请问:寄信到台湾用英文是?

最初由 左突右闪 发布



democracy is all relative. Everyone wants democracy, but in a real democratical environment. If lying, insulting, bribing for tickets is about democracy, one is "too simple, too naive".

Boy, when the democracy system is in place and running, you can say that. But now, the system is simply not there. BTW, do you really think the leaders in our country in the past 50 years never lied to public? Without democracy and a free media, even if they lie, people will never know. The leaders control everything. You simply don't have the right to know.

All you can do is to trust them, no other choice. This is called simple and naive.
 
最初由 左突右闪 发布



democracy is all relative. Everyone wants democracy, but in a real democratical environment. If lying, insulting, bribing for tickets is about democracy, one is "too simple, too naive".

"too simple, too naive"用在这里是一点也不错的。在所谓的民主自由社会里,成功的leader们大多数都是人精,不然也混不上去。在国内,这样的人大都入党了。中国只是用另一种方式实行人的选拔。
 
最初由 trade 发布


我觉得现在的胡温挺好。你想选谁呢?

Can you vote them out (in a pre-determined future date) if they turn out to be bad ?

That's how you control your leader, in a democritic system.
 
最初由 Xiaomimi 发布


Can you vote them out (in a pre-determined future date) if they turn out to be bad ?

That's how you control your leader, in a democritic system.

we'll see if they turn out to be bad. 在他们的位置上,turn out to be bad也不是一件容易的事情。
 
最初由 msft 发布

I love one China, but it has not been realized now. There are 2 governments controlling the land we call China. It is THE fact.

i like these words
 
最初由 msft 发布


Boy, when the democracy system is in place and running, you can say that. But now, the system is simply not there. BTW, do you really think the leaders in our country in the past 50 years never lied to public? Without democracy and a free media, even if they lie, people will never know. The leaders control everything. You simply don't have the right to know.

All you can do is to trust them, no other choice. This is called simple and naive.

If you think the democracy system is not in place and running, then there is no point calling it the first democracy in chinese speaking society. After all, Li uses it as a tool for taiwan's independency. Same thing happened in Hongkong when the Britishes are about to depart, they rush to introduce democracy there, why did not them do it in the past 50 years while they are ruling? When democracy becomes a tool in the wrong hand, it could only become an evil.
politicans all lie. There is no doubt about this, but in one way, they have to be responsible for what they do, what they say, not like the media, they have no responsibilities. Cheng SB is a lawyer, wording player, one real pathetic thing is that the public is being fooled by the politican and not knowing it.
 
最初由 Xiaomimi 发布


Can you vote them out (in a pre-determined future date) if they turn out to be bad ?

That's how you control your leader, in a democritic system.

oh ok, could you vote Martin out?
 
Democracy or not, the nature of politics brings corruption.
 
最初由 松鼠 发布
再次重复一遍:主张一个中国的各位,给我解释一下楼上那本护照是怎么回事儿。要不要在全世界收缴。
在这个问题没搞清之前,拒绝回答任何问题。
照你的逻辑,使用不一样的护照就是不同的主权国家.
香港也是一个主权国家吗?
(香港人和我们大陆人使用的护照不一样,当然你要硬把护照上的名称搬出来抬杠我也没办法.)
 
最初由 DDDD 发布

照你的逻辑,使用不一样的护照就是不同的主权国家.
香港也是一个主权国家吗?
(香港人和我们大陆人使用的护照不一样,当然你要硬把护照上的名称搬出来抬杠我也没办法.)

什么叫香港护照?香港护照全名叫香港特别行政区护照,封面上还印着国徽呢,没见过么?香港护照上照样是这么一句话:

“中华人民共和国外交部请各国军政机关对持照人予以通行的便利和必要的协助。”

你认为ROC护照上会有这么一句么?
 
最初由 松鼠 发布


什么叫香港护照?香港护照全名叫香港特别行政区护照,封面上还印着国徽呢,没见过么?香港护照上照样是这么一句话:

“中华人民共和国外交部请各国军政机关对持照人予以通行的便利和必要的协助。”

你认为ROC护照上会有这么一句么?
你的逻辑似乎是不一样的护照就是不一样的国家.
我只是说香港和大陆的护照也不一样.
我也说了:"你要硬把护照上的名称搬出来抬杠我也没办法".
 
最初由 BloodHound 发布


oh ok, could you vote Martin out?

Of course, an election must be held before October 2005, Canadian voters can kick him out.
 
最初由 DDDD 发布

你的逻辑似乎是不一样的护照就是不一样的国家.
我只是说香港和大陆的护照也不一样.
我也说了:"你要硬把护照上的名称搬出来抬杠我也没办法".

你还装糊涂是不是?我已经说得够明白了,中国护照和香港护照,其颁发机构说到底都是中华人民共和国外交部,所以在外交上两者根本没区别。

ROC护照一样么?你拿台湾护照和香港护照比,实在无知到家了。
 
最初由 松鼠 发布


你还装糊涂是不是?我已经说得够明白了,中国护照和香港护照,其颁发机构说到底都是中华人民共和国外交部,所以在外交上两者根本没区别。

ROC护照一样么?你拿台湾护照和香港护照比,实在无知到家了。
我和你讨论护照的问题,没有讨论无知还是有知的问题.
我此前在这楼里发了两帖,从没有出现过"台湾护照"这个词,"拿台湾护照和香港护照比"从和谈起?
我只是试图用你的逻辑来推出一个的结论.至于这个结论是"无知"还是"有知",我并不关心.
如果大家都在反驳你的观点,有可能是"众人皆醉你独醒",也有可能是你自己喝醉了.
 
为什么要打击“事实独立”?

这个道理其实很简单。阿扁和灯灰搅尽脑汁要修改“宪法”,目的是争取法理独立,现在看来,大陆已经把那条路堵上了,就是底线,越线就打。那怎么办,於是,又玩了个“事实独立”的花花肠子,目的还是一样。因为你承认了所谓的“事实独立”就不得不退到法理独立的后面。你去查一查,“事实独立”这个词是从什么时候开始的就明白了。也可以算是中国特色的一大发明。

可笑的是,有些中国人也把它当个真理。抱上去就不撒手,可怜,阿扁什么时候讲过哪怕是一句真话!回顾一句松鼠引的名言
http://www.comefromchina.com/newbbs/showthread.php?s=&threadid=202073&perpage=15&pagenumber=3
wording, that is all diplomacy is about
 
后退
顶部