Harper决战表明立场,在没有确认难民没有国家安全隐患前不会用飞机接他们来

保守党在2006年以少数政府接盘时,联邦公务员总数是25万不到一点。到2011年选举拿下多数政府时,公务员人数已大到28万多人。然后从2012年开始裁人,到2014年又回到25万左右,这不是瞎折腾又是什么。达菲事件的起因是哈博无视他自己的法律顾问的劝告,自己给自己找的麻烦,说到底,是对他傲慢的一个回报,他的理念不是马尔罗尼,克拉克,金宝儿那样传统意义上保守党的理念,他是比西部改革党还右的极端右翼政客。他是立志是要把加拿大改造成让大多数人认不出来的加拿大,说到底他要把加拿大变成像美国一样的国家。这些并不是什么秘密。这些理念在他就职国家公民联盟期间在美国的一次演讲中发挥得淋漓尽致。在那次演讲中,他认为加拿大是最糟糕的福利国家,全民免费医疗因该被私有的保险来取代。在少数党期间,他还比较收敛。拿下多数政府后,一点点露出其真实面目,不顾执法部门的反对,2012强行取消长枪登记,并且还要销毁过去所有的登记记录,这种极端行为在加拿大的政坛上是很少见的。CFC上有不少人声称保守党是为了下一代,我想问一句,有没有注意到美国发生了多少校园枪击案。加拿大如果像美国一样放松枪支管理,到校园枪击案频发时,大家是否对还会认为自己给下一代做出了正确的选择,尽管我从来不会把我自己在四年一次的联邦选举的投票和下一代的未来联系在一起。
听你这么一说, 好像又不能选保守党了。
那到底选哪个啊?大哥, 你给个准话吧。
NDP , 还是Lib ?
 
听你这么一说, 好像又不能选保守党了。
那到底选哪个啊?大哥, 你给个准话吧。
NDP , 还是Lib ?
必须lib,让那些嘲笑我们愚蠢的人看看,我们就是这么的stupid
 
http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/ste...s-without-proper-security-screening-1.3219359

Stephen Harper says Canada will not airlift refugees without proper security screening

'We are willing to take more people, but we must be sure we are helping the most vulnerable'

Stephen Harper says the government is looking to improve the refugee resettlement process, but it will not airlift thousands of refugees from countries such as Syria and Iraq, where extremist organizations operate, without conducting a proper security screening.

"To help, we must ensure we screen every potential refugee carefully. We have been clear that we are willing to take more people, but we must be sure we are helping the most vulnerable.

"We cannot open the floodgates and airlift tens of thousands of refugees out of a terrorist war zone without proper process. That is too great a risk for Canada," Harper said on Tuesday during a question-and-answer session on Facebook.


Harper and other world leaders have come under increased pressure to take in more refugees as the war in Syria continues to displace millions of people into neighbouring countries.

Four million Syrians have already fled the country, according to the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, which estimates that another 7.6 million people are displaced inside Syria.

Harper said on Tuesday, during a morning campaign stop in Mississauga, Ont., that efforts to bring in more refugees cannot come at the expense of Canada's security.

"This government has already announced prior to the latest round of headlines, we announced our intention to bring more Syrian and Iraq refugees to this country … we're looking to bring in more and we're looking to improve the process."

"When we are dealing with people that are from, in many cases a terrorist war zone, we are going to make sure that we screen people appropriately and the security of this country is fully protected," Harper said.

stephen-harper-facebook-q-a.jpg

Conservative Party Leader Stephen Harper and his wife, Laureen, visited Facebook’s Canadian headquarters in Toronto for a Q&A session. (Facebook)

In January, the Harper government announced it would resettle 10,000 more Syrian refugees over the next three years and another 3,000 Iraqi refugees by the end of 2015, in addition to the 20,000 Iraqi refugees who have already resettled in Canada.

Harper also said Canada will continue to prioritize refugees who are ethnic and religious minorities — comments that previously drew the ire of his political rivals.

"We are going to make sure that we are selecting the most vulnerable bona fide refugees. Obviously with a focus on the religious and ethnic minorities that are the most vulnerable," Harper said during a campaign stop in Mississauga.

'Bureaucratic trap'
NDP Leader Tom Mulcair, who was in Dorval, Que., on Tuesday morning, criticized Harper for lacking the political will to take in more refugees.

"You shouldn't have people in this desperate situation falling into a bureaucratic trap asked to produce identity papers, as if you had time to renew your driver's licence when you were walking across the desert with your family.

"So you have to take that into account, having more people on the ground there would be a good idea. And, of course, we could use military assets to start moving refugees out of the area more rapidly," Mulcair said.

Over the weekend, Liberal Leader Justin Trudeau called on Harper to meet with him and the NDP leader to come up with an improved response to the crisis.

Mulcair also said he had reached out to the Conservative leader.

Harper later dismissed the proposed meeting as "partisan games."

B.C. latest province to offer help
The pressure on Harper to take in more refugees continued to mount on Tuesday when B.C. Premier Christy Clark became the fourth provincial leader in recent days to announce measures to help Syrian refugees resettle in Canada.

The photograph of the Syrian toddler Alan Kurdi, whose body was found on a beach in Turkey after he drowned with his mother and brother trying to reach Europe, hit British Columbians particularly hard because the three-year-old's aunt lives in Coquitlam.

The premiers of Nova Scotia, Quebec and Ontario also announced increased efforts to help Syrian refugees in the past week.


The Canadian office for the United Nations Refugee Agency thanked Nova Scotia Premier Stephen McNeil for his province's contribution of $50,000 for Syrian refugees.

It also expressed gratitude to individual Canadians and other groups "for the outpouring of public support and donations" offered in response to the Syrian crisis.

In a press release issued Tuesday, the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees said the agency only had enough funds to meet about 37 per cent of its needs for the Syrian emergency.

Former Progressive Conservative prime minister Joe Clark said last week that Canada could take in refugees more quickly by sending Canadian officials to United Nations refugee camps where they could screen applicants in person.

Clark said that's what his government did when it airlifted thousands of Vietnamese applicants to Canada from refugee camps in 1979.

'Agree to bring 50,000 of those frightened men, women and children to Canada. Say we'll do it by end-December.'–Rick Hillier, retired Canadian general
Retired general Rick Hillier also added his voice to the debate on Sunday, urging the three main federal leaders to work together to bring 50,000 refugees to Canada by the end of the year.

"Each of our federal leaders has said we must do more, so let's do it.… Challenge our provinces, cities, churches and individual Canadians to step up and help this get done. Let's do it instead of endlessly talking about doing it," Hillier said in a post on Facebook.

Refugee applications processed 'within a year'
Part of the struggle to bring refugees to Canada is based on the resources to process them.

In 2012, Canada closed its visa processing office in Damascus, shunting hundreds of case files over to the already overstretched embassies in Jordan and Egypt.

Then, the government did deploy additional staff to try to get a handle on a case backlog that included both refugee files and family sponsorship ones — cases in which people in Canada were trying to get their own families out of the war.

But at that point, the government had made no firm commitments on Syrian refugee resettlement and staff were largely processing refugee cases belonging to Iraqis.

A spokeswoman from Citizenship and Immigration Canada told CBC News that it was "difficult" to say how many of its staff are currently assigned to processing applications from refugees, because "we move work around the immigration network depending on where we have available resources and where files can be processed most quickly."

"We are processing Syrian resettlement cases within a year and continue to look at ways to streamline processing," Nancy Caron said in an email to CBC News.

Caron said processing times depend on a number of factors, including "the volume of applications, the security situation in the region and how quickly requirements such as security screening and medical examinations can be completed."

She also noted that CIC has "reallocated resources and centralized the intake and processing of applications in Winnipeg to alleviate the administrative burden at visa offices overseas and reduce backlogs."
没说哈伯怎么好,但他至少具有起码的智力和common sense。
 
变成美国好啊。刚才咪咪哥还说在全球绿化浪潮中,美国可能是片净土呢!
招了再裁,不花钱吗,你又不担心加拿大成希腊了?

达菲案我说他自找麻烦是他本来就不概用王子岛的名额提名达菲在first place,因为达菲大部分时间呆在渥村,不符合参议员提名所在地的居住条件,哈勃和娜舅以达菲在王子岛有4000元的财产为由,认定达菲符合居住条件。哈勃自己的法律顾问佩林多次提醒哈勃和娜舅这样做有法律上的风险,可哈勃根本不予理会,坚持提名以回报达菲的助选。那达菲认为既然我符合王子岛的居住条件,我当然应该拿补贴,后面的事就不用说了。所有这事儿就是哈勃为自己的傲慢所付出的代价。懂了吗?

美国是好,美国是一切能人向往的圣地,有谁挡你去吗,加拿大至少有60%的人口不想把加拿大搞成像美国一样。这叫主流民意,懂吗?

多论多2015 年的枪击案比2014年翻了一倍。你要是不嫌少,就等俩年看看。大部分加拿大人,特别是魁北克人反对放松枪支管理是
因为他们对20多年前发生在蒙大工学院惨案记忆犹新。用你的话讲,加拿大人可能懒点,但他们并不像有些CFC上的聪明人那么健忘。呵呵

至于最后一个问题,不再有兴趣回答你。因为你的用语表明你不可理喻。
 
想来想去,我还是选哈珀,经济不好是因为石油下跌,是外部原因,不是加拿大自己造成的,只要油价不涨,现在哪个政党上台都搞不好;国家安全,公民的生命安全,这些比经济问题重要,哈勃能在大选时冒着落选的危险,把国家安全和公民的生命安全放到第一位,是个好总理。
如果选别的党,就算他们把经济搞好了(石油不涨,这是不可能的),可是万一难民里混入了恐怖分子,在首都搞个大爆炸,命都没了,经济好有什么用?要钱还有什么用?
最关键是,增加大量的XX人,这得相应增加多少监控人手哇?这还不把经济增量全吃掉了?
 
最关键是,增加大量的XX人,这得相应增加多少监控人手哇?这还不把经济增量全吃掉了?
猩猩醒醒吧, 哪还有什么“经济增量”哟!都在衰退咧。
 
招了再裁,不花钱吗,你又不担心加拿大成希腊了?

达菲案我说他自找麻烦是他本来就不概用王子岛的名额提名达菲在first place,因为达菲大部分时间呆在渥村,不符合参议员提名所在地的居住条件,哈勃和娜舅以达菲在王子岛有4000元的财产为由,认定达菲符合居住条件。哈勃自己的法律顾问佩林多次提醒哈勃和娜舅这样做有法律上的风险,可哈勃根本不予理会,坚持提名以回报达菲的助选。那达菲认为既然我符合王子岛的居住条件,我当然应该拿补贴,后面的事就不用说了。所有这事儿就是哈勃为自己的傲慢所付出的代价。懂了吗?

美国是好,美国是一切能人向往的圣地,有谁挡你去吗,加拿大至少有60%的人口不想把加拿大搞成像美国一样。这叫主流民意,懂吗?

多论多2015 年的枪击案比2014年翻了一倍。你要是不嫌少,就等俩年看看。大部分加拿大人,特别是魁北克人反对放松枪支管理是
因为他们对20多年前发生在蒙大工学院惨案记忆犹新。用你的话讲,加拿大人可能懒点,但他们并不像有些CFC上的聪明人那么健忘。呵呵

至于最后一个问题,不再有兴趣回答你。因为你的用语表明你不可理喻。

quangeshiqinshou
 
因为大家都是从社会主义和共产主义国家移民来的,都知道NDP上台后会什么样,都有亲身经历。

首先,无论是什么主义,只要放在民主的架构上,都没有问题。无论什么主义,只要放在独裁的架构上,就出问题。

中国的社会主义,最开始就是一群私塾出身的领导者带着更大一群私塾都没念过的人夺取了江山。骨子里还是封建那一套。他们领导者的后代们有了点洋墨水,又学了原始资本主义的那一套。中国的社会主义先天不足到后天变质,从来就没有实现过真正的社会主义。

真正的社会主义,最终会现在加拿大西欧北欧这些国家里最先实现。
 
小平同志说了,那个阶段是“社会主义的初级阶段”,是“有中国特色的社会主义”。
他说啥你就信啥? 他还向毛主席保证过永不翻案呢。后来怎样大家都清楚。

事实上那个阶段是打着社会主义旗号的 “资本主义的初级阶段”。
 
就算是大麻党上台,它的实行的政策与现在的,也不会有多大差别。
 
到了现在,相信大家在这一点上分歧不大,下一届政府多半是少数政府。
大家辩来辩去,其实,任何大的变革的机会都不大,一切按部就班,就这样了。
当然了,如果两个左派党联合花钱,各位准备逃吧或掏吧。这里多是中产或富有阶层吧?
 
到了现在,相信大家在这一点上分歧不大,下一届政府多半是少数政府。
大家辩来辩去,其实,任何大的变革的机会都不大,一切按部就班,就这样了。
当然了,如果两个左派党联合花钱,各位准备逃吧或掏吧。这里多是中产或富有阶层吧?
富有阶层的定义,至少1m加币净资产
 
到了现在,相信大家在这一点上分歧不大,下一届政府多半是少数政府。
大家辩来辩去,其实,任何大的变革的机会都不大,一切按部就班,就这样了。
当然了,如果两个左派党联合花钱,各位准备逃吧或掏吧。这里多是中产或富有阶层吧?
那总比傲慢自大背离加拿大价值观的强吧 人家是给富人服务的 你查查大企业税务近十年来被减了多少就知道了 除非你是那个阶层的 算我没说
 
我一个打酱油的。等着自由党上数据了。光说,屁用。
快呀。人家保守党,基本是有问必答了,

公平起见,同问保守党支持者。

保守党,如何平衡预算?
自由党如何扩大赤字,之后钱从何来?
NDP许诺的好多呀,钱从何来?
 
后退
顶部