpg
    laji.jpg
    110.6 KB · 查看: 225
政府哪来钱?还不是我们纳税人交上去的?
免费发下来,肯定有浪费。
我宁愿自己控制。

什么环保了,造福了,只不过是个官商勾结骗钱的由头。其核心内容是:弄钱!环保则只是个用于赚吆喝的副产品。
 
什么环保了,造福了,只不过是个官商勾结骗钱的由头。其核心内容是:弄钱!环保则只是个用于赚吆喝的副产品。

怀疑是内奸签的合同 :flaming::flaming::flaming:

The contract commits the city to paying for 80,000 tonnes of organic waste per year. But the city fell short of that goal in 2010, sending only 53,000 tonnes of waste to the plant. Taxpayers will now have to foot a $2.5-million bill to make up for the shortfall.

http://ottawa.ctv.ca/servlet/an/loc...McRae_Garbage_110112/20110113/?hub=OttawaHome
 
怀疑是内奸签的合同 :flaming::flaming::flaming:

The contract commits the city to paying for 80,000 tonnes of organic waste per year. But the city fell short of that goal in 2010, sending only 53,000 tonnes of waste to the plant. Taxpayers will now have to foot a $2.5-million bill to make up for the shortfall.

http://ottawa.ctv.ca/servlet/an/loc...McRae_Garbage_110112/20110113/?hub=OttawaHome

Hum......

You forget to mention that the contract itself is $300 million for 20 years. If we don't have enough to recycle we have to pay more on top of that.

So people like 南极找南难 should start recycling so we don't have to pay for more and more.

Recycling is not only for the future generation but for us too, as well as significant financial gain.
 
Hum......

You forget to mention that the contract itself is $300 million for 20 years. If we don't have enough to recycle we have to pay more on top of that.

So people like 南极找南难 should start recycling so we don't have to pay for more and more.

Recycling is not only for the future generation but for us too, as well as significant financial gain.

Why did the city sign such a stupid contract in the first place?

Do you mean we, the tax payers, have to pay more for the stupid contract for 20 years if the waste is less than 80,000 tonnes per year?
 
Hum......

You forget to mention that the contract itself is $300 million for 20 years. If we don't have enough to recycle we have to pay more on top of that.

So people like 南极找南难 should start recycling so we don't have to pay for more and more.

Recycling is not only for the future generation but for us too, as well as significant financial gain.

那是欺骗!你不用成为采购经理或销售经理才能明白如何签合理的合同。那赔偿条款是在侮辱百姓的智力。
 
Why did the city sign such a stupid contract in the first place?

Do you mean we, the tax payer, have to pay more for the stupid contract for 20 years if the waste is less than 80,000 tonnes per year?

Here is a direct quote for a Ottawa Sun reader

The city has misrepresented the green bin program from the start. Now they continue the lies.
53000 tonnes includes the yard waste , which are paying for in a seperate program.
The program managed to collect more than 50% but needed the yard waste to get that high.
The green bin raised the diversion rate 9% , from 32 to 41%. So for almost $300 Million over 20 years the city will get about 15% (80,000 tonnes) of the dump diverted. The dump lasts more than 20 years and costs less than $150 Million to replace and deals with 100% of what was going there.
To make matters worse the harmful stuff, the non biodegradeable things, are still going to the dump.
The city took the easy road to "sell " the idea we are enviromentally friendly.
Anthony Neil, January 10th 2011, 12:13pm

http://www.ottawasun.com/news/ottawa/2010/12/21/16631946.html
 
后退
顶部