孟晚舟引渡案: 2018年12月1日被拘捕；2019年3月1日，加正式启动引渡程序；BC最高法院引渡听证2021年8月18日结束，法官未作出裁决；9月24日孟晚舟与美国政府达成协议，美国撤销引渡请求，BC法院终止引渡程序; 2022年12月1日美国撤销指控

[ccc]

China, Canada, and the USA make a deal under the table:

A). CDN court rules the extradition of Meng, and Meng won't appeal. Then, China expels the sentenced Mike out of China.

B). US declares that DOJ and FBI come to Canada, and DOJ accepts Meng's regret of wrongdoing on the Irian export. The DOJ also states that it has repatriated Meng back to China on humanitarian grounds and her regret. ( A and B timing could be discussing)

C). Meng denies ever admitting any wrongdoing and any regret when she is in China.

D). China releases another Mike quietly right after Meng backs to China, but Mike has to be living in the CDN Beijing embassy for 1-3 months. Then China claims the release of Mike based on his health and humanitarian.

E). China Highest Court rejects the death sentence of the Canadian drug trafficker, after some time, the sentence back to 15 years quietly.

Technology develops so fast. I don't think the US needs Meng anymore in another 2 years if she appeals. The US has already reached the goal of containing Huawei 5g and the depressing and slowing China's technology developments are well underway. Huawei lost a CFO ( she won't be back to that job). and has been contained expanding over the developed countries. Two Canadians lost freedom for approx. 3 years. Both CN and CDN are losers. The US is the sole winner in this fiasco. No one gives dam to that drug trafficker.

This could be the best scenario I can guess. It is not over until it is over.

Have fun CFCers.

PS: the US may require China to buy more treasuries as a condition of release, but that will be between the US and China--a top secrete no one will know. Any country that deals with the US have to give in some, at least 60%. There is no such thing as called win-win when dealing with the US.

“This could be the best scenario I can guess. It is not over until it is over.”

 

[27149]

尊敬的法官，您不能做橡皮图章，这已经属于负面攻击了吧？

至少该说：请您一定要秉公执法，刚正严明。。。。

辩方律师攻击法官，扣帽子，这做法合适吗？

这是引用的以前判例

"In a 2006 decision, McLachlin wrote that an extradition "judge must act as a judge, not a rubber stamp" when considering the facts and law in cases like Meng's. "

 

[茶马盐铁]

这个案子，最后一定是中美加三国打成桌子底下的交易

 

[秋水共长天一摄]

这个案子，最后一定是中美加三国打成桌子底下的交易

加拿大司法独立

 

[茶马盐铁]

加拿大司法独立

都独立， 三国司法都是独立的。只要有一个国家司法不独立， 就没法达成协议。

 

[春夏之交]

 

[ccc]

Meng Wanzhou's legal team resumes extradition defence in B.C. court

Meng Wanzhou's legal team is expected to argue today there is no evidence showing the Huawei executive caused international bank HSBC to violate U.S. sanctions law.

www.ctvnews.ca

 

[这都不是事儿]

受害者没有实际损失，不等于没有欺诈发生。这个已经驳斥过了。重复这些有用吗？​

​

Defence claims no proof Meng Wanzhou is tied to any loss suffered by bank​

 

[ccc]

Meng’s lawyers say fraud case unlike any other in Canadian legal history

If Meng Wanzhou’s lawyers show that the U.S. case against her is ‘manifestly unreliable,’ the judge would have to refuse to permit her to be sent to the United States for trial

www.theglobeandmail.com

 

[ccc]

Government arguing unprecedented application of fraud law in Meng case: lawyer

Meng Wanzhou's case is unfolding amid rising diplomatic tensions with China as courts there are prosecuting Canadians whose sentencing or detentions are widely seen…

vancouversun.com

 

[27149]

受害者没有实际损失，不等于没有欺诈发生。这个已经驳斥过了。重复这些有用吗？​

​

Defence claims no proof Meng Wanzhou is tied to any loss suffered by bank​

"Both sides agree that Meng told HSBC that Huawei and Skycom did business together in Iran.

Nonetheless, HSBC independently chose to clear transactional funds originating from Skycom through its own U.S. subsidiary, Sandler said."

 

[春夏之交]

浏览附件994826

德国的媒体故意省略了华春莹的关键的一句话。

 

[ccc]

Opinion | Political courage could resolve Meng Wanzhou’s extradition case

In pursuing Meng, the U.S. has attempted to set itself up as an international policing agency. This in itself should have tipped off a diligent Canadian minister of justice that the U.S. was acting beyond its jurisdiction. The solution? Cut everyone loose, starting with Meng.

www.thestar.com

 

[ccc]

Meng Wanzhou's defence says U.S. case against her suffers 'evidentiary vacuum'

The United States' case against Huawei executive Meng Wanzhou suffers an 'evidentiary vacuum' linking her actions with any risk of reputational damage or financial loss suffered by HSBC, her alleged victim, one of her lawyers argued in court Tuesday.

www.ctvnews.ca

 

[这都不是事儿]