政府任命魁北克女法官领导Foreign Interference Public Inquiry

调查interference,谁也搞不出个结果来。

 
应对自由车队,政府启用了 Emergency Act, 在反对党的质疑声中也搞了public inquiry, 最后也没找出什么政府的致命错误,真相,结论。。。

现在也一样,找真相的简单要求不够,需要有足够的依据。

比如报告说庄议员家人没有受到威胁,几年没有联系,如果被危险,现在拿出证据不迟。

报告说董议员的确与中国领事有联系,但是没有证据表明他提议中国不要释放两个麦克。

指控中国出钱买选票,支持某候选人,这的确是干预选举,问题是需要证据,否则无法定罪。

Public inquiry 能够推翻这些结论吗?如果不能,为什么要做?
 
让提供这个情报的线人出来作证。
 
Public inquiry 能够推翻这些结论吗?如果不能,为什么要做?
还没开始调查,就说不能推翻这些结论,土豆是你亲大爷吗,你处处维护那个狗娘养的。
 
又跳出来显。没工夫理傻子,自己演吧。

Johnston 的报告不是调查结果?各个反对党或者这里的各位,拿出什么依据需要进行public inquiry? 部长说了,不能简单要求。

那老头的解释很混乱,一方面承认有明显的国外干涉选举,另一方面又不要公开调查,他想要的是秘密调查,但反对党反对,这次连头巾都站在对立面了,吼吼,芭比Q了。
 
Public hearing 是秘密调查的意思?他混乱还是你混乱?

非要搞public inquiry 没什么了不起的,自由车队的emergency act 不是如在野党的愿望搞了吗?大不了自由党下台,重新大选。
 
Public hearing 是秘密调查的意思?他混乱还是你混乱?

非要搞public inquiry 没什么了不起的,自由车队的emergency act 不是如在野党的愿望搞了吗?大不了自由党下台,重新大选。
秘密调查,给公共hearing,那帮孙子就喜欢玩文字游戏。自由车队那次是因为头巾拼命支持土豆,所以一切尽在土豆的控制中,这次很明显失控了,别浪费生命了,大选时投好你自己那票就行了。
 

调查interference,谁也搞不出个结果来。

证据确凿了,cisi说的很直白了。土豆基金会经理层早就闻风辞职了,只要稍微一挖,里面的黑幕就出来。
 
警察才开始调查此事,public inquiry 调查谁去?几位被干预的议员也是从媒体和CSIS才知晓的。

加拿大关于外国干预选举的各种调查顺序真是混乱不堪,情况部门,媒体,议员,在野党,驱除外交官,政府调查,在野党围攻要求public inquiry,调查员辞职,RCMP。。。

现在在野党说public inquiry 具体细节还没有安排好。

RCMP investigating foreign meddling attempts against three MPs​


Updated June 13, 2023 11:02 a.m. EDT
Published June 13, 2023 10:52 a.m. EDT
OTTAWA - The RCMP says investigations are underway into alleged foreign interference involving three members of Parliament, including Conservatives Michael Chong and Erin O'Toole and New Democrat Jenny Kwan.

Acting RCMP Commissioner Mike Duheme confirmed the investigations this morning during a parliamentary committee meeting.


He says more than 100 investigations into foreign interference writ large are underway in Canada.

Duheme also says police stations allegedly operated by Beijing have been closed amid ongoing investigations.

The commissioner says he has been in contact with elections officials about allegations of foreign interference and that the RCMP first learned of the allegations through the media.

He says he doesn't know if the Canadian Security Intelligence Service provided the RCMP with a 2021 memo about the alleged targeting of MPs, but says he doesn't recall seeing it and the information would only have been provided if it met a criminal threshold.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 13, 2023.

 
最后编辑:
加拿大关于外国干预选举的各种调查顺序真是混乱不堪,情况部门,媒体,议员,在野党,驱除外交官,政府调查,在野党围攻要求public inquiry,调查员辞职,RCMP。。。
这种混乱正是土豆一手造成的。土豆滥用权利到及至,而反对党又总是抓一些旁支末节,把挺简单的事弄的很复杂。
 

加总理国安顾问:泄露外国干预机密的人将被发现受罚​

据加拿大广播公司(CBC)22日报导,加拿大总理国家安全与情报顾问托马斯(Jody Thomas)称,她预计向媒体泄露有关中国试图干预加拿大政治的敏感信息,在该国引发数月来关于外国干预加拿大选举争议的安全官员将被发现并受到惩罚。

发表时间: 23/06/2023 - 03:57
8 分钟

1687697744828.png
加拿大总理国家安全与情报顾问托马斯资料图片 © 网络图片
作者:弗林

托马斯在将于周六播出的CBC节目中说,“法律已经被打破。消息来源、技术已被置于风险之中。我们在五眼联盟盟友中的信誉受到了威胁。”

托马斯在采访中说,“有更好的方法来做这件事”。这是她自去年1月被加拿大总理特鲁多(Justin Trudeau)任命为其国安顾问以来首次接受采访。托马斯说,“在国家安全机构中,有更好的方式来提出你的关切。比起拿加拿大的国家安全做赌注,有更好的方法试图让这个话题得到一些关注。”

自去年年底以来,加拿大“环球新闻”和《环球邮报》根据被泄露的机密文件和安全部门的匿名消息来源连续报道中国被指干预加拿大选举,引起全国关注。在某些情况下,这些报道是基于泄露的最高机密情报。《环球邮报》最终发表了一篇由加拿大国家安全人士撰写的文章,其向该报提供了信息。

曝料者表示,他们之所以选择泄露机密,是因为政府官员对收到的有关报告视而不见,一直不采取有效行动制止外国干预。该消息人士写道,“越来越明显的是,没有人考虑采取严肃的行动。更糟糕的是,高级公职人员无视干预的证据开始增多”。

托马斯曾多次出现在一个研究外国干预加拿大选举的议会委员会面前。她告诉CBC称,该消息来源向公众泄露敏感信息是错误的。她说,“这在很多方面都令人难以置信地感到不安。第一,他们对所做的事情如此没意识到。第二,他们会冒着我们国家安全的风险来泄露信息并获得一些恶名……”

托马斯补充说,“第三,(他们)泄露的部分信息并不能说明一个完整的故事,也许在标题上看起来很淫秽和丑闻,但并不能说明被泄露的那份情报之前有什么,之后有什么,分析是什么,用它做了什么。”

当被问及他是否觉得加拿大作为情报伙伴的信誉受到泄密事件的威胁时,美国驻加大使科恩(David Cohen)说,美国政府对加拿大仍有信心。他表示:“我要告诉你,我不能为每一个五眼联盟国家说话,但我可以为美国说话,明确地说,我们与加拿大的情报关系仍然非常牢固。”

当被问及曝料者是否鼓励了加拿大人需要进行的关于国家安全的对话时,托马斯说她认为 “泄密没有好处。我永远不会承认有什么好处”。不过,托马斯表示,加拿大人确实需要讨论国家安全的真正含义,公民应该如何关注这些报告,以及正在做什么来解决这些问题并确保选举的安全。

加拿大反对党一直在呼吁政府对这一问题进行公开调查。加拿大保守党领袖博励治(Pierre Poilievre)指责特鲁多政府在掩盖事实。

博励治最近写信给政府间事务部长勒布朗(Dominic LeBlanc)说,在前加拿大总督约翰斯顿(David Johnston)辞去外国干预问题特别报告员的职务后,他不会提出任何可能领导公开调查外国干预的人的名字,直到特鲁多政府承诺举行公开调查。

 
现在所有跟加拿大总理扯上关系的新闻都显得含智量极低,包括认真并热衷转载这类小宫廷八卦的消息的读者。
 

本周三,绿党领袖伊丽莎白 梅查阅了Jonhnston 的秘密报告,她感觉读后疑问更多了。提供的两份文件共25页,20页援引附件,脚注等都是绝密,她无权查阅。她认为缺少很多关键细节,无法得出Johnston 的报告合理或者不合理。​

文章中略微讨论了董议员的候选资格和两个麦克的关押问题,但是因为缺失信息,无法得出任何结论。​


NDP领袖辛格也接受了查阅报告的邀请,正在尽快安排阅读时间。保守党和魁人党领袖拒绝了,认为这是执政党的圈套,使他们阅读后无权对外发表公开评论。​


梅同意Johnston的意见,(google translation):​


认为有必要查明那些向媒体泄露国家安全文件和信息的人并追究其责任。

“外国国家干涉我们的选举进程是对民主的威胁。国家机构对我们政治进程的干涉也是如此,”梅说。

《环球邮报》三月份发表了一篇匿名评论文章,作者是“国家安全官员”。 主编大卫·沃尔姆斯利表示,这位未透露姓名的官员提供的启示“构成了该报关于外国干涉的新闻报道的支柱”。

这位自称举报人的国家安全官员写道,他们选择讨论外国干涉加拿大记者的威胁,因为“高级公职人员无视干涉的证据开始增加”。

“我们不知道他们的动机。我们不知道他们是谁,他们似乎认为他们可以通过自己的告密者叙述来保护自己,”梅说。 “ I don't buy it。”

“每个加拿大人都应该注意确保我们的安全和情报机构可靠,并确保在那里工作的人认真宣誓。”

Top-secret briefing on foreign interference left out key documents: Green leader​


Green Party Leader Elizabeth May holds a press conference on Parliament Hill in Ottawa on Friday, Aug. 18, 2023. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Sean Kilpatrick
Green Party Leader Elizabeth May holds a press conference on Parliament Hill in Ottawa on Friday, Aug. 18, 2023. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Sean Kilpatrick

Updated Aug. 18, 2023 3:20 p.m. EDT
Published Aug. 18, 2023 11:47 a.m. EDT

OTTAWA - Green Party Leader Elizabeth May said a top-secret briefing on foreign interference this week did not allow her to access key intelligence documents.

Former special rapporteur David Johnston had released an initial report on alleged meddling in Canadian elections in May, along with a confidential annex of evidence that he said opposition party leaders who obtained relevant clearance could review.

May and NDP Leader Jagmeet Singh have both received top-secret security clearance, and May was the first to attend a confidential briefing on Wednesday.

"There's so much more that I thought I was going to find out about," May told reporters Friday on Parliament Hill.

She said officials presented her only with two documents Johnston authored -- 25 pages in total. The main 20-page annex cited numerous intelligence reports she was not allowed to read, she said.

May said the Privy Council Office is still considering her request for access to all the cited records, saying that she needs them in order to assess the credibility of Johnson's findings.

The former governor general's report had concluded that Prime Minister Justin Trudeau's government didn't knowingly or negligently fail to act on foreign attempts to interfere in the last two federal elections.

Johnston also concluded, based on the intelligence he reviewed, that Trudeau hadn't been briefed about specific allegations -- though he also found that serious reforms were needed to improve the way government handles sensitive intelligence.

"I expected to have a larger brain burden of reading and comprehending top-secret documents before leaving the room," May said.
The Green leader said she doesn't suspect a cover-up, but rather a mistake in how officials interpreted Johnston's call to allow those with the right security clearance "to review my conclusions and judge whether they are warranted based on the full information contained in the annex."

May said what she did examine revealed more of the evidence upon which Johnston concluded that there was key context missing in the media reporting around Toronto MP Han Dong.

Dong resigned from the Liberal caucus after Global News published a story citing unidentified security sources who alleged Dong told a Chinese diplomat in February 2021 that releasing detained Canadians Michael Kovrig and Michael Spavor would benefit the Conservatives.

Global had previously published allegations that Dong benefited from Chinese foreign interference in his bid to become the Liberal candidate for his riding in the 2019 election.

The MP has denied all wrongdoing and is suing the news agency over its reports.

May said the questions over the nomination process, in particular, were elaborated on in the documentation she reviewed. "They get into a lot more detail on that, and that's viewed as confidential and top-secret in the documents," May said.

Beijing has rejected all claims that it has meddled in Canada's democracy, though Canadian officials have said China is among the countries that are actively trying to interfere.

May added that she took up the offer to examine the documents in the hopes that she could bridge political partisanship and help inform the debate Canadians are having around foreign interference.

"I want Canadians to have confidence in our elections, our institutions."

When Trudeau offered to bring opposition party leaders into the fold, Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre and Bloc Quebecois Leader Yves-Francois Blanchet both declined, saying they saw it as a trap designed to prevent them from speaking about the allegations in public.
Singh's office said earlier this week that it was working to find a time for him to review documents in Ottawa.

Johnston resigned not long after issuing his first report, citing an atmosphere of hyper-politicization around his work. Before and after that resignation, opposition parties continued to call for a formal public inquiry into the allegations.

May said the Greens have been part of ongoing talks around an inquiry, adding that her party wants it to look at other states in addition to China and be led by one or more commissioners who have the support of all opposition parties. She said the Greens have submitted names of people who might fit the bill.

The B.C. MP was critical of whoever has been leaking intelligence to media, as well as what she calls inappropriate levels of partisanship, saying both are undermining Canada's security.

She said anyone leaking the information needs to be publicly named and prosecuted, or Canada will undermine the trust of its allies.

"I worry that trying to find out who did this will be cast as a political witch hunt with partisan motives. Every Canadian should care to ensure that our security and intelligence establishment be reliable, that the people who work there take their oath seriously," she said.

"Foreign state interference in our electoral process is a threat to democracy. So is interference in our political process from agencies of the state."

She noted the experience of Maher Arar, a Canadian citizen who was tortured in Syria after officials leaked false information that damaged his reputation. She also cited the RCMP public complaints commission's finding that the force likely influenced the 2006 federal election by naming then-Liberal finance minister Ralph Goodale as being the subject of a criminal investigation.

That history has her concerned about leaks that could originate from the Canadian Security Intelligence Service, she said.

"I think we've lost track of the fact that people within CSIS did this deliberately. We don't know their motives; we don't know who they are. And they seem to think that they can be protected by their own narrative that they're whistleblowers. I don't buy it."

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Aug. 18, 2023.


Elizabeth May frustrated by lack of detail in top secret documents on foreign interference​


May says she is unable to decide whether David Johnston's findings were reasonable​


Brennan MacDonald · CBC News · Posted: Aug 18, 2023 11:14 AM EDT | Last Updated: August 18

1692467876406.png

Green Party Co-Leader Elizabeth May, seen at a press conference on Parliament Hill Friday, said there was not enough detail in the top secret documents she reviewed to conclude whether or not special rapporteur David Johnston's conclusions on foreign interference were reasonable or not. (Sean Kilpatrick/The Canadian Press )

Green Party Co-Leader Elizabeth May is expressing frustration with the level of information contained in the two top-secret documents on foreign interference she was permitted to review this week.

May received top-secret security clearance and reviewed the documents compiled by former special rapporteur David Johnston on Wednesday.

"I can't conclude that David Johnston's conclusions were reasonable, nor can I conclude they are unreasonable," May told a press conference Friday morning.

She said she was not allowed to review the documents Johnston cited to support the conclusions in his 20-page summary report.

"The citations and footnotes were to documents described by a title of the memo, the author of a memo, the date and often the designation of how top-secret that document is, and a page number," said May.
Media reports published earlier this year — many based on leaked intelligence and anonymous national security sources — raised questions about the government's handling of China's alleged interference activities in the 2019 and 2021 federal elections.

Under pressure to strike a public inquiry, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau appointed Johnston as special rapporteur to investigate the extent and impact of foreign interference on Canada's electoral processes.

Before resigning from that role, Johnston issued his first report and recommended against calling a public inquiry.

1692467888240.png

In exclusive interview with CBC's Power & Politics, special rapporteur on foreign interference David Johnston says claims that he is biased are based on 'false' allegations. (Toni Choueiri/CBC)

Johnston wrote that he had included a "confidential annex to my report that addresses the major media allegations in detail and includes citations to the intelligence documents and other products that led me to my conclusions."

"The purpose of this confidential annex is to permit individuals holding appropriate Top Secret security clearance to review my conclusions and judge whether they are warranted based on the full information contained in the annex," Johnston wrote.

"A document that is laboriously referenced but unavailable does not help me do what David Johnston said we'd be able to do, which was to see how he formed his conclusions and add whether we agree or disagree that his conclusions were reasonable," said May.

May told reporters she has asked the Privy Council Office whether she can review the documents cited by Johnston and is waiting for a response.

CBC News has reached out to the Privy Council Office for comment.

NDP Leader Jagmeet Singh also has received top secret security clearance. He said Thursday he's working on scheduling a time to review the documents "as soon as possible."

Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre and Bloc Québécois Leader Yves-François Blanchet have both declined to review the documents, arguing the top secret security clearance would prevent them from speaking about the allegations publicly.

May said she agrees with Johnston on the need to identify and hold accountable those who leaked national security documents and information to the media.

"Foreign state interference in our electoral process is a threat to democracy. So is interference in our political process from agencies of the state," said May.

The Globe and Mail published an anonymous opinion piece in March attributed to a "national security official." Editor-in-Chief David Walmsley said the unnamed official provided the revelations that "formed the backbone" of the paper's news stories on foreign interference.

A self-described whistleblower, the national security official wrote that they chose to discuss the threat of foreign interference with Canadian journalists because "evidence of senior public officials ignoring interference was beginning to mount."

"We don't know their motives. We don't know who they are and they seem to think that they can be protected by their own narrative that they're whistleblowers," said May. "I don't buy it.

"Every Canadian should care to ensure that our security and intelligence establishment be reliable, that the people who work there take their oath seriously."

 
最后编辑:

The Honourable Marie-Josée Hogue​

0110_Marie-Josee_Hogue_1.png

The Honourable Marie-Josée Hogue, was appointed a puisne judge of the Court of Appeal of Quebec on June 19, 2015 to replace Mr. Justice P.J. Dalphond.
Madam Justice Hogue received a Bachelor of Civil Laws from the Université de Sherbrooke in 1986 and, at the end of her studies, received the Faculty medal. She was admitted to the Bar of Quebec the following year.
 
后退
顶部