浅谈2024经济

证明你阿土立场错误。立场错误,迟早完蛋。

他的立场是正确的,哪的老百姓自由富裕,我们就崇拜谁。你来加拿大不也是为这个吗。
 
他的立场是正确的,哪的老百姓自由富裕,我们就崇拜谁。你来加拿大不也是为这个吗。
你比阿土过犹不及,都是立场错误。
 
你比阿土过犹不及,都是立场错误。

你自己都崇拜好生活,还教育别人呢?有脸吗?有本事当年你别出来啊,留在国内苦哈哈的熬到现在,那样的话你就有说服力了。
 
你自己都崇拜好生活,还教育别人呢?有脸吗?有本事当年你别出来啊,留在国内苦哈哈的熬到现在,那样的话你就有说服力了。
这又是你的想当然。
人们向往美好生活,天经地义。俗话说:贞妇爱色,纳之以礼,君子爱财,取之有道。就是这个道理。
 
证明你阿土立场错误。立场错误,迟早卡扑。

譬如:在解放战争中,老蒋拥有800多万大军,为何短短三年内,全被歼灭,就是最好的明证。

老习明年就一坎儿,你陪我一块看热闹?看看老习垮得快,还是老蒋垮得快?:evil:
 
老习明年就一坎儿,你陪我一块看热闹?看看老习垮得快,还是老蒋垮得快?:evil:
老蒋早就卡扑啦!你阿土实在是蒙查查,暮飒飒。
 
总理不管会被人说。管,也会被说领导内行。让专业银行家管最好
那正好说明总理是不称职的,应该马上下台,避免继续祸害加拿大。那句”预算会自己平衡的”已经成了全世界的笑柄,都知道加拿大总理是个白痴。:evil:
 
那正好说明总理是不称职的,应该马上下台,避免继续祸害加拿大。那句”预算会自己平衡的”已经成了全世界的笑柄,都知道加拿大总理是个白痴。:evil:
哪有领导抓具体的
 
央行的人不是Bankers么。去年加国商行盈利百亿。刺激经济当然得和他们工作让他们让利
To be honest, I do not quite understand what you were saying, but I can guess what you might mean. If I guess is correct, see below.
总理不用 worry about the economy 吗?:crazy:

Ha, ha, it is sarcastic, but it is true that "It seems nobody listens to our Prime Minister" nowadays, not just in this thread but almost in the whole of Canada.

Recently, the Ontario Liberal caucus and Quebec Liberal caucus joined in the bandwagon to call for Trudeau to step down.

Tom Mulcair, the former NDP leader wrote an article about Trudeau:

Tom Mulcair: Grading Trudeau's performance in 2024, and what's ahead for him in the new year

To avoid partisan bias, I don't quote any comments Mulcair made on Trudeau's handling of domestic issues but only quote Trudeau's handling of Canada's international relations because for international relations, all Canadians no matter which parties they belong to, would stand by Canada's side.

Below are Mulcair comments (main points in read):

" Trudeau personally initiated battles with China and India over, respectively, alleged electoral interference and violent political skullduggery.

Those two cases have something in common: Trudeau's insatiable desire for attention.

In the case of China, it was at a G-20 meeting in Bali that Trudeau strutted up to Chinese President Xi and began to harangue him, out of earshot. His staff proudly told us about their exchange, boasting that Trudeau had been giving Xi an earful about electoral interference in Canada.

As the Chinese president soon told him, at a second encounter, you don’t get to repeat what is supposed to be a private exchange. That’s the opposite of diplomacy, despite the fact that the subject was and remains very serious, Trudeau looked like a rank amateur. A tyro on the world stage.

It’s worth noting that things soon unravelled for Trudeau on everything to do with China, including the Trudeau Foundation and news about sketchy gifts from influential Chinese sources, apparently looking to curry favour. He was trying to look tough to avoid looking weak for past dealings and it backfired terribly, with lasting repercussions for our relations with China, one of the world’s most important economies.

But Trudeau’s worst performance was the opening of a parliamentary session with a bombshell claim about Indian government involvement in the killing of a Canadian citizen on Canadian soil. The accusation couldn’t have been more grave and indeed it appears that it was true.

That wasn’t the problem. The issue was that Trudeau had clearly used that massive bullhorn of the opening of parliament as a way to distract from his rapidly failing political fortunes and everyone who observed it, knew it.

The Americans had to deal with similar bad behaviours by Indian agents on their soil. They handled it, as is their wont, decisively and quickly, but there was no showboating or gloating. Just law enforcement and diplomacy.

Two other major gaffes had to do with what biographer Stephen Maher called Trudeau’s propensity for “pious scolding.”

In the first case, Canada delivered a tough statement against Saudi Arabia on the subject of human rights. The Saudi reaction was fast and furious and Trudeau was once again shown to be a kid in short pants who loves to posture but doesn’t understand the consequences.

A similar lecture by Trudeau, directed at Italian Prime Minister Georgia Meloni on LGBTQ issues, led to another international spat entirely of Trudeau’s making. The fact is, Trudeau was hopelessly misinformed but was, once again, performing for the audience back home.


He had to climb down from his high horse but not before he’d needlessly hurt Canada’s reputation with fellow G-7 member Italy (one Italian newspaper called Trudeau a buffoon on its front page above a picture of Trudeau in black face)."

You can also read the Chinese version of it but I don't like the translation of the English version:

汤姆·穆凯尔:评估特鲁多 2024 年的表现,以及他在新年的前景



PS: " 花袜子" @阿土仔, Mulcair did mention it in his opinion article.
 
后退
顶部