孟晚舟引渡案: 2018年12月1日被拘捕;2019年3月1日,加正式启动引渡程序;BC最高法院引渡听证2021年8月18日结束,法官未作出裁决;9月24日孟晚舟与美国政府达成协议,美国撤销引渡请求,BC法院终止引渡程序; 2022年12月1日美国撤销指控

  • 主题发起人 主题发起人 ccc
  • 开始时间 开始时间

1597725260790.png



華為副董事長兼首席財務官孟晚舟引渡案當地時間17日上午再開庭,孟晚舟律師要求法庭公佈37份關鍵文件用以對抗引渡,稱很多文件經編輯校訂難以反映實情,更指因加國騎警及邊境服務局(CBSA)在拘捕過程中有過失,控方不應向公眾隱藏加國執法者的計劃。

據加拿大廣播公司(CBC)報道,為期約一周的本輪聆訊,將圍繞此案眾多文件中的司法權利及是否被侵犯而展開。開庭首日向公眾開放,而接下來的聆訊預計閉門進行。按規定孟晚舟須參與聆訊,孟晚舟當天沒有出庭,而是在家通過電話參與了聽證過程。

孟晚舟的律師團隊周一針對孟晚舟被捕前後,加美雙方執法者的聯絡信息,更以此試圖說服法官批准公開更多資料,因為辯方認為一些資料可以證明孟晚舟是不當執法的受害人。

她的律師指出,辯方近幾個月獲得的文件顯示,美國司法當局在孟晚舟被拘捕超過兩個月後,仍對獲得孟晚舟手機、手提電腦及平板電腦內的信息感興趣。控方此前在法庭曾堅稱,上述信息從未與美國執法者分享。

孟晚舟的律師稱,美國及加拿大當局合謀侵犯了孟晚舟的權利,因為在拘捕她的時候,先由CBSA在沒有律師的情況下對她進行盤問,更扣押了她的電子設備。在此前的聆訊中,辯方稱騎警向美國聯邦調查局(FBI)提供了這些電子設備中的信息,這違反了《加拿大引渡法》(Canada's Extradition Act)。

在此前長達數月的聆訊中,控辯雙方共涉及文件多達9.3萬件,辯方一直認為此案應結案,因為存在執法者濫用程序的問題。一位控方律師表示,控方花費了數百小時,將這些文件削減為387個,此後在一位被委任為仲裁人的律師幫助下,雙方確立了37份本周法庭重點討論的文件。法庭會做出決定修改20多份文件,因為包含涉及到律師與客戶間相互聯繫司法權利的內容,以及其他受保護的司法權利。

孟晚舟的律師強調,如果執法者濫用司法程序,這就意味著控方已經建立好的司法權利應該被放棄。辯方更引述加拿大最高法院對訴訟權利的解釋為:「訴訟權利不是一方自己有過失證據得以永遠不見陽光的黑洞。」
 
1597725609980.png

Lawyers for Meng Wanzhou zeroed in on communications surrounding the Huawei executive's 2018 arrest Monday as they tried to convince a B.C. Supreme Court judge to release documents they believe could prove Meng was a victim of misconduct.

The chief financial officer's defence team argued that wrongdoing on the part of the RCMP and Canada Border Services Agency officers who detained and arrested Meng meant that the Crown should not be able to shield certain details of their planning from public view.

The lawyers also suggested documents disclosed to the defence in recent months suggest U.S. authorities were still interested in obtaining information related to Meng's laptop, phones and tablet more than two months after she was arrested on an extradition warrant — despite the Crown's insistence that those details were never shared with American law enforcement.

The arguments came on the first day of what is expected to be a week's worth of hearings related to legal privileges attached to documents generate by the high-profile case.

"[Meng] reasonably believes that many documents are subject of excessive redactions and overly broad claims of privilege," the defence team argued in documents filed in advance of the hearing.

"It is likely that there is redacted information that is relevant to her abuse of process allegations."

'I'm on the line'
The first day was held in open court, whereas the rest of the proceedings are expected to occur behind closed doors.

Meng — who was required to attend the hearing — joined by telephone. Associate Chief Justice Heather Holmes asked if she was present as the proceedings kicked off.

"Yes, my lady, I'm on the line," Meng replied.


1597725906005.png

CBSA officers seized Meng Wanzhou's laptop along with her phones and other electronic devices. Defence lawyers have accused Canadian authorities of sharing the information with the FBI. (B.C. Supreme Court)

The U.S. wants Meng extradited to New York to face conspiracy and fraud charges connected to allegations she lied to an HSBC banker at a meeting in Hong Kong about Huawei's relationship with a subsidiary accused of violating U.S. economic sanctions against Iran.

Prosecutors claim Meng denied the relationship between the two companies, and that the bank then placed risked prosecution for violating the same economic sanctions by relying on her alleged misrepresentations to make financial decisions.

Meng's lawyers claim U.S. and Canadian authorities conspired to violate her rights at the time of her arrest by having the CBSA detain and question her without a lawyer and seize her electronic devices.

At an earlier hearing, they accused the RCMP of sharing technical details about those devices with the American Federal Bureau of Investigation in breach of Canada's Extradition Act.

They plan to argue in future hearings that the case should be tossed because of an abuse of process. The current set of proceedings concern the documents the defence claims they'll need to make that case.

The arguments follow months of back and forth between the Crown and defence over what started as a trove of 93,000 documents identified as relevant to defence inquiries.

A Crown lawyer told the court public servants spent hundreds of hours whittling that amount down to 387 documents, and with the help of a lawyer appointed to act as a kind of referee in the case, they have been able to focus on 37 documents up for discussion this week.

Holmes has to rule on redactions to some documents and on decisions to exclude about two dozens documents from public view entirely because of privileges attached to communications between lawyers and their clients, other legally protected communications and public interest.

'Not a black hole'
Meng's lawyers claim that an abuse of process by authorities means even well-established legal privileges should be waived.

They cited a ruling from the Supreme Court of Canada in which the country's top court said litigation privilege was "not a black hole from which one's own evidence of misconduct can never be exposed to the light of day."


1597725940756.png

A still from a video of Meng Wanzhou filed as part of a defence application for access to documents. The video was taken during Meng's first few hours in CBSA custody. (Court proceedings)

But the Crown said privilege concerning communications like those between solicitors and clients should only be set aside if "absolutely necessary" — as in cases where it's needed to prove a person's innocence.

In their arguments, lawyers for Canada's attorney general said Meng should have to pass a threshold to meet that bar showing that she could neither get the information from another source nor be able to prove her abuse of process allegation without it.

The defence said the Crown has already waived privileges related to certain communications — including a letter from a department of justice lawyer to the RCMP officer who arrested Meng giving instructions for the way she should be detained.

Based on the Crown's decision to release that information, the defence claims it should be able to access other related communications.

Defence lawyer Scott Fenton claimed there has been "an inconsistency and an unfairness" in the Crown's decision to release certain information related to requests under international treaties by U.S. authorities for information about Meng's electronic devices.

Fenton said the Crown recently disclosed a detailed legal analysis connected to a request in February 2019, while still refusing to release a "flurry" of emails which occurred at the time of the first request in the days after Meng's arrest — when the defence believes the RCMP sent the FBI the information it was looking for.

 
孟晚舟案新听证会今天开始 律师:美国刻意忽略重要声明

加拿大都市网
2020年8月17日 08:23


meng-696x503.jpg

(孟晚舟律师指美方证据存在漏洞,而且不属实。 星报图片)

中国华为集团首席财务官孟晚舟引渡案新一轮听证会将于8月17日举行,其代表律师周五向媒体发布的文件中辩称,美国用于引渡孟晚舟的证据,存有漏洞且不属实,加拿大法院不应采用相关证据。

其中不属实的内容包括美方通过删减文件内容,误导加拿大法院相信孟晚舟对汇丰“隐瞒”了华为与Skycom技术有限公司(简称:Skycom)的关系,然而事实上,从孟晚舟律师提交的信息来看,汇丰从始至终都知道华为与星通之间的关系。

在该批文件中,孟晚舟的律师团队提出了7项新证据,他们希望卑诗最高法院副首席大法官霍姆斯(Heather Holmes)予以考虑。

孟晚舟的律师提交了包括前美国国务院法律顾问约翰·贝林格(John Bellinger)在内专家证人的证词。贝林格指出,美国为引渡孟晚舟,刻意省去了提交给加拿大法院的证据中,孟晚舟的关键证词。此外美国政府从未因一家金融机构被第三方欺骗,违反经济制裁而对其实施刑事或民事的诉讼。贝林格写道:“任何有关孟女士会让银行陷入法律危险的断言,都不符合美国政府以往的做法。”

孟晚舟律师团队关键证据:汇丰知道华为和星通的合作

此外,孟晚舟律师团队还提交了一份概述华为与在伊朗开展业务的企业之间关系的陈述,内容概述华为与伊朗业务的关联,律师团想借此佐证美方为了把孟晚舟引渡到美国,无视华为与汇丰银行沟通时,曾提到在伊朗业务的事实。

美国向加拿大法院提交的“案件起诉记录”称,孟晚舟对汇丰“隐瞒”了华为与Skycom技术有限公司(简称:Skycom)的关系,“误导”汇丰继续向华为提供银行服务,汇丰因此违反了美国对伊朗制裁法案,面临民事和刑事罚款的“风险”,孟晚舟对汇丰构成“欺诈”。

然而,孟晚舟的律师团队旨在提供一份关键证据,即孟晚舟在2013年8月于香港与汇丰银行高管会面,递交了的一份16页的PPT,详实陈述了华为在伊朗的业务情况,用很大篇幅介绍华为和Skycom在伊朗的客户、产品、合规要求、合规制度。

对此,孟晚舟律师指出,孟晚舟不存在“误导”,也没有“隐瞒”,汇丰从始至终知晓华为与星通之间的关系。

孟将出席一系列电话听证会

孟晚舟律师还称,这些文件显示,美国用的部分诉讼证据 “明显不可靠”,如此不可靠和存在缺陷的证据,即便是拒绝引渡孟晚舟也是正当的。

上述“案件起诉记录”都将于9月在卑诗省最高法院上进行辩论,已作为引渡孟晚舟听证会的一部分依据;整个引渡听证过程预计将持续到2021年4月。

与此同时,孟晚舟8月17日(周一)还将通过电话出席一系列的听证会;孟晚舟的律师团队还要求加拿大司法部长发布更多与她被捕有关的机密文件,以表明她的权利受到了侵犯,但司法部办公室却拒绝作出有关公布。孟晚舟的法律团队认为,基于她的权益受损,应停止相关的引渡程序。

加拿大皇家骑警在2018年12月1日应美国政府的要求,在温哥华国际机场拘捕当时转机的孟晚舟,指她和华为均违反了美国对伊朗的制裁。

 
加中外长会晤硬碰硬 互相要人 谁也不松口
文章来源: 美国之音 于 2020-08-26 08:20:10 - 新闻取自各大新闻媒体,新闻内容并不代表本网立场!
(被阅读 8162 次)

1598487960919.png


加拿大外长商鹏飞(左)和中国外长王毅在罗马举行会晤。 (2020年8月25日)

加拿大外长商鹏飞(Francois-Philippe Champagne)在意大利首都罗马会见了中国外长王毅,要求中国释放两名加拿大公民,但中方没有显示出立场松动的迹象。

商鹏飞和王毅周二在罗马的一家酒店进行了大约90分钟的会谈。商鹏飞正在欧洲访问,王毅到意大利参加意中建交50周年纪念活动。

王毅在结束对意大利的访问后还要前往荷兰、挪威、法国和德国进行访问。这是王毅自病毒大流行爆发以来首次访问欧洲。

在这次会谈中,商鹏飞向王毅表达了加拿大对北京处理香港问题的做法的反对立场,并要求中国释放加拿大前外交官康明凯(Michael Kovrig )和商人斯帕弗(Michael Spavor)。王毅也再次向加拿大提出释放中国科技公司华为前首席财务官孟晚舟。

加拿大外交部在会谈后发表声明说:“商鹏飞外长再次重申,康明凯和斯帕弗的案子依然是重中之重......加拿大将继续呼吁中国立即释放这两人。”

加拿大外交部在声明中还说,商鹏飞在会谈中还敦促中方赦免所有被中国判处死刑的加拿大公民。

本月初,中国广州法院以制造、运输毒品罪判处加拿大公民徐伟洪和叶建辉死刑。从孟晚舟被捕以后,中国已经判处四名加拿大公民死刑。另外两人是范威和谢伦伯格。

孟晚舟是2018年12月在加拿大机场被捕的。这次抓捕行动是应与加国有着引渡条约的美国的要求实施的。美国指控孟晚舟在向伊朗出售违禁商品的过程中犯有金融欺诈行为。

孟晚舟被抓激怒了北京,导致加中关系急剧恶化。就在孟晚舟被捕后不久,北京抓捕了康明凯和斯帕弗。两人被关押至今。

王毅对商鹏飞的要求并没有释放出任何松动的意向,他坚持要求加拿大采取主动行动,解决这一问题。

王毅对商鹏飞说:“由于加方无端拘押中国公民,两国关系遭遇严重困难。解铃还须系铃人,加方对此要有正确认识。”

王毅希望加方拿出“独立自主国家的姿态”,尽快作出决断,消除当前影响中加关系发展的主要障碍。王毅所说的“独立自主国家的姿态”是希望加拿大摆脱美国的影响,主动释放孟晚舟。

中国外交部发言人赵立坚周三对商鹏飞的要求作出了回应。他在例行记者会上说:“康明凯、迈克尔涉嫌从事危害中国国家安全的活动,”“ 中国司法机关严格依法办案,同时保障其合法权利。”

赵立坚说:“当前中加关系面临困难,责任不在中方。加方很清楚问题的症结,应立即采取有效措施纠正错误,为两国关系重回正轨创造条件。”

加拿大国内近期也出现了一些言论,希望通过释放孟晚舟换取中国释放扣押的加拿大公民。但是,加拿大总理特鲁多拒绝了这个建议。他坚持认为,加拿大的法治独立是不可动摇的。

 
1601170120878.png

With a historic U.S. election looming and the fate of two Canadians imprisoned in China hanging in the balance, Meng Wanzhou will appear in a B.C. courtroom next week as her lawyers launch their latest attempt to end extradition proceedings against the Huawei executive.

Meng's defence team will argue that the United States provided Canada with a misleading record of the case against her when they sought Meng's arrest on fraud and conspiracy charges in Vancouver in December 2018.

The allegation is one of three lines of attack the Huawei chief financial officer's lawyers plan to pursue in the coming months to convince the B.C. Supreme Court justice overseeing the case that Meng's rights have been violated.

Legal observers say this week's hearings are unlikely to sway the judge, given the nature of Canadian extradition law.

But they believe Canada's justice minister will face increasing pressure to intervene due to allegations of political interference and China's ongoing detention of Canadians Michael Kovrig and Michael Spavor.

University of British Columbia professor Michael Byers, who holds the Canada Research Chair in Global Politics and International Law, says everyone with a stake in the Meng case — politicians, lawyers and the defendant herself — is likely watching the upcoming U.S. presidential election to see how the results might impact the road ahead.

"A change of administration would be quite significant in terms of U.S. foreign policy, and the Meng extradition request might come into play in that regard," Byers said.

"At some point, the political calculations might change for the Trudeau government, or perhaps a Conservatiive government, if we have a federal election in this country."

Accused of lying to HSBC

Meng was detained on Dec. 1, 2018, after flying to Vancouver from Hong Kong en route to a business conference in Latin America.

The 48-year-old is accused of lying to an HSBC executive in August 2013 about Huawei's relationship with a subsidiary accused of violating U.S. economic sanctions against Iran.


1601170225594.png

Former Democratic U.S. Vice President Joe Biden, right, is running against current Republican President Donald Trump in a November presidential election. Experts say the result could affect Meng Wanzhou's extradition proceedings. (Andrew Harnik/The Associated Press, Olivier Douliery/AFP/Getty Images)

According to prosecutors, HSBC relied on her word to continue financing Huawei, placing the bank at risk of prosecution and loss for unwittingly violating the same set of sanctions.

Meng has accused U.S. President Donald Trump of using her as a bargaining chip in a trade war with China.

She also claims Canadian and American authorities mounted a covert criminal investigation against her, sharing information from her electronic devices and questioning her for three hours before she was officially arrested — contrary to the instructions of the judge who issued the extradition warrant.

The defence and the Crown have agreed on a schedule of intermittent court dates leading up to February 2021, when the judge will hear arguments on alleged violations of Meng's rights.

'A presumption the individual will be transferred'

Starting Monday, Meng's lawyers hope to convince Associate Chief Justice Heather Holmes that claims about the U.S. allegedly misleading the court also meet the threshold needed for consideration as an abuse of process worthy of ending the proceedings.

The defence team claims the U.S. provided the judge with a skewed version of events by omitting facts that prove HSBC didn't rely on Meng's assurances to decide the bank wanted to keep financing Huawei.


1601170267179.png

Hassan Diab holds a news conference on Parliament Hill, in Ottawa in February. He is seeking compensation from the federal government of Canada over his extradition to France on allegations of terrorism. (Fred Chartrand/The Canadian Press)

Byers said it is rare for judges to end extradition proceedings based on the underlying record of the case.

He pointed to the extradition of Hassan Diab, a 66-year-old University of Ottawa lecturer who was accused by French authorities of involvement in a 1980 bombing outside a Paris synagogue that killed four people and injured more than 40.

Diab was extradited in 2014 to France, where he spent more than three years in near-solitary confinement while the allegations against him were investigated. He was never charged and was returned to Canada in 2018 after French judges dropped the case due to lack of evidence.

Diab and his family are now suing the federal government over the role Canada played in his extradition — including allegations that "convincing and crucial evidence" was kept from the extradition judge, such as the fact Canadian officials had determined that Diab's fingerprints didn't appear to match those of the suspected bomber.

"The extradition system is premised on almost a presumption that the individual will be transferred," Byers said.

"The more common outcome is that the individual is transferred even if there are probable concerns."

'Prolonged and unlawful detention'

Vancouver lawyer Gary Botting, who has written a book on Canadian extradition law, agreed with Byers that the prospects are slim for a stay in Meng's case.

Botting's view of the proceedings is in line with those of 19 high-profile Canadians — including former Liberal cabinet minister Allan Rock and former Supreme Court Justice Louise Arbour — who have called on Justice Minister David Lametti to end them.


1601170317106.png

Michael Spavor, left, and former Canadian diplomat Michael Kovrig are in Chinese custody, both having been charged with spying. Both men were detained in the days immediately following Meng Wanzhou's arrest. (The Associated Press/International Crisis Group/The Canadian Press)

Their rationale is based on a legal opinion from prominent defence lawyer Brian Greenspan, who concluded that although a justice minister doesn't normally weigh in on extradition until the judicial phase of the process has concluded, the Extradition Act gives Lametti the right to free Meng at any time.

In an open letter to Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, Rock, Arbour and others said they were writing as Canadians "deeply concerned about the prolonged and unlawful detention" of Kovrig, a former diplomat, and Spavor, an entrepreneur, who have been in Chinese custody since the days immediately following Meng's 2018 arrest.

This summer, the Chinese announced formal charges of spying against Kovrig and Spavor. Legal observers believe the pair will almost certainly be found guilty at trial. China's legal system has a 99.9 per cent rate of conviction.

Trudeau has made it clear he views the detention of the 'Two Michaels' as arbitrary and has publicly stated that the U.S. shouldn't reach a trade deal with China that doesn't deal with Meng and the imprisoned Canadians.

But he also rejected the call for Lametti to intervene.

'It was fixed'

Byers said he doubts the government will take any action ahead of the presidential election. But he said the politics of extradition mean that anything is possible afterward.

He said he was peripherally involved in the late 90s in the case that saw Spain try to extradite the late Chilean dictator Augusto Pinochet from the United Kingdom, where he was arrested while seeking medical treatment.


1601170375789.png

Former Chilean Gen. Augusto Pinochet, shown in 1998 in Santiago, died in 2006. He avoided extradition from the U.K. to Spain with a controversial medical release that was questioned by many. (Santiago Llanquin/The Associated Press)

Pinochet was charged with torture of Spanish citizens and the assassination of a Spanish diplomat during his reign. His arrest caused a global sensation, with human rights activists arguing against those who claimed Pinochet, as head of state, should have immunity from prosecution.

He was cleared for extradition. But in March 2000, Jack Straw, who was then the U.K.'s home secretary, ruled that Pinochet should be returned home because of ill health on questionable medical evidence.

The first thing Pinochet did after landing in Chile was to stand up from his wheelchair to greet supporters.

"It was fixed. That outcome was a fabrication designed to provide political cover for the [U.K.] government," Byers said.

"Politicians can finesse the outcomes in all kinds of imaginative ways."

In the same way, Byers said no matter how things go in the courtroom, pressure from China, the situation of Kovrig and Spavor and Canada's relationship with the United States may yet cause a shift in political calculations for Trudeau and Lametti.

"And this is part of the strategy that Ms. Meng is playing," he said.

"She is trying to draw this case out as long as possible, because she knows that events will occur and that calculations might change."
 
最后编辑:

Meng Wanzhou appears in court to argue U.S. misled Canada in extradition case
Week-long proceeding to determine if latest line of attack meets threshold for judge's consideration
CBC News · Posted: Sep 28, 2020 1:00 AM PT | Last Updated: 4 hours ago



1601340234594.png

Huawei chief financial officer Meng Wanzhou leaves her home for B.C. Supreme Court in Vancouver for a hearing in which her lawyers accuse the U.S. of cherry picking evidence against her. (Ben Nelms/CBC)

Meng Wanzhou made her first appearance in B.C. Supreme Court in months on Monday as her lawyers accused the United States of cherry-picking evidence to try to convince Canada to extradite her.

Defence lawyer Scott Fenton told Associate Chief Justice Heather Holmes the underlying record of the case filed against the Huawei executive was filled with omissions and misstatements.

Meng, 48, is accused of fraud and conspiracy to commit bank fraud.

Prosecutors claim that she used a PowerPoint presentation to lie to an HSBC executive about Huawei's control of a company that was accused of violating U.S. sanctions against Iran.

As a result, the bank allegedly put itself at risk of prosecution for breaching the same laws by continuing to process financial transactions for Huawei through the U.S. banking system.

But Fenton claimed that prosecutors left out two crucial slides from the presentation which established that Meng gave HSBC all the information the financial institution needed to keep out of trouble.

"This is really the elephant in the room," Fenton told the judge.

"She told them everything they needed to know to measure sanctions risk."

The hearing is only likely to last until Wednesday.

The arguments about the record of the case are one of three lines of attack the defence team is taking to try to scuttle the extradition proceedings against Meng, Huawei's chief financial officer.

Hearings have been set for February 2021 on the other two alleged abuses of process, which centre on politicization of the case and alleged violations of her rights at the time of arrest.


1601340261118.png

Huawei chief financial officer Meng Wanzhou is accused of fraud and conspiracy in relation to alleged sanctions violations by a Huawei subsidiary. (Ben Nelms/CBC)

The purpose of this week's proceedings is as a kind of screening procedure for Holmes to decide if concerns about the evidence reach the same threshold for consideration or if the allegations are frivolous.

The proceeding happened in a vastly different courtroom from the last major hearing in the extradition proceedings, which was held last January, when Meng argued that the offence she is accused of would not be considered a crime in Canada.

She lost that argument, clearing a major hurdle toward extradition for the Crown.

Meng wore a light purple mask with the words "Made in Taiwan" printed at the bottom. Her hair is much longer than the last time she appeared in court, and she wore a striped shirt and long beige shorts which displayed the GPS monitoring ankle bracelet she wears as part of her bail conditions.

Meng was arrested at Vancouver's airport on Dec. 1, 2018 on what was supposed to be a stopover from Hong Kong to Mexico City.

'Not a runaway train motion'

The Crown will argue for a summary dismissal of the defence's application for a full hearing on the allegations about the underlying evidence. In extradition cases, the record of the case provided by a requesting state is usually held to be presumptively reliable.

But Fenton said that with that "shortcut" comes a duty for diligence, candour and accuracy.

"This is not a runaway train motion," he said, assuring Holmes that the allegations were serious enough to warrant a stay of proceedings.

"This is not going to delay, prolong or interfere with the schedule in any way."

Meng's lawyers claim senior executives at HSBC knew about Huawei's true relationship with SkyCom, not just "junior" employees, as described in the record of the case.

They say prosecutors failed to mention that HSBC didn't have to use the American banking system to clear financial transactions related to the companies — meaning no sanctions would be violated.


1601340288501.png

Meng Wanzhou is accused of lying to an HSBC executive in August 2013. But her lawyers claim the U.S. has omitted key facts that undermine the strength of the case against her. (Chan Long Hei/Bloomberg)

The defence team wants to enter as evidence an affidavit from John Bellinger, a former counsel to the George W. Bush White House, who claims the U.S. has never imposed civil or criminal penalties on a bank for breaking sanctions after being misled by a customer.

"Any assertion that Ms. Meng's alleged misrepresentations would have put the bank in legal jeopardy for sanctions violations is not supported by past U.S. government practice."

'Actual trial of evidence is not in question'

In court documents, Meng's lawyers point to a 2003 case in which a B.C. Supreme Court judge stayed proceedings when the United Kingdom sought a Victoria man for extradition in relation to an alleged conspiracy involving the sale of rare coins.

In that case, the man's defence determined that one of the chief witnesses had absconded, another had died, and prosecutors didn't actually know if another was available.

In granting a stay, the judge said it would be "unsafe" to rely on the record of the case.

"Where the conduct of a foreign certifying authority falls so far below and expected reasonable standard to amount to a complete failure of due diligence, this impacts on the fairness of the extradition process," wrote Justice Sunni Stromberg-Stein.

The Crown's reply to the defence arguments has yet to be released to the public.


1601340310443.png

Meng Wanzhou sports Jimmy Choo pumps and a GPS ankle monitor. She lives under a form of house arrest that sees her trailed by guards around the clock. (Ben Nelms/CBC)

But Vancouver-based lawyer Gary Botting, who wrote a book on Canadian extradition law, says he doesn't expect the defence to succeed.

Botting says courts have held that "the record of the case is presumptively reliable."

"Everything is aimed at seeing this as a pre-trial patent process that doesn't really result in a trial," he said. "So the actual trial of evidence is not in question."

If anything, Botting expects the Crown to buttress its case with new allegations contained in stories from Reuters this summer that claimed internal documents obtained by the news agency showed that Huawei had acted to cover up its relationship with SkyCom after Reuters first reported on the relationship between the two companies.

Meng has denied the allegations against her. A decision isn't expected on extradition until at least mid-2021.
 
后退
顶部