CTV 最新消息：PP的一个MP 叛变了，有可能加入自由党

[大妈爱酿酒]

呵呵，自由粉歇菜吧，自由党这次在桌子底下用见不得人的方式收买一个叛徒，只会让支持pp的更团结用更极端的方式支持pp，对整个国家不是好事。

自由党人告诉这 叛逃者，让他们把离开党的责任归咎于PP。
而就在八个月前，正是这些人欣然接受了皮埃尔的竞选纲领并赢得了选举。

人们没有意识到，这是一个精心策划的阴谋，目的是操纵舆论，让人们认为PP不应该担任保守党领袖。

 

[JClub]

In parliamentary systems like Canada’s, an MP “crossing the floor” (switching parties while keeping their seat) is allowed because of how representation is defined.

Here are the main reasons

1. MPs are elected​

• On the ballot, voters technically elect a person, not a party.
• Parties are politically important, but they don’t own the seat under Canadian law.
• Once elected, an MP is free to change party affiliation—or sit as an independent.

2. Parliamentary tradition emphasizes​

• Canada follows the Westminster parliamentary tradition (from the UK).
• Historically, MPs are meant to:
  
  • Act according to conscience
  • Respond to new information
  • Represent their constituents’ interests, even if party views change

Forcing re-elections would weaken that independence.

3. No constitutional or legal requirement for re-election​

• The Constitution and Canada Elections Act do not require a by-election when an MP changes parties.
• A by-election is only mandatory if:
  
  • The MP resigns
  • The seat becomes vacant (death, disqualification, etc.)

4. Practical and stability reasons​

Requiring re-elections every time an MP changed parties would:

• Be expensive and frequent
• Destabilize Parliament
• Allow party leaders (not voters) to indirectly force elections

5. Political accountability still exists​

Even though it’s legal:

• Floor crossing is often politically controversial
• Voters can punish the MP in the next general election
• Some MPs choose to resign voluntarily and seek a fresh mandate—but this is a choice, not a rule

Summary​

Floor crossing is allowed because:

• MPs hold seats personally
• Parliamentary systems prioritize MP independence
• The law does not require re-election
• Accountability is enforced at the next election, not immediately

 

[ottawa_tj]

浏览附件1191667

换了新马甲？

 

[冬暖]

换了新马甲？

旧马甲是？

 

[冰中取火]

不管哪个党变到哪个党，没有问题，但这些换党的至少应该先辞去原来的职位，因为那是以那个党的民意才选上的，这是起码的要求吧？
加拿大还有这么白痴的政策换党还可以保留原来职位？

 

[metropolis]

不管哪个党变到哪个党，没有问题，但这些换党的至少应该先辞去原来的职位，因为那是以那个党的民意才选上的，这是起码的要求吧？
加拿大还有这么白痴的政策换党还可以保留原来职位？

当年关键投票前 保守党的 Belinda 叛到自由党，使马丁政府多活了几个月，马丁为她新设置了一个莫名其妙部长位置，以示奖励。

 

[吃肉的绵羊]

这种情况应该重选。很多人都是因为他的党才投票给他的。
根源在于加拿大奇葩的选举制度，选民搞不清到底在选什么，民主了个啥

加拿大议会跳“巢”由来以久。加拿大的民主制度也被加拿大人一直广泛接受和容忍。你不满意就该听你的？
你该想的应该是改变选举制度和规则。

 

[吃肉的绵羊]

Just 7 hours ago the petition calling for Michael Ma’s resignation was only at 5000 signatures. It’s now over 20,000The people are speaking, will he listen? Keep pressure on this traitor.浏览附件1191668x

只要他不主动辞职，他就能任职到下一次选举，没有任何人可以因为他跳巢而停止他的任职。
你唯一可以做到的是下次选举更努力一些，把他选下去，让保守党的新候选人当选。

 

[ottawa_tj]

不管哪个党变到哪个党，没有问题，但这些换党的至少应该先辞去原来的职位，因为那是以那个党的民意才选上的，这是起码的要求吧？
加拿大还有这么白痴的政策换党还可以保留原来职位？

美国也可以这样。

 

[jy]

不管哪个党变到哪个党，没有问题，但这些换党的至少应该先辞去原来的职位，因为那是以那个党的民意才选上的，这是起码的要求吧？
加拿大还有这么白痴的政策换党还可以保留原来职位？

因为有白痴的人支持奇葩的制度。

加拿大议会跳“巢”由来以久。加拿大的民主制度也被加拿大人一直广泛接受和容忍。你不满意就该听你的？
你该想的应该是改变选举制度和规则。

缘木求鱼的保皇派。你满意就好。

 

[欢乐灌水]

Poilievre says MPs defecting from Conservatives 'a problem of Mark Carney's leadership'

https://www.cbc.ca/player/play/video/9.7015412