It is about parent's responsibility...

你的潜台词,我明白。
你觉得投票保守党的一定是教徒?
逻辑上不自洽。
聊什么都扯上宗教,还真是左派的撒手锏。你赢了。

我就是支持谨慎编写教纲。不要拿孩子做实验。不要走极端。不要装。不要仇恨。

随我不是教徒,但是也能看出,CFC对教徒有仇视。你们吵你们的去,但是正经事,没必要扯到宗教上去。
 
你的潜台词,我明白。
你觉得投票保守党的一定是教徒?
逻辑上不自洽。
聊什么都扯上宗教,还真是左派的撒手锏。你赢了。

我就是支持谨慎编写教纲。不要拿孩子做实验。不要走极端。不要装。不要仇恨。

随我不是教徒,但是也能看出,CFC对教徒有仇视。你们吵你们的去,但是正经事,没必要扯到宗教上去。
你不要临走给扣帽子。
选保守党的大多不是教徒,也不是支持它们背后反移民白上至上的种族主义,要在北美建犹太基督王国的理想。
真正的基督徒是有良知正义的。不是他们这样的。
 
当年自由党在强推教纲时的龌龊,如今想起来,还在恶心。

所谓专家,还不是儿童色情专业?
所谓咨询家长,无非就是由校长/家长委员会,指定一名家长。回答特殊设计的问题,完全做到不到公允。还大言不惭。
大家游行,指着游行的骂,phobia。
。。。。。

当时第一次开眼看到一个完全不顾及人民的政党。怪不得民粹主义抬头,你完全不顾及民意,那民众只能逼你顾及。
 
你不要临走给扣帽子。
选保守党的大多不是教徒。真正的基督徒是有良知正义的。不是他们这样的。

赞。这就是正常人在说话。至于他们,

我不知道是谁,无非就是你恨的人呗。哈哈。还好,我不是教徒。哈哈。
 
赞。这就是正常人在说话。至于他们,

我不知道是谁,无非就是你恨的人呗。哈哈。还好,我不是教徒。哈哈。
恨,你用错地方。彼此都在尽公民的責任。
 
说到一起去了。不要恨教徒,他们绝大多数是好的。
所以,事事扯到宗教,对于绝大多数好的教徒来讲,很不公平。
对于我们这种不是教徒的保守党支持这,就更不公平。
 
说到一起去了。不要恨教徒,他们绝大多数是好的。
所以,事事扯到宗教,对于绝大多数好的教徒来讲,很不公平。
对于我们这种不是教徒的保守党支持这,就更不公平。
极端是少数。百分之七十犹太人不支持川普将美领馆迁入耶路撒冷。川普第一女婿库什纳同届校友在脸书上也开设了“你真可耻,库什纳”网页。宾州大学3800人签署了一封公开信并表示,“特朗普不代表我们。对我们来说提出对特朗普的反对非常重要,因为很多时候证明,大家会把沉默当作默许。一个没有包容精神的美国是缺少生产力、创造力和竞争力的。”
极端虽是少数,但它披着外衣,借右翼之风一旦得势,对北美华人移民不是好事。
 
也对,大家不能在对极左的加拿大政治麻木不仁了。与美国不同,加拿大极左已经病入膏肓。加拿大人木讷本质给了极左太大的空间。如今,安省退无可退。加拿大不远的将来,估计也是一样。

总之,莫要沉默。要发声。对不对。
 
也对,大家不能在对极左的加拿大政治麻木不仁了。与美国不同,加拿大极左已经病入膏肓。加拿大人木讷本质给了极左太大的空间。如今,安省退无可退。加拿大不远的将来,估计也是一样。

总之,莫要沉默。要发声。对不对。
加拿大人木讷!?你是那国人?就你精明?
 
木讷不是贬义词,是中性词。就跟说犹太人精明一样。
 
"Repeal" means no more gender theory
POSTED BY TANYA ALLEN 2701.80SC ON JULY 17, 2018
DiNovoHorvath.png


Yesterday, the new PC Minister of Education, Lisa Thompson, in her first ever opportunity to answer a question as a Minister in the Question Period in the Ontario Legislature, offered a “clarification” on the Ford government’s much-advertised “repeal” of the Wynne sex-ed.

Are you sitting down?

Here's a direct quote:

THOMPSON: … I would like to share with you today that, contrary to what was reported last week, we are going to stand firmly in support of students and the realities they face in 2018. We know they need to learn about consent. We know they need to learn about "cyber-safety". We know they need to learn about "gender-identity" and appreciation.

Gender identity? Gender “appreciation”?

What part of "repeal" does Minister Thompson not understand?

Minister Thompson: REPEAL means REPEAL. Or, in terms that even Patrick Brown would understand: REPEAL means SCRAP.

To see the video from the Legislature yourself, please click here, or click the image below.



Remember, it was Kathleen Wynne's culturally insensitive sex-ed curriculum which first introduced gender identity to young children.

What do they mean when they say “gender identity”?


In short, the theory goes something like this: sure, there are only two “biological” sexes, male and female, but there many “genders” and these genders are “socially constructed” and there are many- potentially dozens- of genders.

But according to very sensible Dr Debra Soh, in an op-ed titled "Ontario’s sex ed backlash isn’t about children’s safety” that appeared yesterday in The Globe and Mail:

I, too, was once a vocal supporter of the updated sex-ed curriculum, but watching how its unscientific claims about gender identity have spread so prevalently has dampened my enthusiasm. The curriculum promotes the idea that there are more than two genders and that gender identity is socially constructed.

The fact that few people have pointed out how these teachings aren’t based in science should raise a red flag in parents’ minds.

According to one survey, less than 1 per cent of people in the United States identify as transgender. That means for over 99 per cent of us, our biological sex is our gender.

A curriculum that teaches gender fluidity is misleading and will impair a child’s ability to have an accurate understanding of the world.

This controversial, unscientific “gender theory” is one of the very worst aspects of the Wynne sex-ed. When Ontario parents say they want a “repeal” of the Wynne sex-ed curriculum, they most certainly have “gender theory” top of mind.

What did Doug Ford mean when he said “repeal”? I can't believe that Doug Ford really intended to keep Wynne’s gender theory!

If Premier Ford and Minister Thompson truly want to repeal the Wynne sex-ed, why would Thompson – in her very first Question Period – insist that children are still going to learn about the unscientific gender theory? Why does Minister Thompson insist on teaching the twisted Kathleen Wynne social studies as a part of Ontario sex-ed?

This is a direct departure from last week's announcement of a "repeal".

Minister Thompson- please clarify- will children be forced to learn gender identity theory this fall or not?

Premier Doug Ford: does “repeal” still mean “repeal” ? Or are you pulling a “Patrick Brown” ?

ACTION ITEM:

Please contact the Premier and Minister Thompson and other members of the Cabinet and ask them to recognize that, when it comes to Doug Ford’s promise to “repeal” the Wynne sex-ed, REPEAL MEANS REPEAL! No unscientific, harmful gender identity theory!

If you send an email, please forward me a copy, or simply "BCC" me tanya@pafe.ca. And let me know if you receive a reply email. If you call their offices, let me know you have done so, and let me know me what they tell you on the telephone.

Premier Doug Ford
Email: premier@ontario.ca
Telephone: 416-325-1941

Lisa Thompson, Minister of Education
Email: lisa.thompsonco@pc.ola.org
Telephone: 416-325-5838

Sam Oosterhoff, Parliamentary Asst. to the Minister of Education
Email: sam.oosterhoffco@pc.ola.org
Telephone: 416-325-5494

Other Cabinet Ministers (click this link for the list):

Other MPPs (click this link for the list):

For the Family,

tanya_sig_FINAL.jpg


Tanya Granic Allen, President
 
Lisa M. Thompson is a politician in Ontario, Canada. She is a Progressive Conservative member of the Legislative Assembly of Ontario who represents the riding of Huron—Bruce. She has been an MPP since 2011.

这是一个假的保守派,混进了保守党组织:evil:o_O
 
一个谭哑倒下了,千万个卖磕站起来:buttrock::monster::monster::monster:
 
后退
顶部