CRA的IT部门要招多少人？

[老闹子]

我那就是作为“B组的一员”来提的建议。

你的意思是作为“B组的一员”， 只考虑B组的事， 不用考虑A组的事？

我的理解，并不是你不能考虑A组的事，而是你绝对不能忽略B组的事。从组长角度来看，他需要知道B组的进展才能做决定。而你是B组的，只有你能提供B的项目进展这个信息，这事情是你的职责，其他事情你可管可不管。
只供参考。

 

[闲得慌]

我的理解，并不是你不能考虑A组的事，而是你绝对不能忽略B组的事。从组长角度来看，他需要知道B组的进展才能做决定。而你是B组的，只有你能提供B的项目进展这个信息，这事情是你的职责，其他事情你可管可不管。
只供参考。

B组的项目进展在题中是已知的：
“B组的项目离到期日期还远，现在还看不出有不能按时完成任务的可能。”

 

[whiteyun]

没完没了。

 

[老闹子]

B组的项目进展在题中是已知的：
“B组的项目离到期日期还远，现在还看不出有不能按时完成任务的可能。”

组长需要的信息，远比这些要多得多。比如，抽出一两个人，会对B的项目有什么影响？如果有影响，能否以后挽回？什么时候能够抽出人手？什么样的人可以从B项目抽出来？能够抽出来多久？什么时候必须要多少人回来做B项目？等等。这些信息，只有而且必须B组的成员来提供。

还是那句话，我瞎猜的，仅供参考。

 

[CanChn]

一个team里有2个group, say A and B.

A 组的项目马上要到期了， 但肯定不能按时完成任务。 B组的项目离到期日期还远，现在还看不出有不能按时完成任务的可能。

如果你是B组的一员， 你建议一下， 你该怎么办？

To answer the question,
1, as a member of group B, I should first focus my attention on my job in group B
2, If my T/L asked my suggestion for helping group A, I would ask a question why group A could not meet their deadline before I could give a solution.
For example, if group A need more people to finish its project, group B may temporarily have some one work for group A if it does not affect group B
however, if group A has some technical difficulties, then it does not matter how many people working in the group. In this case, the team should look for other resources to get one who can fix the technical problem
So, the answer I think is open, and the worst answer is to directly give a solution without analytical thinking.

 

[ccc]

To answer the question,
1, as a member of group B, I should first focus my attention on my job in group B
2, If my T/L asked my suggestion for helping group A, I would ask a question why group A could not meet their deadline before I could give a solution.
For example, if group A need more people to finish its project, group B may temporarily have some one work for group A if it does not affect group B
however, if group A has some technical difficulties, then it does not matter how many people working in the group. In this case, the team should look for other resources to get one who can fix the technical problem
So, the answer I think is open, and the worst answer is to directly give a solution without analytical thinking.

So far, this makes the most sense.