佛教的特质及陷阱(ZT)
- 主题发起人 CHRIS88
- 开始时间
Happy Angel
知名会员
- 注册
- 2010-08-17
- 消息
- 999
- 荣誉分数
- 20
- 声望点数
- 148
"Religious discrimination is valuing or treating a person or group differently because of what they do or do not believe. "
这是religious discrimination but not discrimination of religions! 我相信您知道两者的区别？
这个话题很有意义。我们应该好好讨论下。
善意的开导劝诫，不算歧视。
究竟领受与否，是个人与上帝的关系，基督徒不会歧视任何人，就如同耶利米，好心劝诫，也遭到误解，但庆幸的是，上帝是了解祂的儿女的。如果真正歧视异教徒的话，那早就懒得和他们讨论问题了，还能这么有耐心地向他们解释吗？
Happy Angel
知名会员
- 注册
- 2010-08-17
- 消息
- 999
- 荣誉分数
- 20
- 声望点数
- 148
支持。
Happy Angel
知名会员
- 注册
- 2010-08-17
- 消息
- 999
- 荣誉分数
- 20
- 声望点数
- 148
not something need support, it's something everyone need to follow.
Happy Angel
知名会员
- 注册
- 2010-08-17
- 消息
- 999
- 荣誉分数
- 20
- 声望点数
- 148
Happy Angel
知名会员
- 注册
- 2010-08-17
- 消息
- 999
- 荣誉分数
- 20
- 声望点数
- 148
These two words are a pair of synonyms.
What is a hate crime?
CBC News
Posted: Jun 15, 2011 6:50 PM ET
Last Updated: Jun 17, 2011 5:04 PM ET
Related Links
Police dispute shooting victim's hate crime claim
Hot springs beating not hate crime: police
Hate crime reports jump by 42% in Canada
Man wants attack designated hate crime
Cross-burning brother gets 2 months in jail
Toronto religious centres get security funding
External Links
Criminal Code of Canada
Canadian Human Rights Act
Hate crime research and scholarship in Canada
Canadian Anti-Racism Education and Research Society (CAERS)
Canadian Jewish Congress
Canadian Race Relations Foundation
League for Human Rights, B'nai Brith Canada
Hate Jurisdictions of Human Rights Commissions: A System in Need of Reform - League for Human Rights
(Note:CBC does not endorse and is not responsible for the content of external links.)
The Criminal Code of Canada says a hate crime is committed to intimidate, harm or terrify not only a person, but an entire group of people to which the victim belongs. The victims are targeted for who they are, not because of anything they have done.
A hate crime is one in which hate is the motive and can involve intimidation, harassment, physical force or threat of physical force against a person, a group or a property
Two Nova Scotia men were convicted under Canada's hate crime laws in relation to a cross-burning incident on the lawn of an interracial couple in Windsor, N.S. The photo is from the RCMP.Two Nova Scotia men were convicted under Canada's hate crime laws in relation to a cross-burning incident on the lawn of an interracial couple in Windsor, N.S. The photo is from the RCMP. (CBC)
In Canada it is also a crime to incite hatred. Sections 318 and 319 are the relevant sections of the Criminal Code.
Under Section 318, it is a criminal act to "advocate or promote genocide" — to call for, support, encourage or argue for the killing of members of a group based on colour, race, religion, ethnic origin or sexual orientation.
Section 319 deals with publicly stirring up or inciting hatred against an identifiable group based on colour, race, religion, ethnic origin or sexual orientation.
It is illegal to communicate hatred in a public place by telephone, broadcast or through other audio or visual means. The same section protects people from being charged with a hate crime if their statements are truthful or the expression of a religious opinion.
The mischief section, 430, covers hate-motivated mischief and religious property in subsection 4.1.
It provides for harsher sentences than mischief involving other property. Bill C-451, introduced in the last parliament, would have added schools, community centres, daycares and other property to 4.1. However, the bill died with the election call.
The section of the code on sentencing (718.2) encourages judges to consider whether the crime was motivated by hate of the victim's race, national or ethnic origin, language, colour, religion, sex, age, mental or physical disability, sexual orientation or any other similar factor.
Under section 13 of the Canadian Human Rights Act it is a "discriminatory practice" to send hate messages via telecommunications equipment, including the internet.
CBC News
Posted: Jun 15, 2011 6:50 PM ET
Last Updated: Jun 17, 2011 5:04 PM ET
Related Links
Police dispute shooting victim's hate crime claim
Hot springs beating not hate crime: police
Hate crime reports jump by 42% in Canada
Man wants attack designated hate crime
Cross-burning brother gets 2 months in jail
Toronto religious centres get security funding
External Links
Criminal Code of Canada
Canadian Human Rights Act
Hate crime research and scholarship in Canada
Canadian Anti-Racism Education and Research Society (CAERS)
Canadian Jewish Congress
Canadian Race Relations Foundation
League for Human Rights, B'nai Brith Canada
Hate Jurisdictions of Human Rights Commissions: A System in Need of Reform - League for Human Rights
(Note:CBC does not endorse and is not responsible for the content of external links.)
The Criminal Code of Canada says a hate crime is committed to intimidate, harm or terrify not only a person, but an entire group of people to which the victim belongs. The victims are targeted for who they are, not because of anything they have done.
A hate crime is one in which hate is the motive and can involve intimidation, harassment, physical force or threat of physical force against a person, a group or a property
Two Nova Scotia men were convicted under Canada's hate crime laws in relation to a cross-burning incident on the lawn of an interracial couple in Windsor, N.S. The photo is from the RCMP.Two Nova Scotia men were convicted under Canada's hate crime laws in relation to a cross-burning incident on the lawn of an interracial couple in Windsor, N.S. The photo is from the RCMP. (CBC)
In Canada it is also a crime to incite hatred. Sections 318 and 319 are the relevant sections of the Criminal Code.
Under Section 318, it is a criminal act to "advocate or promote genocide" — to call for, support, encourage or argue for the killing of members of a group based on colour, race, religion, ethnic origin or sexual orientation.
Section 319 deals with publicly stirring up or inciting hatred against an identifiable group based on colour, race, religion, ethnic origin or sexual orientation.
It is illegal to communicate hatred in a public place by telephone, broadcast or through other audio or visual means. The same section protects people from being charged with a hate crime if their statements are truthful or the expression of a religious opinion.
The mischief section, 430, covers hate-motivated mischief and religious property in subsection 4.1.
It provides for harsher sentences than mischief involving other property. Bill C-451, introduced in the last parliament, would have added schools, community centres, daycares and other property to 4.1. However, the bill died with the election call.
The section of the code on sentencing (718.2) encourages judges to consider whether the crime was motivated by hate of the victim's race, national or ethnic origin, language, colour, religion, sex, age, mental or physical disability, sexual orientation or any other similar factor.
Under section 13 of the Canadian Human Rights Act it is a "discriminatory practice" to send hate messages via telecommunications equipment, including the internet.
Happy Angel
知名会员
- 注册
- 2010-08-17
- 消息
- 999
- 荣誉分数
- 20
- 声望点数
- 148
"What is a hate crime?
The victims are targeted for who they are, not because of anything they have done."
Christians doesn't care who you are, just care a crime.
The victims are targeted for who they are, not because of anything they have done."
Christians doesn't care who you are, just care a crime.
Happy Angel
知名会员
- 注册
- 2010-08-17
- 消息
- 999
- 荣誉分数
- 20
- 声望点数
- 148
only in you dictionary
There is difference between these two words in your dictionary.
Well, I'm wondering how to identify the behaviors are stirring up hatred.
Actions likely to stir up hatred.
2.—(1) It shall be an offence for a person—
(a) to publish or distribute written material,
(b) to use words, behave or display written material—
(i) in any place other than inside a private residence, or
(ii) inside a private residence so that the words, behaviour or material are heard or seen by persons outside the residence,
or
(c) to distribute, show or play a recording of visual images or sounds,
if the written material, words, behaviour, visual images or sounds, as the case may be, are threatening, abusive or insulting and are intended or, having regard to all the circumstances, are likely to stir up hatred.
(2) (a) In proceedings for an offence under subsection (1), if the accused person is not shown to have intended to stir up hatred, it shall be a defence for him to prove that he was not aware of the content of the material or recording concerned and did not suspect, and had no reason to suspect, that the material or recording was threatening, abusive or insulting.
(b) In proceedings for an offence under subsection (1) (b), it shall be a defence for the accused person—
(i) to prove that he was inside a private residence at the relevant time and had no reason to believe that the words, behaviour or material concerned would be heard or seen by a person outside the residence, or
(ii) if he is not shown to have intended to stir up hatred, to prove that he did not intend the words, behaviour or material concerned to be, and was not aware that they might be, threatening, abusive or insulting.
(3) In this section “private residence” means any structure (including a tent, caravan, vehicle, vessel or other temporary or moveable structure) or part of such a structure used as a dwelling but does not include any part not so used or any part in which a public meeting is being held; and in this definition “public meeting” means a meeting at which the public are entitled to be present, on payment or otherwise and as of right or by virtue of an express or implied permission.
so i highly agree with rctli's saying about someone is stiring up hatred in this forum and that person's id must be banned. actually that person already put cfc under a very high legal risk.
2.—(1) It shall be an offence for a person—
(a) to publish or distribute written material,
(b) to use words, behave or display written material—
(i) in any place other than inside a private residence, or
(ii) inside a private residence so that the words, behaviour or material are heard or seen by persons outside the residence,
or
(c) to distribute, show or play a recording of visual images or sounds,
if the written material, words, behaviour, visual images or sounds, as the case may be, are threatening, abusive or insulting and are intended or, having regard to all the circumstances, are likely to stir up hatred.
(2) (a) In proceedings for an offence under subsection (1), if the accused person is not shown to have intended to stir up hatred, it shall be a defence for him to prove that he was not aware of the content of the material or recording concerned and did not suspect, and had no reason to suspect, that the material or recording was threatening, abusive or insulting.
(b) In proceedings for an offence under subsection (1) (b), it shall be a defence for the accused person—
(i) to prove that he was inside a private residence at the relevant time and had no reason to believe that the words, behaviour or material concerned would be heard or seen by a person outside the residence, or
(ii) if he is not shown to have intended to stir up hatred, to prove that he did not intend the words, behaviour or material concerned to be, and was not aware that they might be, threatening, abusive or insulting.
(3) In this section “private residence” means any structure (including a tent, caravan, vehicle, vessel or other temporary or moveable structure) or part of such a structure used as a dwelling but does not include any part not so used or any part in which a public meeting is being held; and in this definition “public meeting” means a meeting at which the public are entitled to be present, on payment or otherwise and as of right or by virtue of an express or implied permission.
so i highly agree with rctli's saying about someone is stiring up hatred in this forum and that person's id must be banned. actually that person already put cfc under a very high legal risk.