精华 苦辣酸甜难书尽,成败得失笑谈中

Listening to union speech. Still attacked banks and wanted the 0.15% fee on bank's liabilities. Re-stressed Wall Street shouldn't be paid so much. Wanted to use $30 B paid by TARP to lend to small commercial banks. That is ridiculous !!!

In any case, if the bank stocks get hit tomorrow, I won't be unhappy. Holding down valuation of strong banks as long as possible is not a bad idea.

Strong banks are able to pass any fees to consumers....

Don't get too excited yet. I listened to the entire speech. Apart from mentioning the 0.15% proposed bank fees, his attacks on banks and Wall Street greatly tuned down. No breaking up big banks, no separation of commercial banking from investment banking from trading ... as in last Thursday's harsh speech. He knows as well as you and I do that job creation relies heavily on bank lending and attacking big banks are not making banks lend. Although still very early, futures are in deep green as of 10:30pm. I want BAC 17 and WFC 30 back first. I will evaluate and re-evaluate afterwards.

NFLX surged AH upon good ER. I am keeping my eyes wide open for a possible put.
 
DNDN vs WFC

Cat: both closed at exactly 28.20 today. I am a die-hard bull on DNDN and you on WFC. After more work on WFC, I am getting increasingly bullish on WFC too and I am pretty sure I will long WFC for the long haul at some point. My market participation largely depends on one binary event, FDA's ruling on Provenge, expected by May. If Provenge is not approved, my broker account will surely be wiped out. I fully realize the risk involved and am fully prepared to take it. Should Provenge gain marketing licensure, on the other hand, I expect DNDN to see tripple-digit pps far earlier than WFC. As of now, DNDN is my only long-term hold and I have made a habit of buying a little every once in a while when I can get hold to cash. I am gradually reducing my DNDN swing portion and increasing the core-holding portion.

Banks, casinos, insurance and airlines will become my hold positions, just not now. Today, GNVC's secondary offering created a pretty good entry but I will wait until the dust settles before jumping in, paying possibly more for the 184-event interim peek, expected in March. I like the company's cash haul strategy but hate the warrants, exercisable in the next 5 years at a price of 2.75. The secondary offering is definitely good for the company but very bad for existing shareholders, especially all those who loaded above 3 just the day before yesterday. Being severely under water is never a good feeling, no matter how one labels him/herself as a long term investor.

SVA is a classic example of incompetent management. I don't think I can make back the large sum of money I lost there. Very sad to see what is unfolding with this very promising company.

What are your long-term holdings?
 
Immediate Bio acquisition targets

Cat: I am sharing a tiny bio acquisition target: NVLT.OB. Its lead product candidate, NOV-002 for lung cancer, has completed the pivotal Phase 3 registration trial (the 725th event was reached) and top-line results are expected by the end of the quarter (see Jan. 7 PR). NOV-002 is also in Phase 2 trials for breast cancer and ovarian cancer. I will initiate a position in the immediate future.

Also, I will acquire some GNVC for the 184th event second interim peek once the dust settles.

Both are tiny bios and have no options to play.
 
Thanks for sharing bio information. Pity that they don't have options.

I don't think WFC will reach 3-digit anytime soon. It will probably payout 1/2 of its earnings once normalized. The management should try first to buy back 1 B shares before any significant dividend increase - just my wish.

If you write put options, you probably could collect premium in the range of $10K per month based on your size of capital at risk. Isn't that good enough ?

I will keep an eye on DNDN for its May event. The logistics issue is not trivial since it shall affect its business model....
 
There is a joke on airlines. One asked how to become a millionaire. The answer is to start with 1 billion and own an airline. What is changed for airline ? Air Canada seems to be on the verge of another Chapter 11 ...

Surprise to learn you are interested in insurance too. Which one are you studying ?
 
It appears that I have lost Mr. Market's pulse

Mr. Market took me by a huge surprise again today. I was so right in calling a good 4Q GDP report but Mr. Market simply wanted to sell off. Imagine where would it close if GDP did not come up with the fastest growth in 6 years. This is not a good sign for bulls, not at all. Am I wrong in changing my short-term bearish view? The past couple of weeks have lost me and my sense. What to do? Staying away seems the best move but I have already made my commitments, too bad.

Cat: regarding NVLT and GNVC, I got them both. At 2 and 1.7, they are indeed like call options with the benefit of no expiry dates. I would not be surprised if both go down back to sub 1 immediately upon negative data. So, the downside risk should be well understood. Normaly, I don't load up my full positions in one shot but in these cases, I will not touch them either way again until releases of data.

Let's see what February brings.
 
Ben Graham said The Market is a voting machine in the short-run but a weighing machine in the long-run.

It is definitely a special talent being able to tell how the Market is to vote.

As to Mr. Market, his comment is that Mr. Market is like a person constantly shifting from over optimism to over pessimism. Mr. Market always try to influence the mood of participants. The key for an investor is trying to use Mr. Market as a servant rather than being controlled by Mr. Market.

All very intelligent words ...yet very difficult to follow.
 
A sharp rise of a stock price always makes one nervous. Like the movement of Berkshire shares recently. It is as if mutual funds are suddenly being force fed with these shares due to their inclusion in S&P 500....

Volatility in the market is one reason that stock investment is not boring.

The prices of these two bio shares are too high for me. My personal standard is to invest like $100 in order to earn $3000 to $5000. I don't have too much capital committed in bio and thus have to save for rare chances ...
 
My commitments in DNDN, NVLT and GNVC are for the key events. Any day-to-day small movements now are simply noise and I don't really care much at all unless huge movements (probable but highly unlikely) take place due to expectations/sudden change of events, which will cause me to make unexpected moves. The latter two are like lottery tickets and I got whatever I can afford them. I did go through NVLT's previous three Phase 2 trial results. They were all positive. The fact that the 725th event was triggered about 1/2 year later than expected suggests to me that patients in the trial live longer than expected. And I speculate that this is due to the treatment rather than the controlled-arm patients living longer. As such, I am biased towards positive top-line data. GNVC's 2nd interim peek allows more leeway in terms of time left to build a substansive position. Given the nature of these revolutionary treatments, I gamble a small stake in anticipation of either losing all or huge wins.

What I am very pissed at myself is that I made the right calls in terms of key events such as disappointing major banks' 4QERs and I was mostly right (I was wrong about WFC and consequently panicked out of my puts for a huge loss); Obama's SOTUA, in which I expected him not to harshly bash banks and he did come through with my expectations; a nuetral weekly jobless report; good 4Q GDP growth. I formed my market performance expecations and thus made my moves based on these event expectations. I speculated these key events correctly but Mr. Market moved in the opposite directions as I expected. AMAG's 48.25 secondary offering pricing also made me selling my puts. This is simply a sentiment issue that I seem to have completely lost the pulse. Consequently, I missed many many k's of profits in just a matter of days.

Oh well, it is all water under the bridge now. There are 3 weeks left in my front-month options. I will wait the time out. What I worry is that all my anticipated key events have passed and I am now left my options to invisible hands. Normally, I only play front-month options with anticipated key triggers. When one is playing with front-month options, one thing is for sure and that is Mr. Market is never dull and boring. Any movements mean broker account value changes in many k's.

I make my moves based on expectations but I am fully prepared for the unexpected and unexpectable. Win or lose, I made my moves.
 
More DD and thought on NVLT and GNVC

NOV-002 Phase 3 results, expected by the end of March, will be the maker or breaker for NVLT. The pps took off upon the 725th event announcement like a rochet and then retraced to this level. I expect to wake up one day in the next two months or so to see either a double-digit pps or a sub-1 pps. On positive data, the pps will soar. The company will go for a secondary offer, which will tank the pps but stabilize along a level. I will sell on the news, waiting until the secondary offer to re-establish a long holding position.

The effects of the 184th event triggered interim peek for GNVC won't be as drastic. The pps did take off on the trigger announcement but there were other developments that propelled the pps to tripple in a short time span. The secondary offer (priced at 2 with 0.3 free warrants) tanked the pps. On extreme data (i.e., trial halted due to either breathtakingly positive results or landslidingly negative results --- proportionately more treatment-arm patients die than control-arm patients), GNVC will make gigantic moves. Anything in between will subject to the pps to a subtle trading range. There is still a lot of time left for the trial to completion. With the newly offered secondary, GNVC is well positioned financially. It becomes a waiting game.

Cat: I have been through quite a few extreme bio experiences. Your ambition of $100 commitments in exchange for a possible reward of 4-5K is indeed highly admirable but very unrealistic for an outsider. Unless you have insider info about a trial results and buy calls at the perfect strike for 0.05 at exactly the right time, it is inconceivable for a return of 4000-5000% around one event. We exchanged quite a bit now and from these, I conclude that bio is not your cup of tea. You are hard at DD work, very mindful of financials, very steady ...... all great attributes for market participation. But bio is a completely different animal. It seems you don't have the appetite to handle this line of speculation.

With the American arm sale to Taiwan and another political riff it has sparked between China and USA, I am just hoping that DOW won't test 10K comes Monday. Any further drops will cause serious damages to my front-month calls positions.
 
You guys might be on the wrong track. You can't realize what is really happening with a company from the published, such as SVA. Warren Buffett and other successful fund manager's methods are not suitable for personal investment. Why not do something on ETFs, which would be a good way to accumulate knowledge, enjoy life and make profits.
 
Isaac

You are definitely right that for most passive investors, index is the way to go. Even for enterprising individual investors, accumulating periodically over long period of time should be the corner stone of the entire portfolio.

Beyond that, however, one may pick up a few pearls occasionally based on due diligence and some technical operations. Annual reports etc are just the beginning. They are not the end. If simply reading annual reports makes one rich, then everyone can do it.

Annual reports provide enormous insight, though. Buffett keeps reading such reports even now. He divides these reports to two categories: Don't understand and Understand.

For some companies, like SVA you mentioned, some people (like me) may not really gain any insights after reading a pile of them. Of course, other people may find them very insightful.

For some other companies, like AXP, WFC, BOH etc, people with proper training are able to gain insights.

For yet other companies, like Buffett's Berkshire and Watsa's Fairfax Financials, one just needs to mind the downside and then puts complete faith in the management (provided one trusts them).

Reading annual reports and doing studies is the only way I know and feel comfortable to an individal to become an enterprising investor. You are completely right that passive investors should just choose ETFs and relax ...
 
Jia

Thanks for sharing the DD. You are definitely right that the only way I feel comfortable to invest in bio is to use the option speculation. I understand the chance is rare but may pop up sometimes. So, I keep my eyes open but don't really depend on such opportunities.

I won't be unhappy if DOW goes below 10,000. It is not that I am not going to suffer losses. However, such losses shall be temporary in nature and the climate will be conducive to put writing operations.

Without any substantiating evidences, I speculate that current market condition may be similar to the period between 1975 and 1985. The market crash scares people and there are constant news on crisis. Yet, stock market fundamentals are corrected for the previous bull (DOW is flat from 1965 to 1975). The market may grow annually but people are still in doubt. There are probably no violent upside nor violent downside.

The trick is to accumulate as much as possible during this silent period and then hopefully there is a great run after that ...
 
On Bio

You are right that the only possibility is event driven speculation. And short range ones. There were a few such potential opportunities like DNDN last March, ARNA etc sometime last year. Coming April, DNDN may become available again.

It is betting the impossibles. Therefore, the committed capital has to be small but potential gains have to be large. It is like Japanese suicidal attempt to sink carriers in the WWII - kamikatze operation....
 
Cat: for unannounced data, I agree with you. Even with that, there are earlier trial results based on which one can study to make judgements. HGSI was a complete shock to the bio world last year. All earlier trials pointed to a negative result and as such, there was no runup at all based on expectations leading to the release of top line data. OGXI surprised the bio world with positive results of a phase II trial presented at the ASCO but the pps has retraced back to 15 from the high of 40.

Regarding DNDN, I beg to completely differ. I studied the company since 2005 when I first acquired some pitiful shares, then traded in and out frequently, sometimes for gains but other times for losses. It not only wiped my gigantic paper profits out but also gave me a mountain of margin debt May 10, 2007 when TDWaterhouse liquidated my account. I overcame the devastation, live to fight for another day, and maintain my conviction. I dare to tell you that I know nothing less about the company than the CEO and CFO, saved insider info. I truly believe DNDN is a biotech power house in the making, although the pathway won't be smooth sailing all the time. Granted, that is conditional on the approval of Provenge by the FDA. I assign a probabibility of 0.95-0.99 to Provenge winning FDA marketing licensure this time around, barring the FDA not being bought again or a manufacturing facility inspection failure. One doesn't live to meet many paradigm-shifting revolutions in a lifetime and I am just happy that I have the chance to either prosper or die poor with little Debby. The only regret I am suffering tremendously now is the huge loss I suffered in the last three months of last year (chiefly on SVA) and consequently, my stake in DNDN isn't big enough to realize my dreams in 3-5 years should my expectations of its performance be met/exceeded. Despite it is all water under the bridge now, I still wish in my mind I had put into DNDN what I put into SVA, my most stubbornly stupid move of last year as a result of grossly over-estimating the damage H1N1 may cause. SVA's damned CEO is simply an incompetent businessman. He may be a genius in making vaccines but simply put, the entire management team is a collection of incompetent idiots when it comes to Wall Street. I closed my entire position in one shot upon receiving an email reply to my inquiry, saving a pitiful amount of working capital. How often do we get to see a time span of 3 months between a secondary offering PR and the actual bought deal PR? SVA is absolutely the first time ever for me. That was an open invitation for secondary offer participants to short the stock to the ground. I very much regretted that I did not build a short position after closing my calls postioin. If my dream book is ever put to print, Part One will have another chapter on my SVA failure.

Even with my pititul stake, DNDN to me is what was Dell to Peter Lynch, scaled back by a factor of 1 million or 10 million or 100 million, of course. By May, I expected to be either completely wiped out again or have serious working capital to have fun in the market.

I don't expect DNDN to pose another one-day %age surge ever again like what happened last April, even with Nuevenge's Phase III trial success (5-8 years out if it ever gets off the ground). There is simply nothing left to do any furhter except to sit tight (add stake if and when my hands can get hold to cash) and wait for the FDA to make its dutiful ruling. Conditional on Provenge's approval, I will move on to the MOA of breast cancer and ovarian cancer (Nuevenge's targets), and I would greatly appreciate help from anyone with a medical background.


I fear DOW going below 10K now for my front-month calls positions and I am powerless to do anything else but to wait for the invisible hand to hand down the ruling.

My personal view is that when it comes to speculation, there isn't one formulae working for everybody. And that is exactly the nature and fun of Mr. Market. I simply want to be the only owner of my moves, win or lose. I perfer the term speculation to investment and speculator to investor. The overwhelming majority of market participants become investors involuntarily rather than voluntarily. I am trying my very best not to become an involuntary investor.
 
后退
顶部