- 注册
- 2012-03-04
- 消息
- 1,347
- 荣誉分数
- 124
- 声望点数
- 223
继续干点苦力活，作者列举的另外21个诺贝尔获奖者，不一定是直接反对进化论。就象康德说“抬头遥望浩瀚的星空和低头审查自己的良心”。这主要属于第二部分。阿Q个人意见，21个人里有些是上个世纪初的人，说服力不强，有些宗教意识过强。保留21这个数字，赚点眼球
Human beings are animals ... if you believe that consciousness cannot be explained in materialistic terms, then you cannot call yourself a consistent Darwinian evolutionist.
1. William Phillips (b. 1948), winner of the Nobel Prize in Physics in 1997
“If we truly have a free will, if our actions represent true choice and not just results of biochemical reactions following deterministic or random processes, then where does that will come from? But I find these possibilities unconvincing and find it simpler to believe in a transcendence that provides something beyond determinism or chance. I call that transcendence God.”
2. Joseph Murray (b. 1919), winner of the Nobel Prize in Medicine and Physiology in 1990. 获奖原因:器官移植. Catholic
”The Church teaches that every spiritual soul is created immediately by God – it is not “produced” by the parents – and also that it is immortal: it does not perish when it separates from the body at death, and it will be reunited with the body at the final Resurrection“
I’ve never had a conflict between my religious upbringing and my science.”
3. George Wald (1906-1997), winner of the 1967 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine for his work on the biochemistry of vision
George Wald converted late in life from an atheist to a Christian who believed that consciousness was more fundamental than matter
“When it comes to the origin of life there are only two possibilities: creation or spontaneous generation. There is no third way. Spontaneous generation was disproved one hundred years ago, but that leads us to only one other conclusion, that of supernatural creation. We cannot accept that on philosophical grounds; therefore, we choose to believe the impossible: that life arose spontaneously by chance!”
“Most modern biologists, having reviewed with satisfaction the downfall of the spontaneous generation hypothesis, yet unwilling to accept the alternative belief in special creation, are left with nothing.”
”Mind, rather than being a very late development in the evolution of living things, restricted to organisms with the most complex nervous systems – all of which I had believed to be true – that Mind instead has been there always, and that this universe is life-breeding because the pervasive presence of Mind had guided it to be so.“
4. Charles Townes (b. 1915), winner of the 1964 Nobel Prize in Physics
"I do believe in both a creation and a continuous effect on this universe and our lives, that God has a continuing influence - certainly his laws guide how the universe was built. But the Bible's description of creation occurring over a week's time is just an analogy, as I see it. "
"Intelligent design, as one sees it from a scientific point of view, seems to be quite real. This is a very special universe: it’s remarkable that it came out just this way."
5. Eugene Wigner (1926-1996), a winner of the 1963 Nobel Prize in Physics
"certainly it is hard to believe that our reasoning power was brought, by Darwin’s process of natural selection, to the perfection which it seems to possess. "
The miracle of the appropriateness of the language of mathematics for the formulation of the laws of physics is a wonderful gift which we neither understand nor deserve.
6. Werner Heisenberg (1901-1976), winner of the Nobel Prize for Physics in 1945.
Can you, or anyone else, reach the central order of things, or events, whose existence seems beyond doubt, as directly as you can reach the soul of another human being? I am using the term ‘soul’ quite deliberately so as not to be misunderstood.
If we go beyond biology and include psychology in the discussion, then there can scarcely be any doubt but that the concepts of physics, chemistry, and evolution together will not be sufficient to describe the facts.
7. Erwin Schroedinger (1887–1961) winner of the 1933 Nobel Prize in Physics，physicist and theoretical biologist
“Consciousness cannot be accounted for in physical terms. For consciousness is absolutely fundamental. It cannot be accounted for in terms of anything else.”
“I am very astonished that the scientific picture of the real world around me is very deficient. It gives a lot of factual information, puts all our experience in a magnificently consistent order, but it is ghastly silent about all and sundry that is really near to our heart, that really matters to us. It cannot tell us a word about red and blue, bitter and sweet, physical pain and physical delight; it knows nothing of beautiful and ugly, good or bad, God and eternity. Science sometimes pretends to answer questions in these domains, but the answers are very often so silly that we are not inclined to take them seriously.”
8. Sir Charles Sherrington (1857-1952), a neurophysiologist who won the 1932 Nobel Prize for Physiology or Medicine
“For me now, the only reality is the human soul.”
9. Max Planck (1858–1947), winner of the 1918 Nobel Prize in Physics
“No, I regard consciousness as fundamental. I regard matter as derivative from consciousness.“
10. Niels Bohr (1885–1962), winner of the 1922 Nobel Prize in Physics
”We can admittedly find nothing in physics or chemistry that has even a remote bearing on consciousness.“
“Hence consciousness must be part of nature, or, more generally, of reality, which means that, quite apart from the laws of physics and chemistry, as laid down in quantum theory, we must also consider laws of quite a different kind”
