紧急求助！！！！@

[ccc]

从她的英文叙述看，好像是楼主从中线，换到右线，撞她的车是在中线，换道没有完成，车尾还留在中线，被后面的车撞上了，不是cut到后面车之前。

exactly

Then, exactly, it is your fault. (You were changing lanes while the other guy was going straight ahead in that lane.)

 

[househouse]

Then, exactly, it is your fault.

Can u explain why it's my fault?

 

[viper99]

从你的这段叙述看，我觉得警察的判断基本是正确的。

I turned signal while I turned---变线没有提前打信号灯，换线的过程才打信号；

checked the rightest lane and the middle lane were clear.--看来你是一气呵成，连换三条线，否则，你不会说检查中线和最右线。

I made my change successfully, and I was a little bit slow on the rightest lane since I was about to turn right along Marivale at Clyde “DQ”, and it was raining at that time, and I drove very careful. PS, there were traffic on my lane on front of me, and it’s impossible for me to move along very fast.

At that point, that car hit me from the middle lane at my left back bumper。

这里有点矛盾。既然你已经换线完成，中线行使的车怎么会撞倒右线行驶的车上呢？

从你的叙述，很容易让人得出这样结论：你连变三条线，而且，由于最右边是转弯线，还有车，所以，你边换线边减速，最后，换到最右边，但车屁股还厥在中线一部分，很慢的行驶。而且，你没有提前打信号灯，是换线过程中才给的信号，以至于在中线正常行驶的车辆，来不及反应。匆忙中，中线车为避让你（还有雨，路滑），急忙打方向盘避到最左边（最后停到左边停车场）。

高手！
既然已经换线完成，中线行使的车怎么会撞倒右线行驶的车上呢？

边换线边减速，最后，换到右边，但车屁股还厥在中线一部分，很慢的行驶。在中线正常行驶的车辆，来不及反应。

如果是这样，ＬＺ全责，上庭是浪费自己时间精力和公共资源

 

[ccc]

Can u explain why it's my fault?

You were the guy who changed lanes. What if you didn't do so?

高手！
既然已经换线完成，中线行使的车怎么会撞倒右线行驶的车上呢？

边换线边减速，最后，换到右边，但车屁股还厥在中线一部分，很慢的行驶。在中线正常行驶的车辆，来不及反应。

如果是这样，ＬＺ全责，上庭是浪费自己时间精力和公共资源

 

[househouse]

Then, exactly, it is your fault. (You were changing lanes while the other guy was going straight ahead in that lane.)

I'm changing to a clear lane, not cut into his lane, I'm on my way leaving his lane. Why it's my fault?
He doesn't not need to observe the road and keep the proper distance between cars at all?

 

[cgi]

When we got the police station, I did not blame the other driver at all to the officer as I believe the damage of cars itself can explain everything ( my car’s damage at back left, and his at front right, and I was on the right lane), of course it’s all his fault. I trust the officer must be expericed enough to judge, that’s why I don’t even waste one more word to blame the other party ( since I tought it’s very clear all his fault). But I end up got a ticket for not changing lane properly, which is ridiculous!

从利益角度来说，事故的双方是敌我矛盾，为什么你 believe 对方？ 警察没有到现场，全凭双方陈述，你怎么能不说话，trust 警察？

I’ve set a count date with the city already. Since I believe it’s all that guy’s fault: Driving too fast, not checking the road properly. He lied to police and blame me for the whole accident while it’s not true.

别提对方 Driving too fast，那不是理由，因为没有证据。
别提对方 Not checking the road properly，那不是理由，因为没有证据。

在交通事故中撒谎，不是问题。现在你要做的是，陈述事实，甚至也可以撒谎，但是不要前后矛盾，特别不要和已经在警察那里说的矛盾。

 

[lindamy]

Can u explain why it's my fault?

你是从左线开始，连换3线吗？如果那样，你很难胜，那种情况叫‘横穿马路’。

 

[ccc]

I'm changing to a clear lane, not cut into his lane, I'm on my way leaving his lane. Why it's my fault?
He doesn't not need to observe the road and keep the proper distance between cars at all?

高手！
既然已经换线完成，中线行使的车怎么会撞倒右线行驶的车上呢？

边换线边减速，最后，换到右边，但车屁股还厥在中线一部分，很慢的行驶。在中线正常行驶的车辆，来不及反应。

如果是这样，ＬＺ全责，上庭是浪费自己时间精力和公共资源

你如何CLEAR THE LANE？你BLOCK THE LANE ACTUALLY。

西方执行法律，是极其教条的，在很多时候是不讲情理的。警察判断事故，很简单。你换道，对方直行。出了事故，直接判换道司机的错。就像有让牌一样，你有让牌，无论事故是如何发生的，有让牌的司机负全责。

换句话说，如果你不换线，会撞到你么？如果撞到你，是对方的错了（追尾）。

 

[househouse]

高手！
既然已经换线完成，中线行使的车怎么会撞倒右线行驶的车上呢？

边换线边减速，最后，换到右边，但车屁股还厥在中线一部分，很慢的行驶。在中线正常行驶的车辆，来不及反应。

如果是这样，ＬＺ全责，上庭是浪费自己时间精力和公共资源

The point is, how do we know that guy's car is not merging into my lane, or cut very fast into my lane?

 

[viper99]

ＬＺ消消气，新手换道通常是不果断的，谁都一样
不是越慢越好，你观察是是ＣＬＥＡＲ，但因为慢，可能道路就不ＣＬＥＡＲ
最不安全的就是车尾一条道，车头一条道
另外，下雨天不要自己练车，对谁都不安全，８年Ｇ牌坐边上帮不了你，他控制不了方向盘和闸，帮不了你快速安全换道
在下远比８年长远，不敢陪人这么开车的，天气好，路况好，车少，才敢帮Ｇ１，还是驾校好，教练是专业，而且有闸

 

[househouse]

The point is, how do we know that guy's car is not merging into my lane, or cut very fast into my lane?

And that is a teenager, 18, male.

 

[cgi]

Tell the court：

He followed you too close for a while. Before you changed to right-turn lane, you slowed down. Then he hit you from the back before you changed to right-turn lane.

 

[ccc]

你的关键是：

He followed you too close for a while. Before you changed to right-turn lane, you slowed down. Then he hit you from the back before you changed to right-turn lane.

If this was the case, then the other guy's car would have hit right to the bumper, not the corner.

A lie must be made perfectly to convince the judge and you must have the evidence (the damage to the car) to proof it too.

 

[devilsponge]

And that is a teenager, 18, male.

how does that help you in your case? your statement has been subjective throughout this whole thread, which makes it hard to the police to accept your statement.
Again, others have already pointed out, sounds like you slowed down while changing lane, which is a big no no

 

[ccc]

The point is, how do we know that guy's car is not merging into my lane, or cut very fast into my lane?

Are you saying that you were going straight ahead and the other guy was changing lanes now?