美国农业部(USDA)的转基因作物15年报告出来了,方舟子有关转基因增产安全的谎言不攻自破

reine02

资深人士
VIP
注册
2012-02-27
消息
9,438
荣誉分数
2,120
声望点数
273
USDA2014年2月20日在其网站上发布了ERS的美国转基因种植15年来的分析报告《Genetically Engineered Crops in the United States》。原文见:http://www.ers.usda.gov/publications/err-economic-research-report/err162.aspx

路透社的相关报道见:
U.S. GMO crops show mix of benefits, concerns - USDA report

1)报告揭穿了方舟子的转基因作物增产的谎言(实际上不仅没有转基因增产的定论,而且,种子价格高了50%)


The seeds are patented and cost more than conventional seeds - the price of GMO soybean and corn seeds grew by about 50 percent between 2001 and 2010, according to the report. But the companies that sell them say they make weed and insect management easier for farmers and can help increase production.

But in its report, the ERS researchers said over the first 15 years of commercial use, GMO seeds have not been shown to definitively increase yield potentials, and "in fact, the yields of herbicide-tolerant or insect-resistant seeds may be occasionally lower than the yields of conventional varieties," the ERS report states.

Several researchers have found "no significant differences" between the net returns to farmers who use GMO herbicide tolerant seeds and those who use non-GMO seeds, the report states.

2)报告揭穿了方舟子的转基因作物使用农药少,因而比传统粮食作物食用更安全的谎言 (转基因作物虽然农药杀虫剂少用了0.18磅/公顷,但农药杀草剂使用量增加了0.50磅/公顷。农药总使用量总量是增加的。况且极少量的除草剂残留都会导致癌症。报告中也提到some scientific studies are reporting that the chemicals used on the crops are linked to disease and illness.)。

GMO crops that prevent yield losses to pests is more helpful to farmers financially, allowing crops more yield potential and higher monetary returns, the report states. As well, insecticide use on corn farms was down to 0.02 pound per acre in 2010, down from 0.21 pound per acre in 1995, the report states.

But while insecticide use has gone down, herbicide use on GMO corn is rising, the report states. Herbicide use on GMO corn increased from around 1.5 pounds per planted acre in 2001 to more than 2.0 pounds per planted acre in 2010. Herbicide use on non-GMO corn has remained relatively level during that same time frame, the ERS said.

3)转基因作物由于要大量使用杀草剂农药,导致农田杂草产生抗药性,使得今后农作物的生产更加困难。

And the over reliance on glyphosate has translated to an increase weed resistance, which makes crop production much harder. Glyphosate is the chief ingredient in Roundup herbicide sold by Monsanto, and its use has translated to the glyphosate resistance seen in 14 weed species and biotypes in the United States, according to ERS.
 
最后编辑:
昨天看了焦点访谈,说是93号汽油与89号比,除了价格贵,没有任何优点,包括传说中的省油,功效、环保,发动机保护。 :p
炼油厂家、加油站的大忽悠? @ccc
 
昨天看了焦点访谈,说是93号汽油与89号比,除了价格贵,没有任何有点,包括传说中的省油,功效、环保,发动机保护。 :p
cbc的焦点访谈?
 
教主将要说:写这报告的人不是真正的专家。一棍子打死。:dx:
ERS的, 估计是非主流。。。对手是财团,这嘴架还有得打。
 
教主将要说:写这报告的人不是真正的专家。一棍子打死。:dx:
教主最近辟谣说他不是“斗鸡眼”。:tx:

教主还隔洋与美国的学术期刊打假专家Jeff Beall 斗上了。因为Jeff Beall打了方舟子及其帮凶的假。:monster:

Jeff Beall: Under Pressure, MDPI Tries to Clean House, Retracts Paper
Why publish with MDPI when there are many better venues ?

I recently added publisher MDPI to my list of questionable publishers, an addition that has caused the publisher to go on the offensive against me and, on the positive side, to address some of its problems.

MDPI owner Shu-Kun Lin called in favors, asking his friends to support his business by leaving MDPI-favorable comments on my blog. One commenter wrote, “I have just received an SMS message from a MDPI Editor to come to this forum and to defend MDPI.”

I found that most of the comments favoring MDPI were written either by non-scholars or by scholars who have never published a paper in MDPI’s many journals. Several researchers, clearly friends of Lin, but who had never published in Lin’s journals, made arguments about how great the journals are. I think it’s very telling that Lin’s friends don’t publish in his journals. His friends know him well.

I’ve also angered someone named Fang Zhouzi (real name Shi-min Fang, or Fang Shi-min). He apparently markets himself as a Chinese science watchdog, trashing science published in journals other than those published by his friend Shu-Kun Lin, from whom he reportedly receives a stipend.

Fang is feverishly searching for dirt about me on the internet and publishing whatever he finds in his U.S.-based blog, all to defend his patron, Lin.

After I added MDPI to my list of questionable publishers, the company quickly retracted the 2004 article “Statistical Convergent Topological Sequence Entropy Maps of the Circle,” for plagiarism, even though the plagiarism was reported many years earlier. The plagiarism was reported in 2005 in an American Mathematical Society website called MathSciNet (picture below).

A report of the plagiarism was first published in 2005.

This report of the plagiarism was first published in 2005; the retraction (from the MDPI journal Entropy) occurred in February, 2014.

A discussion of the plagiarism — and the publisher’s anger at someone who reported it — was published on a math forum called MathForge (see comment #8), based at the Norwegian University of Science and Technology in Trondheim, Norway. It is likely that MDPI publisher Lin himself was the editor at the time the plagiarized article was published

I stand by the addition of publisher MDPI to my list. I recommend that scholars not submit papers to its journals and not serve on its editorial boards. This publisher is becoming increasingly controversial, and researchers should insulate themselves from such controversy, for it could hurt their careers in the long term.
 
最后编辑:
教主最近辟谣说他不是“斗鸡眼”。:tx:
.
看上去报告还挺平衡的。
Consumers. Consumer acceptance of foods with GE ingredients varies with product characteristics, geography, and the information that consumers are exposed to. Most studies in industrialized nations find that consumers are willing to pay a premium for foods that don’t contain GE ingredients. However, studies in developing countries yield more mixed results. Some studies, including some with a focus on GE ingredients with positive enhancements (such as nutrition), find consumers to be willing to try GE foods and even to pay a premium for them, while others find a will-ingness to pay a premium for non-GE foods. Most studies have shown that willingness-to-pay for non-GE foods is higher in the EU, where some retailers have policies limiting the use of GE ingredients. Non-GE foods are available in the United States, but there is evidence that such foods represent a small share of retail food markets.
 
很有趣:

Studies in which consumers were willing to pay a premium for non-GE food
China, Vegetable oil, Hu, et al., 2006 Consumers would consume GE product with a 14-percent discount after hearing basic or positive information, and a 66-percent discount after hearing negative information
China, Soybean oil and rice Lin et al., 2006, Consumers on average would pay a 52-percent premium for non-biotech foods

Studies in which consumers were willing to pay a premium for genetically engineered (GE) food or GE food with enhanced characteristics
China, Rice, Li et al., 2002, 80 percent of consumers did not require a premium to purchase GE rice and on average were willing to pay a 38-percent premium for GE rice and a 16-per-cent premium for GE soy oil
 
最后编辑:
USDA2014年2月20日在其网站上发布了ERS的美国转基因种植15年来的分析报告《Genetically Engineered Crops in the United States》。原文见:http://www.ers.usda.gov/publications/err-economic-research-report/err162.aspx

路透社的相关报道见:
U.S. GMO crops show mix of benefits, concerns - USDA report

1)报告揭穿了方舟子的转基因作物增产的谎言(实际上不仅没有转基因增产的定论,而且,种子价格高了50%)


The seeds are patented and cost more than conventional seeds - the price of GMO soybean and corn seeds grew by about 50 percent between 2001 and 2010, according to the report. But the companies that sell them say they make weed and insect management easier for farmers and can help increase production.

But in its report, the ERS researchers said over the first 15 years of commercial use, GMO seeds have not been shown to definitively increase yield potentials, and "in fact, the yields of herbicide-tolerant or insect-resistant seeds may be occasionally lower than the yields of conventional varieties," the ERS report states.

Several researchers have found "no significant differences" between the net returns to farmers who use GMO herbicide tolerant seeds and those who use non-GMO seeds, the report states.

2)报告揭穿了方舟子的转基因作物使用农药少,因而比传统粮食作物食用更安全的谎言 (转基因作物虽然农药杀虫剂少用了0.18磅/公顷,但农药杀草剂使用量增加了0.50磅/公顷。农药总使用量总量是增加的。况且极少量的除草剂残留都会导致癌症。报告中也提到some scientific studies are reporting that the chemicals used on the crops are linked to disease and illness.)。

GMO crops that prevent yield losses to pests is more helpful to farmers financially, allowing crops more yield potential and higher monetary returns, the report states. As well, insecticide use on corn farms was down to 0.02 pound per acre in 2010, down from 0.21 pound per acre in 1995, the report states.

But while insecticide use has gone down, herbicide use on GMO corn is rising, the report states. Herbicide use on GMO corn increased from around 1.5 pounds per planted acre in 2001 to more than 2.0 pounds per planted acre in 2010. Herbicide use on non-GMO corn has remained relatively level during that same time frame, the ERS said.

3)转基因作物由于要大量使用杀草剂农药,导致农田杂草产生抗药性,使得今后农作物的生产更加困难。

And the over reliance on glyphosate has translated to an increase weed resistance, which makes crop production much harder. Glyphosate is the chief ingredient in Roundup herbicide sold by Monsanto, and its use has translated to the glyphosate resistance seen in 14 weed species and biotypes in the United States, according to ERS.


这个报告忽视2个很关键的方面,
1. 种植转基因作物大幅度减轻农民工作量;
2. 种植转基因作物减少农民身体暴露在农药的喷雾之中。
 
USDA2014年2月20日在其网站上发布了ERS的美国转基因种植15年来的分析报告《Genetically Engineered Crops in the United States》。原文见:http://www.ers.usda.gov/publications/err-economic-research-report/err162.aspx

路透社的相关报道见:
U.S. GMO crops show mix of benefits, concerns - USDA report

2)报告揭穿了方舟子的转基因作物使用农药少,因而比传统粮食作物食用更安全的谎言 (转基因作物虽然农药杀虫剂少用了0.18磅/公顷,但农药杀草剂使用量增加了0.50磅/公顷。农药总使用量总量是增加的。况且极少量的除草剂残留都会导致癌症。报告中也提到some scientific studies are reporting that the chemicals used on the crops are linked to disease and illness.)。


GMO crops that prevent yield losses to pests is more helpful to farmers financially, allowing crops more yield potential and higher monetary returns, the report states. As well, insecticide use on corn farms was down to 0.02 pound per acre in 2010, down from 0.21 pound per acre in 1995, the report states.

But while insecticide use has gone down, herbicide use on GMO corn is rising, the report states. Herbicide use on GMO corn increased from around 1.5 pounds per planted acre in 2001 to more than 2.0 pounds per planted acre in 2010. Herbicide use on non-GMO corn has remained relatively level during that same time frame, the ERS said.
.

此段翻译不准。“Herbicide use on GMO corn increased from around 1.5 pounds per planted acre in 2001 to more than 2.0 pounds per planted acre in 2010“ 这只是 GMO 用药 2001年与2010年相比。并不是GMO 用药 与NON-GMO 用药相比。”insecticide use on corn farms was down to 0.02 pound per acre in 2010, down from 0.21 pound per acre in 1995” 因为1995以前基本没有GMO。
 
这个报告忽视2个很关键的方面,
1. 种植转基因作物大幅度减轻农民工作量;
2. 种植转基因作物减少农民身体暴露在农药的喷雾之中。


补充一点, 种子的成本上升了, 但是买农药的钱省了很多, 增加买除草剂的钱没多少。
 
1、有人多么想整倒方舟子啊!
2、整倒方舟子需要造多少谣啊!
3、还要继续啊!
 
1、有人多么想整倒方舟子啊!
2、整倒方舟子需要造多少谣啊!
3、还要继续啊!
就是嘛,连米国农业部都参加整倒方舟子的造谣行动了。
 
后退
顶部