To be honest, I do not quite understand what you were saying, but I can guess what you might mean. If I guess is correct, see below.
Ha, ha, it is sarcastic, but it is true that "It seems nobody listens to our Prime Minister" nowadays, not just in this thread but almost in the whole of Canada.
Recently, the Ontario Liberal caucus and Quebec Liberal caucus joined in the bandwagon to call for Trudeau to step down.
Tom Mulcair, the former NDP leader wrote an article about Trudeau:
To avoid partisan bias, I don't quote any comments Mulcair made on Trudeau's handling of domestic issues but only quote Trudeau's handling of Canada's international relations because for international relations, all Canadians no matter which parties they belong to, would stand by Canada's side.
Below are Mulcair comments (main points in read):
"
Trudeau personally initiated battles with China and India over, respectively, alleged electoral interference and violent political skullduggery.
Those two cases have something in common: Trudeau's insatiable desire for attention.
In the case of China, it was at a G-20 meeting in Bali that Trudeau strutted up to Chinese President Xi and began to harangue him, out of earshot. His staff proudly told us about their exchange, boasting that Trudeau had been giving Xi an earful about electoral interference in Canada.
As the Chinese president soon told him, at a second encounter, you don’t get to repeat what is supposed to be a private exchange. That’s the opposite of diplomacy, despite the fact that the subject was and remains very serious, Trudeau looked like a rank amateur. A tyro on the world stage.
It’s worth noting that things soon unravelled for Trudeau on everything to do with China, including the Trudeau Foundation and news about sketchy gifts from influential Chinese sources, apparently looking to curry favour. He was trying to look tough to avoid looking weak for past dealings and it backfired terribly, with lasting repercussions for our relations with China, one of the world’s most important economies.
But Trudeau’s worst performance was the opening of a parliamentary session with a bombshell claim about Indian government involvement in the killing of a Canadian citizen on Canadian soil. The accusation couldn’t have been more grave and indeed it appears that it was true.
That wasn’t the problem. The issue was that Trudeau had clearly used that massive bullhorn of the opening of parliament as a way to distract from his rapidly failing political fortunes and everyone who observed it, knew it.
The Americans had to deal with similar bad behaviours by Indian agents on their soil. They handled it, as is their wont, decisively and quickly, but there was no showboating or gloating. Just law enforcement and diplomacy.
Two other major gaffes had to do with what biographer Stephen Maher called Trudeau’s propensity for “pious scolding.”
In the first case,
Canada delivered a tough statement against Saudi Arabia on the subject of human rights. The Saudi reaction was fast and furious and Trudeau was once again shown to be a kid in short pants who loves to posture but doesn’t understand the consequences.
A similar lecture by Trudeau, directed at Italian Prime Minister Georgia Meloni on LGBTQ issues, led to another international spat entirely of Trudeau’s making. The fact is, Trudeau was hopelessly misinformed but was, once again, performing for the audience back home.
He had to climb down from his high horse but not before he’d needlessly hurt Canada’s reputation with fellow G-7 member Italy (one Italian newspaper called Trudeau a buffoon on its front page above a picture of Trudeau in black face)."
You can also read the Chinese version of it but I don't like the translation of the English version:
PS: " 花袜子" @
阿土仔, Mulcair did mention it in his opinion article.
