谷歌大侠
高级会员
- 注册
- 2014-11-17
- 消息
- 1,076
- 荣誉分数
- 385
- 声望点数
- 93
我没有仔细追踪新闻报道,不知官方的说法是从哪天,哪个病例开始的。
我只是看到我村CTC 和 Ottawa Public Health 发布的数据图很不同。从3月25日起,开始关注每天公布的数据,发现CTC的数据和一般网站发布的每天确诊病例一致,但是 Public Health 发表的数据与众不同,每天的新增数目不是更新加在最后的数据上,而是每天会修改以前的数据。而且多数增加,个别时会减少。
以我们所有人都知道的3月11日,我村第一例确诊病例,是从奥地利滑雪回来的,但是现在 Public Health 的数据显示,我村第一确诊病例是在2月20日。现在3月11日的确诊病例不是1,而是48. 那么我村的社区传播是从何时开始的呢?现在每天新增的几十例大概大多属于本地型。早在发现第一例确诊的输入型之前20天,我村已经确诊至少48例,已成蔓延趋势。
3月23日星期一,是渥太华第一批回家工作的日子,当时公布的确诊数是:24,现在Public Health修正后发布的数据是263,11倍。
官方公布的加拿大数据在3月11日是118,48 / 118 = 41%都在小小的渥太华了。
所以,现在多个老人院,不断发现新的大量确诊病人,和死亡是从何时开始社区传播的?
同样,美国现在超过50万的确诊人数,纽约州已经超过世界所有其他国家确诊人数。美国的数据表明(在最下面几行),仅3人是从武汉撤侨,两艘游轮共149人,军队3366。这样是数据分布像是最近一个月由输入型转为本地型传播的吗?
在40天以前的3月1日,美国确诊数是91,加拿大是24,40天内,现在分别是:502876,22148. 美国增加了5526倍,加拿大增加923倍。
Ottawa Public Health(OPH)的数据不是大家用的“通常的 confirmed cases” vs. date 曲线,而是 epidemic curve (epi curve or epidemiological curve),是 scientific community/research health professional 用的,OPH的图标也清楚标明“Cumulative epidemiological curve of Ottawa residents with confirmed COVID-19, by the EARLIEST of onset date, test and reported date”。举个例子,一个病人3月11日出现症状,过了一周后觉得可能是 covid 19,3月18日去测试,3月28日结果出来阳性确诊,那么在通常的统计中,这个病例算入3月28的数据,但是在 OPH 的 epi curve 中,这个病例最后会算入3月11日的数据中去。
下面是来自CDC网站的关于epidemic curve的解释:
Interpretation of Epidemic (Epi) Curves during Ongoing Outbreak Investigations | Foodborne Outbreaks | Food Safety | CDC
An epidemic curve (epi curve) shows progression of illnesses in an outbreak over time. Epi curves depict when people became ill by day, week, or month.
www.cdc.gov
An epidemic curve (epi curve) shows progression of illnesses in an outbreak over time. Epi curves depict when people became ill by day, week, or month. In foodborne outbreak investigations, this information is often shown by the week people became ill. The horizontal axis (x-axis) is the week when a person became ill, also called the week of illness onset. The vertical axis (y-axis) is the number of persons with illness onset each week. During ongoing outbreak investigations, the epi curve is updated as new data become available. There are several important issues in understanding and interpreting epi curves during ongoing outbreak investigations.
- There is an inherent delay between the date that an illness starts and the date that the case is reported to public health authorities. This delay typically takes 2-3 weeks for Salmonella infections. Thus, for example, someone who got sick with a Salmonella infection last week is very unlikely to have their infection reported to public health authorities by now, and someone who got sick 3 weeks ago may just be reported now.
- Some background cases of illness are likely to occur that would have happened even without an outbreak. This makes it difficult to say exactly which case is the first in an outbreak. Epidemiologists typically focus on the first recognized cluster (group) of illnesses rather than the very first case. Due to the inherent reporting delay described above, the cluster is sometimes not detected until several weeks after the persons became ill.
- For some cases, the date of illness onset is not known because it takes time before someone from the health department can do an interview to ask for this information. Sometimes, this interview never occurs. If investigators know the date that a specimen from an ill person arrived in the laboratory for testing, they may estimate the date of illness onset as 3 days before the specimen submission date.
- It can be difficult to determine when cases start to decline because of the reporting delay. This information can become clearer as time passes.
波士顿大学一段关于epidemic curve的内有说根据epidemic curve可以判断是那一种outbreak:Point source outbreaks (epidemics) ,Continuous common source epidemics or Propagated (or progressive source) epidemic.