I think Canadian Charter instead of Christian Faith rules Canada. It is quite different from USA. Although Christian population takes up most of Canadians, they should still obey Charter of Freedom, Equality and Human Rights. Anyway, not all Christian people think so, especially in young generations.:blink:
精华 看了 PARKDALE 关于同性恋婚姻的投票帖,联想到...
- 主题发起人 ★Surprise★
- 开始时间
I think Canadian Charter instead of Christian Faith rules Canada. It is quite different from USA. Although Christian population takes up most of Canadians, they should still obey Charter of Freedom, Equality and Human Rights. Anyway, not all Christian people think so, especially in young generations.:blink:
★Surprise★
新手上路
- 注册
- 2004-08-25
- 消息
- 853
- 荣誉分数
- 0
- 声望点数
- 0
既然你这么说,我觉得我没有任何必要再回复你了,大家也看清楚了FISHER2004是怎样定义同性恋的.
请你注意你的措辞,你这样言行非常的不尊重同志人群,你在侵犯人权知道吗?同志人群可以依据加拿大法律告你你知道吗?
请你多看些资料吧. 我的帖子里怎么会有这种言论出现的...
哎...
oread
新手上路
- 注册
- 2002-01-24
- 消息
- 20,275
- 荣誉分数
- 16
- 声望点数
- 0
You raised an interesting point!
Although religion has been separated from state for quite some time, when it comes to what's called "foundational values", the religion still dictates quite a large percentage of the Canadian population.
The Canadian Charter of Human Rights is imposed by the state, but it has no jurisdiction on religious belief. However what is the issue at hand, really? Gay marriage? No, I think that the issue at hand is actually: "Should the consititution supercede religion?" At least, that's many Canadians are afraid of: traditional, religious values are disappearing, instead, the country is more and more secular. Is this what the country wants? The country that is founded on Christian values?
Although religion has been separated from state for quite some time, when it comes to what's called "foundational values", the religion still dictates quite a large percentage of the Canadian population.
The Canadian Charter of Human Rights is imposed by the state, but it has no jurisdiction on religious belief. However what is the issue at hand, really? Gay marriage? No, I think that the issue at hand is actually: "Should the consititution supercede religion?" At least, that's many Canadians are afraid of: traditional, religious values are disappearing, instead, the country is more and more secular. Is this what the country wants? The country that is founded on Christian values?
Broken Arrow
新手上路
- 注册
- 2002-10-30
- 消息
- 261
- 荣誉分数
- 0
- 声望点数
- 0
By the same token, can I ask "Should the religion supercede constitution?" When in conflict, I prefer constitution over religion everyday.
The opposite of Christian is not secular, it could be other religion. Afterall, it is a country of multi-culture. Personally I don't feel Christian is that much superior over others. In this case it seems to go secular as most of religion are against it I guess.
A country founded based on Christian does not have to be Christian forever, doesn't it? Many Christian countries around the world are transformed from non-Christian to Christian, who to say they will not transform to something else?
The opposite of Christian is not secular, it could be other religion. Afterall, it is a country of multi-culture. Personally I don't feel Christian is that much superior over others. In this case it seems to go secular as most of religion are against it I guess.
A country founded based on Christian does not have to be Christian forever, doesn't it? Many Christian countries around the world are transformed from non-Christian to Christian, who to say they will not transform to something else?
In my opinion, the constitution must supercede religion, which can guarantee real individual freedom of religion selection, and guarantee real individual equity and human rights. Otherwise, you could trace back to long history and find tons of negative examples, many of which are from Christrian History.
As for the "more secular issue", I don't think so high divorce date is good for family and society. Keeping a family secular is nothing to do with the family structure, however, mutual true love is the key no matter what kind of family structure is.
★Surprise★
新手上路
- 注册
- 2004-08-25
- 消息
- 853
- 荣誉分数
- 0
- 声望点数
- 0
大家继续讨论...
- 注册
- 2004-07-25
- 消息
- 33,823
- 荣誉分数
- 375
- 声望点数
- 243
怎么？我说的不对吗？
你说过电影中有同性恋床戏的，对不对？
你暗示过同异性恋也是同性恋，对不对？
你说过同性恋婚姻或结合能减少爱滋病，对不对？
即如此，我也没有必要再跟你的贴。就此打住。
- 注册
- 2004-07-25
- 消息
- 33,823
- 荣誉分数
- 375
- 声望点数
- 243
Are you a hat seller? Keep the hat for yourself, ok?
Do you understand Chinese? Where is "discrimination " or "hatred" in my words?
I know Human Rights is your big selling point. Just keep selling. I am not against it either. By the way, do you know what the free speech is?
oread
新手上路
- 注册
- 2002-01-24
- 消息
- 20,275
- 荣誉分数
- 16
- 声望点数
- 0
It's easier said than done. What would you feel if China overturns the entire Confucius value system?
I take that you are not Christian, neither am I, so this is not really a big issue for me. However you have to understand how Christians feel, and recognize that this whole country is founded on Christian values. Understand and respect that.
You think that the constitution should be the ultimate deciding factor, OK, then let me take this discussion a little further: what if the constitution is in direct conflict with what you believe? In other words, what if the constitution touches on issues that you consider your core moral values? Issues like abortion or organ/human cloning? It's not as easy to decide as this one, is it?
Personally I think these "foundational issues" are best left to the Supreme Court to decide, otherwise we'll never hear the end of it. As of now, I still have faith in the constitution, but I'm less certain as where it is going to take us.
I take that you are not Christian, neither am I, so this is not really a big issue for me. However you have to understand how Christians feel, and recognize that this whole country is founded on Christian values. Understand and respect that.
You think that the constitution should be the ultimate deciding factor, OK, then let me take this discussion a little further: what if the constitution is in direct conflict with what you believe? In other words, what if the constitution touches on issues that you consider your core moral values? Issues like abortion or organ/human cloning? It's not as easy to decide as this one, is it?
Personally I think these "foundational issues" are best left to the Supreme Court to decide, otherwise we'll never hear the end of it. As of now, I still have faith in the constitution, but I'm less certain as where it is going to take us.
★Surprise★
新手上路
- 注册
- 2004-08-25
- 消息
- 853
- 荣誉分数
- 0
- 声望点数
- 0
希望版主删除一些肤浅,恶毒,诋毁性的言论.
也请某些人在辩驳之前多看看书读读资料
不要自己什么都不懂,还在这里主观地胡说一气, 狂汗中...
也请某些人在辩驳之前多看看书读读资料
不要自己什么都不懂,还在这里主观地胡说一气, 狂汗中...
