真是抢钱呀! property tax...年年涨

That is why you should vote and pay your attention to your vote. 小筒子们。要不,下次选我?我很cheap. 保证不浪费你的辛苦钱(放我口袋的除外),。。。

我不是选民,没车,走路上班,买菜,很少坐公车,没结婚,没孩子,更用不着警察,每年还要近千的health premium,基本不去医院。

但是很多东西你不能自己不用,就不能说一直不用。
比如你有小孩了,你突然说,我有小孩了,你终于可以收我的钱了。
那市政府是不是可以说,哦,我们终于可以收你钱了,我们现在去培养一个老师,去盖一个学校来教你的孩子,你稍等?

你家被人入室抢劫了,你跟对方说,稍等,我交一个警察服务费?
 
000005_1.jpg
2970838556_6c26403fc4_z.jpg



我不是选民,没车,走路上班,买菜,很少坐公车,没结婚,没孩子,更用不着警察,每年还要近千的health premium,基本不去医院。

但是很多东西你不能自己不用,就不能说一直不用。
比如你有小孩了,你突然说,我有小孩了,你终于可以收我的钱了。
那市政府是不是可以说,哦,我们终于可以收你钱了,我们现在去培养一个老师,去盖一个学校来教你的孩子,你稍等?

你家被人入室抢劫了,你跟对方说,稍等,我交一个警察服务费?
 
我不是选民,没车,走路上班,买菜,很少坐公车,没结婚,没孩子,更用不着警察,每年还要近千的health premium,基本不去医院。

但是很多东西你不能自己不用,就不能说一直不用。
比如你有小孩了,你突然说,我有小孩了,你终于可以收我的钱了。
那市政府是不是可以说,哦,我们终于可以收你钱了,我们现在去培养一个老师,去盖一个学校来教你的孩子,你稍等?

你家被人入室抢劫了,你跟对方说,稍等,我交一个警察服务费?

:cool::cool::cool::cool:
很多一辈子工作的人从来没有领取过失业金;很多人一辈子没有生孩子,可是大家照样在付自己的一份。
这个社会的好处就在于用这种税收制度保证了相对的公平和人与人之间的关爱。
 
同时,更不能忘记,现在的加拿大,是靠几代人的努力和纳税,才逐渐形成今天的国度。

我们现在交纳这点税,实在微不足道。
 
俺家这不是还没孩子么。。。。想不到那么多阿



就是看着这钱。。。心疼啊。。。



我家LG说,上税是为了一个安全的环境。。。。听起来好像有道理



赶紧生孩子,最好还一下就双胞胎,就不亏了。
 
买大房子,占了大大的生态脚印,税总是要缴的。
 
I don't like seeing the increase on my property tax bill either, and I don't appreciate the extra burdens imposed onto residents because of years' of mismanagement at City Hall, e.g., the sky-shot water fee for sewage upgrade, green bin, etc.

Nevertheless, I am not too concerned about property tax, because it accounts for only a very small portion of all taxes I pay each year, while the municipal services are more closely related to our day-to-day life and the community. Using a particular service or not, you benefit from it directly or indirectly. For example, people using public transportation help to make the roads less busy for drivers; social housing keeps people off street and make the community more balanced and "harmonized".

For an average double-income family, if their total tax obligation is made of 10 portions, I guess municipal tax probably is only 1 of the 10, provincial accounts for 3, and the federal takes the rest 6. If I look at the areas of responsibilities for these 3 levels of government, I would rather pay a higher proportion to the local government, and be more conservative at the federal level.

http://www.parl.gc.ca/About/Parliament/SenatorEugeneForsey/touchpoints/touchpoints_content-e.html

Anyway, this is what makes Canada the way it is.
 
To stand on your point of view, you are totally correct and justified. But



1. why do those people without car/no bus-taking need to pay the snow removal?



2. why do those people need to pay police when they do not care the social security? and



3. Why pay education tax for those with no kids?







I agree that the city should not spend maney freely. But tax can not based on individuls. It is a collective issue.



I do not suggest to collect tax based on individual, I suggest to collect tax for basic service. For the rest non-essential service, pay the user fee. As I said, the basic service could include police, snow removal;, and some education. For those have kids, they can pay some extra charge, like tuituion. It is like someone rather have some allowance than being forced to send their kids to free daycare. You give people choices and let them decide what they would like to do.

That would also reduce the waste of the governement, othewise, your money would go to union and pay their salary increase, while you do not see any benefit at all.
 
后退
顶部