Tories misled Parliament on G8 spending: Auditor-General

  • 主题发起人 主题发起人 cfz
  • 开始时间 开始时间
Tories Tories, they are desperate... let any other party be elected!
 
Judging from many past incidents, I think the Tories are dishonest. They seem to hide everything they do, instead of being transparent and let the voters see the real numbers, and actual facts.
 
I have yet to see the evidences but my impression is that lots of the controversies stem from the minority reality.They need at least one term of majority to prove they are really dishonest:).
 
不上当。:p
 
It will be an issue because of the perfect timing but a temporary issue due to its nature. It is really a no-issue.

After all, it is only a draft report that was "leaked" illegally. Furthermore, the GA herself cautioned the public not to jump to any conclusions until the release of the formal report.

Even if everything is true, it is about $50 million that were used for trees, street sidewalks, public constructions etc. for a region that happens to be a conservative riding. This is really nothing comparing to the liberal scandal, which is so scandalous that there are still billions of dollars not accounted for. Nobody knows where the money ended up until now!

Well, just my two cents.:)
 
加拿大: 权力导致腐败
中国: 绝对权力导致绝对腐败

看来全世界都不能免俗.
 
For these who are interested, the following is the whole issue:


The funding request was not made in a transparent manner

2.11 - In November 2009, Supplementary Estimates (B) 2009-10 were tabled in the House of Commons. They included an item of $83 million for the "Border Infrastructure Fund relating to investments in infrastructure to reduce border congestion" (Exhibit 2.1). The Treasury Board Secretariat provided us with documentation showing that the intention was to use $50 million of this $83 million for G8 Summit projects. We noted, however, that this was not disclosed in the funding request made to Parliament through the Supplementary Estimates. Therefore, when Parliament considered the Supplementary Estimates as tabled, the request only indicated that money was to be used to reduce border congestion.

The funding request was not made in a transparent manner

2.13 - In our view, by presenting the request for funding in this way the government was not transparent about its purpose. Parliament was not provided with a clear explanation of the nature of the approval being sought or that these expenditures would not be required to meet the pre-existing terms and conditions of the Border Infrastructure Fund.
 
How about this one?

Tories used praise for Liberals to defend summit costs: Fraser

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/story/2011/04/11/cv-election-weston-ag-fraser.html

Canada's auditor general has rebuked the Conservatives for recycling an unrelated quote by her about a previous Liberal government's security spending in a parliamentary report on the costs of the G8/G20 summits in Ontario last summer, CBC News has learned.

The Conservatives' report, presented as a dissenting opinion to the Commons the morning Parliament was dissolved last month, quotes Sheila Fraser giving high marks to the Harper government for prudent spending on the summits.

The report quoted the auditor general as saying: “We found that the processes and controls around that were very good, and that the monies were spent as they were intended to be spent.”

But in a scathing letter addressed to members of a Commons committee on Friday, which was received by the clerk and members on Monday, Fraser said the quote had nothing to do with the summits.

Instead, she said, the Conservatives inserted a 2010 comment she made during a CBC News interview on security spending by a previous Liberal government after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks.

“The comments attributed to me in the [Conservative] report are completely unrelated to G8/G20 spending,” Fraser writes in her letter.

“I would appreciate it if the report could be modified as it is clearly erroneous.”

Stockwell Day, a member of the Harper cabinet who is not running for re-election, said Fraser was quoted in error and the Conservatives "unequivocally apologize." "As soon as I was aware of this letter I asked for the analysis from our officials, our people," Day told host Evan Solomon on the CBC's Power & Politics.

"In fact, I believe and we believe she was erroneously quoted on that. There was a wrong attribution given to her analysis, and we just unequivocally apologize for that."

Day said that the parties' House leaders are being contacted to see how "the proper quote" can be entered into the parliamentary record.

"This quote was wrongly attributed … and she is right to be upset," he said.
'It’s beneath contempt': NDP's Martin

But New Democrat MP Pat Martin took exception to Day’s characterization of the issue as a “misquote.”

“This was complete misrepresentation and a fraudulent use of a quote about an event that happened years before, cut and pasted into this context,” Martin said.

Martin told the CBC's Solomon that Fraser pointed out in the letter that she wasn’t even a witness before that committee.

"She made no official comment about (it), because she was in the middle of her investigation about the G8/G20,” Martin said.

“The auditor general is the most trusted individual on Parliament Hill. For (the Conservatives) to misrepresent and to falsify her comments is unethical. It’s dishonest. It’s beneath contempt.”

Fraser’s letter is addressed to the chairman of the now defunct Commons operations and estimates committee, Liberal MP John McKay, and copied to several other members, including Martin.

When the government was defeated last month, the committee had just finished studying the more than $1.2 billion the Harper government spent on the three-day summits held in Toronto and in Muskoka cottage country to the north of the city.

But the Conservatives on the committee issued their own two-page report.

In it, they claimed: “All witnesses brought forward testimony demonstrating strong endorsement of the government’s unprecedented transparency to summit costs.”

The misquote from Fraser was intended to back that claim.

The incident comes as the Conservatives are trying to douse a separate political flare-up over Fraser’s draft audit of summit spending.

The Canadian Press reports that a draft copy of that audit slams the Conservatives for spending close to $50 million on dubious summit projects completely unrelated to the international events, and misleading Parliament in the process.

The draft report also suggests the process may have been illegal, according to The Canadian Press.

Conservative candidate John Baird, speaking as the former transport minister in charge of infrastructure funding, claimed he has read a later draft of Fraser’s audit that makes no reference to the Harper government misleading Parliament.

The fall of Prime Minister Stephen Harper's minority government last month forced Fraser to shelve plans to present her final audit to Parliament April 5.
 
Tories have apologized swiftly for the misquotation. Human beings make mistakes. I am satisfied as long as they apologize for their mistakes and move on.:)
 
一场G8峰会烧掉10亿,绝对有问题。
 
I don't think this is a mistake. This is typical Tories' "street smart" behavior. They apologized only because they were caught.

Tories have apologized swiftly for the misquotation. Human beings make mistakes. I am satisfied as long as they apologize for their mistakes and move on.:)
 
后退
顶部