Daycare

[liuliuk]

想知道家附近的greenboro daycare好不好，问问妈妈们有谁知道公立daycare有没有排名之类的可以参考的啊？谢谢

 

[laroussefrance]

Acorn early learning centre 特别好，在 Bank St. 自己google吧
用的是意大利特殊的教育法，对中国人很合适（比较缺乏的方面）。家长和孩子能学的东西挺多，很多主流中等以上家庭都很欣赏
蒙校其实对移民家庭不合适，不要一阵风的跟着--这是这里的幼儿专家说的

 

[liuliuk]

蒙校我们也去看过了，觉得理念还不错，就是假期太长，所以想看看家附近的daycare

最主要还是要看家庭的实际情况

 

[wiki]

Reggio Emilia approach看起来跟普通daycare没有太大区别呀，看下面的founding principles，跟KRP差不多。

The Reggio Emilia philosophy is based upon the following set of principles:

• Children must have some control over the direction of their learning;
• Children must be able to learn through experiences of touching, moving, listening, seeing, and hearing;
• Children have a relationship with other children and with material items in the world that children must be allowed to explore and
• Children must have endless ways and opportunities to express themselves.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reggio_Emilia_approach#Philosophy

 

[Sahara snow]

Greenboro Day Care is a very good daycare center. My older one had stayed two years there before she went to JK. The teachers there are nice and stable, most of them have worked there for more than 10 years. They have a on-site cook who prepares very fresh and healthy food every day. They have two big seperate yards and one indoor gym, so the kids can ride tricycles indoor in the winter. Moreover, when the centre closes one week in August and one week in December, they deduct that portion of money from the tuition fees (according to my experiences a few years ago).

 

[liuliuk]

谢谢snow的建议，因为之前也看过蒙校，所以在公立和私立的学校之间纠结呢

 

[laroussefrance]

不好意思，昨天没上网。
WIKI引用的四点非常对，但问题是你知道老师究竟做到多少？Children must have some control over the direction of their learning;第一条就没有仔细的标准，你需要去不同的幼儿园才能比较，或者问专业。专业都是同行，世界也挺小的，透漏底细的不多。但据我所知，Acorn是经常被请去给专业老师作介绍的模范之一。
第二条，这里的幼儿园都做得不错。Children must be able to learn through experiences of touching, moving, listening, seeing, and hearing。但用project approach的地方做得最深入。
第三条和第四条Children have a relationship with other children and with material items in the world that children must be allowed to explore and
Children must have endless ways and opportunities to express themselves.
蒙校在这方面就欠缺些。social skills的培养机会少，和解决实际问题的能力欠创造性。中国人光看书读得好，所以你喜欢蒙校。但现在和未来要的是有创造里的人才。还有社交能力，这根本不是梦校的重点，纯属弱项了。至于第四点，教具的安排等等都是按部就班，当然有它的好处，但你要比比别的如Waldorf curriculum和Reggio Emilia的艺术，天壤之别吧，那Acorn或者Italy原汁的可是艺术家坐堂的。
多看看闻闻，别老整天就一个蒙校的，有点井底之蛙。去看看就知道了，家长自己都会喜欢上。我和那学校也没什么瓜葛，只是最近听里面专业人士介绍，有点新鲜，告诉大家。蒙校外面的天可大了。

 

[laroussefrance]

对不起，顶一下希望大家能看见

 

[laroussefrance]

顶两下

 

[mustard]

懵了！怎么专业老师都这么说呢，难道蒙校真的不适合移民孩子？我报名费都交了。

LS，请详细说说，要不方便就QQH我。谢谢！

 

[liuliuk]

不好意思，昨天没上网。
WIKI引用的四点非常对，但问题是你知道老师究竟做到多少？Children must have some control over the direction of their learning;第一条就没有仔细的标准，你需要去不同的幼儿园才能比较，或者问专业。专业都是同行，世界也挺小的，透漏底细的不多。但据我所知，Acorn是经常被请去给专业老师作介绍的模范之一。
第二条，这里的幼儿园都做得不错。Children must be able to learn through experiences of touching, moving, listening, seeing, and hearing。但用project approach的地方做得最深入。
第三条和第四条Children have a relationship with other children and with material items in the world that children must be allowed to explore and
Children must have endless ways and opportunities to express themselves.
蒙校在这方面就欠缺些。social skills的培养机会少，和解决实际问题的能力欠创造性。中国人光看书读得好，所以你喜欢蒙校。但现在和未来要的是有创造里的人才。还有社交能力，这根本不是梦校的重点，纯属弱项了。至于第四点，教具的安排等等都是按部就班，当然有它的好处，但你要比比别的如Waldorf curriculum和Reggio Emilia的艺术，天壤之别吧，那Acorn或者Italy原汁的可是艺术家坐堂的。
多看看闻闻，别老整天就一个蒙校的，有点井底之蛙。去看看就知道了，家长自己都会喜欢上。我和那学校也没什么瓜葛，只是最近听里面专业人士介绍，有点新鲜，告诉大家。蒙校外面的天可大了。

谢谢楼上的给的意见，其实我们前后也跑了不少daycare了，就是想给孩子找个合适的