CastleCode
AAA
川普虽然不靠谱，但是真心为他的人民抹福利[emoji3]
孟晚舟引渡案: 2018年12月1日被拘捕；2019年3月1日，加正式启动引渡程序；BC最高法院引渡听证2021年8月18日结束，法官未作出裁决；9月24日孟晚舟与美国政府达成协议，美国撤销引渡请求，BC法院终止引渡程序; 2022年12月1日美国撤销指控
- 主题发起人 ccc
- 开始时间
- 注册
- 2003-04-13
- 消息
- 241,024
- 荣誉分数
- 37,876
- 声望点数
- 1,393
政府不能干预? 看看最终到底是谁决定是否引渡吧....
莫非是加拿大政府在为自己铺退路?
Justice Minister Jody Wilson-Raybould has outlined the next steps in Huawei CFO Meng Wanzhou‘s possible extradition to the United States, starting with the U.S. filing a full extradition request and possibly ending with the minister herself having to make the final decision.
Justice Minister Jody Wilson-Raybould has outlined the next steps in Huawei CFO Meng Wanzhou‘s possible extradition to the United States, starting with the U.S. filing a full extradition request and possibly ending with the minister herself having to make the final decision.
In a statement released Wednesday afternoon, Wilson-Raybould said she wanted to “clarify” Canada’s extradition process and reiterate Meng’s rights to legal recourse.
“It is internationally understood and accepted that people who are alleged to have committed crimes in another country should be surrendered to that country to address the charges,” the statement read.
According to the Department of Justice, an individual can be extradited if the alleged criminal activity in question is recognized as criminal in both countries.
Foreign countries can either provide Canada with a formal extradition request along with supporting documents and evidence, or request the provisional arrest of the person in question.
The latter option, permitted “where urgency has been established,” was taken in the case of the Huawei executive, Wilson-Raybould pointed out, adding that the decision to seek an arrest warrant was made “without any political interference or direction.”
If the B.C. Supreme Court approves Meng’s extradition, Wilson-Raybould will then have to make the final decision on whether Meng will be surrendered to U.S. authorities.
“At each stage of the extradition process in Canada, there is careful balancing of the interests of the person sought for extradition against Canada’s international obligations,” Wilson-Raybould said. “The person sought is able to challenge their extradition at multiple levels, both before the superior and appellate courts in Canada, and by making submissions to me on the issue of surrender.”
The minister added that she cannot make any comment on the facts of the case in order to protect the independence of the Canadian courts and extradition process.
Wilson-Raybould’s responsibility could leave Canada between a rock and a hard place as it finds itself in an uncomfortable spot between two economic superpowers.
While Canada maintains that the rule of law is separate from politics, U.S. President Donald Trump openly stated Tuesday that he’d “certainly intervene” in Meng’s case in the interest of U.S.-China trade.
China’s state-run media was already ridiculing Canada’s assertion that Meng would be dealt with fairly and transparently by an independent judiciary.
Prime Minister Justin Trudeau reaffirmed Canada’s commitment to the rule of law again on Wednesday, “regardless of what goes on in other countries.”
Foreign Affairs Chrystia Freeland also addressed the issue on Wednesday, telling reporters that authorities must “ensure that any extradition request is about seeing that justice is done” and not about “political interference.”
— With files from the Canadian Press
莫非是加拿大政府在为自己铺退路?
Justice Minister Jody Wilson-Raybould has outlined the next steps in Huawei CFO Meng Wanzhou‘s possible extradition to the United States, starting with the U.S. filing a full extradition request and possibly ending with the minister herself having to make the final decision.
Justice Minister Jody Wilson-Raybould has outlined the next steps in Huawei CFO Meng Wanzhou‘s possible extradition to the United States, starting with the U.S. filing a full extradition request and possibly ending with the minister herself having to make the final decision.
In a statement released Wednesday afternoon, Wilson-Raybould said she wanted to “clarify” Canada’s extradition process and reiterate Meng’s rights to legal recourse.
“It is internationally understood and accepted that people who are alleged to have committed crimes in another country should be surrendered to that country to address the charges,” the statement read.
According to the Department of Justice, an individual can be extradited if the alleged criminal activity in question is recognized as criminal in both countries.
Foreign countries can either provide Canada with a formal extradition request along with supporting documents and evidence, or request the provisional arrest of the person in question.
The latter option, permitted “where urgency has been established,” was taken in the case of the Huawei executive, Wilson-Raybould pointed out, adding that the decision to seek an arrest warrant was made “without any political interference or direction.”
If the B.C. Supreme Court approves Meng’s extradition, Wilson-Raybould will then have to make the final decision on whether Meng will be surrendered to U.S. authorities.
“At each stage of the extradition process in Canada, there is careful balancing of the interests of the person sought for extradition against Canada’s international obligations,” Wilson-Raybould said. “The person sought is able to challenge their extradition at multiple levels, both before the superior and appellate courts in Canada, and by making submissions to me on the issue of surrender.”
The minister added that she cannot make any comment on the facts of the case in order to protect the independence of the Canadian courts and extradition process.
Wilson-Raybould’s responsibility could leave Canada between a rock and a hard place as it finds itself in an uncomfortable spot between two economic superpowers.
While Canada maintains that the rule of law is separate from politics, U.S. President Donald Trump openly stated Tuesday that he’d “certainly intervene” in Meng’s case in the interest of U.S.-China trade.
China’s state-run media was already ridiculing Canada’s assertion that Meng would be dealt with fairly and transparently by an independent judiciary.
Prime Minister Justin Trudeau reaffirmed Canada’s commitment to the rule of law again on Wednesday, “regardless of what goes on in other countries.”
Foreign Affairs Chrystia Freeland also addressed the issue on Wednesday, telling reporters that authorities must “ensure that any extradition request is about seeing that justice is done” and not about “political interference.”
— With files from the Canadian Press
最后编辑:
- 注册
- 2003-04-13
- 消息
- 241,024
- 荣誉分数
- 37,876
- 声望点数
- 1,393
她拍板是否引渡孟晚舟 加拿大里外不是人(图)
京港台：2018-12-13 11:47| 来源：加国无忧
加拿大(专题)联邦司法部长周三表示，即使法庭批准将中国华为(专题)公司高管孟晚舟引渡到美国面对欺诈指控，引渡的最终决定权仍在于这位部长本人。这将令加拿大在中美两个经济大国之间的处境更加困难。
加拿大司法部长Jody Wilson-Raybould
据加通社报道，美国总统特朗普(专题)已经公开声称他会考虑介入并干涉孟晚舟案，这令人更加质疑加拿大在拘捕华为公司高管背后的真正意图。
加拿大一直声称司法程序与政治无法，孟晚舟一案将会得到公正、独立的审判。但是如果法庭宣判一名被告必须引渡到另一国面对指控，最终的决定还是由一位政客作出。
加拿大司法部长Jody Wilson-Raybould周三表示，她非常重视她的“引渡责任和义务”，如果加拿大法庭批准引渡孟晚舟，“作为司法部长，我必须就移交被引渡的人作出最终决定。”
为此，Wilson-Raybould发表声明说，她不会作更多表态，因为这“可能破坏法庭程序的独立性以及加拿大引渡程序的正常运作。”
她说：“为了保障正当的程序以及尊重法庭的独立，与所有法庭程序一样，此案中检控官的立场向法庭作出提呈，并得到适当的考虑是至关重要的。”
不过，特朗普令这一立场更加繁杂。他在周二晚接受路透社采访时说，如果他认为有助于与中国达成贸易协定，如果他认为有必要，他就会介入孟晚舟案。
特朗普的表态也与美国驻加拿大大使Kelly Craft当天上午的说法相背离。这位大使与加拿大当局的说法一致，即孟晚舟案将在独立司法系统下得到公正和透明的审理。
加拿大从未如此被孤立
加拿大前驻中国大使马大维（David Mulroney）指出，“我们在很长时间以来都没有如此被孤立。特朗普证实了中国的愤怒指责--皇家骑警基本上就是为美国政府办事，抓捕一名人质用于他们的贸易谈判。”
加拿大总理杜鲁多的首位外交政策顾问、渥太华大学国际事务教授Roland Paris表示，加拿大过去几十年一直享有非常舒适的国际环境，但是现在没有了。“现在，许多指导外交政策的假设成疑，包括我们是否支持美国。”
加拿大只有一个选择
马大维与Paris都认为，加拿大只有一个选择：坚持法律准则，希望特朗普的干涉被视为一位变幻莫测总统的又一个一时兴起。
然而，美国国务卿彭佩罗在周三似乎强调了特朗普的话。彭佩罗在接受Fox and Friends电视采访时说：“我们始终要平衡美国的利益。任何时候的执法行动，我们需要确保将外交政策考虑在内。”他说：“这样做完全合适。总统的使命非常明确，美国第一。”
卑诗大学中国专家Paul Evans表示，中国方面正在倾听和做记录。
他说：“从中国的现实的角度，特朗普与彭佩罗的讲话暗示法律与政府不是分开的。他们深刻了解这一点。”
“在加拿大，坚守法律是政府躲避在中美两国冲突中站队的方式。在这个案子上，我们既不虚伪也不天真。”
杜鲁多周三再次重申了加拿大对法律的承诺，无论其他国家发生什么。
马大维说，杜鲁多没有其他选择，“我们完全受大国的支配。”
Paris指出，美国实际上是一个不太可靠的伙伴。加拿大无论多难，都不能放弃依赖基于法律的国际秩序。“加拿大在这场新兴的大国斗争中的周旋余地有限。我们有意维护与中国的互利合作，如果美国采取在中国问题上要么支持要么反对的鲜明立场（with-us-or-against-us attitude），要达到平衡就会更加困难。”
京港台：2018-12-13 11:47| 来源：加国无忧
加拿大(专题)联邦司法部长周三表示，即使法庭批准将中国华为(专题)公司高管孟晚舟引渡到美国面对欺诈指控，引渡的最终决定权仍在于这位部长本人。这将令加拿大在中美两个经济大国之间的处境更加困难。
加拿大司法部长Jody Wilson-Raybould
据加通社报道，美国总统特朗普(专题)已经公开声称他会考虑介入并干涉孟晚舟案，这令人更加质疑加拿大在拘捕华为公司高管背后的真正意图。
加拿大一直声称司法程序与政治无法，孟晚舟一案将会得到公正、独立的审判。但是如果法庭宣判一名被告必须引渡到另一国面对指控，最终的决定还是由一位政客作出。
加拿大司法部长Jody Wilson-Raybould周三表示，她非常重视她的“引渡责任和义务”，如果加拿大法庭批准引渡孟晚舟，“作为司法部长，我必须就移交被引渡的人作出最终决定。”
为此，Wilson-Raybould发表声明说，她不会作更多表态，因为这“可能破坏法庭程序的独立性以及加拿大引渡程序的正常运作。”
她说：“为了保障正当的程序以及尊重法庭的独立，与所有法庭程序一样，此案中检控官的立场向法庭作出提呈，并得到适当的考虑是至关重要的。”
不过，特朗普令这一立场更加繁杂。他在周二晚接受路透社采访时说，如果他认为有助于与中国达成贸易协定，如果他认为有必要，他就会介入孟晚舟案。
特朗普的表态也与美国驻加拿大大使Kelly Craft当天上午的说法相背离。这位大使与加拿大当局的说法一致，即孟晚舟案将在独立司法系统下得到公正和透明的审理。
加拿大从未如此被孤立
加拿大前驻中国大使马大维（David Mulroney）指出，“我们在很长时间以来都没有如此被孤立。特朗普证实了中国的愤怒指责--皇家骑警基本上就是为美国政府办事，抓捕一名人质用于他们的贸易谈判。”
加拿大总理杜鲁多的首位外交政策顾问、渥太华大学国际事务教授Roland Paris表示，加拿大过去几十年一直享有非常舒适的国际环境，但是现在没有了。“现在，许多指导外交政策的假设成疑，包括我们是否支持美国。”
加拿大只有一个选择
马大维与Paris都认为，加拿大只有一个选择：坚持法律准则，希望特朗普的干涉被视为一位变幻莫测总统的又一个一时兴起。
然而，美国国务卿彭佩罗在周三似乎强调了特朗普的话。彭佩罗在接受Fox and Friends电视采访时说：“我们始终要平衡美国的利益。任何时候的执法行动，我们需要确保将外交政策考虑在内。”他说：“这样做完全合适。总统的使命非常明确，美国第一。”
卑诗大学中国专家Paul Evans表示，中国方面正在倾听和做记录。
他说：“从中国的现实的角度，特朗普与彭佩罗的讲话暗示法律与政府不是分开的。他们深刻了解这一点。”
“在加拿大，坚守法律是政府躲避在中美两国冲突中站队的方式。在这个案子上，我们既不虚伪也不天真。”
杜鲁多周三再次重申了加拿大对法律的承诺，无论其他国家发生什么。
马大维说，杜鲁多没有其他选择，“我们完全受大国的支配。”
Paris指出，美国实际上是一个不太可靠的伙伴。加拿大无论多难，都不能放弃依赖基于法律的国际秩序。“加拿大在这场新兴的大国斗争中的周旋余地有限。我们有意维护与中国的互利合作，如果美国采取在中国问题上要么支持要么反对的鲜明立场（with-us-or-against-us attitude），要达到平衡就会更加困难。”
