谢谢CFC网友！四年后见！｛保守党赢了166席！林顿赢102席！绿党历史上第一次进MP!｝

[ccc]

还有这个：http://bbs.comefromchina.com/forum79/thread904629.html

PC这次有“偷鸡不成失把米”的危险。

 

[ccc]

一场G8峰会花掉10亿。

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/ottawa/story/2011/04/11/cv-election-ag-report.html?ref=rss

Auditor's draft report alleges Tories misspent G8 funds

The auditor general says the Harper government allegedly misinformed Parliament to win approval for a $50-million G8 fund that lavished money on dubious projects in a Conservative riding.

And she suggests in a draft report the process may have been illegal.

The findings are contained in the draft of a confidential report Sheila Fraser was to have tabled in Parliament on April 5. The report analyzed the $1-billion cost of staging last June's G8 summit in Ontario cottage country and a subsequent gathering of G20 leaders in downtown Toronto.

It was put on ice when the Harper government was defeated and is not due to be released until sometime after the May 2 election. However, a Jan. 13 draft of the chapter on the G8 legacy infrastructure fund was obtained by a supporter of an opposition party and shown to The Canadian Press.

All four main parties called for the auditor general's final report to be released before the first televised leaders debate on Tuesday, in the wake of the Canadian Press report.

The draft reveals that a local "G8 summit liaison and implementation team" — Industry Minister Tony Clement, the mayor of Huntsville and the general manager of Deerhurst Resort, which hosted the summit — chose the 32 projects that received funding. It says there was no apparent regard for the needs of the summit or the conditions laid down by the government.

The auditor general's office said Monday morning it would not comment on the story, and said Fraser does not give interviews on any matters during elections.

 

[CHRIS88]

还有这个：http://bbs.comefromchina.com/forum79/thread904629.html

PC这次有“偷鸡不成失把米”的危险。

It will be an issue because of the perfect timing but a temporary issue due to its nature. It is really a no-issue.

After all, it is only a draft report that was "leaked" illegally. Furthermore, the GA herself cautioned the public not to jump to any conclusions until the release of the formal report.

Even if everything is true, it is about $50 million that were used for trees, street sidewalks, public constructions etc. for a region that happens to be a conservative riding. This is really nothing comparing to the liberal scandal, which is so scandalous that there are still billions of dollars not accounted for. Nobody knows where the money ended up until now!

 

[Election20II]

Opinion polling in the Canadian federal election, 2006

 

[CHRIS88]

It will be an issue because of the perfect timing but a temporary issue due to its nature. It is really a no-issue.

After all, it is only a draft report that was "leaked" illegally. Furthermore, the GA herself cautioned the public not to jump to any conclusions until the release of the formal report.

Even if everything is true, it is about $50 million that were used for trees, street sidewalks, public constructions etc. for a region that happens to be a conservative riding. This is really nothing comparing to the liberal scandal, which is so scandalous that there are still billions of dollars not accounted for. Nobody knows where the money ended up until now!

For these who are interested, the following is the whole issue:

The funding request was not made in a transparent manner

2.11 - In November 2009, Supplementary Estimates (B) 2009-10 were tabled in the House of Commons. They included an item of $83 million for the "Border Infrastructure Fund relating to investments in infrastructure to reduce border congestion" (Exhibit 2.1). The Treasury Board Secretariat provided us with documentation showing that the intention was to use $50 million of this $83 million for G8 Summit projects. We noted, however, that this was not disclosed in the funding request made to Parliament through the Supplementary Estimates. Therefore, when Parliament considered the Supplementary Estimates as tabled, the request only indicated that money was to be used to reduce border congestion.

The funding request was not made in a transparent manner

2.13 - In our view, by presenting the request for funding in this way the government was not transparent about its purpose. Parliament was not provided with a clear explanation of the nature of the approval being sought or that these expenditures would not be required to meet the pre-existing terms and conditions of the Border Infrastructure Fund.

 

[Election2011]

还有这个：http://bbs.comefromchina.com/forum79/thread904629.html

PC这次有“偷鸡不成失把米”的危险。

“联邦审计总长费沙原定4月5日，提交机密报告给国会。该份报告提到有关的指控，但是由于哈珀政府在3月25日倒台，为了避免影响大选选情，这份机密报告就不再在大选期间公佈，要直到5月2日大选之后才公诸于世”。

叶教授可能又算错了！等到4月5日的审计报告出来后，4月底再造反不是更好吗？

不过，如果保守党成不了多数党，审计报告就成了自新魁联合造反的理由。

要想安心过好日子，还是投保守党一票吧！

 

[ccc]

看热闹的,不怕乱子大。

 

[Election2011]

看热闹的,不怕乱子大。

一念之间：乱了敌人，锻炼了队伍！

 

[Election2011]

领导人的辩论记分卡: 哈珀(5), 林顿(4)，叶礼庭(3.5),杜塞(3.5)

哈珀很快适了应新环境，清楚地通过摄像机向全国人民说明：　本次大选是选出一个保守党多数执政的强大和稳定的国家或选得一个不计后果的联盟执政的危及经济的联邦政府。（满分5)

林顿，一个资深的政治辩论家，轻松地微笑着，通过他平易近人的语气，向哈珀和叶庭礼开炮和向全国人民解说: 联邦政府已破碎，只有新民主党能修复它（四分）

叶庭礼以哈弗教授毕业答辩的派头，不适应政治领袖电视辩论会的新环境。没能利用这一机会反击哈珀“国内所有知名经济学家都支持削减公司税”的论点。（3.5分）

杜塞，英文辩论不是他的强项，但尽力了（3.5分）

 

[ccc]

What a show!

 

[Election2011]

What a show!

Harper has done great & he is wining!

 

[ZhiZuChangLe]

Harper has done great & he is wining!

Good!

 

[West Life]

Harper has done great & he is wining!

支持Harper

 

[Election2011]

支持Harper

国家需要一个多数党！

 

[第N个马甲]

最后的结果，就是PC白折腾一场，还是个少数政府。

um...Harper was given a lecture on democracy that's hilarious