川普白等谁赢, 其实无所谓. 美国人的选择. 但是

[lindamy]

您咋那么急躁呢，母们不懂英文么？反正母们不去文学城上找中文的fake news 往CFC 这里搬，嘿嘿。

这个母们回复您了啊，一个州级的法院找了一个理由不受理州政府领导作为被告的案子，并不代表舞弊不存在。

川总律师团队的诉讼策略是他们商量出来的结果，无所谓守法不守法好不啦

州级法院过不去，能直接送到联邦最高法院吗？

1 hr 7 min ago

Trump has had more than 30 defunct election-related lawsuits in 30 days. Here's where things stand.​

From CNN's Katelyn Polantz

President Donald Trump listens during a Medal of Freedom ceremony in the Oval Office of the White House on December 3 in Washington, DC. Brendan Smialowski/AFP/Getty Images

After more than 30 defunct lawsuits in 30 days, attempts by President Trump and his backers to overturn the election of Joe Biden as the next president have failed in court — sometimes repeatedly, with judges gutting claims and shutting down all possible legal avenues to interfere with the Electoral College.

The President's effort isn't stopping, with more lawsuits and appeals getting filed almost daily and more than $170 million raised in response to pleas for cash from Trump.

But officials across the country confirmed that the 2020 vote was secure. Biden's victories have already been certified in six of the most closely contested states — Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin. His wide Electoral College win over Trump is secured, and will be formalized this month.

Judges have rejected Trump's attempts so thoroughly over the past few weeks, they've shut down the cases on nearly every question they're asked.

One federal judge in Pennsylvania, Matthew Brann, wrote he couldn't do what the Trump campaign and Trump's personal lawyer Rudy Giuliani wanted because it would be unconstitutional. A judge in Michigan, Timothy Kenny, explained point by point why witness statements suspecting fraud fell short.

A judge on the Pennsylvania Supreme Court wrote in a concurring opinion last weekend, which denied a Republican attempt to throw out millions of absentee votes in the state, that the court shouldn't "lend legitimacy to such transparent and untimely efforts to subvert the will of Pennsylvania voters."

And yet, Trump's dreams linger in court. Ongoing cases still look to push false narratives of fraud — often built on their disbelief of Biden support in heavily Democratic cities and unhappiness with absentee voting.

Here's a look at the lawsuits the Trump campaign and allies have won and lost:

Read more here.

 

[webID]

43 min ago

Pennsylvania congressman files longshot petition with Supreme Court seeking to nullify certification​

From CNN's Ariane de Vogue

Pennsylvania Rep. Mike Kelly has filed a longshot petition asking the Supreme Court to nullify the certification of Pennsylvania election results.
Kelly is challenging the Commonwealth’s “no-excuse” absentee ballot scheme that was passed in October 2019.

It is the latest petition from Republicans still seeking to challenge the election and it faces steep odds at the Supreme Court, particularly because the dispute turns on issues of state law. The Pennsylvania Supreme Court dismissed the challenge last weekend holding that Kelly and others failed to file their challenge in a timely manner.

“It is beyond cavil that petitioners failed to act with due diligence” in presenting the case, the court held noting that they filed the suit more than one year after the enactment of the law at issue.

The new emergency petition will be filed with Justice Samuel Alito who has jurisdiction over the Pennsylvania courts. He will likely refer it to the whole court. It has not yet officially been received by the clerk’s office.

Election law expert Rick Hasen of the University of California Irvine notes that Kelly is seeking an order to nullify the effect of the certification of elections but that “it is not clear that this kind of remedy is even available.”

“I do not expect this case to go anywhere at the Supreme Court,” Hasen said in a blog post.

Lawyers for Kelly argue that Pennsylvania’s General Assembly “exceeded its powers by unconstitutionally allowing no-excuse absentee voting, including for federal offices, in the Election.”

They argue that the legislature’s move violated both the Pennsylvania Constitution and the US Constitution. “Because the Pennsylvania Constitution has not been amended,” they argued, “the legislative efforts to authorize no-excuse mail-in voting are fatally defective and inherently unconstitutional.”

引用 回复
举报 编辑 删除

[IMG alt="lindamy"]https://bbs.comefromchina.com/data/avatars/m/60/60003.jpg?1585164111[/IMG]

lindamy​

时代广场舞照跳​

VIP
注册2005-11-23消息17,861荣誉分数3,823声望点数373

• 1 分钟之前
• 添加书签
• #52

1 hr 7 min ago

Trump has had more than 30 defunct election-related lawsuits in 30 days. Here's where things stand.​

From CNN's Katelyn Polantz

President Donald Trump listens during a Medal of Freedom ceremony in the Oval Office of the White House on December 3 in Washington, DC. Brendan Smialowski/AFP/Getty Images

After more than 30 defunct lawsuits in 30 days, attempts by President Trump and his backers to overturn the election of Joe Biden as the next president have failed in court — sometimes repeatedly, with judges gutting claims and shutting down all possible legal avenues to interfere with the Electoral College.

The President's effort isn't stopping, with more lawsuits and appeals getting filed almost daily and more than $170 million raised in response to pleas for cash from Trump.

But officials across the country confirmed that the 2020 vote was secure. Biden's victories have already been certified in six of the most closely contested states — Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin. His wide Electoral College win over Trump is secured, and will be formalized this month.

Judges have rejected Trump's attempts so thoroughly over the past few weeks, they've shut down the cases on nearly every question they're asked.

One federal judge in Pennsylvania, Matthew Brann, wrote he couldn't do what the Trump campaign and Trump's personal lawyer Rudy Giuliani wanted because it would be unconstitutional. A judge in Michigan, Timothy Kenny, explained point by point why witness statements suspecting fraud fell short.

A judge on the Pennsylvania Supreme Court wrote in a concurring opinion last weekend, which denied a Republican attempt to throw out millions of absentee votes in the state, that the court shouldn't "lend legitimacy to such transparent and untimely efforts to subvert the will of Pennsylvania voters."

And yet, Trump's dreams linger in court. Ongoing cases still look to push false narratives of fraud — often built on their disbelief of Biden support in heavily Democratic cities and unhappiness with absentee voting.

Here's a look at the lawsuits the Trump campaign and allies have won and lost:

Read more here.

又用 Fake News 当您的权威性消息来源展开攻势啦。您要不再去翻一翻，哪些案子的原告是选民，哪些案子是由和党候选人提出的集体诉讼，哪些案子是川总律师团队以川总竞选团体为原告提出的诉讼好不啦

 

[lindamy]

又用 Fake News 当您的权威性消息来源展开攻势啦。您要不再去翻一翻，哪些案子的原告是选民，哪些案子是由和党候选人提出的集体诉讼，那些案子是川总律师团队以川总竞选团体为原告提出的诉讼好不啦

你贴一个不fake 的，还能多出几个胜诉的案子？

 

[webID]

你贴一个不fake 的，还能多出几个胜诉的案子？

指出Fake News把选举有关的案子都算在川总团队头上您不爱听啦？

已经回复您多次啦，州级法院拒绝开庭审理以州政府领导作为被告的案子，并不代表没有舞弊行为，更不是败诉。您要对美国的司法系统有信心，有耐心。

 

[webID]

没办法。哎。

哈哈，您一觉的烧脑，恶心，就不理她，淫家错觉认为您说不过她了呢，还不得追着您听您求饶啊。都是您给惯出来的

 

[webID]

肯定会把所有的案子都认为是川普的，然后判断都是失败的，败诉的，然后造成舆论说川普连任没戏，就这个目的

哪怕观看了一个听证会，多少有点common sense 的人，都不会再嚷嚷证据证据证据了啦