紧急求助!!!!@

请不要激动。我是站在客观的立场帮你分析。

我同意 nobody can guarantee she is making the correct judgment, but nobody can guarantee she is making a mistake either。
想想看,她是professional的专业警察,你只是个G1业余司机。对法官来说, 谁说的更值得相信?所以不要想当然认为法官会相信你,不相信警察。你要多作几手准备去让法官信服。你懂得法庭象市场就好办了。你要有bargain power,讨价还价的理由。重要的是要能自圆其说。别太相信TV电视剧,那都是编导吸引观众编出来的。Good luck!


No, no, I'm not 激动 at all. I'm just telling you the truth.
Why judge should believe her more? I am the person who is on site, while she just a person who heard " you say, I say". Then who's information makes more sense?
 
You know what, the police did not even see anything, right? All her judgment is based on I say, he say, almost the same ground as you guys here. So honestly nobody can guarantee she is making the correct judgment, not even herself, I believe.

My case is not say speeding, or red light, or whatever, say caught on site by police, it's we reported to the police and asked them to judge. If the police can't judge it properly, fine, we got a smarter, professional one, who is a real judge.

I've appeared in court at different occasions here, most of the time, being honest, we call it "bullshits" should be more appropriate. You say, I say, lawyer say, judge say, looks serious, but the nature of it , is more like a market. Have you watched the TV play " Law and Order"?

No, no, I'm not 激动 at all. I'm just telling you the truth.
Why judge should believe her more? I am the person who is on site, while she just a person who heard " you say, I say". Then who's information makes more sense?

Sorry, but you read the above carefully youself.

Only Chinese could understand what you were trying to say. When making an argument, try to have a good logic and find the support to your point and make it a case favourable to you.
 
Sorry, but you read the above carefully youself.

Only Chinese could understand what you were trying to say. When making an argument, try to have a good logic and find the support to your point and make it a case favourable to you.


That's why that guy take advantage over me.
Since I can not make a clear statement in English, and he lied clearly. I don't know how to use English to describe clearly what has happened.

So, the good thing is, I'll have an interpreter on court. And the situation will be, " police say, I say, interpreter say, judge say" .....
 
That's why that guy take advantage over me.
Since I can not make a clear statement in English, and he lied clearly. I don't know how to use English to describe clearly what has happened.

So, the good thing is, I'll have an interpreter on court. And the situation will be, " police say, I say, interpreter say, judge say" .....

:blink:
 
楼主,我再给你点提示。上法庭你有权力要求交换证据,证物的。你到时候研究研究那个警察能出示什么证据。如果她给出的证据是对方的言词,那绝对是天大的笑话。

另外检控官都很坏,很会和你玩心理战。这种对他们来说嬴面不大的官司,他会想办法和你谈条件。让你认罪,给你减免罚款什么的。不要听他任何bullshit。你看到证据之后,如果他们没有什么明显有力的,你一定要和他们搞到底。而已一般法庭翻译都会帮你的。

如果你申请的证据没有拿到,你可以要求推迟开庭,直到拿到为止。你会玩这个游戏的话,会很有趣的。另外保险公司那里你真的得研究研究怎么和他们说了。99%被追尾的是老大,尤其是你这种典型的情况,非常符合物理原则的。
 
你们可能都没出过厅。有点太乐观了。当你手按圣经对法官宣誓只说实话后,任何一句假话查出来就是perjury(伪证罪),是大罪。对警察同样。而且加拿大的法律是假定被告人无罪,由起诉者证明被告有罪。可是在安省交通告票案中,总是假定被罚人有罪。你自己的责任证明警察是错误的。好了,法官如果信了你,就表示警察说假话了。她要承担后果。所以证明警察罚错了人是非常困难的。要做好败诉的心理准备。主要要想好怎么证明LZ没有连换两条车道(要用英语思维和表达)。只说没有必要没用。警察可以说因为你是G1,可能为了练车, 连换两条车道。要想出一个确实能说服人的理由。因为没有证人,而且事情过了多日。开车的小伙子绝对不会出厅的。你只和警察PK。Good luck!

警察不会说可能换两道,警察只要说小伙子说LZ换两道,而LZ也陈述换两道(LZ原贴用的就是chang to the rightest lane),当庭再改口供很难。
说实话LZ老公的意见很有用,也会比LG客观多了,可惜LZ不愿与大家共享。
 
That's why that guy take advantage over me.
Since I can not make a clear statement in English, and he lied clearly. I don't know how to use English to describe clearly what has happened.

So, the good thing is, I'll have an interpreter on court. And the situation will be, " police say, I say, interpreter say, judge say" .....
呵呵,建议你最好自己带上个信得过,口语好的翻译。否则法庭指定的翻译用英语说的什么你都听不懂(他/她或是水平不够,或是有意)。你输都不知道是怎么输的。 这样的事不是没发生过。
 
No, no, I'm not 激动 at all. I'm just telling you the truth.
Why judge should believe her more? I am the person who is on site, while she just a person who heard " you say, I say". Then who's information makes more sense?

不要激动
法官信警察多一点的原因是警察是第三方,不是利益方,警察没必要偏袒另一方,按你的说法,警察是根据你“you say I say" 作的判断,现在要推翻当处的"you say I say"就很难了
 
20多页,撞车的事实很清楚,LZ没有撞人,被别人追尾。LZ从中线换到右线,头进去了,尾还留在中线时,被中线行驶的小伙子撞了车左后侧。

警官开罚单,是因为LZ时机不当右换道,妨碍了右道上正常行驶的车辆。当时,在右道上直行的小伙躲闪不及,车子向左躲避,终究右前碰到LZ的左后。
 
They can say I'm not a matured driver, but he can't just hit my car and lied to police and gave me a ticket.

我不认为小伙子在警官面前撒谎。他只是隐去了某些事情,也许他觉得不讲出来比较有利。
 
很热闹吆。

很快这就变成渥村的一个legacy了,都有一万多个点击量。

保险公司的广告在哪里呢?不会也是在胡主席身后吧?
 
楼主,我再给你点提示。上法庭你有权力要求交换证据,证物的。你到时候研究研究那个警察能出示什么证据。如果她给出的证据是对方的言词,那绝对是天大的笑话。

另外检控官都很坏,很会和你玩心理战。这种对他们来说嬴面不大的官司,他会想办法和你谈条件。让你认罪,给你减免罚款什么的。不要听他任何bullshit。你看到证据之后,如果他们没有什么明显有力的,你一定要和他们搞到底。而已一般法庭翻译都会帮你的。

如果你申请的证据没有拿到,你可以要求推迟开庭,直到拿到为止。你会玩这个游戏的话,会很有趣的。另外保险公司那里你真的得研究研究怎么和他们说了。99%被追尾的是老大,尤其是你这种典型的情况,非常符合物理原则的。

有些跟贴很好笑,可有些就笑不出来了。

我们在这里是要经过客观,合理地分析,帮助LZ用最少的时间,最小的代价,换取最大的经验教训。真有些不明白,LZ已经很被动,很不幸了,为什么还要怂恿她玩,置她于死地呢。
 
这帖,引各路神仙竞折腰。

目前,已有12,188人次访问,328个回帖(多么吉祥的数字)。一个火字了得。
 
LZ已经很被动,很不幸了,为什么还要怂恿她玩,置她于死地呢。 -------I don't agree.

Because LZ said her english is not very good, but until now I couldn't see any detail explaination in Chinese telling us what has exactly happened. She has made things even more confusing.

And she always think about things in her own way. How can people help her? :blink:
 
后退
顶部