歧视性的绿卡
- 主题发起人 visitor
- 开始时间
I have a different view on this example, so I'd like to extend your example a little bit further.最初由 我没有.com 发布
举个例子，一个2个bedroom的房子，最多住四个人左右，超过了，大家之间必然会产生不少的矛盾，且渐渐恶化，所以就得控制人口，不能再继续让其他人进入了。如何控制呢？就得区别有交房租的和没交房租的。
同样的道理，在加拿大学习的留学生，所交纳的费用也是比当地居民高很多的。简而言之，追求绝对的公平是不可能的，也是不现实的。
暂住证有其弊端的一面，但请不要只看见弊端的一面而一叶障目了。
至于宪法如何如何，我有点法盲，我关心的只是实际效果如何了。
另外，这东西是“北京市公安局负责人日前透露”，所以我是不大相信的。
A family has a two bed-room house with four children, let's assume all the children contribute to the construction of the house. Later, 3 of them left the house for whatever reasons (compelled, maybe). After some years, the outside three children want to return their original house, but the one who lives there told his/her brothers/sisters, "No, you cannot live here any more because I have a big family, there is no place", if you are one of the 3 children, what do you think ?
I always believe Chinese peasants have contributed too much to the country to a extend that they are actually deprived severely by the country machine. I am not from countryside, but I did have some classmates (in my junior middle school) who came from the countryside. To be honest, whenever I think of the hardship they endured, I feel definitely sorry. You can never imagine what they eat everyday and their cloths. It is really a pain to reflect those days (early 80s). What can I say ....?
After some years, the outside three children want to return their original house, but the one who lives there told his/her brothers/sisters, "No, you cannot live here any more because I have a big family, there is no place", if you are one of the 3 children, what do you think ?
这就是矛盾了。你觉得这么多的人住在这个一个小屋子里会没矛盾吗？
我也同情民工的艰苦生活，但感情不能替代一切，更多的民工拥入同一个城市，民工在这个城市里的生活水平只会更差。
小恩小惠并不是对民工最大的同情。
Admit it or not, in China, we have a systematic discrimination policy aginst no-city-dwellers, which is absolutely wrong.
I think if you give fair and honest policies to the countryside areas (note: I am not asking for preferential policies, just fair and equivalent policies), the situation will be totally different. I know there will be lots of conflicts in a crowded space, but my point is: You cannot deprive one's RIGHTS because of conflicts. In my previous example, why should not the inside child get out of the house or compensate for the other three children ? In terms of rights, they are all EQUAL, aren't they ?
I think if you give fair and honest policies to the countryside areas (note: I am not asking for preferential policies, just fair and equivalent policies), the situation will be totally different. I know there will be lots of conflicts in a crowded space, but my point is: You cannot deprive one's RIGHTS because of conflicts. In my previous example, why should not the inside child get out of the house or compensate for the other three children ? In terms of rights, they are all EQUAL, aren't they ?
曾经是
知名会员
- 注册
- 2002-01-27
- 消息
- 922
- 荣誉分数
- 0
- 声望点数
- 126
Why bill gates is rich? He worked for it.
Believe me, people from country side are as smart as you and me. Giving them fair chance, they can build up "for loops" much quicker than many of us here.
We are extremely lucky to be living at better places, but being lucky is not the excuse for ignoring those who are not that lucky.
