美国总统选举: 几个州重新点票

  • 主题发起人 主题发起人 ccc
  • 开始时间 开始时间
这种技术性挑战不会阻挡老川当选,只是增加他当选的争议性。

从他昨天的Ohio的演讲看,尽管有许多草根支持者对希拉里不依不饶,他基本上是会放手以求和解。
有一个有趣的情况就是每一次竞选,OHIO总是一个方向标,很多州都跟着OHIO的方向走,这一次川普爷赢了OHIO是一个关键。

想想这次的游行未必不是一件坏事,起码给了川普爷一个上马威,也算是负能量正化吧(偶突然想到这个词)。:p
 
因为绿党要求手工点票,在12月14号选举人投票之前肯定不能完成。这样的话川普的46张选举人票成为争议票,他就只有260票,达不到270。

稳坐钓鱼台,怕啥。最后谁拿到270+谁入主白宫。

特朗普担心最后拿不到270+?
 
这个代价会太大。他必须在1年内小有所成以应付中期选举;在3年内有显著成效以应付下次大选。另外选战后不再与对手纠缠也是美国很好的一个政治传统。
先坏规矩的可是洗那里 。
 
特朗普及其支持者采取法律行动力阻重新计票
2016年12月04日 06:50:50 来源: 新华社

  
129389178_14807687715361n.jpeg


资料图片

  美国总统选举重新计票风波不断发酵。威斯康星州已于12月1日展开总统选举重新计票工作,以回应美国绿党总统候选人吉尔·斯坦先前对威州、宾夕法尼亚州和密歇根州票数统计的质疑。

  当选总统唐纳德·特朗普曾表示重新计票是一场“骗局”,他和支持者近日分别在上述三个“摇摆州”采取法律行动,力阻重新计票。

  【特朗普阻验票】

  宾夕法尼亚州选举官员2日更新此次美国大选的计票数据。结果显示,截至2日,特朗普在该州领先希拉里的选票数由此前的7.1万票缩水至4.9万票,领先率由1%降至0.8%。宾州定于5日审理斯坦寻求法院下令全州验票的申请。

  美联社报道,特朗普的律师团队已在宾州采取法律行动,欲阻止斯坦的重新计票请求。他们在一份诉状中称,“根本没有证据显示宾州的投票系统被操纵”。

  与此同时,特朗普的律师团队还在密歇根州采取了类似的法律行动,他们向密歇根州选举委员会提出异议,反对斯坦重新计票的要求。特朗普的律师称,斯坦在密歇根州只获得1%的选票,没有达到因计票疏忽而导致败选的地步,因此不能寻求重新计票。

  美国密歇根州总检察长、共和党人比尔·许特2日则向最高法院提起诉讼,要求阻止绿党在该州推动选票重计的活动。许特同样认为,斯坦的得票率太低,不符合提出重新计票的条件,且重新计票将产生巨额开支、花费数百万美元,这将对纳税人造成不利。

  按美联社的说法,如果没有法律介入,密歇根州预计将在6日或7日启动重新计票程序。对于许特的诉讼,密歇根州法院可能不会“立即”作出裁定,但法院已要求该州选举委员会在6日前对此作出书面回应。

  【斯坦提质疑】

  眼下,威斯康星州是三个“摇摆州”中唯一正式展开重新计票的州。威州共有72个县,其中一个县已于2日完成重新计票工作。

  分析人士认为,即便威斯康星州、宾夕法尼亚州和密歇根州重新计票,只有三个州的结果全部反转,才有可能颠覆大选结果,但这种可能性极低。

  一些评论人士认为,斯坦此番寻求重新计票的举动仅仅是为了筹资和提高政治知名度。

  在威州重新计票展开后的几个小时,“伟大美国”政治行动委员会等为支持特朗普竞选而组建的组织在该州提起联邦诉讼,同时要求法院下达临时禁令,暂停重新计票工作。诉状称,重新计票对在大选中选择特朗普的选民权利造成威胁,且由于威州选举机构必须赶在12月13日前重新统计全部选票,很可能因仓促出错。

  地区法院2日晚些时候驳回了这些组织暂停重新计票的要求,但定于9日对其提起的联邦诉讼举行听证。

  面对特朗普及其支持者试图阻止验票的举动,斯坦回应称,这是破坏民主的“可耻”行为。

  “(重新计票)法律程序的出台是为了保证选举的准确、安全和公正,唐纳德·特朗普及其支持者却冒昧地寻求阻碍这一程序,我们不会因此退出,”斯坦2日在一份声明中说。

  “核实选票能够化解所有疑问,这是常识,”斯坦阵营的一名捐助人说,“特朗普极力阻碍重新计票的做法,让我们不禁要问:‘为什么他会害怕重新计票?’”(刘曦 新华社专特稿)
 
Green Party’s Jill Stein drops Pennsylvania election recount bid
David DeKok
HARRISBURG, Pa. — Reuters
Published Saturday, Dec. 03, 2016 7:57PM EST
Last updated Saturday, Dec. 03, 2016 9:15PM EST

Green Party candidate Jill Stein abruptly dropped her petition for a recount of all votes cast in the U.S. presidential election in Pennsylvania after a judge ordered her campaign to post a $1-million bond, court documents showed on Saturday.

The bond was set by the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania a day after representatives of President-elect Donald Trump requested a $10-million bond, according to the papers.

The court gave the petitioners until 5 p.m. local time (2200 GMT) on Monday to post the bond, but said it could modify the amount if shown good cause. Instead, Stein’s campaign withdrew.

“Petitioners are regular citizens of ordinary means. They cannot afford to post the $1,000,000 bond required by the court,” wrote attorney Lawrence Otter, informing the court of the decision to withdraw.

Stein, who garnered only about 1 per cent of the presidential vote on Nov. 8, has also sought recounts in Michigan and Wisconsin. Trump won narrow victories over Democrat Hillary Clinton in all three states, part of the industrial heartland of the country until manufacturers started leaving for Mexico and other low-wage countries.

Trump and his allies have attempted to stop the initiatives in the states, calling the recount effort a “scam.” Clinton’s campaign has said it would take part in the recounts.

“The judge’s outrageous demand that voters pay such an exorbitant figure is a shameful, unacceptable barrier to democratic participation,” Stein said in a statement. “No voter in America should be forced to pay thousands of dollars to know if her or his vote was counted.”

Stein said she planned to announce “the next step” in the recount effort on Monday at a previously scheduled news conference at Trump Tower in New York City.

She said recounts already under way in some Pennsylvania counties would continue. The state’s election commission had approved recounts in 75 precincts where voters had requested one, but refused to allow a full forensic audit of voting machines, she said.

Even if all of the recounts were to take place, the overall outcome of the election would not likely change.

The presidential race is decided by the Electoral College, or a tally of wins from the state-by-state contests, rather than by the popular national vote.

Trump surpassed the 270 electoral votes needed to win, with 306 electoral votes. Recounts would have to flip the result to Clinton in all three states to change the overall result.

In the popular vote, Clinton had a margin of more than 2.5 million votes over Trump, the independent Cook Political Report said.
 
Jill Stein, US Green Party candidate, drops election recount bid in Pennsylvania
Agence France-Presse
4 December 2016 • 2:38am

Former Green Party presidential candidate Jill Stein dropped her efforts Saturday to request a vote recount in Pennsylvania, one of three battleground states won by Donald Trump where she challenged the results.

"Petitioners are regular citizens of ordinary means. They cannot afford to post the $1,000,000 bond required by the court," read a filing submitted in the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania.

Ms Stein plans to hold a rally on Monday across the street from Trump Tower in New York "vowing to fight tooth and nail to verify the accuracy, security and fairness of the vote," a statement read.

On Twitter, she added: "How odd is it that we must jump through bureaucratic hoops and raise millions of dollars so we can trust our election results?"

Stein's fundraising efforts for recounts in Pennsylvania, Michigan and Wisconsin have obtained nearly $7 million so far, according to her website. In all three states, Mr Trump only narrowly defeated Clinton.

Her recount request in Pennsylvania was complicated by opposition from Mr Trump. Michigan's attorney general filed suit to halt Ms Stein's recounts efforts in the state. And in Wisconsin, Mr Trump supporters have tried to stop the recount there.

Ms Stein's campaign has cited unspecified "anomalies" as grounds to mount a challenge in all three Rust Belt states.

The move came amid stepped-up calls from some of Trump's leftist opponents to challenge the results of the November 8 election, which followed a bitter campaign that included persistent charges of Russian hacking and allegations by Mr Trump of fraud.

Although experts say there is virtually no chance of overturning the result, the demands could reignite debate over the legitimacy of Mr Trump's election, already fueled by Democrat Hillary Clinton's lead in the popular vote, which now stands at around 2.5 million.
 
Jill Stein drops Pennsylvania recount suit after failing to raise $1m bond

Green Party fails to raise $1m bond ordered by court but persists in recount efforts in Michigan, Wisconsin and some Pennsylvania precincts



Jill Stein has fought for recounts in Michigan, Wisconsin and Pennsylvania. Photograph: ddp USA/REX/Shutterstock
Associated Press in Harrisburg
Sunday 4 December 2016 00.29 GMT

The Green Party dropped its Pennsylvania recount suit on Saturday, ending its bid to have the state explore whether voting machines and systems had been tampered with and the election result manipulated.

Late Saturday, a court canceled a hearing scheduled for Monday, when attorneys for Jill Stein, the party’s 2016 nominee, would have argued their case. Lawyers for the Green Party said they could not afford the $1m bond ordered by the court by Monday at 5pm. Green Party-backed efforts to analyze election software in scattered precincts are continuing, however, alongside efforts in other states.

Stein has spearheaded recount campaigns in Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin, states where Republican Donald Trump won narrowly over Democrat Hillary Clinton. Pennsylvania’s Republican party has opposed the recount, as have Trump’s allies in Michigan and Wisconsin.

An updated count Friday by Pennsylvania election officials showed Trump’s lead shrinking to 49,000 from 71,000 over Democrat Hillary Clinton. Trump’s lead is 0.8%, down from over 1%, out of 6m votes cast. Pennsylvania has a 0.5%-margin trigger for an automatic statewide recount.
 
Jill Stein drops Pennsylvania recount suit after failing to raise $1m bond

Green Party fails to raise $1m bond ordered by court but persists in recount efforts in Michigan, Wisconsin and some Pennsylvania precincts



Jill Stein has fought for recounts in Michigan, Wisconsin and Pennsylvania. Photograph: ddp USA/REX/Shutterstock
Associated Press in Harrisburg
Sunday 4 December 2016 00.29 GMT

The Green Party dropped its Pennsylvania recount suit on Saturday, ending its bid to have the state explore whether voting machines and systems had been tampered with and the election result manipulated.

Late Saturday, a court canceled a hearing scheduled for Monday, when attorneys for Jill Stein, the party’s 2016 nominee, would have argued their case. Lawyers for the Green Party said they could not afford the $1m bond ordered by the court by Monday at 5pm. Green Party-backed efforts to analyze election software in scattered precincts are continuing, however, alongside efforts in other states.

Stein has spearheaded recount campaigns in Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin, states where Republican Donald Trump won narrowly over Democrat Hillary Clinton. Pennsylvania’s Republican party has opposed the recount, as have Trump’s allies in Michigan and Wisconsin.

An updated count Friday by Pennsylvania election officials showed Trump’s lead shrinking to 49,000 from 71,000 over Democrat Hillary Clinton. Trump’s lead is 0.8%, down from over 1%, out of 6m votes cast. Pennsylvania has a 0.5%-margin trigger for an automatic statewide recount.


钱不够,为什么不找川普借呢?
他是亿万富豪啊!
 
钱不够,为什么不找川普借呢?
他是亿万富豪啊!
希拉里自己有基金会。拿一个米资助Jill Stein小菜一碟。她不敢出钱,还是怕趟浑水。名声败了不说。最后赢不了,川普会整死她。
 
Jill Stein drops Pennsylvania recount suit after failing to raise $1m bond

Green Party fails to raise $1m bond ordered by court but persists in recount efforts in Michigan, Wisconsin and some Pennsylvania precincts



Jill Stein has fought for recounts in Michigan, Wisconsin and Pennsylvania. Photograph: ddp USA/REX/Shutterstock
Associated Press in Harrisburg
Sunday 4 December 2016 00.29 GMT

The Green Party dropped its Pennsylvania recount suit on Saturday, ending its bid to have the state explore whether voting machines and systems had been tampered with and the election result manipulated.

Late Saturday, a court canceled a hearing scheduled for Monday, when attorneys for Jill Stein, the party’s 2016 nominee, would have argued their case. Lawyers for the Green Party said they could not afford the $1m bond ordered by the court by Monday at 5pm. Green Party-backed efforts to analyze election software in scattered precincts are continuing, however, alongside efforts in other states.

Stein has spearheaded recount campaigns in Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin, states where Republican Donald Trump won narrowly over Democrat Hillary Clinton. Pennsylvania’s Republican party has opposed the recount, as have Trump’s allies in Michigan and Wisconsin.

An updated count Friday by Pennsylvania election officials showed Trump’s lead shrinking to 49,000 from 71,000 over Democrat Hillary Clinton. Trump’s lead is 0.8%, down from over 1%, out of 6m votes cast. Pennsylvania has a 0.5%-margin trigger for an automatic statewide recount.


不是是她已经集资了500万吗?
钱呢?
 
不是是她已经集资了500万吗?
钱呢?

就如同我集资CFC刀乐一样,入了手就舍不得了。:D
 
怎么不再八了?威斯康星州重新点票结束,川普多得131票,选举结果不变
wisconsin.JPG
 
后退
顶部