官邸收租金于惯例不合。为孩子顾保姆，花不了几个钱，总理们不是自己付不起，问题在于特权。
这利用职权占纳税人便宜的恶例是Justin的爹开始的，保守党的Mulron 萧规草随无过亦无功。保守党哈伯取消此例，让太太和普通加拿大家庭一样在家相夫教子，改变了这个恶例。
Justin所说象他和哈伯那样的有钱人（他是真有钱、哈伯不过是工资比较高的打工族而已）不需要孩子福利的豪言壮语言犹在耳，居然就不由自主地从新开始了他爹所立的恶例。果然是虎父无犬子？
看看评论，说啥的都有。呵
http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/justin-trudeau-nannies-hypocritical-1.3345671
Yeah Trudeau's kids should stay at home alone all day. Then the conservatives will say he is a bad parent.
Trudeau's wife doesn't get paid for all the stuff she has to do as the PM's wife, I think it is fair for the government to paid for this.
I can't believe this is the only controversy. Trudeau must be doing good then.
@JasonDiggy you obviously have no kids. At least no teenagers.
@peter Griffith Justin face it.... you've been outed....
And Harper ordered a brand new armoured car for himself and his family and increased his personal security for himself and his family larger than any PM before him. JT's nannies costs wouldn't even fill the tank of Harper's armoured car. Get real Lisa.
Show 44 older replies
@Buffalojump why not since it's already paid for....duh yeah go but a new one! Pointless rebuttal.
@globecare
Raitt forgot that Harper regime squandered a cool billion dollars on G20 Toronto fiasco.
Fake lake, special fence, gazebos and agents provocateurs included.
Do not forget illegal arrests and that a female journalist was threatened by rogue cops with a gang rape.
Lisa Raitt does not pass The Smell Test... and CONs still do not get it, shooting themselves in the foot once again.
Show new replies (1 available)
Conservatives should talk about being hypocritical... amongst themselves.
Show 14 older replies
@TheFly Absolutely., never voted conservative but one this one they are dead on.
@traffic Stick with the topic if possible. Trudeau should pay for his childrens care.
It's really nothing compared to the 1 Billion$( yes you read that right 1 000 000 000$) Harper wasted to host the G20 in Toronto and Trudeau is actually busy working on serious issues so he needs some help. Big drama for nothing.
Show 13 older replies
@Joe131 That is an entirely different issue.
Flag
@Joe131 wow the defence is pointing out how bad the other guy was... wrong is wrong regardless of what the other guy did.
Flag
Which is worse - disguising nannies as "special assistants" or taking them to Paris on the taxpayers' dime? Talk about "being entitled to his entitlements"! This gives new meaning to hypocrisy.
Show 14 older replies
@Chris.S.PEI Women wearing disguises in Paris probably isn't a good idea at this time.
@Bucadogg Steve liked to spend money on this his conservative base wouldn't have a problem with like security and bombing people overseas, if the house needs repairs (which it badly does) than it should get them. 10 million is still a drop in the bucket compared to steve's bombing missions (which accomplish nothjng)
Flag
What did you expect? He's a Trudeau, all take and no give unless it's your money.
@JimBob
No. A Trudeau as PM means the best of Canada is possible. With Harper, it was the opposite.
@JimBob ...Were you posting this sort of politicians economic requirements when Harper had a makeup artist and hairdresser travelling around the country and around the world with him ?
Then there was the 100 strong RCMP bodyguards, the full time photographer, the wife and kids flying to USA and West Coast to watch a hockey game.
If there were not two low paid nannies, the taxpayers would have to supply security for Trudeau's three children, plus his wife, plus cook and housekeepers, drivers...
» more
Show new replies (2 available)
The sense of entltilement and abuse of power begins. It doesn't take long does it?
@Richard Sharp Maybe but is it her money?
@Mashoud Nasseri Has Justin sold the limo yet?
Way to jump on the bandwagon Mrs raitt, sadly you had none of the same sentiment for your own boss a mere 2 months ago....who's the real hypocrit here.
Its a shame she was not worried about hypocrisy when Harper was in power
- 1 hour ago
48
48
48
Likes
http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/justin-trudeau-nannies-hypocritical-1.3345671#
And there goes Rona's hope of changing the tone. Same old Reformatories.
Flag
@x46x46x46
How much did Harper spend a year on personal/household staff? How many were there?
Let's compare lists.
@x46x46x46 The smell is the same even with Rona at the helm of the rapidly sinking ship.
- 16 minutes ago
1
1
1
Like
Tens of thousands of Canadians pay for their Nannies and Babysitters.
Justin must apologize to Canadians and pay back the taxpayers - immediately.
@Fmpsportsguy
Excuse me.... please tell us more about this so called Universal Day Care. It never existed.
@Fmpsportsguy Umm child tax credits went up in July. Your making us look bad dude. Chill
preaching water while drinking wine! typical liberal!
@Jachim Soyer ...He was used to that down east Food!
@Harper the White Stephen Harper's 2012 Indian limo tab was to $1.2M.
And Harper should've paid for his own "hair" (lol) cuts, and extra security...
- Eastern Liberals,Eastern press
@mrclam
I thought you wanted a change from Harper not more of the same,,your as bad as Trudeau.
I certainly ain't no conservative but Trudeau having us pay for his child-care like this is just wrong. Pony up dude!
Harper & the band of 40 thieves stole enough from us ; thank you very much Ms Raitt. I think Canada can pay for Justin's nannies .
Both nannies are women! Come on Justin at least get one Manny. It's 2015!
Lisa Raitt is not the Prime Minister. Her role and responsibilities, and that of her spouse (if she has one), pale in comparison to those of the Prime Minister and the Prime Minister's wife. These expenses have always been covered. What a petty bunch of small minded and immature partisans Canadians are.
@Guardian52 yeah. They should pay the elite until they have no more money! The Liberal way or the highway!
The Conservatives look very funny, as opposition critics.I hope Canada never sees another Conservative government.
@AlexHarveyBand
You may as well give up on that wish!
a $2000.00 child care benefit is a far cry from a year of salary for a Nanny. The job demands much of his time.. most of his time... so I think it fair any PM with small children should be allowed a Nanny on the taxpayers dime. We are not a 3rd world country.
- 1 hour ago
17
17
17
Likes
@trickymyk He keeps spending and giving our $$$ away, we will be!!!!
@trickymyk Actually I think we are a third world economy - if not for natural resources, we wouldn't be a well off nation.
- Anti-Intellectual Free Market TheoCon Fundamentalist
Comment was removed (of course): Obviously a government official, like the leader of the country, is different from the average person who happens to be fairly wealthy. For one, the children need security. And its sometimes cheaper to have security for the family when they are together, or in close proximity. It's also unrealistic to imagine that just any babysitter, or Nanny can look after the PM's children. So, its a fake issue but Lisa Raitt took the bait and stands to lose face.
@anti-Intellectual Free Market TheoCon Fundamentalist the children have security. Child care is the parents' responsibility, not the taxpayers.
Hey Lisa, soon as Harper pays Canadians back for having a full time hairstylist-manicurist-fashion consultant on the public dole, we'll listen to what you have to say.
@Bruin Lover
as a paid staffer? hell no he doesnt. if he did the cons would be throwing a huge fit over it.
- 42 minutes ago
1
1
1
Like
Flag
@jonnny he does though. He has to do a lot of public appearances and it's part of the job. Child care is not a public expense though.
- 40 minutes ago
2
2
2
Likes
Flag
Timothy Wasylko, the official chef of the prime minister’s residence, makes an annual salary between $61,048 and $72,919, according to the cabinet order
In 2006, Harper was sued for wrongful dismissal by his former chef, who claimed the prime minister never paid him for additional duties that included babysitting, washing the family car and burying one of Harper’s pet cats.
http://o.canada.com/uncategorized/whats-it-pay-to-be-stephen-harpers-chef-or-housekeeper
- 2 hours ago
17
17
17
Likes
Flag
@Stiring the pot Aw, and the Trudeaus brought their own chef, butlers and nannies.
- 39 minutes ago
1
1
1
Like
Flag
@Alma_Fudd
Excellent point. I don't expect you'll get a response though. The only answer to JT's hypocrisy is to deflect to Harper.
- 10 minutes ago
0
0
0
Likes
Flag
Seriously Raitt, Harper had us paying for his hair dresser, and makeup artist for years, and what about the over $5,000 a month for his electrical bills, and don't tell Canadians that his kids and wife didn't have over the top security paid for by us...and then there is that second honeymoon under the guise of a photo-op visit to India, that he and Laureen took, and he insisted on his cars being taken for a cool million...the only hypocrites here are you and the Con party.
- 1 hour ago
16
16
16
Likes
Show 2 older replies
Flag
@Morsel The electric bills were Wynne's idea of a joke. One that she played on everyone in Ontario, and coming soon to the rest of Canada.
- 37 minutes ago
1
1
1
Like
Flag
@Morsel
and lets not forget the 24/7 harper vanity thing on youtube that we all paid for......
- 2 minutes ago
0
0
0
Likes
Flag
Maybe sell the fleet of armoured Limos that dear coward shipped all over the world.
- 2 hours ago
16
16
16
Likes
Flag
Who really cares what Lisa Raitt says these days,she had 10 years with Harper & it's over Lisa. iT's too bad she didn't take the time to speak out against all the muzzling that Harper enforced during his reign maybe Canadians would have noticed.
- 1 hour ago
15
15
15
Likes
Flag
@cancell
Have you ever heard of the concept of cabinet unity?
Flag
Those doe-eyed liberal voters are starting to wish the Conservatives were in charge.
- 1 hour ago
12
12
12
Likes
Show 4 older replies
Flag
@CharlyRobertson I'm enjoying the entertaining government - Harper was boring, and Mulcair wouldn't have been too exciting either. But Trudeau? Now he's going to provide months, if not years, of entertainment - at least for 4 years anyway.
- 34 minutes ago
1
1
1
Like
Flag
@lauren Brown
Ah, No. The Conservatives were so bad that many Canadians voted Liberal even though most of us are old enough to remember how arrogant, elitist and corrupt they were last time they were in.
- 7 minutes ago
0
0
0
Likes
Flag
The host on the Power Panel is incredibly biased against the Liberals. She's crossing some journalistic lines.
- 1 hour ago
13
13
13
Likes
Show 5 older replies
Flag
@Eastern Liberals,Eastern press
Were have you been?
C onservative
B roadcasting
C orporation
Harper, Harperized the CBC with his board member appointments a long time ago.
Harperization is written all over slanted headlines and in the questions, comments and bias of the Panel hosts.
Flag
@one voice And to think under Harper all she could say was canned speak! She should be thankful Canada has free speach again!
- 34 minutes ago
1
1
1
Like
Flag
Lisa is an air head. One of the Harper Neo Cons coming out from under the rock they have crawled under since getting thumped in the last election. People are not interested in the divisive sniping made famous by the Tories.
Trudeau is the Prime Minister of our country who will make enormous sacrifices to personal his life for the good of all Canadians. Taking his wife to world meetings is not new and when they have small children it is expected that there would be assistance from the taxpayers....
» more
- 1 hour ago
13
13
13
Likes
Flag
Dumbest controversy ever. Maybe he should just be PM part time and miss briefings calling around to find a sitter.
- 1 hour ago
13
13
13
Likes
Show 1 older reply
Flag
@RG500Gamma
I'm guessing they are equal partners in childcare. And his salary as PM is paying for his children's care when neither parent is available.
Flag
@Chris.S.PEI Why? Sophie have to wash her hair? He married a neglectful mother like his own?
- 34 minutes ago
1
1
1
Like
Flag
Oh stuff it Lisa.
- 2 hours ago
13
13
13
Likes
Flag
@Sir_Will
Really.
With what is going on in the world,
*this* is what Lisa Raitt and the CBC are paying attention to?
That Trudeau has a Security Detail for his kids?
