请教

[CHRIS88]

-----
to your "scholarly attitude" comments.

Do you really expect me to quote some fanatic's cooked up figures as historical facts?

Let's forget about the attitude thing. It was meant to be a joke.

On a separate matter, you could certainly have quoted the "facts" and then prove it false. This is actually the easier way for you to discredit Christian historians and therefore win me (and others) over. You know what, no one is going to tie your hands up for doing that. This is the beauty of living in an open and free Christian society, isn't it?

 

[ForwardRetreat]

... an open and free Christian society, isn't it?

You are accrediting this "open and free" society to christianity( catholism or christianity)? This is a foundemental distrust in humanity itself.

"Open and free socieity" does not approve anything other than the gradul betterment of humanity - the quality of being human. Christianity is no way the driving force of the success of the west.

Furthermore, what an ideology can bring about has nothing to do with proving an existence of an entity.

 

[CHRIS88]

You are accrediting this "open and free" society to christianity( catholism or christianity)? This is a foundemental distrust in humanity itself.

"Open and free socieity" does not approve anything other than the gradul betterment of humanity - the quality of being human. Christianity is no way the driving force of the success of the west.

Furthermore, what an ideology can bring about has nothing to do with proving an existence of an entity.

hehe, you have one more work to do, which you have intentionally neglected for a long time, providing supporting evidences for your argument. Your unwillingness in doing so is a bit of puzzling to me as you have proven to be very good in digging out evidences.

 

[ForwardRetreat]

okay, I will have to call it a wrap for today now. Will be off work soon. You have fun. I will have to pick up kids and keep them entertained instead now. take care.

 

[野骆驼]

天主教有個教宗