想问问大家,关于小学开设性教育课程的想法。

落后势力指的是所有感觉新教纲年龄不合适的家长把?

如果是,很遗憾,你和省长同性格。他指责家长有病。你指责家长落后势力!

你用了那么多好词形容这个教纲,但是没有提供参考,分析,对比。也没有真正地在社会上取得共识。
这样都行,按你的理论我们可以更大步一点。幼儿园全都教会了岂不是更好。口肛自同6种性别。上小学前全部给孩子学了。(这里只是根据你的逻辑推了一下)

任何事情要有分析,有对比,有数据,有商量,有参考。不是省长说先进就一定是开放文明先进的。何况是这个教纲还是在一个刑罪犯手下做出来的。他的先进根家长和社会主体的先进肯定不是一码事。
 
看看落后势力长什么样?其实他们就是普通人。他们接受教纲内容,接受部分孩子早熟的可能性。他们通情达理到了这种程度,但是他们面对的是一个武断,政治驱动,不理民意的团体。他们有可能被迫放弃公共教育。如果他们是落后势力,我也是。只可惜不是每个家庭都上的起私校的。
Parents consider their options with new sex ed curriculum

sexedmain.jpg
Kim Bornais, left, Ally Carter, Tammy Moore and Gregory Moore express their concerns about Ontario's new sex education curriculum on March 4, 2015. (TYLER BROWNBRIDGE/The Windsor Star)

Gregory and Tammy Moore aren’t naive about the sexualized world their sons are growing up in, but Ontario’s new health and physical education curriculum makes them feel powerless to influence how quickly the innocence of their sons’ childhoods are being chipped away.

In an attempt to retain some control, the Moores are exploring private schooling or withdrawing their children from certain aspects of the curriculum.

“I feel it’s not appropriate for every child at the same time,” said Tammy Moore, who has four boys at Amherstburg’s Stella Maris Catholic Elementary School. “My four boys, they’re all so different. My 11-year-old in Grade 6 isn’t ready for some of this. My younger boys, I’m going to have to talk to them sooner. You know your own child best.”

The new curriculum, unveiled two weeks ago, remains a divisive topic.


Tammy and Gregory Moore talk about Ontario’s new sex education curriculum on March 4, 2015. (TYLER BROWNBRIDGE/The Windsor Star)

A poll released last week by Forum Research found 49 per cent of Ontarians approve of the new curriculum while 34 per cent disapprove. Seventeen per cent of the 996 people contacted by phone had no opinion.

“There are a lot more people concerned about this then people think,” said Tracy Walls, who has three sons in the public system. “They don’t speak up because they don’t think their voice matters. We know this is going to be implemented, but as parents we’re looking for options.”

Greater Essex County District School Board principals are regularly getting calls of concern or inquiry about the curriculum, said spokesperson Scott Scantlebury. Mike Seguin, a superintendent of education for the Windsor-Essex Catholic District Board, said principals are receiving some calls but not what he considered a significant number.

The area’s two largest school boards are trying to reassure families they have options.

Sharon Seslija, the GECDSB teacher consultant for health and physical education, said the first step for parents is to talk to the school principal.

Letters warning when sensitive material will be taught will continue to be sent home.

“We’ve seen that in the past,” said Seslija of parents’ withdrawing their children from classes teaching sensitive material.

“If you’re not comfortable, you have that option or sometimes alternative material can be offered.”

Seslija said teachers will also take into account what they feel their students are prepared to handle.

“Some students aren’t ready for some things and some have seen a lot more,” Seslija said. “Teachers can tailor the examples they use to fit their class while still meeting the expectations.”

Seguin said a similar policy is in place at the WECDSB.

“A lot of what’s in there is already delivered through our Fully Alive program, which is taught through a Catholic lens,” Seguin said. “We’re fully confident we can implement this curriculum in a Catholic classroom. If parents are insistent, we certainly will make accommodations.”

Ally Carter said she and her husband had already been contemplating private schooling for their children, but the new curriculum has helped them make up their minds.

“We don’t disagree with what it is teaching,” said Carter, who has sons in the kindergarten programs at Belle River Public Elementary School.

“We disagree with the perspective and what is age appropriate. My six-year-old isn’t ready for this.”

Carter said they plan to transfer their sons to a private Christian school next fall.

Even though she knows the curriculum is taught in all certified schools in Ontario, Carter said she’s more comfortable with the presentation in that setting.

“We don’t shelter our kids. But we teach them and show them based on our values, not the government’s,” she said.

Kyle Oates, a youth worker at Amherstburg Community Church, said schools are trying to perform a very difficult balancing act.

He admits, in his experience, some children are ready and need the information being taught while others will find the curriculum is clearly beyond their ability to grasp.

“My concern is for the ones where it’s too early or they’re too young,” Oates said.

“It does fall on parents to teach about sex. It starts younger because it’s in the media.

“Some kids, even aged nine, they need to see this stuff (in the curriculum).”
 
多伦多人说我们不是病人。否则我们就不会当初投你的票。我们要求referendum。

GTA community members call for referendum on sex education at Brampton town hall meeting

sex_education_3___Content.jpg

Sex education
Staff photo by Nouman Khalil
A large number of concerned parents attended a the town hall meeting in Brampton on Saturday, March 7. The meeting called for a referendum on sex education curriculum in Ontario.
Nouman Khalil
BRAMPTON – The debate on Ontario's new sex education curriculum is not yet over.

During a heated town hall meeting on Saturday (March 7) at the Terry Miller Recreation Centre in Brampton, concerned parents, community members and retired teachers called for a referendum on the province's sex education curriculum.



Organized by Peel's Home Owners Welfare Association (HOWA), a large number of people from across the GTA, including Mississauga-Erindale MPP Harinder Takhar and Brampton-Springdale MPP Harinder Malhi, attended the meeting.



“We’re asking for a referendum,” said Lou Iacobelli, a retired Toronto Catholic District School Board teacher. “This curriculum is not age appropriate."



Iacobelli, also a blogger and community activist, called the consultation process ‘a joke’ and said this government is avoiding to listen to the people who actually voted it to power. He said the right thing to do was to put this curriculum on the Liberal election agenda before the 2014 Ontario elections.



“Let’s reclaim your parental responsibilities for the sake of the innocence of the children and protect their safety because this curriculum is not going to protect children,” said Iacobelli.



Ontario’s Liberal government has announced the new curriculum, which includes homosexuality in Grade 3, puberty in Grade 6 (with masturbation as a possible topic) as well as information about sexually transmitted infections and delaying sexual activity in the Grade 7.



The education will be part of health and physical education in school from September this year.



“There are some issues in the curriculum, I agree,” MPP Malhi told the participants of the meeting. “I wasn’t taught these things and I turned out okay. I do see the issue, I do see the concerns.”



Added Takhar, “I don’t have anything to do with this curriculum, I saw it at the same time you saw it.”



Takhar suggested parents to make a list of things they don’t agree with and hand it over to the government for consideration.



Jotvinder Sodhi, president of HOWA, said the struggle will continue until the goal is achieved.



He said in the coming weeks, tens of thousands of parents will be provided with prepared ‘opt-out’ letters (from sex-ed classes) to the school principals as well as letter to their MPPs.



“It’s like our homes are at fire,” said Sodhi. “Together with all communities, we are going to stop this curriculum. We’re just ordinary parents and don’t want to get involved in any kind of politics. We are just calling to remove inappropriate material from the curriculum.”



“We are not homophobic. If we were homophobic, we would not have elected you,” said Shena Sandhu, an Oakville resident.



“I just want to say to the premier that my son is going to be very young for the words that they will be using in this curriculum. I don’t think it is appropriate and I just want a program that protects my child,” said Katherine, a Mississauga resident who did not feel comfortable giving her last name.



Demonstrations at the Peel District School Board headquarters on Hurontario Street and Queen’s Park are being planned for the coming weeks
 
他们面对的是一个武断,政治驱动,不理民意的团体。

相同内容的教育大纲, 自由党以前就提出过, 遭到保守势力的反对未能通过.

这一次, 安省人民觉醒了, 他们齐心协力, 在去年大选中给了自由党多数党的执政地位, 为进步的教育大纲顺利通过铺平了道路 。。。
 
没错。“安省人民该醒了“。多么亲切的句型呀。在这件事情上自由党所作所为=Levin。但是我仅仅是代表我自己。不敢代表“安省人民”。但是我和很多朋友觉醒了。谢谢

不要使用逻辑花招。
1。安省人民选自由党是因为很多其他的政纲。自由党在获选前激进性教纲的状态是被废的。他们骗取了选票。在他们宣传的政纲中如果他们黑体字强调了将强推极端教纲,请拿出一定数量的证据。我投票的时候看政纲,没有看到。

2。逻辑上你以偏概全,说起安省人民觉醒了。选自由党,好像他们选择自由党只是为了性教纲。其实他们根重要的是怕失业。

3。逻辑上你用“这一次”来形容安省人民,好强调他们“觉醒”,其实安省时自由党基地。根本不存在这一次的“觉醒”。 他们只是惯性。你在使用了某种技巧。使读者相信你不真实的说法。

接下来,期待自由党更多的宣传招数。我作为以前自由党支持者今天想觉醒。看看大家能不能识别。
 
自己看,我说得很清楚。
 
投安省自由党的CFCer,你们谁是为了这个教纲投出的这一票?
 
自己看,我说得很清楚。

大哥, 现在除了俺, 都没人给你顶贴了.新大钢实施在即, 你要加强呼吁力度啊.

看看你贴的照片, 图中很多包头巾的, 建议你到那个社区去一定能拉到更多票 ...
 
投安省自由党可能是为别的原因,不过既然投了自由党,实际上就推动了新教纲的实施
这个还是 trade-off 的道理, 有的无失,白日梦挺美。

投安省自由党的CFCer,你们谁是为了这个教纲投出的这一票?
 
谢谢你,还真是像你说得。你帮了我不少帮定这个帖子。谢谢。

是你又用了暗示。暗示包头巾的才会反对。想用大家的反恐情绪,来达到不可告人的目的。不用你建议。我也不会去。我就想让中国人见识一下什么叫政治黑。拉中国人的支持一起反对极端教纲。

除了包头巾的,中国人反对的多了!白人反对的也多了!
 
投安省自由党可能是为别的原因,不过既然投了自由党,实际上就推动了新教纲的实施
这个还是 trade-off 的道理, 有的无失,白日梦挺美。

如果自由党的政纲宣传里黑字写着强制推行2010年被废除的性教纲?
也许你说得有一定道理。但是。我清楚地记得,我投票时,没这一条。
 
谢谢你,还真是像你说得。你帮了我不少帮定这个帖子。谢谢。

是你又用了暗示。暗示包头巾的才会反对。想用大家的反恐情绪,来达到不可告人的目的。不用你建议。我也不会去。我就想让中国人见识一下什么叫政治黑。拉中国人的支持一起反对极端教纲。

除了包头巾的,中国人反对的多了!白人反对的也多了!


支持
政治真黑
 
后退
顶部
首页 论坛
消息
我的