孟晚舟引渡案: 2018年12月1日被拘捕;2019年3月1日,加正式启动引渡程序;BC最高法院引渡听证2021年8月18日结束,法官未作出裁决;9月24日孟晚舟与美国政府达成协议,美国撤销引渡请求,BC法院终止引渡程序; 2022年12月1日美国撤销指控

  • 主题发起人 主题发起人 ccc
  • 开始时间 开始时间
任正非感谢川普政府 推广了华为
www.creaders.net | 2019-02-22 07:45:25 环球网

华为创始人任正非近来加大了在外媒上的“宣传攻势”。继18日接受英国广播公司(BBC)采访时表示“美国没办法扼杀华为”后,任正非又在接受美国哥伦比亚广播公司(CBS)采访时强调,“5G不是原子弹”,他还感谢特朗普政府推广了华为。

CBS21日发布了这次专访内容。CBS说,中国科技巨头华为一直在5G技术中处于领先地位,并已与近30个国家签订了推广合同。然而,一个明显的例外是,美国认为,华为会对国家安全造成威胁。近日,任正非在华为深圳总部接受CBS记者采访时回应称,是特朗普政府多虑了。

“他们(特朗普政府)把5G技术夸大到某些军事设施的水平,但5G不是原子弹,”任正非说道,“我们现在在推出5G,很快我们还将迎来6G。在未来,将会有适合美国的新设备。”

随后,在谈到美国对5G技术及华为设备的担忧时,CBS记者表示,特朗普政府对使用华为设备的盟友发出了警告,副总统彭斯也在慕尼黑安全会议上称,“如果我们的盟友越来越依赖东方国家,我们就无法确保西方国家的安全。”

CBS记者就此询问任正非,“你将此视为一个威胁吗?”

任正非回答:“首先,我要感谢他们两个(特朗普与彭斯),他们都是大人物。5G技术此前并不为普通人所熟知,但现在这些大人物都在谈论5G,我们变得更有影响力了,也因此收获了更多的合同。”

对于任正非的回答,记者笑称“听起来有点讽刺”,任正非说道:“请转告他们,我实际上是在感谢他们推广了我们。”

20190222_15508502637770.jpg
20190222_15508502669693.jpg


任正非接受CBS采访视频截图


在接受CBS采访前,任正非18日接受了BBC的采访。当时,他一句“美国没办法扼杀华为”迅速登上世界多家主流媒体。任正非说,世界不能离开华为,因为华为(跟竞争对手比)更先进。

21日晚,美国总统特朗普在推特上就美国发展5G技术发文称,“我要美国赢,是通过竞争,而不是封杀当前更先进的科技。” 虽然特朗普总统并没有在推文中点名华为,但外界人认为,他的话很像是在回应任正非。

华为轮值董事长胡厚崑则在领英上回应特朗普“不靠封杀”的推文,他表示,“华为已准备好,通过真正的竞争,为美国建设真正的5G网络。”
 
任正非感谢川普政府 推广了华为
www.creaders.net | 2019-02-22 07:45:25 环球网

华为创始人任正非近来加大了在外媒上的“宣传攻势”。继18日接受英国广播公司(BBC)采访时表示“美国没办法扼杀华为”后,任正非又在接受美国哥伦比亚广播公司(CBS)采访时强调,“5G不是原子弹”,他还感谢特朗普政府推广了华为。

CBS21日发布了这次专访内容。CBS说,中国科技巨头华为一直在5G技术中处于领先地位,并已与近30个国家签订了推广合同。然而,一个明显的例外是,美国认为,华为会对国家安全造成威胁。近日,任正非在华为深圳总部接受CBS记者采访时回应称,是特朗普政府多虑了。

“他们(特朗普政府)把5G技术夸大到某些军事设施的水平,但5G不是原子弹,”任正非说道,“我们现在在推出5G,很快我们还将迎来6G。在未来,将会有适合美国的新设备。”

随后,在谈到美国对5G技术及华为设备的担忧时,CBS记者表示,特朗普政府对使用华为设备的盟友发出了警告,副总统彭斯也在慕尼黑安全会议上称,“如果我们的盟友越来越依赖东方国家,我们就无法确保西方国家的安全。”

CBS记者就此询问任正非,“你将此视为一个威胁吗?”

任正非回答:“首先,我要感谢他们两个(特朗普与彭斯),他们都是大人物。5G技术此前并不为普通人所熟知,但现在这些大人物都在谈论5G,我们变得更有影响力了,也因此收获了更多的合同。”

对于任正非的回答,记者笑称“听起来有点讽刺”,任正非说道:“请转告他们,我实际上是在感谢他们推广了我们。”

浏览附件814674 浏览附件814675

任正非接受CBS采访视频截图


在接受CBS采访前,任正非18日接受了BBC的采访。当时,他一句“美国没办法扼杀华为”迅速登上世界多家主流媒体。任正非说,世界不能离开华为,因为华为(跟竞争对手比)更先进。

21日晚,美国总统特朗普在推特上就美国发展5G技术发文称,“我要美国赢,是通过竞争,而不是封杀当前更先进的科技。” 虽然特朗普总统并没有在推文中点名华为,但外界人认为,他的话很像是在回应任正非。

华为轮值董事长胡厚崑则在领英上回应特朗普“不靠封杀”的推文,他表示,“华为已准备好,通过真正的竞争,为美国建设真正的5G网络。”
敌人反对的我们就要支持;
敌人支持的我们就要反对!

美国和西方现在需要华为了, 华为就应该对其进行封锁和禁运!
用中国人民的血汗,用中国工程师的辛勤工作,去推动和建设美国和西方的信息化? 做梦!

别人的东西, 华为做不了主, 但是华为的技术和产品, 美国和西方连根毛也别想得到!
 
News release
March 1, 2019 – Ottawa, Ontario, Canada – Department of Justice

Canada is a country governed by the rule of law. Extradition in Canada is guided by the Extradition Act, international treaties and the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, which enshrines constitutional principles of fairness and due process.

Today, Department of Justice Canada officials issued an Authority to Proceed, formally commencing an extradition process in the case of Ms. Meng Wanzhou.

The decision follows a thorough and diligent review of the evidence in this case. The Department is satisfied that the requirements set out by the Extradition Act for the issuance of an Authority to Proceed have been met and there is sufficient evidence to be put before an extradition judge for decision.

The next step in the case is as follows:

  • The British Columbia Supreme Court has scheduled an appearance date for March 6, 2019 at 10:00 a.m. (PST) to confirm that an Authority to Proceed has been issued and to schedule the date for the extradition hearing.
During the extradition hearing, the Crown will make its detailed arguments in its submissions to the Court, where evidence will be filed and become part of the public record.

An extradition hearing is not a trial nor does it render a verdict of guilt or innocence. If a person is ultimately extradited from Canada to face prosecution in another country, the individual will have a trial in that country.

While court proceedings are underway, Ms. Meng will remain on bail subject to her existing conditions, as set by the court.

Quick facts
  • The Authority to Proceed is the first step in the extradition process. The decision on whether to issue an Authority to Proceed was made by Department of Justice Canada officials, who are part of a non-partisan public service.

  • The next step is the judicial phase where a judge hears the case. If the judge decides a person should be committed for extradition, then the Minister of Justice must decide if the person should be surrendered (extradited) to the requesting country.

  • The Minister of Justice will not comment on the facts of this case given he may need to make a decision later in this process.

  • Under the Extradition Act and the Treaty, Canada must review the alleged conduct and determine whether it could have resulted in a jail sentence of 1 year of more if it had taken place in Canada. The conduct for which extradition is sought must also be considered criminal in both the United States of America and in Canada. This is known as “dual criminality”.

  • Canada’s extradition process protects the rights of the person sought by ensuring that extradition will not be granted if, among other things, it is contrary to the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, including the principles of fundamental justice.
 
https://www.theglobeandmail.com/pol...dition-hearing-against-huawei-executive-meng/
Canada allows extradition hearing to proceed against Huawei executive Meng Wanzhou

Robert Fife Ottawa Bureau Chief
Steven Chase
Published March 1, 2019Updated 9 minutes ago

XEVHBCSQVRDQTODDLOPDZS4GW4.jpg



Huawei chief financial officer Meng Wanzhou arrives at a parole office in Vancouver on Dec. 12, 2018.The federal Justice Department is giving the go-ahead for an extradition case to proceed against Huawei executive Meng Wanzhou, who is wanted in the United States on fraud allegations.

Darryl Dyck/The Canadian Press

Canada’s Justice Department has granted permission for an extradition hearing to proceed on whether to deliver Huawei executive Meng Wanzhou into the hands of U.S. law authorities.

Ms. Meng, a Chinese citizen, was arrested at a Vancouver airport in December, triggering a diplomatic rift between Canada and China.

The Trudeau government took pains to defend Friday’s decision, emphasizing in a news release that Canada is merely sticking to the letter of the law governing extraditions.

“Canada is a country governed by the rule of law,” a Department of Justice statement said. “The decision on whether to issue an authority to proceed was made by Department of Justice ... officials who are part of a non-partisan public service.”

China has accused Canada of collaborating with the United States to persecute Ms. Meng, one of the top executives with China’s biggest private company. The Chinese embassy in Canada said the decision to arrest Ms. Meng in December amounts to a “political conspiracy” to undermine the telecom giant and has argued Prime Minister Justin Trudeau could easily have intervened to stop this from happening.


U.S. prosecutors accuse Ms. Meng and Huawei of fraud to circumvent U.S. sanctions on Iran. Her defence will hinge in part on alleged political motives behind the U.S. charges, and partly on proving that she did nothing wrong under Canadian law, her lead counsel, Richard Peck, told The Globe and Mail last month.

The Trudeau government has repeatedly insisted it is simply complying with the terms of the extradition treaty between Canada and the United States.

On Friday, Canada’s Department of Justice said a review of the arguments laid out by the United States has satisfied the criteria to proceed with an extradition hearing.

“The decision follows a thorough and diligent review of the evidence in this case. The department is satisfied that the requirements set out by the Extradition Act for the issuance of an Authority to Proceed have been met and there is sufficient evidence to be put before an extradition judge for decision.”

The Canadian government also noted that an extradition hearing will not make a decision on whether Ms. Meng is guilty of anything. “An extradition hearing is not a trial nor does it render a verdict of guilt or innocence. If a person is ultimately extradited from Canada to face prosecution in another country, the individual will have a trial in that country.”

The Chinese government, however, remains unconvinced that the Trudeau government has no margin to manoeuvre.

Hours before the Department of Justice announcement, China’s Foreign Ministry questioned Canada’s judicial independence as Mr. Trudeau faces accusations of trying to stop a corruption prosecution of SNC-Lavalin.

Beijing has strongly protested Ms. Meng’s arrest to U.S. and Canadian officials and accused both countries of a premeditated attempt to undermine the global aspirations of Huawei, whose founder is the father of Ms. Meng.

At a regular daily news briefing in Beijing, China’s Foreign Ministry took Canada to task over possible double standards by commenting on allegations of political interference in the SNC-Lavalin case.

Former justice minister and attorney-general Jody Wilson-Raybould said Mr. Trudeau and senior officials in the Prime Minister’s Office inappropriately pressed her to help the construction giant avoid a corruption and bribery trial.

Asked by a state media journalist if it was contradictory for Mr. Trudeau to say he couldn’t interfere in Ms. Meng’s case and yet his government stands accused of trying to intervene in the SNC-Lavalin case, Foreign Ministry spokesman Lu Kang said he “really liked this question.”


"Of course I think that this is a question that should be asked of the Canadian government," Mr. Lu said.

“In fact on this case you have mentioned, people in Canada are paying it a great deal of attention,” he added. “In fact, not only Chinese and Canadian citizens, but the whole world is extremely interested to hear how the Canadian government answers this question.”

Both Ms. Meng and Huawei have denied the U.S. allegations.

Beijing is demanding the release of Ms. Meng. After she was detained in Vancouver, China arrested two Canadians on national security grounds, and a Chinese court later sentenced to death a Canadian man who previously had only been jailed for drug smuggling.

The British Columbia Supreme Court has scheduled an appearance date for March 6 at 10 a.m PT to confirm that an “authority to proceed” has been issued and to schedule the date for the extradition hearing.
 
我早说了汇丰才是幕后黑手。

中国集中火力打击加拿大, 却轻轻巧巧的放过汇丰,简直就是脑残。
中国才不会打击汇丰,否则人家的总部更死心塌地留在伦敦了。
 
中国驻加拿大使馆发言人就加司法部就孟晚舟案签发授权进行令发表谈话

  中方对加拿大司法部就孟晚舟案签发授权进行令表示强烈不满和坚决反对。孟晚舟案不是一起简单的司法案件,而是对一家中国高科技企业的政治迫害。后来的事态发展证明了这一点。加方尽管标榜“法治原则”、“司法独立”,但并不能掩盖其在孟晚舟案上犯下的错误。

  从事件所呈现出的明显的政治干预情况看,如果加方真的遵循法治原则、司法独立,加方就应该按照加引渡法的有关条款,拒绝美方引渡请求,立即释放孟晚舟女士。加法庭的最终审理结果将是对加方是否坚持司法独立的试金石。我们将拭目以待。

http://ca.chineseembassy.org/chn/xw/t1642351.htm
 
英文版

Remarks of the Spokespers on of the Chinese Embassy in Canadaon the Issuance of Authority to Proceed by the Department of Justice Canada on the case of Meng Wanzhou

2019/03/02

The Chinese side is utterly dissatisfied with and firmly opposes the issuance of Authority to Proceed by the Department of Justice Canada on the case of Meng Wanzhou. This is not a merely judicial case, but a political persecution against a Chinese high-tech enterprise. The subsequent developments have proved this. The so-called "rule of law" and "judicial independence" asserted by Canada can not cover up the mistakes made by the Canadian side on the case of Meng Wanzhou.

Judging from the obvious political interference presented on this case, if Canada really abides by the principle of rule of law and judiciary independence, the Canadian side should refuse the extradition request of the United States and immediately release Ms. Meng Wanzhou in accordance with the relevant provisions of the Extradition Act of Canada. The final result of the Canadian court to handle this case will be a touchstone for testing whether Canada adheres to the judicial independence or not. We will wait and see


说实话,这英文不有表达出中方的不满。。。也没啥内容。
 
英文版

Remarks of the Spokespers on of the Chinese Embassy in Canadaon the Issuance of Authority to Proceed by the Department of Justice Canada on the case of Meng Wanzhou

2019/03/02

The Chinese side is utterly dissatisfied with and firmly opposes the issuance of Authority to Proceed by the Department of Justice Canada on the case of Meng Wanzhou. This is not a merely judicial case, but a political persecution against a Chinese high-tech enterprise. The subsequent developments have proved this. The so-called "rule of law" and "judicial independence" asserted by Canada can not cover up the mistakes made by the Canadian side on the case of Meng Wanzhou.

Judging from the obvious political interference presented on this case, if Canada really abides by the principle of rule of law and judiciary independence, the Canadian side should refuse the extradition request of the United States and immediately release Ms. Meng Wanzhou in accordance with the relevant provisions of the Extradition Act of Canada. The final result of the Canadian court to handle this case will be a touchstone for testing whether Canada adheres to the judicial independence or not. We will wait and see


说实话,这英文不有表达出中方的不满。。。也没啥内容。

Spokespers,Canadaon,这两个单词没学过。

中方/加方 The Chinese side/the Canadian side, 绝对中国特色。

:D

upload_2019-3-1_20-59-21.png
 
最后编辑:
Spokespers,Canadaon,这两个单词没学过。

中方/加方 The Chinese side/the Canadian side, 绝对中国特色。

:D

浏览附件816023
没有proof reading。。。分管宣传的党委书记应该写检查。
 
外交部发言人陆慷就加拿大方面执意推进针对中国公民孟晚舟的所谓引渡司法程序发表谈话

来源: 外交部网站 2019-03-02

  中方对加方执意推进对孟晚舟女士的所谓引渡司法程序表示强烈不满和坚决反对,并已提出严正交涉。

  中方在孟晚舟事件上的立场是明确的、坚定的。美加两国滥用其双边引渡条约,对中国公民任意采取强制措施,是对中国公民合法权益的严重侵犯。这是一起严重的政治事件。我们再次敦促美方立即撤销对孟晚舟女士的逮捕令和引渡请求,敦促加方立即释放孟晚舟女士,让她平安回到中国。
 
后退
顶部