想买SUV-VW TIGUAN

CR上推荐的中型SUV就是Highlangder, Pilot, and Chevalot Transvers
小型的就是RAV 4和CRV,做个参考。
 
仅论驱动方式对安全性的影响的话 四驱》前驱》后驱 就这么简单
 
为什么买VW Tiguan? 价钱好像不太合理额。

“Ford’s all-new Escape starts at $21,499. The just-arrived and also all-new 2013 Mazda CX-5: $22,995, base. Honda re-did its popular CR-V earlier this year and the base version there is $25,990. Toyota’s RAV4, due for a re-do later this year, starts at $24,865. The point is, VW is charging a premium for the Tiguan, even though just about everyone sells a compact SUV with all-wheel-drive and front-wheel-drive and eight of those in this segment are Top Safety Picks of the U.S. Insurance Institute for Highway Safety – including the Tiguan (and the CR-V, Hyundai Tucson, Patriot, Kia Sportage, Mazda CX-5, Mitsubishi Outlander and Subaru Forester).”http://www.theglobeandmail.com/glob...tiguan-the-price-is-not-right/article4368145/
 
没有具体研究其他车型所以不随便评价,但是一味比较哪个价钱起价最低不见得是最明智的,发动机,变速箱,底盘技术,安全配置,舒适配置,外形等等。。。。。。



如果比较价钱 大致会使这个走势 欧洲系〉〉 日系〉〉美系〉〉韩系



被动安全配置现在大家都比较丰富而且基本都是表配,谁也不敢在安全上做文章。主动配置,底盘技术,用的材料成本那就差多了,看得见的功能配置很容易讨喜,但看不见的东西越来越不好好做了。









为什么买VW Tiguan? 价钱好像不太合理额。



“Ford’s all-new Escape starts at $21,499. The just-arrived and also all-new 2013 Mazda CX-5: $22,995, base. Honda re-did its popular CR-V earlier this year and the base version there is $25,990. Toyota’s RAV4, due for a re-do later this year, starts at $24,865. The point is, VW is charging a premium for the Tiguan, even though just about everyone sells a compact SUV with all-wheel-drive and front-wheel-drive and eight of those in this segment are Top Safety Picks of the U.S. Insurance Institute for Highway Safety – including the Tiguan (and the CR-V, Hyundai Tucson, Patriot, Kia Sportage, Mazda CX-5, Mitsubishi Outlander and Subaru Forester).”http://www.theglobeandmail.com/glob...tiguan-the-price-is-not-right/article4368145/
 
但我想那汽车评论员,Jeremy Vato, 不只是比较价钱。比如他在该评论中谈到Tiguan的内部设计:
The Tiguan's cabin is all-VW, too. It is well-conceived, filled with high-quality materials and you find everything where it should be; it's all sensible and intuitive. But is it one of the stunning interiors we're seeing come to market in so many new cars? No. It's functional, well-made and a little dull.

作为一个专业的车评家,他应该不会只看价钱。他感觉到整个Tiguan车的东西没有比别的车更优秀到那里去,但却要多收几千元;所以他在这个标题为“Volkswagen Tiguan: The price is not right ”文章最后的总结是:

And that sums up the Tiguan – good but not exceptional. Sure, it's a Top Safety Pick, and so are seven others like it. Sure, it has a good engine, and so do so many others – and many rivals offer far more choice in the engine department. Sure, the Tiguan looks like a VW, feels like a VW and handles all sorts of chores with no muss, no fuss. And so do many others.

So again, why the price premium?
 
去试开了,不考虑TIGUAN。 车身没觉得太小,性能也不错,但动力实在不大,感觉开着没力气。

有没有人推荐NISSAN ROGUE?
 
仅论驱动方式对安全性的影响的话 四驱》前驱》后驱 就这么简单

仅仅这么看很偏见

安全性是很多东西加在一起的。

前后重量分配70/30你就是四驱也相当于前驱


而且谁能给我解释清楚为什么么
假设一个50/50的车,悬挂一样,轮胎一样,说明抓地力一样,四驱除了起步快,弯道能让你多踩点,哪里安全了?

前方出现人的时候你的刹车距离比前后驱都要长,为什么?因为你重

冬天刹车距离跟转弯能力最重要。我觉得会开车的人,后驱冬天最给力。保证拐弯100%grip,而且后驱通常前后比重更接近50/50, 更稳定
 
这个我同意!!月下来拍吧:D

我就说一句:
RS3 前后轮胎size, 说明什么?头重。会发生什么?understeer. 相当于什么?前驱
 
别在这里理论讨论了

前驱四驱后驱都开过至少一个冬天的来点经验谈。纸上谈兵没意思。
 
别在这里理论讨论了

前驱四驱后驱都开过至少一个冬天的来点经验谈。纸上谈兵没意思。

赫赫。
我当年买车时,和开4Runner的同事讨论过。他的结论是四驱冬天起步时很爽,野外off road很爽。
我觉得我都不需要,所以少花了两三千买前驱。:D
 
赫赫。
我当年买车时,和开4Runner的同事讨论过。他的结论是四驱冬天起步时很爽,野外off road很爽。
我觉得我都不需要,所以少花了两三千买前驱。:D

的确很爽,承认

但是爽 =/= 安全。。。按理来说,越爽越不安全:D

刚才不是说你
 
后退
顶部