快断气了 - 俄罗斯要对欧洲下手了

别看新闻节目乱扯,来看看代表美国外交战略政策的外交期刊最近发表的文章:


Instead, policymakers in Washington must wrestle with two distinct kinds of goals. In the near term, U.S. priorities remain denying Putin a battlefield victory, avoiding the escalation of the conflict, and limiting its humanitarian and economic costs. Over the long term, the United States wants to shape Russian behavior in such a way that minimizes risks to U.S. geopolitical interests and international stability and reduces the potential for future regional conflict.


The main challenge today is that Ukraine’s brave resistance—even combined with ever-greater Western pressure on Moscow—is highly unlikely to overcome Russia’s military advantages, let alone topple Putin. Without some kind of deal with the Kremlin, the best outcome is probably a long, arduous war that Russia is likely to win anyway. And such a protracted conflict would cement the current extreme level of hostility between Russia and the West, undermining long-term U.S. interests in regional and global stability.

It will be extremely hard, if not impossible, for the United States to achieve either its short- or long-term objectives if the war drags on for months longer. However distasteful it may be to reach a compromise with Putin after the carnage he has unleashed, the United States should work to secure a negotiated settlement to the conflict sooner rather than later.



But Russia’s initial struggles do not mean that it will lose this war. Putin seems to have shifted from seeking regime change to a strategy of imposing costs; by inflicting ever-greater pain and suffering on Ukraine, he seeks to force Zelensky to accept his terms for peace, including the recognition of Ukraine’s eastern Donetsk and Luhansk regions as independent states. Russia can still snatch victory—defined this way, at least—from the jaws of defeat over the coming weeks and months. It would doubtless be a brutal, bloody, and ultimately Pyrrhic victory, but the Russian military, even after suffering the losses it has suffered, still has the capacity to achieve it.
 
总之,接着打!谁也别认怂 ...... :evil:
 
别看新闻节目乱扯,来看看代表美国外交战略政策的外交期刊最近发表的文章:


Instead, policymakers in Washington must wrestle with two distinct kinds of goals. In the near term, U.S. priorities remain denying Putin a battlefield victory, avoiding the escalation of the conflict, and limiting its humanitarian and economic costs. Over the long term, the United States wants to shape Russian behavior in such a way that minimizes risks to U.S. geopolitical interests and international stability and reduces the potential for future regional conflict.


The main challenge today is that Ukraine’s brave resistance—even combined with ever-greater Western pressure on Moscow—is highly unlikely to overcome Russia’s military advantages, let alone topple Putin. Without some kind of deal with the Kremlin, the best outcome is probably a long, arduous war that Russia is likely to win anyway. And such a protracted conflict would cement the current extreme level of hostility between Russia and the West, undermining long-term U.S. interests in regional and global stability.

It will be extremely hard, if not impossible, for the United States to achieve either its short- or long-term objectives if the war drags on for months longer. However distasteful it may be to reach a compromise with Putin after the carnage he has unleashed, the United States should work to secure a negotiated settlement to the conflict sooner rather than later.



But Russia’s initial struggles do not mean that it will lose this war. Putin seems to have shifted from seeking regime change to a strategy of imposing costs; by inflicting ever-greater pain and suffering on Ukraine, he seeks to force Zelensky to accept his terms for peace, including the recognition of Ukraine’s eastern Donetsk and Luhansk regions as independent states. Russia can still snatch victory—defined this way, at least—from the jaws of defeat over the coming weeks and months. It would doubtless be a brutal, bloody, and ultimately Pyrrhic victory, but the Russian military, even after suffering the losses it has suffered, still has the capacity to achieve it.
写的很好,希望所有的人都能冷静下来。这是美国厉害的地方,各种各样的声音都有,可以批评政府的政策而不用担心受惩罚。就怕双方都只有一个声音,把对方描述成恶魔,自己是正义的一方,战争可以取得胜利。拿这样仗就停不下来。
Putin显然也害怕战争无限的持续下去。
根据最新的俄罗斯和乌克兰的报道,谈判取得了重大进展,除了克里米亚。
 
俄罗斯到底每天要花多少钱,只能参照下估计个大概的数量级。20年阿富汗战争美国花了1万亿,平均一天下来1.37亿。阿富汗战争美军大约1万人俄罗斯现在20万军队,兵员数量20倍,尽管俄军不如美军有钱,毕竟跟平均数10年前美军比,而且美军基本上是驻守大规模行动很少,俄军花大几十亿一天是跑不掉的。
 
写的很好,希望所有的人都能冷静下来。这是美国厉害的地方,各种各样的声音都有,可以批评政府的政策而不用担心受惩罚。就怕双方都只有一个声音,把对方描述成恶魔,自己是正义的一方,战争可以取得胜利。拿这样仗就停不下来。
Putin显然也害怕战争无限的持续下去。
根据最新的俄罗斯和乌克兰的报道,谈判取得了重大进展,除了克里米亚。
谁放弃了乌东?普大爷还是司机?:crazy:
 

俄罗斯2022年能源收入有望突破3200亿美元,较去年增加1/3




这点钱只能打16天仗。
 
谁放弃了乌东?普大爷还是司机?:crazy:
查查几次中东战争,以色列占领了周围国家多少土地,除埃及的最后退了点,舒利亚黎巴嫩等很多国家土地依然占着,能怎么样?
除非美国出兵。
 
查查几次中东战争,以色列占领了周围国家多少土地,除埃及的最后退了点,舒利亚黎巴嫩等很多国家土地依然占着,能怎么样?
除非美国出兵。
擦!你怎么跟立坚同志一样?我问的是谁放弃乌东了?没人放弃,这仗就还得打。
 
奥地利说可以接受所有对俄制裁措施,进口天然气除外。

9 min ago

"All other sanctions" on Russia are acceptable for Austria but "not the gas embargo," finance minister says​

From CNN’s Livvy Doherty in London

Austria’s finance minister told CNN that his country supports all sanctions on Russia except a gas embargo.

“Once a sanction hits yourself more than the one targeted by the sanction, I think there’s not much use,” Magnus Brunner said, adding that Austria’s industry is so dependent on Russian gas that they have “no choice.”

There was not much sense in a sanction that harmed Austria’s economy more than Russia’s, he stressed.

More context: The European Union imported nearly 100 billion euros ($110 billion) worth of Russian energy last year. Russia supplies about 40% of the bloc's imports of natural gas, and about 27% and 46% of its imported oil and coal respectively.

In March, EU leaders pledged to reduce consumption of Russian gas by 66% before the end of this year, and to break the bloc's dependence on Russian energy by 2027.

Russian oil has already been banned by the United States and United Kingdom.

CNN's Anna Cooban contributed reporting to this post.
 
欧盟说可能可以用卢布购买俄国天然气而不违背制裁条款。


16 min ago

EU companies may be able to purchase Russian gas in rubles without violating sanctions, the EU Commission says​

From CNN's Amy Cassidy in London
European companies may be able to purchase Russian gas in rubles without violating the European Union's sanctions against Moscow, according to new advice issued by the European Commission on Friday.
The advice issued states how a process involving the Russian Central Bank would be a breach of sanctions and how continued payment in Euros/Dollars would be possible.
In a document issued to the member states and published online Thursday, the Commission states it "appears possible" that Moscow's decree demanding energy payments be made in Russian currency "does not preclude a payment process which is in line with the EU restrictive measures."
However, the commission notes the procedure is not yet clear.
A Russian decree issued in late March demands companies hold accounts in Russia's state-owned Gazprombank, which would convert payments for gas into rubles, in order to fulfill contracts, instead of trading directly with state gas giant Gazprom. The decree only applies to existing contracts.
"EU companies can ask their Russian counterparts to fulfill their contractual obligations in the same manner as before the adoption of the Decree, i.e., by depositing the due amount in Euros or Dollars," the EU's guidance states.
Gazprombank has been sanctioned by the UK and the US, but not the EU.
However, the Russian Central Bank, which is sanctioned by the EU, could be involved in Gazprombank's currency conversion, the commission notes.
"Agreed contracts must be respected," a spokesperson from the EU Commission told CNN Friday, adding that "97% of the relevant contracts explicitly stipulate payment in euros or dollars. Companies with such contracts should not accede to Russian demands."
"We have carefully analyzed the new decree, and we are in contact with Member State authorities and with energy companies that would be affected. The EU will continue to respond in a united manner to this latest attempt by Russia to circumvent our sanctions," the spokesperson continued.
 
俄罗斯到底每天要花多少钱,只能参照下估计个大概的数量级。20年阿富汗战争美国花了1万亿,平均一天下来1.37亿。阿富汗战争美军大约1万人俄罗斯现在20万军队,兵员数量20倍,尽管俄军不如美军有钱,毕竟跟平均数10年前美军比,而且美军基本上是驻守大规模行动很少,俄军花大几十亿一天是跑不掉的。


听说习近平给普京划了7000亿美元。
 
后退
顶部