二选一

我觉得acura的内室材料普遍比较好,做工比较精致,有点类似于欧洲车的内室,celica的内室实在不敢恭维,感觉就是烂塑料堆在一起,还装了个 detachable CD car deck,记得是panasonic的,我到现在也不明白 whats the point they did that? RSX type S用的是BOSE音响,真的很专业,如果仔细观察,像audi,benz,nissan的z350,还有porsche的车都用的是这个牌子,RSX差不多是用这个牌子音响系统的最低价位的一款车了
总之相比celica,各方面我都推举RSX
 
不咿?挂稍微有?硬…… [/B]

哈哈,硬悬挂好啊,高速转弯,快速左右并线超车的时候,会很有信心。
 
最初由 CowBoy 发布
我觉得acura的内室材料普遍比较好,做工比较精致,有点类似于欧洲车的内室,celica的内室实在不敢恭维,感觉就是烂塑料堆在一起,还装了个 detachable CD car deck,记得是panasonic的,我到现在也不明白 whats the point they did that? RSX type S用的是BOSE音响,真的很专业,如果仔细观察,像audi,benz,nissan的z350,还有porsche的车都用的是这个牌子,RSX差不多是用这个牌子音响系统的最低价位的一款车了
总之相比celica,各方面我都推举RSX

:cool:
 
最初由 CowBoy 发布
我觉得acura的内室材料普遍比较好,做工比较精致,有点类似于欧洲车的内室,celica的内室实在不敢恭维,感觉就是烂塑料堆在一起,

兄弟啥叫感觉就是烂塑料堆在一起?你的车里是用啥堆的,怎么这么牛?

最初由 CowBoy 发布
还装了个 detachable CD car deck,记得是panasonic的,我到现在也不明白 whats the point they did that?

不明白?There are just some things you will never learn!

And that's what you called GARBAGE? Are you out of your mind?
 
最初由 CowBoy 发布
我觉得acura的内室材料普遍比较好,做工比较精致,有点类似于欧洲车的内室,celica的内室实在不敢恭维,感觉就是烂塑料堆在一起,还装了个 detachable CD car deck,记得是panasonic的,我到现在也不明白 whats the point they did that? RSX type S用的是BOSE音响,真的很专业,如果仔细观察,像audi,benz,nissan的z350,还有porsche的车都用的是这个牌子,RSX差不多是用这个牌子音响系统的最低价位的一款车了
总之相比celica,各方面我都推举RSX

大哥阿~~你的车里不是塑料的是全金属阿???你是开坦克的吧?!
真牛啊!!:lol2:
 
我有一辆celica GT。感觉车的发动机有些软,起步不是很快,马力也没有rsx强,但是车快不快要看谁来开,而且rsx比较费油,发动机噪音也比较大。内饰我觉得差不多。外型CELICA做的很经典了。不过CELICA最大缺点是坐在里面视线不好,换道回头的时候看后面有些费劲。所以总的来说应该RSX好些吧,当然也体现在价格上,好象差了3000左右。看你喜欢什么样的了。
 
最初由 lover-f 发布


兄弟啥叫感觉就是烂塑料堆在一起?你的车里是用啥堆的,怎么这么牛?



不明白?There are just some things you will never learn!

And that's what you called GARBAGE? Are you out of your mind?
也许是今年的celica改型,这点我对celica的狂热者道歉,但我敢确定去年的GTS使用的panasonic detachable car deck,今年不知是否沿用,但不知为何转向了infinty
总之,我只是个人观点比较下两款车,作了个似乎不恰当的比喻而已,so plz dont reacting too passionately, 无心冒犯celica fansss~ sorry~
 
03款的似乎一样
03celica_6.jpg
 
Well it's ok for you to prefer one car over another, as I prefer a lot of cars over celica too. But the point is don't diss others even if you don't like it. And you made couple of mistakes there, first the pic you posted for rsx is Type-s I believe, which is the top level of rsx, then I think you should post a celica GTS pic, not the GT(or SE) with the fabric seats, to make the comparison. Second the standard audio system on GTS is Premium JBL AM/FM Cassette CD(8 Speakers in 6 Locations), not the panasonic you mentioned before. So my point is that I like celica, and at the mean time I like RSX a lot too, but you don't have to assault on one to appraise the others.

Love or Respect instead of love or hate is the key.
 
I know this year is JBL,but last year thy got panasonic for sure,u can even see panasonic label on the car~
and check this out,isnt it GT-S???
http://www.canadiandriver.com/articles/ly/03celica_gts.htm
top model RSX has the same interior as premium and even the touring model,whats the different? just type S gots a BOSE label on its car deck~
 
最初由 CowBoy 发布
I know this year is JBL,but last year thy got panasonic for sure,u can even see panasonic label on the car~
and check this out,isnt it GT-S???
http://www.canadiandriver.com/articles/ly/03celica_gts.htm
top model RSX has the same interior as premium and even the touring model,whats the different? just type S gots a BOSE label on its car deck~

OK I'm tired of this. Why don't you go to Toyota.ca and copy pics from there? See what's the standard specs of the GTS. It got a leather seating not the one you posted with fabric seats, OK?
And the base model and premium edition of RSX don't have BOSE audio system, they are just not BOSE doesn't matter if you put a label on it or not. And the base model doesn't have leather seating, so no their interiors are not the same. Stop hating and start learning that's all I have to say.Bye.
 
后退
顶部