卡北居民请进,事关卡北前途,誓师动员沟通大会NOV 5 在EOM大礼堂

希望你买得开心,顺心,安心,省心。未来属于你们。:zhichi:
:tx::tx::tx:
开玩笑啦。
我建议你们动员那几个支持香港打砸抢民主自由卫士的渣滓。
有民意基础,有民主动机。
把MINTO, RICHCRAFT办公室烧了不就行了。
最起码,天天去堵MINTO, RICHCRAFT办公室啊。
为什么把简单的事情复杂化呢。
指望卡北的程序猿,还不如指望母猪上树。
所谓秀才造反,十年不成。
一个字,笨。
 
最后编辑:
:tx::tx::tx:
开玩笑啦。
我建议你们动员那几个支持香港打砸抢民主自由卫士的渣滓。
有民意基础,有民主动机。
把MINTO, RICHCRAFT办公室烧了不就行了。
最起码,天天去堵MINTO, RICHCRAFT办公室啊。
为什么把简单的事情复杂化呢。
指望卡北的程序猿,还不如指望母猪上树。
所谓秀才造反,十年不成。
一个字,笨。
留个底。万一哪天办公室着火了,我就去阿sir爱母屁建个凯斯
 
一群乌合之众成不了气候,贪心不足。
与巴屯一样,开始要保球场,后来变成让大伙帮那几家临球场院子交land primium upgrade fee了,结果把八成以上的小区居民推向了对立面,然后建筑商就自然胜利了。
最后差不多也是这个套路
 
留个底。万一哪天办公室着火了,我就去阿sir爱母屁建个凯斯
为毛啊?你敢恐吓民主斗士!!
先天天去堵MINTO, RICHCRAFT办公室。
MINTO, RICHCRAFT一定叫警察赶人啦。
然后警民冲突,警察一定滥用暴力啊。
然后把MINTO, RICHCRAFT办公室烧了就是顺理成章的事吗。
记住,干这事一定要打美国国旗!!!。
你们有堂堂正正美国人做反对党领袖,怕什么!!!
到时候美国参众两院都会支持你们的。
以土豆的尿性,借它一百个胆子也不敢为难你们了。
 
为毛啊?你敢恐吓民主斗士!!
先天天去堵MINTO, RICHCRAFT办公室。
MINTO, RICHCRAFT一定叫警察赶人啦。
然后警民冲突,警察一定滥用暴力啊。
然后把MINTO, RICHCRAFT办公室烧了就是顺理成章的事吗。
记住,干这事一定要打美国国旗!!!。
你们有堂堂正正美国人做反对党领袖,怕什么!!!
到时候美国参众两院都会支持你们的。
以土豆的尿性,借它一百个胆子也不敢为难你们了。

然后有请香港黄之峰, 何韵诗莅临卡屯指导群众革命工作 :buttrock::buttrock::buttrock:
 
研究了一把战场形势,设了几个模型掐算了几把,如果cl 赢了,
Golf盘子兵营有两个可能 :

1)可能性一
两个总容量5-600单元的大兵营only
2)可能性二
两个总容量400单元的中型兵营+100到200单元b1级别stacked townhouse小兵营混杂在3-400套传统的townhouse群中。

Single house总共500套。31,32,33,43,44尺
新区入口就是两个中(或大)兵营把门。
 
最后编辑:
两大兵营的位置和效果图。

如果可能性一总数有5-600套的话,这两大兵营可能在8层或以上。
如果可能性一总数有4-500套的话, 这两大兵营可能在6层或以上。
下图之一就是左大营和右大营的精确定位。
下图之二就是左大营和右大营的效果图。

如果让CLUBLINK项目胜诉允许开发,卡北的治安形势可能要重新评估,在这一片20年来,没有恶性治安导致人死亡的事件,20年间仅有的一次严重治安人身伤害案件在5,6年前在STEPHEN LEACOCK外的公园发生XX案件,据说犯事的就是住在EOM东面一小片廉价出租屋。
Gold_Compount_Left_RightArmyStyle.jpg
Golf_Compount_8floorAprtment.jpg
 
再来看看CLUBLINK/MINTO/RICHCRAFT 新GOLF盘最“旗舰”,最”豪华“的44尺豪宅是啥样
44尺中其实包括了5尺左右的GARAGE SETBACK,实用面积肯定低于RR 最低一档的42尺。属于正常SINGLE39尺,40尺一档。改进的是车库大了一些。
另外对数字启用也太粗糙, 44华人或亚裔买家会咋想呢?

Minto_44ft_Golf_Inside.jpg
Minto_44ft_Golf_Outside.jpg


 
:tx::tx::tx:
开玩笑啦。
我建议你们动员那几个支持香港打砸抢民主自由卫士的渣滓。
有民意基础,有民主动机。
把MINTO, RICHCRAFT办公室烧了不就行了。
最起码,天天去堵MINTO, RICHCRAFT办公室啊。
为什么把简单的事情复杂化呢。
指望卡北的程序猿,还不如指望母猪上树。
所谓秀才造反,十年不成。
一个字,笨。

得靠有狼性的, 话说那个公司最有狼性呢
 
市政府议员和开发商都老铁了:
Majority on planning committee taking developer donations
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/otta...nning-committee-developer-donations-1.4832148
对了,文中帮助议员Jan Harder操办开发商捐款会的那个Jack Stirling,就是这次以“独立协调人”身份,引导Stonebridge居民交levy买球场的那位。
巴屯那个harder快20年了,不倒翁,占据着这么一个类似国土局一把手的位置,多少人对她不愤,传言很多,可是巴屯人们还是没有把她选下去。是时候换血了。
 
https://obj.ca/article/spurred-tech...ll-kanata-golf-club-purchase-halt-development
Spurred by tech titan Terry Matthews, residents mull Kanata golf club purchase to halt development

Spurred on by an appeal from billionaire tech titan Terry Matthews, Kanata residents are stepping up with offers to donate funds to save the Kanata Golf and Country Club from being razed for a new residential development, the local councillor says.

More than 400 people attended a community meeting Monday night at the Brookstreet Hotel to talk about golf course owner ClubLink’s controversial plan to redevelop the 71-hectare site. ClubLink is proposing to team up with local developers Minto Communities and Richcraft Homes to tear up the course and replace it with roads, parks, ponds and 1,500 homes divided among single-detached houses, townhouses and apartments.

ClubLink senior vice-president of investments Robert Visentin told OBJ earlier this month the golf course industry has been in decline for the past decade and the firm needs to look at new ways of making the property more financially viable.

But Kanata North Coun. Jenna Sudds, who organized Monday night’s meeting, said the community doesn’t want to see all that greenspace disappear. She said Matthews, best known as the co-founder of telecom giant Mitel, told residents at the meeting he’d be willing to make a significant contribution to any bid to buy the course from ClubLink if other residents agreed to put money toward the cause as well.

Sudds said Wednesday she’d already heard from a number of constituents who told her they’d be happy to chip in to save the course from being bulldozed.

“I think as a community, we need to look at all avenues that are possible,” she said. “For the community, it was certainly a call to action. We need to work together to do whatever we can to save this greenspace.”

Barbara Ramsay, chair of the Kanata Greenspace Protection Coalition, which opposes ClubLink’s plans, said Matthews’ offer is intriguing.

“That’s a large idea that he’s talking (about), but it’s an idea that is certainly worth vetting,” she said, adding she too has been approached by residents asking if her group would take the lead in putting together such a proposal along with the tech entrepreneur.

Opponents of ClubLink’s redevelopment plans say they have the potential to negatively affect their property values, lead to more traffic congestion in the Kanata Lakes and Beaverbrook communities and put more strain on public infrastructure such as roads and schools.

They also say the proposal violates a legal agreement that dates back almost 40 years.

Sudds, Ramsay and others point to a 1981 agreement between the former city of Kanata and the course’s owner at the time that requires 40 per cent of the Kanata Lakes property to be maintained as green space, including the golf course, and gives the city the right to take over the land at no cost if the owners no longer want to operate the course and cannot find another operator or buyer who wants to maintain it.

ClubLink bought the golf course in 1996; the City of Ottawa took over all legal agreements signed by all former municipalities in the former region of Ottawa-Carleton, including Kanata, when they were amalgamated in 2001.

The city filed an application last week asking Ontario’s Superior Court of Justice to rule on whether the so-called 40 per cent agreement is still valid. Sudds said Wednesday the city has asked the court to expedite the application in the hope of having a hearing by Dec. 13.

ClubLink officials say they believe the agreement is invalid.

“We wouldn’t have filed an application and gone through the work of doing all these reports if we thought it was a valid agreement,” Valentin said recently.

Meanwhile, the clock is ticking on ClubLink’s development application with the city, which was filed in early October. Under provincial law, the city has 120 days – meaning until Feb. 5 – to make a decision on whether to green-light the proposal.

Sudds and others worry the court hearing process won’t be concluded by the time the February deadline arrives, putting the city in a quandary.

“There is literally nothing that we can do as a city to stop the planning (process),” she said. “We’re doing everything we can on the legal side to try to get this dealt with prior to the 120 days expiring. Obviously, it’s distressing. Until we hear back from the court, it’s hard for us to be able to assess how realistic these timelines are. But I do know that we’ve got an incredible legal team working on our side, and I know that they’ll provide good advice either way.”

The Kanata Greenspace Protection Coalition is hosting a public meeting next Tuesday evening at Earl of March Secondary School to discuss how the community can support the city’s legal fight.

“It is the right thing to do – as far as we’re concerned, the only thing to do – to show the respect to the 40 per cent agreement that it deserves,” Ramsay said.
 
后退
顶部