Minto购房悲剧----从走进Minto售房中心那一刻降临

[ccc]

minto多卖了还好办，买少了确实有点难办了

怎么讲？

 

[uglyducking]

怎么讲？

Remember a Vancouver condo buyer who bailed out for a 1.5m condo purchase agreement and the builder sold the condo for 1.2m later on?

 

[ccc]

Remember a Vancouver condo buyer who bailed out for a 1.5m condo purchase agreement and the builder sold the condo for 1.2m later on?

这个，我还真不知道。:blowzy:

 

[uglyducking]

这个，我还真不知道。:blowzy:

builder sued that buyer for $300k damage

 

[ccc II]

builder sued that buyer for $300k damage

案例不尽相同，对我说来。不大明白。

 

[cvictor]

builder sued that buyer for $300k damage

不明白。

 

[uglyducking]

The house was sold for 1.5m, market tumbled before the closing date and buyer decided to bail out the deal, give up the deposit. The builder could only sell the house for 1.2m, They lost $300k profit due to the buyer broke the contract, result, lawsuit.

 

[ccc]

The house was sold for 1.5m, market tumbled before the closing date and buyer decided to bail out the deal, give up the deposit. The builder could only sell the house for 1.2m, They lost $300k profit due to the buyer broke the contract, result, lawsuit.

法律程序最后的结果是什么？

 

[councilor]

案例不尽相同，对我说来。不大明白。

Minto以43万二次出售这个房子，比原价低了10万，即使没收BDW的，Minto还是亏了。如果BDW放弃6.6万，再从Minto那里以43万购买同样的房子，和原来的53万价格比较，BDW也赚了。

如果上法庭，比原价低了10万可以说明Minto并不想故意毁约，反而是BDW可能以房型为理由，故意毁约。

我不相信BDW故意毁约，但法官相信吗？Minto以43万，在三天内出手，说明Minto确实被BDW的closing under protest 吓坏了，所以，干脆以低于差价6.6万的价格出售，为以后的诉讼，做好了充分准备，

 

[timmy]

才过了三天，还在争议中，明偷就敢把房子贱卖了。
这个事实，说明他们视弱势买家如草芥，做法相当地骇人听闻！
每次读这个长贴，心情都相当沉重，也感慨个体与大佬抗争的艰辛。
楼主已经很努力，但输赢是很难预料的了。谋事在人、成事在天，望上帝保佑你！
如果需要买房，那么就买旧房，地点成熟、与卖家又半斤八两，重蹈覆辙的可能性也大大降低。

 

[uglyducking]

法律程序最后的结果是什么？

Didn't follow. I believe this thing happened around 2008. Now the condo price there shooting back up again.


Something like this,
http://www.vancouver-real-estate-direct.com/nogo/lawsuits.html

I believe BDW is a totally different case though.

 

[Ayin_Ottawa]

For good or bad, they are "we".

================
Spot The Speculators #28 – Olympic Village Speculations Gone Sour
Posted on 23 February 2011 | Leave a comment

Early buyers are being sued for trying to back out of their commitments to purchase at the Olympic Village [Globe and Mail, 20 Feb 2011].
Examples, from the article -

1. Port Coquitlam resident Cordelia Lins and her husband had put down $50,090 in May of 2008 for a unit they originally agreed to buy for $500,900. Problems with records make it difficult to determine the assessed value. Ms. Lin said she couldn’t say anything about the lawsuit because she was “in negotiations.”

2. Vancouver resident Gee Lim, who paid the largest deposit for a unit he originally agreed to buy for $1.4-million, did not answer his phone. He originally agreed to buy his unit in April 2008. Last July, the province’s land-assessment authority valued that unit at only $1.172-million.

3. Tian Qi, who has no phone listing at the Richmond address provided in the suit, had agreed to pay $516,000 for his unit in the Kayak building that is now being marketed. It was assessed at $504,000 by B.C. Assessment Authority last July. He put down his deposit in April 2008.

http://vreaa.wordpress.com/2011/02/

 

[uglyducking]

BDW said minto priced the house under question same as the normal floor plan house. The question I'd like to ask, whats the price for a reduced floor plan house? 100k less?

I'll never get an answer anyway

 

[hatco]

闲聊这么多有什么用. 当初要么不买,要么close deal on closing day.

 

[闲得慌]

minto多卖了还好办，买少了确实有点难办了
不过也说明minto当时给你报价有过高的可能。

从BDW这个新发现，我看出3点：

1. 进一步说明当初BDW与MINTO签约的房子是大户型，而实际要交付给BDW的房子是缩小的户型。关于这一点，BDW已经有书面文件证明，这个新发现只是旁证。

2. MINTO 的不诚实再次被钉在铜板上。这个不诚实又表现在2个方面：
a. 在价格上对BDW说谎.
b. 在房子早就卖掉后还继续装模作样地打广告欺骗大众。

3. 对纠纷性质的进一步认定：这不是一个钱多钱少的普通商业纠纷，而是商业欺诈。


大家补充。