突发：东航一架737飞机在广西坠毁，机上共132人

[一心无住]

这么缺德不怕你爹在火葬场诈尸么

你爷爷一定诈尸过了！

 

[linsening]

要么是飞行员故意的，但可能性不大；要么是水平尾翼机械故障，

 

[Anakin]

RIP!
又是737，是max型吗？

737 800是第三代737
737 Max是第四代737

 

[茶马盐铁]

I'm a military pilot and, if I can give my two cents here, among the wise of 9GAG, this is a very strange way to die.

The aircraft did not and could not stall, as it has a very different downing pattern.
This was not an engine failure, as that would have resulted in glide.

This kind of downing is only possible, if you do a nose down and keep it that way. The wings were broken off already, most likely and that's why it went this straight down.

Software failure is very... strange this way, because that would require the software to think you have immediately shifted 90 degrees in your course upwards. The autopilot would simply drop control back to the pilot.

One plausible way is that they had a bank error, did not correct, fell out of course (turned 90 degrees, and then lost lift, nose down and it was already over) and then it was too late.

 

[gocanoeing]

别胡诌了，飞机如果完全失去动力，就这么垂直落下去的。你玩的是纸飞机，原理不一样。

还挺好学呢，原来的水平方向速度在空阻下很快就很小了，剩下的几乎就是重力加速度作用下的垂直速度。

你的想象力我一向是佩服的

 

[gocanoeing]

I'm a military pilot and, if I can give my two cents here, among the wise of 9GAG, this is a very strange way to die.

The aircraft did not and could not stall, as it has a very different downing pattern.
This was not an engine failure, as that would have resulted in glide.

This kind of downing is only possible, if you do a nose down and keep it that way. The wings were broken off already, most likely and that's why it went this straight down.

Software failure is very... strange this way, because that would require the software to think you have immediately shifted 90 degrees in your course upwards. The autopilot would simply drop control back to the pilot.

One plausible way is that they had a bank error, did not correct, fell out of course (turned 90 degrees, and then lost lift, nose down and it was already over) and then it was too late.

关键要有当时精确的航迹图才能判断

如果接近90度，那几乎唯一的可能就是有人把机头压到了垂直向下

如果离90度有距离，那就有得分析了。像文中说的bank error，完全失去升力，那也应该像抛物线

另一个可能是如果飞行员发现失速，改出失速的办法一般是压机头向下俯冲以增加速度，但这个向下压的角度不应该太大

 

[lindamy]

简单点说吧，地面摩擦力大。

自学科普改帖了，有进步。

ztbll said:
自己去找点科普东西看看吧，空阻是个变量，和速度，介质密度关系很大，怎么和你的地面磨差比较呢。

 

[luck_qlf]

水平尾翼故障可能性比较大

 

[今剩叹]

看那个矿业公司的视频，只看到机体，而宽大的机翼看不到，说明视线是和航行方向垂直的，直接向下俯冲无疑了。

网上有”谣言“说是一个出现财务问题的飞行员所为，有名有姓的。

 

[eclipse]

这个调查应该会由中国和波音一起参与的吧？

空难调查参与程序是标准. 该参与的参与, 该闭嘴的闭嘴.

很遗憾, 虽然现在我对官方信任度比你还低, 但是, 有些事情, 老百姓三头六臂, 也不可能做到. 只有盲信.

赞一下土共政府，这事没搞意识形态，找老美来一起调查。

美国国家运输安全委员会已任命一名高级航空安全调查员作为美国授权代表，调查2022年3月21日中国东方航空一架波音737-800客机在中国梧州附近坠毁的事件。波音(Boeing)、通用电气(General Electric)和联邦航空管理局(Federal Aviation Administration)的代表将担任技术顾问

 

[ztbll]

你的想象力我一向是佩服的

关键要有当时精确的航迹图才能判断

如果接近90度，那几乎唯一的可能就是有人把机头压到了垂直向下

如果离90度有距离，那就有得分析了。像文中说的bank error，完全失去升力，那也应该像抛物线

另一个可能是如果飞行员发现失速，改出失速的办法一般是压机头向下俯冲以增加速度，但这个向下压的角度不应该太大

你不但缺乏想像力，基础知识也欠缺。飞机失事原因我虽然不知道，但你所谓的抛物线就是胡说八道，那是飞机还受控的状态下保持滑行，但显然不是这个飞机的状况。飞机失速外加发动机空中停车就是那么落下去的，如果有经验的飞行员在高度足够的前提下是可以把飞机拉起来的。

 

[gocanoeing]

你不但缺乏想像力，基础知识也欠缺。飞机失事原因我虽然不知道，但你所谓的抛物线就是胡说八道，那是飞机还受控的状态下保持滑行，但显然不是这个飞机的状况。飞机失速外加发动机空中停车就是那么落下去的，如果有经验的飞行员在高度足够的前提下是可以把飞机拉起来的。

你没学过中学物理，我可以理解

 

[ztbll]

你没学过中学物理，我可以理解

中学物理不教你空气阻力怎么计算，所以你一直以为有抛物线呢。

 

[gocanoeing]

中学物理不教你空气阻力怎么计算，所以你一直以为有抛物线呢。

原来你认为抛物线只在真空存在？

 

[飞来客]

近年来波音737系列飞机出事频繁，从2000年至今已失事28架。