这案子，加拿大移民官员/记者理不清了；你怎么看？（更新：移民部长特批，男孩将先持TRV来加拿大，然后办PR）

[ccc]

这个过程摆在那里，过去了，翻篇吧
这里几个讨论的，甚至我有认识的，当初移民可也是费了老大力气了
现在成功了，就嘲笑别人是圣母？
特别讨厌那些穷骨头稍许阔了点，就翻脸对待更穷的人

道理谁不懂？既然LZ问别人看法，我提我的看法
从四岁孩子的角度看，加拿大更适合那个孩子，一个是孩子父母在加拿大，二是加拿大是民主富裕国家，更利于孩子生活
最后，提醒大家，印度人是很好的加拿大公民资源，他们爱好和平勤奋工作，不是恐怖分子

当时为什么质问他们五个小时？

法规没有商量的余地。如果要家庭团聚，他们现在的唯一出路是回印度。

 

[xilihutu]

当时为什么质问他们五个小时？

法规没有商量的余地。如果要家庭团聚，他们现在的唯一出路是回印度。

好吧，既然你下结论了，还问什么？

问我，我就支持孩子来加拿大与父母团聚

 

[cvictor]

可以把他们作为难民吧，失去了孩子的父母，或者失去了父母的孩子。这都是可怜兮兮的难民啊。这难民孩子来了加拿大以后
，有人抚养。咳

 

[ccc]

可以把他们作为难民吧，失去了孩子的父母，或者失去了父母的孩子。这都是可怜兮兮的难民啊。这难民孩子来了加拿大以后
，有人抚养。咳

两回事情。

我们移民，抵达后有酒店临时歇息一下么，管你一日三餐么，第一年发生活费给你么。

他们（孩子的父母）当时同政府签的文件就这么作废了？

开一个口子，后患无穷。

想家庭团聚，孩子父母可以回去。

 

[b4w]

当时为什么质问他们五个小时？

法规没有商量的余地。如果要家庭团聚，他们现在的唯一出路是回印度。

村长别想当然，特鲁多政府，一定会利用移民部长个案特权，让他们都来加拿大，仅仅因为前政府不允许他们来，新政府的肚量，一切都要跟前政对着干，哪怕是无理取闹案例，你看着吧。

 

[ccc]

村长别想当然，特鲁多政府，一定会利用移民部长个案特权，让他们都来加拿大，仅仅因为前政府不允许他们来，新政府的肚量，一切都要跟前政对着干，哪怕是无理取闹案例，你看着吧。

父母移民了。现在是他们的儿子的问题。

开一个口子，后患无穷。

等着看。你看到什么消息喊一嗓子。

 

[cvictor]

两回事情。

我们移民，抵达后有酒店临时歇息一下么，管你一日三餐么，第一年发生活费给你么。

当时同政府签的文件就这么作废了？

开一个口子，后患无穷。

想家庭团聚，孩子父母可以回去。

哎哟，一个孩子还后患无穷。那么多的难民都进来了。
验DNA，是亲子，就是孤儿，苦命的孩子。比接受不明不白的难民强。

 

[www]

父母移民了。现在是他们的儿子的问题。

开一个口子，后患无穷。

等着看。你看到什么消息喊一嗓子。

确实是，以前同样的案例应该不少，一旦通过，大家都可以拿出来重新申请了，这对广大的规规矩矩填报真实信息的父母不公平。移民部长不会这么糊涂吧。

 

[ccc]

到目前，报纸网站上有这么几个评论：
http://ottawacitizen.com/opinion/co...ernment-to-be-reunited-with-four-year-old-son

5 Comments
Sort by
Top

Add a comment...


Cathy Sutherland ·
Laurentian High School
It's easy for people to stand in judgement when the issue others are facing is not their own. There is more to this story than this article.
They were coming to a new country very different from their own. They had to find work so they could support themselves before sending for their little boy.
They left the baby with family members where he would be cared for while they ltried to settle here.
They are hard working people who did not place a burden on the welfare system.
Never judge until you've walked a mile in someone else's shoes.
Like · Reply ·

3 · 9 hrs


Rick Unsworth ·
Algonquin College
What kind of parents would immigrate and leave their son behind. The child would have been one year old when the parents abandoned him. Class people. Throw them out of Canada.
Like · Reply ·

5 · Dec 18, 2015 7:59pm


Beverley Bell ·
Sir John A. Macdonald, Ottawa
they haven't done anything that would justify throwing them out. But yes, one does have to wonder why they didn't identify the child on their original applications, and why they came here without him. He's lived with his grandparents his entire life, not with his parents. He's better off where he is. if they miss him so much, they could go home.
Like · Reply ·

7 · Dec 18, 2015 8:05pm


Richard Lane
Agreed. One of them could have returned home to look after the child. I can't imagine why they'd leave him behind.
Like · Reply ·

4 · 21 hrs


John Carlo ·
College of Southern Nevada
Rick, you will be surprised at how many people have to sacrifice their families for a better life. Not everyone undertand the complicated forms they need to fill so they rely on others and they are ill advise. They made a mistake and a bad choice, why should the child be punished for life? If they go back they will have nothing, if they leave their chld behind, they will have nothing...
Like · Reply ·

3 · 17 hrs
Show 5 more replies in this thread


Glen Hingston
Does everybody expect Trudeau to change every decision made by the previous government? Do they not remember that the previous government was a majority? If the message was no previously it should remain no imho.
Like · Reply ·

2 · 13 hrs


Richard Lane
It wasn't the government which made the decision. The rules were applied to this situation and that's how it turned out.
Like · Reply ·

3 · 12 hrs


Evan Blake ·
Autodidacticism
just another daily dose of ottawa citizen progressive propaganda.
Like · Reply · 3 hrs


Evan Blake ·
Autodidacticism
there's a reason governments aren't run based off fee fees.
Like · Reply · 4 hrs

 

[conquestofparadise]

到目前，报纸网站上有这么几个评论：
http://ottawacitizen.com/opinion/co...ernment-to-be-reunited-with-four-year-old-son

5 Comments
Sort by
Top

Add a comment...


Cathy Sutherland ·
Laurentian High School
It's easy for people to stand in judgement when the issue others are facing is not their own. There is more to this story than this article.
They were coming to a new country very different from their own. They had to find work so they could support themselves before sending for their little boy.
They left the baby with family members where he would be cared for while they ltried to settle here.
They are hard working people who did not place a burden on the welfare system.
Never judge until you've walked a mile in someone else's shoes.
Like · Reply ·

3 · 9 hrs


Rick Unsworth ·
Algonquin College
What kind of parents would immigrate and leave their son behind. The child would have been one year old when the parents abandoned him. Class people. Throw them out of Canada.
Like · Reply ·

5 · Dec 18, 2015 7:59pm


Beverley Bell ·
Sir John A. Macdonald, Ottawa
they haven't done anything that would justify throwing them out. But yes, one does have to wonder why they didn't identify the child on their original applications, and why they came here without him. He's lived with his grandparents his entire life, not with his parents. He's better off where he is. if they miss him so much, they could go home.
Like · Reply ·

7 · Dec 18, 2015 8:05pm


Richard Lane
Agreed. One of them could have returned home to look after the child. I can't imagine why they'd leave him behind.
Like · Reply ·

4 · 21 hrs


John Carlo ·
College of Southern Nevada
Rick, you will be surprised at how many people have to sacrifice their families for a better life. Not everyone undertand the complicated forms they need to fill so they rely on others and they are ill advise. They made a mistake and a bad choice, why should the child be punished for life? If they go back they will have nothing, if they leave their chld behind, they will have nothing...
Like · Reply ·

3 · 17 hrs
Show 5 more replies in this thread


Glen Hingston
Does everybody expect Trudeau to change every decision made by the previous government? Do they not remember that the previous government was a majority? If the message was no previously it should remain no imho.
Like · Reply ·

2 · 13 hrs


Richard Lane
It wasn't the government which made the decision. The rules were applied to this situation and that's how it turned out.
Like · Reply ·

3 · 12 hrs


Evan Blake ·
Autodidacticism
just another daily dose of ottawa citizen progressive propaganda.
Like · Reply · 3 hrs


Evan Blake ·
Autodidacticism
there's a reason governments aren't run based off fee fees.
Like · Reply · 4 hrs

不睡觉吗村长？

 

[lifeisfun]

法归法，情归情，这个先例不能开. 况且这家是知法犯法，应自食后果

 

[Anakin]

父母移民了。现在是他们的儿子的问题。

开一个口子，后患无穷。

等着看。你看到什么消息喊一嗓子。

这口子一开，木木七大姑八大姨的孩子当年都是忘了写了。

 

[mangliu]

贼心眼不是嘲笑，那算你是幽默？
这个过程摆在那里，过去了，翻篇吧
这里几个讨论的，甚至我有认识的，当初移民可也是费了老大力气了
现在成功了，就嘲笑别人是圣母？
特别讨厌那些穷骨头稍许阔了点，就翻脸对待更穷的人

道理谁不懂？既然LZ问别人看法，我提我的看法
从四岁孩子的角度看，加拿大更适合那个孩子，一个是孩子父母在加拿大，二是加拿大是民主富裕国家，更利于孩子生活
最后，提醒大家，印度人是很好的加拿大公民资源，他们爱好和平勤奋工作，不是恐怖分子

 

[臭农民]

法归法，情归情，这个先例不能开. 况且这家是知法犯法，应自食后果

that's it

 

[神经过的渥太华]

法归法，情归情，这个先例不能开. 况且这家是知法犯法，应自食后果

情，那父母也不占。