茶马盐铁
我想看看自定义头衔到底能有多少字。继续加，看系统什么时候把这个字符串截断。呃，居然还有？那就继续吧。
- 注册
- 2015-08-14
- 消息
- 33,700
- 荣誉分数
- 9,684
- 声望点数
- 373
终于走到了这一步。
- 主题发起人 茶马盐铁
- 开始时间
danielgu0819
初级会员
- 注册
- 2022-08-24
- 消息
- 779
- 荣誉分数
- 106
- 声望点数
- 53
我个去。。。都啥人啊，对社会没有任何贡献，就天天琢磨这些。。。以后找ai去
CFC_GMAIL
土地平旷，屋舍俨然，有良田、美池、桑竹之属。阡陌交通，鸡犬相闻。其中往来种作，男女衣着，悉如外人。
- 注册
- 2015-11-10
- 消息
- 2,493
- 荣誉分数
- 1,303
- 声望点数
- 323
这貌似TED上的演讲。
不是政治人物。不关左左右右啥事
她讲的是医学。我随手在美国国家医学图书馆 (NLM)上搜到了这个，与她说的一致。
Coming out of People with Pedophilic Orientation - PMC
Objective: According to research participants, those who come out with their pedophilia are less likely to abuse children. Method: This study builds on qualitative research with 16 participants/members of a self-help group for people with pedophilic ...
pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- 目的：根据研究参与者的反馈，公开恋童癖倾向的人虐待儿童的可能性较低。
- 方法：本研究基于对16名恋童癖自助小组成员的定性研究。
- 结果：公开恋童癖倾向的人在心理上更有能力应对自身问题，并且公开身份能够让他们获得来自社会环境的支持。然而，公开恋童癖倾向极其困难，因为它往往与“虐待儿童者”的标签联系在一起。
- 结论：对那些无意虐待儿童的恋童癖者采取理解的态度，有助于预防儿童性虐待，因为这能让他们更容易获得资源、治疗和教育。
但是发推者篡改了演讲者的话，以下陈述是发推者编造的，根本不是演讲者的主张
“Pedophilia is simply just another sexuaI orientation. We need to overcome our negative feelings we have towards them and treat them with respect..” 
Al又告诉我：
这种观点在医学、法律和伦理领域都是被明确拒绝的。
核心事实
* 非性取向：主要的精神卫生组织（如美国心理学会 APA）将恋童癖定义为一种精神障碍（Paraphilic Disorder），而非一种性取向（如异性恋、同性恋或双性恋）。
* 伤害与同意：性取向涉及成年人之间基于知情同意的吸引。儿童在法律和发育上都不具备给予此类同意的能力。因此，针对儿童的性行为被视为虐待和犯罪。
* 社会保护：社会对这种行为的负面态度源于保护未成年人免受无法弥补的身体和心理伤害的必要性。
This perspective is explicitly rejected across medical, legal, and ethical fields.
Key Facts
* Not a Sexual Orientation: Major mental health organizations (such as the APA) classify pedophilia as a psychological disorder (Paraphilic Disorder), not a sexual orientation like heterosexuality, homosexuality, or bisexuality.
* Harm and Consent: Sexual orientation involves attractions between adults capable of informed consent. Children are legally and developmentally incapable of providing such consent. Consequently, sexual acts involving children are classified as abuse and are criminal offenses.
* Social Protection: The negative societal view of this behavior is rooted in the essential need to protect minors from irreparable physical and psychological harm.
Would you like to discuss the psychological definitions or the legal protections for minors in Ontario?
您想了解更多关于心理学定义或安大略省对未成年人的法律保护吗？
最后编辑:
CFC_GMAIL
土地平旷，屋舍俨然，有良田、美池、桑竹之属。阡陌交通，鸡犬相闻。其中往来种作，男女衣着，悉如外人。
- 注册
- 2015-11-10
- 消息
- 2,493
- 荣誉分数
- 1,303
- 声望点数
- 323
Al说：
你提到的应该是 Mirjam Heine 于 2018 年在 TEDxUniversityofWürzburg 发表的演讲，题目通常被翻译为《为什么我们需要改变对恋童癖的看法》（Why our perception of pedophilia has to change）。
该演讲在当时引发了巨大的社会争议，以下是关于该事件的明确事实：
演讲核心主张
* 医疗化观点：Heine（当时是一名医学生）主张将恋童癖视为一种先天性的性偏好（Sexual Preference），而非一种可以自行选择的恶意行为。
* 鼓励就医：她认为，社会对恋童癖的极端排斥会导致这类人群因恐惧而不敢寻求心理帮助，从而增加了他们最终实施犯罪（虐待儿童）的风险。
* 去标签化：她呼吁给予这一群体一定的“尊重”或理解，目的是让他们能够“出柜”并接受预防性治疗，从而保护儿童。
TED 官方处理与出处
该视频发布后，因其观点极具争议且被认为可能误导公众，遭到了广泛抵制。
* 下架处理：TED 官方随后将该视频从其 YouTube 频道和官网移除。
* 官方声明：TED 在其官方博客中明确表示，该演讲引用的研究容易产生严重误解，并重申 TED 不支持或倡导恋童癖。
* 移除原因：除了内容争议，TED 也提到是应演讲者本人要求（出于安全考虑）将其删除。
* 出处：TED Blog: TEDx talk under review (2018-06-19)
The speech you are referring to is likely the one given by Mirjam Heine at TEDxUniversityofWürzburg in 2018, titled "Why our perception of pedophilia has to change."
This talk caused significant public outcry at the time. Here are the clear facts regarding the event:
Core Arguments of the Speech
* Medical Perspective: Heine, a medical student at the time, argued that pedophilia should be viewed as an innate sexual preference rather than a chosen malicious behavior.
* Encouraging Treatment: She suggested that extreme societal ostracization prevents these individuals from seeking psychiatric help, which may increase the risk of them acting on their urges and committing crimes (child abuse).
* Destigmatization: She called for a level of "respect" or understanding to allow these individuals to "come out" and seek preventative therapy to ultimately protect children.
TED's Official Response and Source
After the video was published, it faced widespread backlash for its controversial stance and potential to mislead the public.
* Removal: TED officially removed the video from its YouTube channel and website.
* Official Statement: TED stated on its blog that the talk cited research in ways open to serious misinterpretation and reaffirmed that TED does not promote or advocate for pedophilia.
* Reason for Deletion: In addition to the content concerns, TED noted the speaker herself requested the removal due to safety concerns.
* Source: TED Blog: TEDx talk under review (2018-06-19)
如果您想了解关于此话题的医学界主流观点（如 DSM-5 的定义），我可以为您详细说明。
Would you like to know more about the mainstream medical consensus (such as DSM-5 definitions) on this topic?
你提到的应该是 Mirjam Heine 于 2018 年在 TEDxUniversityofWürzburg 发表的演讲，题目通常被翻译为《为什么我们需要改变对恋童癖的看法》（Why our perception of pedophilia has to change）。
该演讲在当时引发了巨大的社会争议，以下是关于该事件的明确事实：
演讲核心主张
* 医疗化观点：Heine（当时是一名医学生）主张将恋童癖视为一种先天性的性偏好（Sexual Preference），而非一种可以自行选择的恶意行为。
* 鼓励就医：她认为，社会对恋童癖的极端排斥会导致这类人群因恐惧而不敢寻求心理帮助，从而增加了他们最终实施犯罪（虐待儿童）的风险。
* 去标签化：她呼吁给予这一群体一定的“尊重”或理解，目的是让他们能够“出柜”并接受预防性治疗，从而保护儿童。
TED 官方处理与出处
该视频发布后，因其观点极具争议且被认为可能误导公众，遭到了广泛抵制。
* 下架处理：TED 官方随后将该视频从其 YouTube 频道和官网移除。
* 官方声明：TED 在其官方博客中明确表示，该演讲引用的研究容易产生严重误解，并重申 TED 不支持或倡导恋童癖。
* 移除原因：除了内容争议，TED 也提到是应演讲者本人要求（出于安全考虑）将其删除。
* 出处：TED Blog: TEDx talk under review (2018-06-19)
The speech you are referring to is likely the one given by Mirjam Heine at TEDxUniversityofWürzburg in 2018, titled "Why our perception of pedophilia has to change."
This talk caused significant public outcry at the time. Here are the clear facts regarding the event:
Core Arguments of the Speech
* Medical Perspective: Heine, a medical student at the time, argued that pedophilia should be viewed as an innate sexual preference rather than a chosen malicious behavior.
* Encouraging Treatment: She suggested that extreme societal ostracization prevents these individuals from seeking psychiatric help, which may increase the risk of them acting on their urges and committing crimes (child abuse).
* Destigmatization: She called for a level of "respect" or understanding to allow these individuals to "come out" and seek preventative therapy to ultimately protect children.
TED's Official Response and Source
After the video was published, it faced widespread backlash for its controversial stance and potential to mislead the public.
* Removal: TED officially removed the video from its YouTube channel and website.
* Official Statement: TED stated on its blog that the talk cited research in ways open to serious misinterpretation and reaffirmed that TED does not promote or advocate for pedophilia.
* Reason for Deletion: In addition to the content concerns, TED noted the speaker herself requested the removal due to safety concerns.
* Source: TED Blog: TEDx talk under review (2018-06-19)
如果您想了解关于此话题的医学界主流观点（如 DSM-5 的定义），我可以为您详细说明。
Would you like to know more about the mainstream medical consensus (such as DSM-5 definitions) on this topic?
CFC_GMAIL
土地平旷，屋舍俨然，有良田、美池、桑竹之属。阡陌交通，鸡犬相闻。其中往来种作，男女衣着，悉如外人。
- 注册
- 2015-11-10
- 消息
- 2,493
- 荣誉分数
- 1,303
- 声望点数
- 323
DSM-5 对恋童癖的定义 (Pedophilic Disorder)
根据美国精神医学学会（APA）发布的 《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版 (DSM-5)，事实如下：
* 诊断标准：恋童障碍被定义为一种性偏离障碍 (Paraphilic Disorder)。诊断要求个体对青春期前儿童（通常为 13 岁或以下）有持续、强烈的性兴趣，且这种兴趣导致了个体显著的痛苦、功能障碍，或导致其对儿童采取了实际行动。
* 非“性取向”：在医学和临床心理学中，恋童癖被视为一种精神病理学状况。它不被纳入如异性恋、同性恋或双性恋等正常性取向的范畴，因为后者涉及成年人之间的共识。
* 核心差异：同意能力：医学界强调，性取向的定义前提是双方具备法律和发育上的同意能力。由于儿童无法给予此类同意，针对儿童的吸引在本质上被界定为病理性且具有伤害性的。
Mainstream Medical Consensus (DSM-5)
According to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5) by the American Psychiatric Association (APA):
* Classification: Pedophilic disorder is categorized as a Paraphilic Disorder. Diagnosis requires intense, recurrent sexual arousal toward prepubescent children (usually age 13 or younger) that causes significant distress, functional impairment, or results in the individual acting on these urges.
* Not an "Orientation": In clinical psychology, it is treated as a psychopathological condition. It is not recognized as a sexual orientation (like heterosexuality or homosexuality) because those involve attractions between adults capable of consent.
* Capacity for Consent: The medical consensus dictates that sexual orientations involve individuals with the legal and developmental capacity for informed consent. Since children lack this capacity, these attractions are inherently pathological and harmful.
出处与参考 (Sources)
* American Psychiatric Association: What are Paraphilic Disorders?
* DSM-5-TR (Text Revision): Section on Pedophilic Disorder (302.2).
需要我对比安大略省法律对“同意年龄”的规定吗？
Would you like me to compare this with the legal "Age of Consent" regulations in Ontario?
根据美国精神医学学会（APA）发布的 《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版 (DSM-5)，事实如下：
* 诊断标准：恋童障碍被定义为一种性偏离障碍 (Paraphilic Disorder)。诊断要求个体对青春期前儿童（通常为 13 岁或以下）有持续、强烈的性兴趣，且这种兴趣导致了个体显著的痛苦、功能障碍，或导致其对儿童采取了实际行动。
* 非“性取向”：在医学和临床心理学中，恋童癖被视为一种精神病理学状况。它不被纳入如异性恋、同性恋或双性恋等正常性取向的范畴，因为后者涉及成年人之间的共识。
* 核心差异：同意能力：医学界强调，性取向的定义前提是双方具备法律和发育上的同意能力。由于儿童无法给予此类同意，针对儿童的吸引在本质上被界定为病理性且具有伤害性的。
Mainstream Medical Consensus (DSM-5)
According to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5) by the American Psychiatric Association (APA):
* Classification: Pedophilic disorder is categorized as a Paraphilic Disorder. Diagnosis requires intense, recurrent sexual arousal toward prepubescent children (usually age 13 or younger) that causes significant distress, functional impairment, or results in the individual acting on these urges.
* Not an "Orientation": In clinical psychology, it is treated as a psychopathological condition. It is not recognized as a sexual orientation (like heterosexuality or homosexuality) because those involve attractions between adults capable of consent.
* Capacity for Consent: The medical consensus dictates that sexual orientations involve individuals with the legal and developmental capacity for informed consent. Since children lack this capacity, these attractions are inherently pathological and harmful.
出处与参考 (Sources)
* American Psychiatric Association: What are Paraphilic Disorders?
* DSM-5-TR (Text Revision): Section on Pedophilic Disorder (302.2).
需要我对比安大略省法律对“同意年龄”的规定吗？
Would you like me to compare this with the legal "Age of Consent" regulations in Ontario?
CFC_GMAIL
土地平旷，屋舍俨然，有良田、美池、桑竹之属。阡陌交通，鸡犬相闻。其中往来种作，男女衣着，悉如外人。
- 注册
- 2015-11-10
- 消息
- 2,493
- 荣誉分数
- 1,303
- 声望点数
- 323
以下是关于安大略省（及加拿大全国）法律中“同意年龄”的核查事实：
加拿大法律中的同意年龄 (Age of Consent in Canada)
在加拿大，《刑法典》（Criminal Code of Canada）统一规定了性行为的法律年龄，各省（包括安大略省）均执行此联邦标准。
* 法定年龄 (The General Age)：自 2008 年起，加拿大的法定同意年龄为 16 岁。在此年龄以下，法律认为儿童不具备给予性行为合法同意的能力。
* 年龄差例外 (Close-in-age Exemptions)：为了不将青少年之间自愿的实验行为罪恶化，法律允许特定的年龄差：
* 12 或 13 岁的未成年人可以与比自己大不超过 2 岁的人发生行为。
* 14 或 15 岁的未成年人可以与比自己大不超过 5 岁的人发生行为。
* 信任/权威关系 (Position of Trust or Authority)：如果对方处于信任、权威或依赖关系中（如老师、教练、雇主），则同意年龄提高至 18 岁。
* 剥削与恋童癖 (Exploitation)：法律严禁任何针对未成年人的性剥削。涉及恋童癖背景的行为通常会被归类为“性侵犯”（Sexual Assault）或“性干预”（Sexual Interference）。
Age of Consent in Canada (Ontario)
In Canada, the Criminal Code (a federal law) dictates the legal age for sexual activity, which applies uniformly across all provinces, including Ontario.
* General Age: Since 2008, the age of consent in Canada is 16 years old. Below this age, children are legally deemed incapable of consenting to sexual activity.
* Close-in-age Exemptions: To avoid criminalizing consensual behavior between peers, there are specific exceptions:
* 12 or 13-year-olds can consent to activity with someone less than 2 years older.
* 14 or 15-year-olds can consent to activity with someone less than 5 years older.
* Position of Trust: The age of consent is raised to 18 years old if the older person is in a position of trust, authority, or dependency (e.g., teachers, coaches).
* Exploitation: Any sexual activity involving a minor that is deemed exploitative is illegal. Acts stemming from pedophilic interests are prosecuted under "Sexual Interference" or "Sexual Assault."
出处与参考 (Sources)
* Department of Justice Canada: Age of Consent to Sexual Activity (Full Link: https://www.justice.gc.ca/eng/rp-pr/other-autre/clp/faq.html)
* Criminal Code of Canada: Section 150.1 (Full Link: Criminal Code)
您需要我为您整理一份关于在安大略省如何举报此类潜在犯罪或寻求青少年保护资源的清单吗？
Would you like me to compile a list of resources for reporting potential crimes or accessing youth protection services in Ontario?
加拿大法律中的同意年龄 (Age of Consent in Canada)
在加拿大，《刑法典》（Criminal Code of Canada）统一规定了性行为的法律年龄，各省（包括安大略省）均执行此联邦标准。
* 法定年龄 (The General Age)：自 2008 年起，加拿大的法定同意年龄为 16 岁。在此年龄以下，法律认为儿童不具备给予性行为合法同意的能力。
* 年龄差例外 (Close-in-age Exemptions)：为了不将青少年之间自愿的实验行为罪恶化，法律允许特定的年龄差：
* 12 或 13 岁的未成年人可以与比自己大不超过 2 岁的人发生行为。
* 14 或 15 岁的未成年人可以与比自己大不超过 5 岁的人发生行为。
* 信任/权威关系 (Position of Trust or Authority)：如果对方处于信任、权威或依赖关系中（如老师、教练、雇主），则同意年龄提高至 18 岁。
* 剥削与恋童癖 (Exploitation)：法律严禁任何针对未成年人的性剥削。涉及恋童癖背景的行为通常会被归类为“性侵犯”（Sexual Assault）或“性干预”（Sexual Interference）。
Age of Consent in Canada (Ontario)
In Canada, the Criminal Code (a federal law) dictates the legal age for sexual activity, which applies uniformly across all provinces, including Ontario.
* General Age: Since 2008, the age of consent in Canada is 16 years old. Below this age, children are legally deemed incapable of consenting to sexual activity.
* Close-in-age Exemptions: To avoid criminalizing consensual behavior between peers, there are specific exceptions:
* 12 or 13-year-olds can consent to activity with someone less than 2 years older.
* 14 or 15-year-olds can consent to activity with someone less than 5 years older.
* Position of Trust: The age of consent is raised to 18 years old if the older person is in a position of trust, authority, or dependency (e.g., teachers, coaches).
* Exploitation: Any sexual activity involving a minor that is deemed exploitative is illegal. Acts stemming from pedophilic interests are prosecuted under "Sexual Interference" or "Sexual Assault."
出处与参考 (Sources)
* Department of Justice Canada: Age of Consent to Sexual Activity (Full Link: https://www.justice.gc.ca/eng/rp-pr/other-autre/clp/faq.html)
* Criminal Code of Canada: Section 150.1 (Full Link: Criminal Code)
您需要我为您整理一份关于在安大略省如何举报此类潜在犯罪或寻求青少年保护资源的清单吗？
Would you like me to compile a list of resources for reporting potential crimes or accessing youth protection services in Ontario?
CFC_GMAIL
土地平旷，屋舍俨然，有良田、美池、桑竹之属。阡陌交通，鸡犬相闻。其中往来种作，男女衣着，悉如外人。
- 注册
- 2015-11-10
- 消息
- 2,493
- 荣誉分数
- 1,303
- 声望点数
- 323
结论：这个推是恶意污蔑造谣拉仇恨。
推文中编造的严重错误的观点根本不是视频中的。
视频是一位医学生在TED发表演讲，内容是
治疗"恋童癖”这种心理疾病。
1、患有这种心理疾病的人，并不一定会付诸行为导致犯罪。2、公众对于这种疾病患者的歧视、蔑视、敌视，会导致患者严重的病耻感。
3、患者不敢让别人知道自己的隐疾，也就不会得到医治。
4、由于病情没有医治，恶化后最终会导致患者犯罪，侵害儿童。
5、医学生提议公众减少对这种疾病患者的歧视敌意，对于没有犯罪的患者要尊重、接纳。
6、公众态度的正面转变，可以帮助患者鼓足勇气承认这种疾病、并积极治疗这种疾病。
7、公众态度的正面转变，可以减少犯罪、保护儿童。
不要把"患者"当"罪犯"
帮助患者治疗疾病
防止患者变成罪犯
最后编辑:
CFC_GMAIL
土地平旷，屋舍俨然，有良田、美池、桑竹之属。阡陌交通，鸡犬相闻。其中往来种作，男女衣着，悉如外人。
- 注册
- 2015-11-10
- 消息
- 2,493
- 荣誉分数
- 1,303
- 声望点数
- 323
其实这个呼吁并不是什么标新立异，或者离经叛道的观点。
医学界本来就一直都在呼吁公众：
1、学习心理学医学知识，
2、扶助患者医治疾病追求健康。
Generally speaking：1、公众普遍缺乏关于心理学、精神病学、药理学的知识。（不限于"恋童癖”这种精神疾病）
2、很多人不仅无知，还自以为是，固执地抱持错误的观点、成见，否定科学知识，攻击污蔑专业意见。
3、公众的无知偏见，导致他们对心理障碍精神疾病患者的误解、歧视、蔑视、仇恨。
4、患者对于心理障碍精神疾病有强烈的病耻感。
5、患者不愿承认自己的病情，讳疾忌医。
6、许多疾病本来是可以有效地医治，控制病情发展，减轻症状，减少重发。
7、作为患者，他们常常无力靠自己坚持长期治疗。周围人的帮助、支持、鼓励是必不可少的。
8、但是由于公众的无知偏见，患者不但得不到帮助支持鼓励，还会遭到歧视、蔑视、仇恨、误解、阻碍，导致患者的病情不但无法改善，反而每况愈下。
9、最后患者精神崩溃大爆发，造成严重悲剧。
10、公众对患者的歧视、仇视加剧。很多人打死都不肯反思自己的责任。全是别人错。闭眼乱喷就好，谁错我都不会错。
最后编辑:
