言论自由是不是论坛的底线？

[oread]

言论自由是不是论坛的底线？

 

[海子]

xjj, you made a wrong vote in that we could choice both..

---
for other kind of bbs ,i dont care about whether there is a limit or not.

but for a politics&history bbs. the answer is obvious!

 

[oread]

:blowzy:
怎么改啊?

 

[忙里偷闲]

最初由 小贱贱 发布
言论自由是不是论坛的底线？

不明白，能讲得更详细点吗？

 

[oread]

Do you think the right to freely express your opinions in this forum is the bottom line? Bottom line as I understand means that it is the least that we could do.

One thing I left out in this vote is that the freedom of expression should still be bounded within the guidelines of this forum, but I thought this was understood: any games must have rules. However a bottom line is a bottom line, no matter how you interpret it.

Is this clear enough?

 

[panzer]

最初由 小贱贱 发布
Do you think the right to freely express your opinions in this forum is the bottom line? Bottom line as I understand means that it is the least that we could do.

One thing I left out in this vote is that the freedom of expression should still be bounded within the guidelines of this forum, but I thought this was understood: any games must have rules. However a bottom line is a bottom line, no matter how you interpret it.

Is this clear enough?

I really appreciate your efforts, however, I'm now concerned that the direction you're pushing for may not help this website as a whole due to certain unspecified but generally understood justifications. Sigh!

 

[oread]

But I don't understand those so called "justifications"!
Should there be any "justifications" at all?
Should we compromise the basic values that this country is founded upon to support these "unspecified but generally understood justifications"???

Once again, a bottom line is the least we could do, like the air we breath or the right to live. Freedom of expression is such bottom line. I am pleased to see that over 60% of people voted for the freedom of expression. Maybe there is hope after all.

 

[panzer]

最初由 小贱贱 发布
But I don't understand those so called "justifications"!
Should there be any "justifications" at all?
Should we compromise the basic values that this country is founded upon to support these "unspecified but generally understood justifications"???

Once again, a bottom line is the least we could do, like the air we breath or the right to live. Freedom of expression is such bottom line. I am pleased to see that over 60% of people voted for the freedom of expression. Maybe there is hope after all.

向阁下致敬，虽是女流但具秋瑾之风，赞成您的建议，已经投票！

 

[klin]

在我看来，论坛的底线就是所在国的法律。凡是加国法律禁止的言论和行为，都不允许。仔细阅读各位的isp条例，粗话和诽谤已经包括在内。除此之外，我看不到有什么别的需要禁止的。

 

[假道学]

最初由 klin 发布
在我看来，论坛的底线就是所在国的法律。凡是加国法律禁止的言论和行为，都不允许。仔细阅读各位的isp条例，粗话和诽谤已经包括在内。除此之外，我看不到有什么别的需要禁止的。

赞同Klin的观点。
Klin不愧为版主，讲出的道理让人服!

论坛是有底线的，这就是所在国的法律。法律所禁止的言论，包括宣扬种族歧视，宣扬群体仇恨，对他人进行人身攻击，揭露他人隐私等，都至少是论坛中言论的底线.

 

[oread]

请注意标题: 言论自由是不是论坛的底线?
举个极端的例子: 在加拿大, 就是你宣扬纳粹主义也不能因此而治罪. 因为法律保证言论的自由.
美国政府监视言论极端分子团体由来已久, 可是不能为他们的观点而起诉就是因为那个最根本的FIRST AMENDEMENT - FREEDOM OF SPEECH.
言论自由归根结底就是人说话的权利. 这和人生存的权利一样重要.

 

[辟邪]

最初由 小贱贱 发布
请注意标题: 言论自由是不是论坛的底线?
举个极端的例子: 在加拿大, 就是你宣扬纳粹主义也不能因此而治罪. 因为法律保证言论的自由.
美国政府监视言论极端分子团体由来已久, 可是不能为他们的观点而起诉就是因为那个最根本的FIRST AMENDEMENT - FREEDOM OF SPEECH.
言论自由归根结底就是人说话的权利. 这和人生存的权利一样重要.

现在的美国已经不是这么回事了

 

[oread]

不过一届白痴政府。美国会为此付出代价的。

 

[hxp417]

I love 小贱贱 (Sage) !!

 

[panzer]

最初由 hxp417 发布
I love 小贱贱 (Sage) !!

So do I!