给RIM支招之二:Office in Motion

  • 主题发起人 主题发起人 lebut
  • 开始时间 开始时间

lebut

新手上路
VIP
注册
2009-01-18
消息
1,795
荣誉分数
65
声望点数
0
(这段时间实在太忙了;抛砖引玉吧,倾听大伙的意见)

BB不是个简单的手机,它背后是个强大的Secure Enterprise System。 由于Playbook的诞生让我们看到Office in Motion的具体实验,但Playbook似乎无法完成Office in Motion的重任。

Back-end: 这是RIM的强项,应该没有技术障碍。

Front-end: RIM需要开始生产自己的高端Laptop PC。

Market: 绝大多数BB的商业,政府和军方用户都会接受RIM版的Office in Motion。


(有时间就具体展开;没有时间就等大家的高见了)
 
太超前了,这年头看的是“花活”,等大家都“陈管西“了,安全性才会被“用户“重视。
 
RIM的BIS, BES什么的,都是在百家争秀还没有出现dominant design的时候的过渡产品。
dominant design在近几年会尘埃落定, 他们必须想办法把自己的技术优势融入进去。

另辟蹊径的风险很高啊, 看这个公司一向的策略, 并不像苹果那么有创意(其实就是了解用户), 剑走偏锋成功的几率, 我看很小……
 
支嘛招都没用,只要RIM还在前NORTEL的MANAER们的混乱管理下,RIM的前途是可以预见的.
(这段时间实在太忙了;抛砖引玉吧,倾听大伙的意见)

BB不是个简单的手机,它背后是个强大的Secure Enterprise System。 由于Playbook的诞生让我们看到Office in Motion的具体实验,但Playbook似乎无法完成Office in Motion的重任。

Back-end: 这是RIM的强项,应该没有技术障碍。

Front-end: RIM需要开始生产自己的高端Laptop PC。

Market: 绝大多数BB的商业,政府和军方用户都会接受RIM版的Office in Motion。


(有时间就具体展开;没有时间就等大家的高见了)
 
难的不是支招,而是执行。也就是做比说重要。
 
难的不是支招,而是执行。也就是做比说重要。

这摊子就是大家说说
RIM的高层肯定不会来看的。 最后谁蒙对了能博得些掌声=)
 
什么都干肯定是不成的。。。

问题的关键是要有Idea,然后找其他厂商合作引导市场那就够成功啦。。。如果连概念都吹不出来,太不上桌面去吸引partners,那就死定了。。。

(这段时间实在太忙了;抛砖引玉吧,倾听大伙的意见)

BB不是个简单的手机,它背后是个强大的Secure Enterprise System。 由于Playbook的诞生让我们看到Office in Motion的具体实验,但Playbook似乎无法完成Office in Motion的重任。

Back-end: 这是RIM的强项,应该没有技术障碍。

Front-end: RIM需要开始生产自己的高端Laptop PC。

Market: 绝大多数BB的商业,政府和军方用户都会接受RIM版的Office in Motion。


(有时间就具体展开;没有时间就等大家的高见了)
 
The BlackBerry, once ubiquitous in business, faces deep challenges in that market as more companies allow employees to pick their own smartphones and add third-party security applications.

One of the BlackBerry’s main selling points has been Research in Motion’s top-tier security and management features, which appeal to IT managers eager to control what workers do with corporate information and protect business systems from cyber attacks.

But with companies such as Good Technology and MobileIron offering applications that could untether IT managers from their BlackBerrys, analysts say that consumer-market pressures could intrude into RIM’s mainstay corporate market.

Only two of nine major U.S. companies contacted by Reuters said they exclusively use the BlackBerry, namely Boeing and Exxon Mobil.


The remaining seven — Alcoa, Caterpillar, DuPont, Kraft Foods, PepsiCo, Microsoft and Verizon Communications — support at least one other brand, such as Apple’s iPhone or phones that run Google’s Android or Microsoft Windows.

“I would say their enterprise base has been besieged really, first by Apple, then by Android,” John Jackson, a mobile device analyst at CCS Insight, said of RIM. “What’s happening in the consumer market is repeating itself in the enterprise market. They’ve been materially hurt in their core enterprise market.”

RIM’s share of the U.S. smartphone market stood at 25% in April, down from 35% in October last year, pushing BlackBerry to third place from first place in the market, according to research firm comScore.

Most of RIM’s problems, analysts say, can be traced to their delay in rolling out new phones to compete with the iPhone or Android phones sold by Samsung, HTC and Motorola.

Chemical company DuPont, which has 67,000 employees, started to give some workers the option to use the iPhone in the fourth quarter of last year. In a few months, iPhones grew to about a quarter of Dupont’s smartphones, according to Eric Smith, a telecommunications manager at the company.

“The technology that people have available in their personal and daily lives, they want to use at work. People had their own iPhones and iPads, and they said, ’Hey, why can’t we use these for work?’” said Smith.

SECURING PERSONAL PHONES

RIM shares are down 60% from their year high, and dropped sharply in mid-June when it released dismal quarterly results and postponed a new operating system and touchscreen version of the Bold phone aimed at companies.

These delays pile pressure on IT managers to support additional phone platforms, which can be costly — or risk security breaches if they say no and employees use their own phones anyway for company matters.

To help IT managers, there is a growing number of third-party security options, such as email encryption and technology, that allow IT managers to remotely control data on personal phones. For example, they can wipe corporate data from lost or virus-infected phones.

As employees get more choices, they take on more responsibility for security, said Bob Tinker, CEO of MobileIron, which raised US$20-million in a fourth round of private funding in May.

“It’s much more of an adult model, where you’re given the latitude to do what you need to do, but if you cross the boundary, there are consequences,” Tinker said.

The influence IT managers have over phone selection is shrinking. Company-bought smartphones fell to 7% of the market in 2010 from 15% in 2009, according to research and accounting firm Strategy Analytics.

Neil Mawston, a London-based analyst at Strategy Analytics, calls the trend consumerization. “BlackBerry has really been the one that’s been hit really hard by that trend,” he said.

Another survey by research firm Yankee Group found that 55% of IT managers cited RIM as their preferred operating system, but that fell to 34% when they were asked what they will prefer in two years.

Boeing has not found a security option that it trusts other than BlackBerry, said the aircraft maker’s spokesman Kenn Johnson, adding that it was feeling pressure to allow more phone choices. “We always know there’s a desire for that cool aspect, but it can’t be at the fault of security,” he said.

Jackson, the mobile analyst at CCS Insight, said it was imperative for RIM to develop more exciting phones.

“Unless you can outsex Apple, you’re going to have a problem,” he said.

© Thomson Reuters 2011
 
The BlackBerry, once ubiquitous in business, faces deep challenges in that market as more companies allow employees to pick their own smartphones and add third-party security applications.

One of the BlackBerry’s main selling points has been Research in Motion’s top-tier security and management features, which appeal to IT managers eager to control what workers do with corporate information and protect business systems from cyber attacks.

But with companies such as Good Technology and MobileIron offering applications that could untether IT managers from their BlackBerrys, analysts say that consumer-market pressures could intrude into RIM’s mainstay corporate market.

Only two of nine major U.S. companies contacted by Reuters said they exclusively use the BlackBerry, namely Boeing and Exxon Mobil.


The remaining seven — Alcoa, Caterpillar, DuPont, Kraft Foods, PepsiCo, Microsoft and Verizon Communications — support at least one other brand, such as Apple’s iPhone or phones that run Google’s Android or Microsoft Windows.

“I would say their enterprise base has been besieged really, first by Apple, then by Android,” John Jackson, a mobile device analyst at CCS Insight, said of RIM. “What’s happening in the consumer market is repeating itself in the enterprise market. They’ve been materially hurt in their core enterprise market.”

RIM’s share of the U.S. smartphone market stood at 25% in April, down from 35% in October last year, pushing BlackBerry to third place from first place in the market, according to research firm comScore.

Most of RIM’s problems, analysts say, can be traced to their delay in rolling out new phones to compete with the iPhone or Android phones sold by Samsung, HTC and Motorola.

Chemical company DuPont, which has 67,000 employees, started to give some workers the option to use the iPhone in the fourth quarter of last year. In a few months, iPhones grew to about a quarter of Dupont’s smartphones, according to Eric Smith, a telecommunications manager at the company.

“The technology that people have available in their personal and daily lives, they want to use at work. People had their own iPhones and iPads, and they said, ’Hey, why can’t we use these for work?’” said Smith.

SECURING PERSONAL PHONES

RIM shares are down 60% from their year high, and dropped sharply in mid-June when it released dismal quarterly results and postponed a new operating system and touchscreen version of the Bold phone aimed at companies.

These delays pile pressure on IT managers to support additional phone platforms, which can be costly — or risk security breaches if they say no and employees use their own phones anyway for company matters.

To help IT managers, there is a growing number of third-party security options, such as email encryption and technology, that allow IT managers to remotely control data on personal phones. For example, they can wipe corporate data from lost or virus-infected phones.

As employees get more choices, they take on more responsibility for security, said Bob Tinker, CEO of MobileIron, which raised US$20-million in a fourth round of private funding in May.

“It’s much more of an adult model, where you’re given the latitude to do what you need to do, but if you cross the boundary, there are consequences,” Tinker said.

The influence IT managers have over phone selection is shrinking. Company-bought smartphones fell to 7% of the market in 2010 from 15% in 2009, according to research and accounting firm Strategy Analytics.

Neil Mawston, a London-based analyst at Strategy Analytics, calls the trend consumerization. “BlackBerry has really been the one that’s been hit really hard by that trend,” he said.

Another survey by research firm Yankee Group found that 55% of IT managers cited RIM as their preferred operating system, but that fell to 34% when they were asked what they will prefer in two years.

Boeing has not found a security option that it trusts other than BlackBerry, said the aircraft maker’s spokesman Kenn Johnson, adding that it was feeling pressure to allow more phone choices. “We always know there’s a desire for that cool aspect, but it can’t be at the fault of security,” he said.

Jackson, the mobile analyst at CCS Insight, said it was imperative for RIM to develop more exciting phones.

“Unless you can outsex Apple, you’re going to have a problem,” he said.

© Thomson Reuters 2011

sorry, what is "outsex"?
 
后退
顶部