最初由 roaring mouse 发布
就是采用孔子的“敬鬼神而远之。“,您好像没有采用。Confucius said "be respectful for gods, but keep a distance from them.' i never believed i gods though as a kid i believed in the existence of ghosts. if i do not believe, no need to keep a distance.
最初由 roaring mouse 发布
by that i mean god is powerless; he cannot even send out cats to catch mice.
最初由 wushuren 发布
世界上有猫,那难道不是上帝送来的吗?
我当时还以为你要用这个来自嘲一下哪。“看那,这里有个假基督徒纯粹是只老鼠,我可不是猫,我可不想狗拿耗子多管闲事,上帝大人,赶紧派只猫来。“。
实际上,如果上帝不派猫来,自己扮成猫,来捉我这个“假基督徒老鼠”,比如注册个马甲说自己是牧师和基督徒什么的。这样猫捉耗子才比较有优势。中国古书兵法36策,你不会用啊,比如反间计。这样只能帮助我进一步说出来。
而且基督徒们看到的是一个反上帝和一个维护上帝的人在论战。
您这人很厚道。
最初由 roaring mouse 发布
cats were left out of the ark when god sent the flood. this reminds of a question: r u against cloning? how about ivf? i know you have no opinion about use of condoms.
最初由 wushuren 发布
我在担心一些问题。比如说,人类社会发展到一定阶段以后,好像是需要一定的条件才能迈入下一个门槛的,否则就是灾难。比如在进入原子能时代之前,灭掉日本军国主义和纳粹希特勒。那么基因技术的全面掌握和应用会不会让人类社会迈入下一个门槛,在进入这个门槛前,需要什么条件?要知道基因技术几乎就是造人的技术。
当然对于没有发生的事情,我只能猜测。
在旁观者看来,咱们在这里没完没了,就好像杞人忧天的,外加神经病。不过,咱酸一把,所谓,不谋万世者,不足以某一时,不谋全局者,不足以谋一域,当作是炒股分析训练吧。哈哈。
最初由 yokel 发布
"The communists would never have won over the KMT as the KMT army was far superior to the Mao's peasant army."
What do you mean by "win over"? Do you mean the Communist won over the KMT as friend during the war between 1946 to 1949? I assume you meant "defeat"...
You are now desperate and showing your ignorance again...
-
最初由 yokel 发布
"by your viewpoints, no social progress is possible."
Looks like you either don't understand my point at all, or trying to deliberately twist my point.
This is what I said. "doing the right thing at the right time". If you don't understand what it means, just ask people here for help, or find someone to read my line and explain it to you. If you want to blame Chinese people for the existence of the regime, or if you want to compare China with the countries of your favorite category, be my guest. You don't have to try so hard to twist the meaning of other people's words, or to try so desperately to put your words into other people's mouth. It will only make you look desperate.
最初由 yokel 发布
"See the courageous people of Nepal and see how they fight to end un-democracy"
Now you are ignorant again comparing Nepal to China. Lets me just give you one of the differences between China and Nepal because I am tired of listing differences to you and you don't seem to understand anyway. Nepal is a country that can not even take care of Mao guerrillas. Any guerrillas in China? Did Nepal government use machine guns and tanks on its citizens/protesters?
最初由 yokel 发布
["By your viewpoints, even the Americans could not win the war against the British, whose army was far more powerful than the American farmer army"
You need to re-read my point again, or find someone read it and explain it to you.
By the way who told you the British army was "far more powerful than the American farmer army"? The British army did not even have the power to fight the Indipendence that was declared a year before the American-British war.
最初由 yokel 发布
"glad you find it gratifying in the washroom. hope your soul is washed clean there too."
I guess that's the best you can do...LOL
Yes, I may feel "gratifying" and "uplifting" in that situation, and I think many people may feel similar way. But the difference between you and rest of us is nobody but you will feel "soul is washed clean there" because it was you who believes whatever "gratifying" and "uplifting" is like religions. It's too late to deny that you are the one who believes that "Religion is like sex." or "Religion is like sh*ting!" based on your logic, and keeps telling us "that is a statement made by many others." Trying so hard to impose your logic and your understanding of religions on others only makes you even more pathetic.
最初由 yokel 发布
"
You need to read the history of that period. Here are some of the reading points for you to start with.
- The war between the Communist and the KMT during 46 to 49 was not for or about democracy in China at all. Instead it's one of the bloodiest civil wars on earth and more and more people find the war was not justified. It makes your argument totally irrelevant to the subject (improving democracy).
- The civil war was about Mao's personal dream to be an emperor, his hunger for power and he did not care much about how many Chinese would die during the civil war. It had nothing to do with democracy.
- Your example was about army fighting army militarily, not about citizens fighting government peacefully. By that example you are inciting the bare-handed citizens fighting government and army. You can see how desperate your argument is.
- Do you know how many millions of Chinese died during that war? Anyone who has BASIC understanding of democracy will not even think of risking the loss of that many Chinese lives. You are obviously lack of BASIC understanding of democracy and the modern Chinese history. What's worse is you don't seem to care about how many Chinese will die in order to achieve your so called "democracy".
By the way, my 286 wants to send her regards to you. 7 years, what a pathetic character...LOL
最初由 yokel 发布
- Do you know how many millions of Chinese died during that war? Anyone who has BASIC understanding of democracy will not even think of risking the loss of that many Chinese lives. You are obviously lack of BASIC understanding of democracy and the modern Chinese history. What's worse is you don't seem to care about how many Chinese will die in order to achieve your so called "democracy".
By the way, my 286 wants to send her regards to you. 7 years, what a pathetic character...LOL
最初由 wushuren 发布
我在担心一些问题。比如说,人类社会发展到一定阶段以后,好像是需要一定的条件才能迈入下一个门槛的,否则就是灾难。比如在进入原子能时代之前,灭掉日本军国主义和纳粹希特勒。那么基因技术的全面掌握和应用会不会让人类社会迈入下一个门槛,在进入这个门槛前,需要什么条件?要知道基因技术几乎就是造人的技术。
当然对于没有发生的事情,我只能猜测。
在旁观者看来,咱们在这里没完没了,就好像杞人忧天的,外加神经病。不过,咱酸一把,所谓,不谋万世者,不足以某一时,不谋全局者,不足以谋一域,当作是炒股分析训练吧。哈哈。