posting

[求公理]

On Aug 27 through 26, 2005, I published comments relating to Zheng Anderson, which I should not have published.

I now understand that Ms. Anderson did have staff working at her office when she was in China between March 9 and April 26, 2005 and my calls were returned.

I now understand from Ms. Anderson that no client of hers has ever complained to the Law Society of Upper Canada.

I now understand that Ms. Anderson was not advertising as of August 2, 2005. Ms. Anderson never said she did not advertise at any time.

Ms. Anderson did go to court with me. She did negotiate with the opposite party. She did do work for me. I was dissatisfied with Ms. Anderson’s services but cannot say I was “improperly treated”

Ms. Anderson left the country after the order was issued and entered.

 

[如假包换的马甲]

ha, now you know what a lawyer is make of......wording is very important.

this posting must be part of the deal of your lost sue

 

[小番茄]

You have maligned a good lawyer.
Now the truth is there....

 

[redhouse1]

最初由 小番茄 发布
You have maligned a good lawyer.
Now the truth is there....

what a good lawyer means?

Because her client appologized ?

She did the job didn't mean she did the job well,

the truth is: She is a lawyer, may or may not be a good lawyer

 

[ccc]

We all have our own jusdgement, anyways. We read postings from both of them and we all could come to a better understanding or conclusions.

After all, what are lawyers and politicians, etc.?

 

[adware]

someboy is shouting " A23 Hole"

 

[小番茄]

最初由 redhouse1 发布


what a good lawyer means?

Because her client appologized ?

She did the job didn't mean she did the job well,

the truth is: She is a lawyer, may or may not be a good lawyer

1. The truth is, you do not know what you are talking about. Do you know what this case is about? It is a case where the client libelled the lawyer.Do you know what libel and it's implications are?

2. I would say her client stopped short of an apology.

3. The libel suit obviously would be based on the premise that the lawyer did, in fact, do the job well.

4. The lawyer in question has a reputation as a good lawyer. Certainly from time to time, particular individuals may be unhappy about a service provided by a particular lawyer. It does not neccessarily follow that the lawyer is not a good one.

Frankly I see no merit to your opinions: they seem to lack substance.

 

[redhouse1]

最初由 小番茄 发布


1. The truth is, you do not know what you are talking about. Do you know what this case is about? It is a case where the client libelled the lawyer.Do you know what libel and it's implications are?

2. I would say her client stopped short of an apology.

3. The libel suit obviously would be based on the premise that the lawyer did, in fact, do the job well.

4. The lawyer in question has a reputation as a good lawyer. Certainly from time to time, particular individuals may be unhappy about a service provided by a particular lawyer. It does not neccessarily follow that the lawyer is not a good one.

Frankly I see no merit to your opinions: they seem to lack substance.

I didn't put any conclusion on whether she is a good or bad lawyer.

But you, concluded she is a good lawyer by this posting!!!

Either you are simple or
pretend to be simple or
you did on purpose and tell a liar or
you speak on behalf of the lawyer without substance or
you are the lawyer itself.

 

[winterfire]

最初由 redhouse1 发布


I didn't put any conclusion on whether she is a good or bad lawyer.

But you, concluded she is a good lawyer by this posting!!!

Either you are simple or
pretend to be simple or
you did on purpose and tell a liar or
you speak on behalf of the lawyer without substance or
you are the lawyer itself.

I am quiet surprise why the lawyer's client made this disgraced apology. do you think she should be under the some kind of pressure? she had to do!!! beacuse some lawyers always have powerfull to make wrong thing to right even true was wrong, isn't it?
I'm very disapoint, what the hell is the world?
what's the true? where is true?

 

[winterfire]

最初由 求公理 发布
On Aug 27 through 26, 2005, I published comments relating to Zheng Anderson, which I should not have published.

I now understand that Ms. Anderson did have staff working at her office when she was in China between March 9 and April 26, 2005 and my calls were returned.

I now understand from Ms. Anderson that no client of hers has ever complained to the Law Society of Upper Canada.

I now understand that Ms. Anderson was not advertising as of August 2, 2005. Ms. Anderson never said she did not advertise at any time.

Ms. Anderson did go to court with me. She did negotiate with the opposite party. She did do work for me. I was dissatisfied with Ms. Anderson’s services but cannot say I was “improperly treated”

Ms. Anderson left the country after the order was issued and entered.

***It is obviously a part of the deal that the poor loser had to take under a possible big pressure.
***Is a client able to say:"from Ms. Anderson that no client of hers has ever complained to the Law Society of Upper Canada.".Obviousily,this guy was forced to tell a lie.
***Do you guys think Ms. Anderson is a eligible lawyer if the pressure is coming from her? I'll never hire this kind lawyer!

 

[Jeff]

Re: Re: posting

Why? I think this is the reason:
http://www.comefromchina.com/newbbs/showthread.php?s=&threadid=403849

She made untruth statement in public.

 

[opfm]

Re: Re: posting

最初由 winterfire 发布


***It is obviously a part of the deal that the poor loser had to take under a possible big pressure.
***Is a client able to say:"from Ms. Anderson that no client of hers has ever complained to the Law Society of Upper Canada"?
Obviousily,this guy was forced to tell a lie.
***Do you guys think Ms. Anderson is a eligible lawyer if the pressure is coming from her? I'll never hire this kind lawyer!

YES!

 

[如假包换的马甲]

Re: Re: posting

最初由 winterfire 发布


***It is obviously a part of the deal that the poor loser had to take under a possible big pressure.
***Is a client able to say:"from Ms. Anderson that no client of hers has ever complained to the Law Society of Upper Canada.".Obviousily,this guy was forced to tell a lie.
***Do you guys think Ms. Anderson is a eligible lawyer if the pressure is coming from her? I'll never hire this kind lawyer!

You are talking senseless

Utter stupidity

 

[6350leaf]

最初由 求公理 发布
On Aug 27 through 26, 2005, I published comments relating to Zheng Anderson, which I should not have published.

I now understand that Ms. Anderson did have staff working at her office when she was in China between March 9 and April 26, 2005 and my calls were returned.

I now understand from Ms. Anderson that no client of hers has ever complained to the Law Society of Upper Canada.

I now understand that Ms. Anderson was not advertising as of August 2, 2005. Ms. Anderson never said she did not advertise at any time.

Ms. Anderson did go to court with me. She did negotiate with the opposite party. She did do work for me. I was dissatisfied with Ms. Anderson’s services but cannot say I was “improperly treated”

Ms. Anderson left the country after the order was issued and entered.

As a previous client of Ms. Anderson, I can attest to the fact that her legal services are professional and first-rate. I believe that the apology posted here on this web-site, which retracted previous statements made against Ms Anderson, is an acknowlegement of the high quality legal services that Ms. Anderson has provided.

 

[白吃米饭]

何着说了一堆骗人的话， 骗取了一堆同情。还假惺惺，可怜惜惜的用英文说了一堆好似不情愿的话来骗得通情啊！！无耻无耻！！！！！！