犬儒刁民， 中国的精神贵族在哪里？
- 主题发起人 oread
- 开始时间
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 犬儒刁民， 中国的精神贵族在哪里？
The whole shooting scene is a mock documentary made two years ago. If I remember correctly, it was reported on CNN.ORG, not on CNN.COM, which is a "fake" CNN site. It is not the point here. The point is it was made two years ago and was widely reported on internet of how and why it was made. However, for some reason, CCTV broadcasted it as news natinally this March. You go figure.
I have nothing against CCTV, just pointed out the fact that CCTV would do a lot of things normally I would not.
I did not call anyone idiot, so I don't understand what you mean by saying 人人都有犯傻的权利，但你要分清正常人和傻子的区别.
I appologize for typing in English.
The whole shooting scene is a mock documentary made two years ago. If I remember correctly, it was reported on CNN.ORG, not on CNN.COM, which is a "fake" CNN site. It is not the point here. The point is it was made two years ago and was widely reported on internet of how and why it was made. However, for some reason, CCTV broadcasted it as news natinally this March. You go figure.
I have nothing against CCTV, just pointed out the fact that CCTV would do a lot of things normally I would not.
I did not call anyone idiot, so I don't understand what you mean by saying 人人都有犯傻的权利，但你要分清正常人和傻子的区别.
I appologize for typing in English.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 犬儒刁民， 中国的精神贵族在哪里？
Funny, we can actually agree in the end. However, I think the point of the article is more like a 棒喝, than trying to blame the history. The author to me sounds more like 恨铁不成钢 than 对中华文化的蔑视. I don't agree everything in the article, but I can understand where it come from.
Anyway, thanks for the discussion. I am glad we did not head to the direction of name calling.
Funny, we can actually agree in the end. However, I think the point of the article is more like a 棒喝, than trying to blame the history. The author to me sounds more like 恨铁不成钢 than 对中华文化的蔑视. I don't agree everything in the article, but I can understand where it come from.
Anyway, thanks for the discussion. I am glad we did not head to the direction of name calling.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 犬儒刁民， 中国的精神贵族在哪里？
I guess you just really don't like the way the author present the ideas. It reminds me one episode of Friends:
Chandler told Joey he was more and more like a woman. Joey found it quite offensive. Chandler asked why so, is that because what he said. He said no, "it is not what you said, it is the way you said it" Poor Joey with a sad face...one second later... he cried out"Oh my God, I am a woman"
我喜欢读关心中国的文章，但我要的是理性的思考和有逻辑的语言，而不只是满篇的激情。
It would be nice if everyone can have理性的思考和有逻辑的语言 .
I guess you just really don't like the way the author present the ideas. It reminds me one episode of Friends:
Chandler told Joey he was more and more like a woman. Joey found it quite offensive. Chandler asked why so, is that because what he said. He said no, "it is not what you said, it is the way you said it" Poor Joey with a sad face...one second later... he cried out"Oh my God, I am a woman"
我喜欢读关心中国的文章，但我要的是理性的思考和有逻辑的语言，而不只是满篇的激情。
It would be nice if everyone can have理性的思考和有逻辑的语言 .
ray902
新手上路
- 注册
- 2002-12-25
- 消息
- 3,687
- 荣誉分数
- 1
- 声望点数
- 0
中国人是善吃的民族，所谓民以食为天。 但如今的中国充斥着世界上最多的假烟、假酒、假药；中国更充斥着世界上最多的毒米、毒面、毒油、毒饭。 本来猪肉注水、鸡肉中塞沙子、大米中搀石子是我在国内时屡次品尝领教的早已不足为奇， 但前一段时间的南京大毒杀和近来报道的广东“馊水油”，中国人的愚蠢自私和害人已无所不用了。一个对食物都不放过施毒、造假的民族还能再可耻到什么程度？还能再渺小到什么程度？还能再可恨、可怜到什么程度？
人类社会除了法律和习俗外还有良心这个自然又是最基本的道德约束。 中国人能在民以之为天的食物中下毒、造假而且屡见不鲜， 中国人的良心和道德是多么败坏可想而知了。 中国人的这种渺小、鄙琐的道德比纳粹的道德更低下更可憎， 因为这种渺小和卑劣是纯粹的渺小和卑劣， 其中一丝一毫的高贵都没有。谈到中国人， 大家总喜欢用勤劳、智慧、勇敢来自欺欺人，却不知道这样道德水平的民族怎么可能是勤劳、勇敢和智慧的？中国人是勤劳的但必须在鞭挞之下；中国人智慧吗？ 五千年的“文明”中国对世界的科学与进步有什么值得一提的贡献？ 中国人当然是勇敢的， 在中国的大街上到处横行的是一些赤裸着上身、叫嚣聚殴的无畏无赖们， 但当蒙满的铁骑和日本的钢枪挺进中原时， 中国除了一溃千里的逃跑英雄就是卑躬屈膝的白发汉臣， 这样的勇敢民族在世界民族之林中也是绝无仅有的奇景。
这才是真正的哀号
Re: Re: 犬儒刁民， 中国的精神贵族在哪里？
光线短短一贴“屁”字叠出，想来是动了真情。
美国还是中国的囚犯多，或者是否美国的囚犯“世界最多”，光线似乎知道内情，但又没有什么证据或者引述，如果接下来仍无引述，可以视为捏造（捏造并不一定犯法，不必惊慌），比较囚犯的绝对数量是没有意义的，倘若甲国的绝对人口是乙国的一百倍，乙国就是举国犯法也赶不上甲国的一小撮，从来都是比较犯罪率，没听说过比较囚犯的绝对数量的。
再将我的一贯法宝祭起来：你怎么定义“一小撮”，“轰轰烈烈”，“盲目放大”和“社会上”？
光线短短一贴“屁”字叠出，想来是动了真情。
美国还是中国的囚犯多，或者是否美国的囚犯“世界最多”，光线似乎知道内情，但又没有什么证据或者引述，如果接下来仍无引述，可以视为捏造（捏造并不一定犯法，不必惊慌），比较囚犯的绝对数量是没有意义的，倘若甲国的绝对人口是乙国的一百倍，乙国就是举国犯法也赶不上甲国的一小撮，从来都是比较犯罪率，没听说过比较囚犯的绝对数量的。再将我的一贯法宝祭起来：你怎么定义“一小撮”，“轰轰烈烈”，“盲目放大”和“社会上”？
ray902
新手上路
- 注册
- 2002-12-25
- 消息
- 3,687
- 荣誉分数
- 1
- 声望点数
- 0
