Emmm, tell me what is not true about that or in that. Had I ever mentioned I had great respect to Buddha or Buddhism?
好笑的基督教
- 主题发起人 terry890
- 开始时间
Emmm, tell me what is not true about that or in that. Had I ever mentioned I had great respect to Buddha or Buddhism?
- 注册
- 2005-03-09
- 消息
- 8,494
- 荣誉分数
- 3,271
- 声望点数
- 373
I repeat.
这个楼的主题是Kent挑战进化论, 指出进化论和它所依赖的＂科学证据＂并不科学。由此，他得出结论，进化论不是科学而是宗教信仰。
现在，楼已经码了这么高，竟没有一个人提出有力的反证。
不过，大家倒不必因此而妄自菲薄。Kent在美国大学校园和世界上最好的进化论学者公开辩论几十场，所有论点论据在网上公布十几年，到目前为止，没有人能正面反驳他的论点。不仅如此，本来以教授研究进化论为业的进化论学者中也有人在为辩论准备的过程中因为认真系统地研究他的论点论据而改变了自己的看法并且勇敢地公开承认了这一点。
如此看来，进化论的一些狂热信徒们在这个进化论的帖子里不愿意讨论进化论是情有可原的了。
所谓没人提出有力的反证能说明什么？这种小儿科的东西用得着别人去费劲巴拉的提反证吗？不知道克神父有没有机会去你最推崇的先进基督教国家美国的首都华盛顿，进那里的自然博物馆看看再回来说有没有证据。最不济，如果没有忽悠到差旅费，也可以到村里的加拿大自然博物馆看看，我想即使你去看过了，也会说那些都不是有力的反证。那么，你到是拿点象样的东西来证明一下你的６０００年地球史让大家开开眼。
Please don't tell me no one cares. Dozens of elite evolutionists in the world who spent millions of taxpayers dollars in their scientific research to prove evolution cared enough to try to rebuke him publicly. However, they all failed miserably.
This is not to say that they are not smart. On the opposite, they are intelligent, well-educated, well-funded, and highly regarded professional evolutionists. They are the best in the evolutionist camp!
The fact that even they failed to prove wrong a single point among the hundreds raised by a self-funded former high school teacher does speak quite loud.
It is not the scientists who have problem. It is the scientific hypothesis they have been working so hard to prove true has a big problem - it is not true.
- 注册
- 2003-09-30
- 消息
- 79,763
- 荣誉分数
- 23,535
- 声望点数
- 1,373
Emmm, tell me what is not true about that or in that. Had I ever mentioned I had great respect to Buddha or Buddhism?
you already proved that Buddha is a greatest cheater and you still show your respect to him?
i am not here to judge whether you said in your post is true or not. i am just simply helping you to show your opinion on other religions and/or science.
- 注册
- 2005-03-09
- 消息
- 8,494
- 荣誉分数
- 3,271
- 声望点数
- 373
我可以负责任地告诉你，和所谓基督徒争执的都不是佛教徒。在这里，我没有把基督教作为一种宗教来讨论，而是“科学”，Ok？
Well, of course I knew you are not a Buddhist.
By the way, Christianity is not science. The real point of dispute here is: is the theory of evolution science or religion?
- 注册
- 2003-09-30
- 消息
- 79,763
- 荣誉分数
- 23,535
- 声望点数
- 1,373
Please don't tell me no one cares. Dozens of elite evolutionists in the world who spent millions of taxpayers dollars in their scientific research to prove evolution cared enough to try to rebuke him publicly. However, they all failed miserably.
This is not to say that they are not smart. On the opposite, they are intelligent, well-educated, well-funded, and highly regarded professional evolutionists. They are the best in the evolutionist camp!
The fact that even they failed to prove wrong a single point among the hundreds raised by a self-funded former high school teacher does speak quite loud.
It is not the scientists who have problem. It is the scientific hypothesis they have been working so hard to prove true has a big problem - it is not true.
that young lad in that video you shared claimed that some fresh dinosaur flesh was discovered a few years ago blah blah? if I heard/remembered clearly?
- 注册
- 2003-09-30
- 消息
- 79,763
- 荣誉分数
- 23,535
- 声望点数
- 1,373
the theory of evolution is a science theory because you can 证实或证伪。
基督 is not a science because you can only believe in it, you can not 证实或证伪 even someone think he/she can 证实 it(something called 见证?)
- 注册
- 2003-09-30
- 消息
- 79,763
- 荣誉分数
- 23,535
- 声望点数
- 1,373
- 注册
- 2003-09-30
- 消息
- 79,763
- 荣誉分数
- 23,535
- 声望点数
- 1,373
The real point of dispute here is: "god created the universe in 6 days literally" science or religion?
ForwardRetreat
非自定义头衔
- 注册
- 2011-03-23
- 消息
- 2,013
- 荣誉分数
- 429
- 声望点数
- 93
claiming 6 thousand year old earth is not the stupidest that christianity can offer. There are some christians out there claming a fixed, non-moving, non-spinning earth. check this out, it is at least laughworth.
The World (Earth and unattached atmosphere) is neither rotating around its own axis nor orbiting the Sun. In reality the Sun, Stars and Moon are going around the Stationary, Spherical World just as observed and just as the Bible, Quran, and 1 Enoch say:
(Sun 24hrs... Moon 24hrs 50min 28sec... Stars 23hrs 56min 4sec... all east to west.)
google the earth is not moving, you can see what religion can do to a human mind.
The World (Earth and unattached atmosphere) is neither rotating around its own axis nor orbiting the Sun. In reality the Sun, Stars and Moon are going around the Stationary, Spherical World just as observed and just as the Bible, Quran, and 1 Enoch say:
(Sun 24hrs... Moon 24hrs 50min 28sec... Stars 23hrs 56min 4sec... all east to west.)
google the earth is not moving, you can see what religion can do to a human mind.
you already proved that Buddha is a greatest cheater and you still show your respect to him?
I didn't prove he was a cheater. I believe he was.
However, I do not respect him not because he was cheater (we are all cheaters) but because he has become the symbol of a false religion that is still cheating people in the millions.
On the other hand, I would certainly show due respect to him as an individual, well, if he comes back to life. In this case he is just a sinner like me, sometimes tell the truth, sometimes tell a lie. I would have respected him just as I respect myself - a sinful human being but with dignity of a human being just the same.
Thank you for doing that.
- 注册
- 2005-03-09
- 消息
- 8,494
- 荣誉分数
- 3,271
- 声望点数
- 373
老何，封挨批艾迪，txjjtdbj.
鸭子，你要害我不成？村长挖了大坑，俺不跳你也不跳，急得村长自己在跳脚。老何，别听鸭刮刮叫。
It is never the point of dispute because it is a given: this has been a religious belief and will always be. A religious belief can not be proven.
