从有关一篇华尔街邮报华人被怀疑,排挤,打击的文章,进而想到我们华人应如何庄严的投下我们的选票: 永远投自由党.

GlobeCitizen

知名会员
注册
2012-07-14
消息
1,134
荣誉分数
88
声望点数
158


就连左左(美国民主党,加自由党)在没有硝烟的环境中都这样了,还有中裔美国人,加拿大人选右右政党(美国共和党,加保守党)。 脑壳一定是被夹坏了。就为了少交点税,或上厕所时方便些或"安全"些? 亦或是自己的小孩今后还有名校可上,凡此种种,不胜枚举。

从自身根本长远利益来说,我永远投自由党(有一到两次还投了新民主党), 不管是我博士期间(博士第二年入籍)收入还不高,到今天衣食无忧,即便今后变成千万富翁,亿万富翁,我是永远的自由党(新民主党)。

即使今天我为Justin Trudeau 的无能无为扼腕叹息,从少数族裔的根本长远利益来说,我还是永远的自由党(新民主党)。

以上只是鄙人之拙见,恕不做进一步解释。你若喜欢,好!你若不喜欢,也好!

Article courtesy of billwanhua who posts this article earlier in other thread:

Harvard, MIT lose experienced scholars as fear of government surveillance prompts 4 in 10 to consider leaving

HONG KONG—An increasing number of scientists and engineers of Chinese descent are giving up tenured positions at top-tier American universities to leave for China or elsewhere, in a sign of the U.S.’s fading appeal for a group that has been a driver of innovation.

The trend, driven in part by what many of the scholars describe as an increasingly hostile political and racial environment, has caused the Biden administration to work with scholars of Chinese descent to address concerns.

More than 1,400 U.S.-trained Chinese scientists dropped their U.S. academic or corporate affiliation for a Chinese one in 2021, a 22% jump from the previous year, according to data gathered by researchers from Princeton University, Harvard University and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. The data, to be published by the advocacy group Asian American Scholar Forum on Friday, is based on changes to the addresses listed under authors’ names in academic journals.
Advertisement - Scroll to Continue

Chinese scientists trained in the U.S. have returned to China in increasing numbers over the past two decades as the country has grown more affluent and gained stature as a center of scientific research. In the past decade, China has tried to recruit top researchers through talent programs, but historically the majority elected to stay in the U.S.
Departures from the U.S. rose sharply starting in 2020, however, when the Covid-19 pandemic coincided with an increase in criminal cases filed against academics under the China Initiative, a Trump-era Justice Department program intended to counter national security threats from China.

President Biden’s Justice Department said it would stop pursuing new cases under the China Initiative in February, following a series of failed prosecutions and complaints of racial profiling, but some scientists of Chinese descent said they still feel as though suspicions are being directed toward them and fear that will continue as long as relations between the U.S. and China remain tense.
 
愿意投谁投谁,说穿了都是根据自己的屁股……
 
那么恨白左,怎么把白左双标学会了, 这里有两个更加绑架别人选举意思的帖子:
麻烦你跟贴前仔细看看,我说了“恨白左”吗?

他谈自己的政治观念或者想选谁,没有问题。我是说这个标题很不妥。比如改成下面这样就没问题:

我看了一篇华尔街邮报华人被怀疑,排挤,打击的文章,担心加拿大也会排华,所以我永远投自由党.​

你明白这个区别吗?
 
最后编辑:
新民主在碧诗掌权说明少数族裔还是理智的。有人错看自己的位置。也不明白利益是靠自己争取的。不是别人施舍
 
麻烦你跟贴前仔细看看,我说了“恨白左”吗?

他谈自己的政治观念或者想选谁,没有问题。我是说这个标题很不妥。比如改成下面这样就没问题:

我看了一篇华尔街邮报华人被怀疑,排挤,打击的文章,担心加拿大也会排华,所以我永远投自由党.​

你明白这个区别吗?
楼主发表的只是他自己的观点,个人认为拿自己观点影响别人选举应该是违法的,但是我承认我不知道在加拿大这个是不是违法。

同样,楼主标题上面谈他自己的观点,跟列出的那两个帖子实际内容里面谈他们的观点,实际上没有不同,一个在标题上面说了,另两个在内容里面说了,都是试图影响别人选举,本身没有区别,标题也好,内容也好。
 

就连左左(美国民主党,加自由党)在没有硝烟的环境中都这样了,还有中裔美国人,加拿大人选右右政党(美国共和党,加保守党)。 脑壳一定是被夹坏了。就为了少交点税,或上厕所时方便些或"安全"些? 亦或是自己的小孩今后还有名校可上,凡此种种,不胜枚举。

从自身根本长远利益来说,我永远投自由党(有一到两次还投了新民主党), 不管是我博士期间(博士第二年入籍)收入还不高,到今天衣食无忧,即便今后变成千万富翁,亿万富翁,我是永远的自由党(新民主党)。

即使今天我为Justin Trudeau 的无能无为扼腕叹息,从少数族裔的根本长远利益来说,我还是永远的自由党(新民主党)。
 


就连左左(美国民主党,加自由党)在没有硝烟的环境中都这样了,还有中裔美国人,加拿大人选右右政党(美国共和党,加保守党)。 脑壳一定是被夹坏了。就为了少交点税,或上厕所时方便些或"安全"些? 亦或是自己的小孩今后还有名校可上,凡此种种,不胜枚举。

从自身根本长远利益来说,我永远投自由党(有一到两次还投了新民主党), 不管是我博士期间(博士第二年入籍)收入还不高,到今天衣食无忧,即便今后变成千万富翁,亿万富翁,我是永远的自由党(新民主党)。

即使今天我为Justin Trudeau 的无能无为扼腕叹息,从少数族裔的根本长远利益来说,我还是永远的自由党(新民主党)。

以上只是鄙人之拙见,恕不做进一步解释。你若喜欢,好!你若不喜欢,也好!

Article courtesy of billwanhua who posts this article earlier in other thread:

Harvard, MIT lose experienced scholars as fear of government surveillance prompts 4 in 10 to consider leaving

HONG KONG—An increasing number of scientists and engineers of Chinese descent are giving up tenured positions at top-tier American universities to leave for China or elsewhere, in a sign of the U.S.’s fading appeal for a group that has been a driver of innovation.

The trend, driven in part by what many of the scholars describe as an increasingly hostile political and racial environment, has caused the Biden administration to work with scholars of Chinese descent to address concerns.

More than 1,400 U.S.-trained Chinese scientists dropped their U.S. academic or corporate affiliation for a Chinese one in 2021, a 22% jump from the previous year, according to data gathered by researchers from Princeton University, Harvard University and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. The data, to be published by the advocacy group Asian American Scholar Forum on Friday, is based on changes to the addresses listed under authors’ names in academic journals.
Advertisement - Scroll to Continue

Chinese scientists trained in the U.S. have returned to China in increasing numbers over the past two decades as the country has grown more affluent and gained stature as a center of scientific research. In the past decade, China has tried to recruit top researchers through talent programs, but historically the majority elected to stay in the U.S.
Departures from the U.S. rose sharply starting in 2020, however, when the Covid-19 pandemic coincided with an increase in criminal cases filed against academics under the China Initiative, a Trump-era Justice Department program intended to counter national security threats from China.

President Biden’s Justice Department said it would stop pursuing new cases under the China Initiative in February, following a series of failed prosecutions and complaints of racial profiling, but some scientists of Chinese descent said they still feel as though suspicions are being directed toward them and fear that will continue as long as relations between the U.S. and China remain tense.
这忠心表的,都永永远远千秋万代了啊?你这怎么不搬北朝鲜去住呢?
 
楼主发表的只是他自己的观点,个人认为拿自己观点影响别人选举应该是违法的,但是我承认我不知道在加拿大这个是不是违法。

同样,楼主标题上面谈他自己的观点,跟列出的那两个帖子实际内容里面谈他们的观点,实际上没有不同,一个在标题上面说了,另两个在内容里面说了,都是试图影响别人选举,本身没有区别,标题也好,内容也好。
请问,马甲590也是你吗?
 
楼主发表的只是他自己的观点,个人认为拿自己观点影响别人选举应该是违法的,但是我承认我不知道在加拿大这个是不是违法。

同样,楼主标题上面谈他自己的观点,跟列出的那两个帖子实际内容里面谈他们的观点,实际上没有不同,一个在标题上面说了,另两个在内容里面说了,都是试图影响别人选举,本身没有区别,标题也好,内容也好。
每次参选人和同伙不都是使出浑身解数影响选民吗,如果有法律禁止,太难操作了
 
有道是被卖了,还帮着数钱。还好没有智商税!
欢迎对号入座。
 
5670224-Oprah-Winfrey-Quote-When-you-know-who-you-are-and-what-you-stand.jpg
 
后退
顶部