It is about parent's responsibility...

等时间来检验。你们是为拉票而拉票,为误导而误导。还是在理性助选?
你不认识我呀。我有什么理由为拉票而拉票呢?我有什么理由要不分青红皂白地一味支持保守党呢?
 
用一种新发明的"gender identity theory" 来解释这些现象, 并暗中鼓励变性,是KW的性教育大纲的危害所在。
建立一个合适的性教育大纲,实际上也面临着很多挑战:

--- 如何减少霸凌现象 -- 霸凌现象并不只发生在性别疑惑的孩子身上, 即使全班都是变性人,仍然会有霸凌现象。以霸凌现象为由头灌输或者鼓励变性 是某些人的私货,别有用心。 但确实需要给孩子们正确的认识,人与人之间的不同,尊重人与人之间的差别。我觉得霸凌现象就是个尊重问题
--- 同性婚姻是合法的,在这个前提下,如何向孩子们介绍家庭关系, 是个很棘手的问题。学校不可能不介绍 同性婚姻,目前只能在什么年龄段 让孩子认识这个现象 来找一个平衡点。同性婚姻家庭的孩子如何能正确认识两性关系更是个难题

--- 确实有孩子confuse about his gender identity, 应不应该鼓励变性手术或者吃药?小学阶段怎样办?初中阶段怎样办?高中阶段怎样办?
---
-- 欢迎大家到教育厅长的推特上去献计献策
可能有极少数的孩子有性别取向的困扰,但这属于个案可以个别辅导。
孩子人生观价值观世界观还未成熟时,这些知识很容易被作为正常取向而被接受,造成更多孩子的困扰。
 
细节是问题所在, 你不看细节, 那就没办法了。KW 的性教育大纲的理论基础是 性别是流动的,随时可以变。变性很容易。他们的理论是自相矛盾的。既然性别流动,为啥要随时换厕所呢?干嘛不根据出生性别上厕所呢?孩子到了一定年龄有羞耻之心,他们完全不顾这样一个事实,单单强调他们的“gender identity theory", 这样一个不成熟的理论,拿真人来做实验,居心可怕。
我扫瞄了一眼安省1-12年级的健康卫生教育大纲里的3年级和6年级的,没有看到你们宣传的xxx内容。你能把大纲原文找出来截屏在这里吗?我相信里面一定有xxx内容,可是我眼拙看不出来:shy::buttrock:
 
我只是想说随便骂人是多么糟糕。下次你看见有谁"更不济",欢迎提出来。

"更不济"好像都难
那些拿着夸大或不实信息来吓唬忽悠不明真相群众以期达到其不可告人的或是自己都不知道是啥的目的的人岂止是更不济,那是更可怜可怕。跟着希特勒屠杀犹太人的就是一大批这种人,在文革中打砸抢虐杀老师领导走资派的也是这批人。人类社会因为有这种人而时不时不断倒退。
 
最后编辑:
现在是保守党卫队:monster:

极端性教育,讨论了好几年了,CFC穿越一下,你就能看到,当时作为父母的普通人如何一条一条的分析这套极端教纲了。当时分析的已经非常全面,没必要重复了。

现在你所谓的保守党卫队,其实根本不存在,其实无非就是普通华人,有孩子在小学低年级的。
看到了弊端,发声,没用,被指为恐惧症,
然后突然明白,某党根本就不理会人民二字。
进而看到了自由党的末日。
进而开始支持重视政治,进而开始支持保守党,
推翻反人民的某党。

如今的保守党回归以人为先!(参见保守党最新宣传语)大概也是这个逻辑吧。

中国有句古话,自作孽,不可活。就是这意思。
加拿大人政治上比较厚重,木讷。花了十几年时间,但是终于还是无法忍受,干掉了这个反人民的政党了。而且,我看不到某党在未来10年还有什么翻身的机会了。
 
反对和赞成2015性教纲的人都有。难道只是反对的人是人民,赞成的人不是人民?我本人本不在此持立场,但反感某些极端观点。
 
反对的,当时被指责为phobia。
显然自由党不把人民当回事。
自由党把反对者不当人民。

结果如何?一目了然。

支持者,可以继续支持,你也是人民。好像没看到那句话说支持极端教杠的不是人民了。

只有自由党才会把人民不当人看。完全不给家长留任何余地。完全不信任家长。完全要把家长的教育权剥夺,完全要搞集中营似的,一言堂教育体制。完全是自由主义理想的反面。
 
最后编辑:
极端性教育,讨论了好几年了,CFC穿越一下,你就能看到,当时作为父母的普通人如何一条一条的分析这套极端教纲了。当时分析的已经非常全面,没必要重复了。

现在你所谓的保守党卫队,其实根本不存在,其实无非就是普通华人,有孩子在小学低年级的。
看到了弊端,发声,没用,被指为恐惧症,
然后突然明白,某党根本就不理会人民二字。
进而看到了自由党的末日。
进而开始支持重视政治,进而开始支持保守党,
推翻反人民的某党。

如今的保守党回归以人为先!(参见保守党最新宣传语)大概也是这个逻辑吧。

中国有句古话,自作孽,不可活。就是这意思。
加拿大人政治上比较厚重,木讷。花了十几年时间,但是终于还是无法忍受,干掉了这个反人民的政党了。而且,我看不到某党在未来10年还有什么翻身的机会了。
以明神父为首的cfc伪保守党杆子都是以讹传讹,没有确凿证据。我得自己去研究2015安省大纲了。问他们要了半天的原文出处,他们也拿不出来:(
 
反对的,当时被指责为phobia。
显然自由党不把人民当回事。
自由党把反对者不当人民。

结果如何?一目了然。

支持者,可以继续支持,你也是人民。好像没看到那句话说支持极端教杠的不是人民了。

只有自由党才会把人民不当人看。完全不给家长留任何余地。完全不信任家长。完全要把家长的教育权剥夺,完全要搞集中营似的,一言堂教育体制。完全是自由主义理想的反面。

保守党政府已经改口了。人民还没有取得最后的胜利。
https://www.cp24.com/news/ontario-s...l-teach-some-modern-themes-minister-1.4015305

Ontario sex-ed curriculum will still teach some modern themes: minister
image.jpg



Shawn Jeffords, The Canadian Press
Published Monday, July 16, 2018 1:52PM EDT
Last Updated Monday, July 16, 2018 6:46PM EDT
TORONTO -- Ontario's education minister went back and forth Monday on just what students will learn while her government scraps the province's modernized sex-ed curriculum.

Ultimately, Lisa Thompson indicated that no decisions had been made on whether concepts like consent, cyber safety and gender identity will be taught in classrooms this fall.

The province's new Progressive Conservative government announced last week that it was reverting to a 1998 version of the curriculum while consultations are carried out to create a new document.

Thompson first told the legislature on Monday that not all parts of the modernized sex-ed curriculum -- updated in 2015 by the Liberals -- would be scrapped.

"We know they need to learn about consent," she said at the legislature. "We know they need to learn about cyber safety, we know they need to learn about gender identity and appreciation. But we also know that the former Liberal government's consultation process was completely flawed."

A short time later, Thompson told reporters that only a portion of the curriculum will be rolled back, not the entire document.

"What we'll be looking at is the developing sexual relations," she said. "That's the part in the curriculum that we'll be taking a look at."

Late Monday afternoon, however, Thompson's office released a statement that appeared to contradict her comments from earlier in the day.

"We have made no decisions on what the new curriculum will look like. The final decision on the scope of the new curriculum will be based on what we hear from Ontario parents," the statement said.

"While these consultations occur, we are reverting to the full health and physical education curriculum that was last taught in 2014. This curriculum leaves ample space to discuss current social issues."

Premier Doug Ford repeatedly promised to repeal and replace the sex-ed curriculum during his run for the Tory leadership earlier this year and during the spring election, saying parents had not been adequately consulted.

Critics have said the 1998 version of the curriculum did not include many modern themes that children need to keep themselves safe online and did not address things like same-sex marriage.

The modernized curriculum included warnings about online bullying and sexting that were not in the previous version, and also discussed same-sex marriage, gender identity and masturbation.

NDP Leader Andrea Horwath said Monday's developments make it clear the Tory government does not know what it's doing on the sex-ed file.

"September is coming pretty quick," she said. "It's reprehensible and irresponsible that this government has left everything in such a disarray that educators in our province aren't even aware of what's going to happen come September."

Interim Liberal Leader John Fraser questioned why the government wanted to repeal a curriculum that has been taught in classrooms across the province for three years.

"It's irresponsible to cancel that curriculum," he said. "It's there to protect our children."

Jason Kunin, an English teacher in Toronto, said regardless of what the Tory government does with sex-ed, teachers will address modern issues in class.

"Whether you have it enshrined in the documents or not, you can't simply say we're going to pretend like these things don't exist and expect 60,000 teachers in Ontario to suddenly go along with pretending that it's 1998," said Kunin, who signed on to an online petition condemning the government's scrapping of the modernized health curriculum among other issues.

"You can repeal the curriculum but these conversations are still going to happen."
 
压制教纲更新,从来不是保守党政纲。
保守党说的从来是,反对的极端内容和年龄不符的内容。你仔细看看保守党政纲吧。

具体操作,当然是先把极端的那个变态玩意取消,然后便置信的,进步,但又不极端的。
 
你连2015教纲都没看过?还怪别人。还说别人以讹传讹。什么是讹?搞了半天,你都没看过,你真行。

以明神父为首的cfc伪保守党杆子都是以讹传讹,没有确凿证据。我得自己去研究2015安省大纲了。问他们要了半天的原文出处,他们也拿不出来:(
 
压制教纲更新,从来不是保守党政纲。
保守党说的从来是,反对的极端内容和年龄不符的内容。你仔细看看保守党政纲吧。

具体操作,当然是先把极端的那个变态玩意取消,然后便置信的,进步,但又不极端的。
口交肛交同性恋教给11岁六年级的小学生是不是有点过了?
在华人社区,弥漫反对更多是冷十的这个。如果新教纲里还继续,请明神父及保党卫队再带领我们去保党总部静坐游行,反对保党。能做到吗?
 
后退
顶部