chatbot
知名会员
- 注册
- 2019-10-21
- 消息
- 2,508
- 荣誉分数
- 502
- 声望点数
- 123
俄乌战争，全世界能源价格上涨，通货膨胀，工资提高，当然政府开支也会受影响加拿大和谁打仗了？
认真的闲话一下我为什么反对卡尼。。。
- 主题发起人 eclipse
- 开始时间
gocanoeing
本站元老
- 注册
- 2006-11-21
- 消息
- 16,488
- 荣誉分数
- 2,414
- 声望点数
- 373
@chatbot 送你一个详细的，好好看
| Fiscal Year | Budget Balance (CAD) | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| 2006–2007 | +$13.9 billion | Surplus 哈珀上台啦 |
| 2007–2008 | +$9.6 billion | Surplus |
| 2008–2009 | -$5.8 billion | Deficit begins amid global financial crisis |
| 2009–2010 | -$55.6 billion | Largest deficit during recession |
| 2010–2011 | -$33.4 billion | Deficit narrows |
| 2011–2012 | -$26.3 billion | Continued deficit reduction |
| 2012–2013 | -$18.4 billion | Deficit continues to decrease |
| 2013–2014 | -$5.2 billion | Nearing balance |
| 2014–2015 | -$2.9 billion | Further reduction in deficit |
| 2015–2016 | -$1.0 billion | Slight deficit |
| 2016–2017 | -$17.8 billion | Deficit increases 自由党土豆上台啦, 2015 Oct, 烂土豆 赢了， 这是他领导的第一年业绩，直接比上一年多花了168亿加刀 |
| 2017–2018 | -$19.0 billion | Stable deficit |
| 2018–2019 | -$14.0 billion | Deficit decreases |
| 2019–2020 | -$39.4 billion | Deficit widens 新冠还没开始吗？捅菊花开始了？花哪了？ |
| 2020–2021 | -$327.7 billion | Record deficit due to COVID-19 pandemic |
| 2021–2022 | -$90.2 billion | Deficit decreases post-pandemic |
| 2022–2023 | -$35.3 billion | Continued deficit reduction |
| 2023–2024 | -$40.1 billion | Slight increase in deficit 为啥又增加？ 哦哦，捅菊花要钱的 |
chatbot
知名会员
- 注册
- 2019-10-21
- 消息
- 2,508
- 荣誉分数
- 502
- 声望点数
- 123
2019年前的的deficit水平对加拿大这样的国家很健康啊所以土豆会连任，有点deficit在西方国家很正常，没什么大不了，但是如果没什么大灾大难的话，只需要控制在正常范围内。
chatbot
知名会员
- 注册
- 2019-10-21
- 消息
- 2,508
- 荣誉分数
- 502
- 声望点数
- 123
这要感谢卡总啊，在卡总带领下，加拿大避开了2009大全球大衰退。
放屁，功劳是财长的。Jim Flaherty!
我还记得他每年去宣布财政报告前要擦亮皮鞋！
Flaherty's leadership during the crisis garnered international recognition. In October 2009, he was named Finance Minister of the Year by Euromoney magazine, which praised Canada's strong policy response to the global economic crisis and its enhanced reputation on the world stage.
Jim Flaherty RIP!
chatbot
知名会员
- 注册
- 2019-10-21
- 消息
- 2,508
- 荣誉分数
- 502
- 声望点数
- 123
央行具体政策运作是独立于政党的，不归财政部管辖。JIM是有他自己作为财长那份功劳。Carney有他作为行长的功劳，这是世界公认的。也就是这份经历才让他成为英国历史上首位外籍行长
无耻，卡尼当年是有功绩，但只是小作用。
主要的功劳是财长，这是全球公认的。第二算哈珀，总理。最多第三算卡尼。
你所谓的 “在卡总带领下，加拿大避开了2009大全球大衰退”， 无耻之尤！
chatbot
知名会员
- 注册
- 2019-10-21
- 消息
- 2,508
- 荣誉分数
- 502
- 声望点数
- 123
Great question 
! Mark Carney gets a lot of credit for helping Canada avoid the worst of the 2008 global financial crisis—though, as with all complex events, it was a team effort with some luck, too. Here's why he's often seen as the hero of the hour:
---
1. Fast and Decisive Action as BoC Governor
Carney became Governor of the Bank of Canada in February 2008, just as the financial storm clouds were gathering. He acted quickly and boldly:
Cut interest rates aggressively, including a surprise 50 basis point cut in March 2008.
Provided liquidity to banks through innovative programs to keep credit flowing.
Maintained a clear and steady communication strategy, which helped anchor market confidence.
---
2. Strong Canadian Banking System
Carney gets credit for maintaining a stable financial system, but he also benefited from Canada's conservative banking regulations, which had been in place long before he took over. For example:
Canadian banks didn’t engage in as much subprime lending.
The Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI) kept leverage in check. Still, Carney's international credibility helped reassure global investors about Canada's stability.
---
3. Global Reputation Boost
Because of how Canada fared during the crisis, Carney became a global rockstar:
In 2011, he was named Chair of the Financial Stability Board (FSB), an international body overseeing financial reforms.
In 2013, he was appointed Governor of the Bank of England, the first foreigner to hold the job.
---
4. Coordination with Fiscal Policy
Carney worked effectively with the federal government (then under PM Stephen Harper and Finance Minister Jim Flaherty). While he controlled monetary policy, the government launched a stimulus package, and both sides worked in sync to stabilize the economy.
---
TL;DR:
Mark Carney is credited for his quick thinking, calm leadership, and communication, which helped steer Canada through 2008 better than most. But Canada also had:
Strong pre-crisis regulations
Coordinated fiscal policies
A bit of luck (like high commodity prices rebounding quickly)
So it wasn’t just Carney—but he definitely deserves a spot on the Crisis MVP list
.
Want the more spicy behind-the-scenes version of events too?
! Mark Carney gets a lot of credit for helping Canada avoid the worst of the 2008 global financial crisis—though, as with all complex events, it was a team effort with some luck, too. Here's why he's often seen as the hero of the hour:---
1. Fast and Decisive Action as BoC GovernorCarney became Governor of the Bank of Canada in February 2008, just as the financial storm clouds were gathering. He acted quickly and boldly:
Cut interest rates aggressively, including a surprise 50 basis point cut in March 2008.
Provided liquidity to banks through innovative programs to keep credit flowing.
Maintained a clear and steady communication strategy, which helped anchor market confidence.
---
2. Strong Canadian Banking SystemCarney gets credit for maintaining a stable financial system, but he also benefited from Canada's conservative banking regulations, which had been in place long before he took over. For example:
Canadian banks didn’t engage in as much subprime lending.
The Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI) kept leverage in check. Still, Carney's international credibility helped reassure global investors about Canada's stability.
---
3. Global Reputation BoostBecause of how Canada fared during the crisis, Carney became a global rockstar:
In 2011, he was named Chair of the Financial Stability Board (FSB), an international body overseeing financial reforms.
In 2013, he was appointed Governor of the Bank of England, the first foreigner to hold the job.
---
4. Coordination with Fiscal PolicyCarney worked effectively with the federal government (then under PM Stephen Harper and Finance Minister Jim Flaherty). While he controlled monetary policy, the government launched a stimulus package, and both sides worked in sync to stabilize the economy.
---
TL;DR:Mark Carney is credited for his quick thinking, calm leadership, and communication, which helped steer Canada through 2008 better than most. But Canada also had:
Strong pre-crisis regulations
Coordinated fiscal policies
A bit of luck (like high commodity prices rebounding quickly)
So it wasn’t just Carney—but he definitely deserves a spot on the Crisis MVP list
.Want the more spicy behind-the-scenes version of events too?
chatbot
知名会员
- 注册
- 2019-10-21
- 消息
- 2,508
- 荣誉分数
- 502
- 声望点数
- 123
排第三就够了，第一最大的功劳就是找了第三。第二具体干什么了，第二一大的贡献就是配合了第三的工作。
chatbot
知名会员
- 注册
- 2019-10-21
- 消息
- 2,508
- 荣誉分数
- 502
- 声望点数
- 123
问问chatbot吧。两人旗鼓相当。Jim已经不在了，你要能把他找来当党魁，我就啥也不说了
Ooooh, spicy question!
"Who made the bigger contribution?" is kind of like asking who’s more important in a heist movie — the mastermind or the getaway driver. Both are crucial. But let’s break it down fairly.
---
Mark Carney — The Central Bank Wizard
Pros:
Moved first and fast (interest rate cuts + liquidity support).
Maintained confidence in the financial system.
International credibility added trust to Canada’s stability.
Didn’t just avoid disaster — actually made Canada look smart globally.
Cons:
Had limited tools (mostly interest rates and communication).
Depended on a stable banking system and sound government fiscal policy.
---
Jim Flaherty — The Fiscal General
Pros:
Designed and delivered Canada’s Economic Action Plan (stimulus).
Backed up the financial system with the mortgage buyback program (IMPP).
Preserved regulatory strength, didn’t give in to populist pressures.
Protected jobs and demand on the ground — very real world effects.
Cons:
Stimulus decisions came a bit later (early 2009).
Had to work within political constraints, including opposition pressure.
---
So... Who Did More?
It depends on how you frame “contribution”:
---
Final Verdict (drumroll... 
)
They were a dream team. Seriously. If one had failed, the other’s success wouldn’t have mattered. It was their coordination, communication, and mutual respect that made Canada stand out globally during 2008–2009.
But if you forced me to pick who had the edge in terms of immediate impact during the crisis… I’d say Carney gets the slight edge — because financial confidence is everything in a panic. But Flaherty's work kept the engine running after the storm passed, and that’s just as important.
Wanna imagine how it would’ve gone down if only one of them had been around? Could be fun to do an alternate timeline
Ooooh, spicy question!
"Who made the bigger contribution?" is kind of like asking who’s more important in a heist movie — the mastermind or the getaway driver. Both are crucial. But let’s break it down fairly.---
Mark Carney — The Central Bank WizardPros:
Moved first and fast (interest rate cuts + liquidity support).
Maintained confidence in the financial system.
International credibility added trust to Canada’s stability.
Didn’t just avoid disaster — actually made Canada look smart globally.
Cons:
Had limited tools (mostly interest rates and communication).
Depended on a stable banking system and sound government fiscal policy.
---
Jim Flaherty — The Fiscal GeneralPros:
Designed and delivered Canada’s Economic Action Plan (stimulus).
Backed up the financial system with the mortgage buyback program (IMPP).
Preserved regulatory strength, didn’t give in to populist pressures.
Protected jobs and demand on the ground — very real world effects.
Cons:
Stimulus decisions came a bit later (early 2009).
Had to work within political constraints, including opposition pressure.
---
So... Who Did More?It depends on how you frame “contribution”:
---
Final Verdict (drumroll... )They were a dream team. Seriously. If one had failed, the other’s success wouldn’t have mattered. It was their coordination, communication, and mutual respect that made Canada stand out globally during 2008–2009.
But if you forced me to pick who had the edge in terms of immediate impact during the crisis… I’d say Carney gets the slight edge — because financial confidence is everything in a panic. But Flaherty's work kept the engine running after the storm passed, and that’s just as important.
Wanna imagine how it would’ve gone down if only one of them had been around? Could be fun to do an alternate timeline
chatbot
知名会员
- 注册
- 2019-10-21
- 消息
- 2,508
- 荣誉分数
- 502
- 声望点数
- 123
But if you forced me to pick who had the edge in terms of immediate impact during the crisis… I’d say Carney gets the slight edge — because financial confidence is everything in a panic. But Flaherty's work kept the engine running after the storm passed, and that’s just as important.
gocanoeing
本站元老
- 注册
- 2006-11-21
- 消息
- 16,488
- 荣誉分数
- 2,414
- 声望点数
- 373
