我来说说老外开车习惯

1.我说的都是外面的镜子,从来没说内镜不是平面,还您帮我找出来的,真自我感觉良好。:eek:
2.我又没说有关系,咋了?提供是应您的要求,忘的太快了。:D
3.是不是坏习惯您说了不算,别自我感觉高人一等。:kan:
4.行业标准也不是您能评价得了的,您歇了吧。:jiayou:
这中国汽车行业的标准就应该抄国外的,人家那么多年都总结好了,照抄照搬多好,也不侵犯IP。自己净出幺蛾子,整出个曲率半径r1200的镜子来,还不想shoulder check。要是行的话,这边不早就用了吗!
 
这中国汽车行业的标准就应该抄国外的,人家那么多年都总结好了,照抄照搬多好,也不侵犯IP。自己净出幺蛾子,整出个曲率半径r1200的镜子来,还不想shoulder check。要是行的话,这边不早就用了吗!

各有利弊,按国内的行车密度,照搬北美的标准也未必就弊大于利。
 
这种国内科普文章你也信?至少也要找到英文链接看看原文再说。是不是有点奶义务了。。。?

我靠,又遇到高手了。:p
 
这种国内科普文章你也信?至少也要找到英文链接看看原文再说。是不是有点奶义务了。。。?
那个95年美国人提出的方法有反对意见的,它虽然在change lane时不用做shoulder check但是那种方法在车后方产生更大的blind spot。wikipedia上讲blind spot的地方有讲到那个方法。
 
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blind_spot_(vehicle)

If side view mirrors are properly adjusted in a car, there are no blind spots on the sides.[4][5][6][7] Such an arrangement can greatly reduce the probability of side swipes and other accidents, particularly in lane changes. This method was first revealed by George Platzer in a 1995 paper presented to the Society of Automotive Engineers.[4][6][7][8] The method is frequently overlooked in driver's education classes, and takes some getting used to.[8][9] Calculated elimination of blind spots by properly trained drivers is cheap, and obviates the need for expensive technological solutions to that problem, provided drivers take the time to set up and use their mirrors effectively.[6][7] The arrangement — pointing the side view mirrors substantially outboard in a fixed mechanical formula — is relatively simple to achieve, but it takes some knowledgeable effort. It is reputed to be a lifesaver.[4][5][6][7][8][9]

However, one source considers that method a driving mistake and claims it to be even more dangerous, because it creates other blind spots directly behind the vehicle—he lists nine reasons, e.g., when backing up—which are impossible to eliminate by a "shoulder check".[10][11]

Of course, rearward invisibility is an entirely different matter. The area directly behind vehicles is the source of Back-up collisions, particularly involving pedestrians, children and objects directly aft of a vehicle. That area has been called a "killing zone."[11][12] These problems are the object of a number of technological solutions, including (in rough order of technological complexity, simplest first): rear-view mirror, side-view mirror. fresnel lens,sonar, parking sensors and backup camera. A similar problem attaches to positions left and right of a vehicles' rear bumper as the driver attempts to back out of a parking space. Specially designed cross traffic alert warning systems have been developed.[6][13][14]
 
那个95年美国人提出的方法有反对意见的,它虽然在change lane时不用做shoulder check但是那种方法在车后方产生更大的blind spot。wikipedia上讲blind spot的地方有讲到那个方法。
那是肯定的,要不然20年后的今天不早就推广执行了吗?国内的科普网站,断章取义,不深究,不靠谱。。。
 
说的就是你这种感觉。:D
山南为阳,水南为阴。
春江水暖鸭先知,开春的时候鸭总是在北岸游水,所以他说他高你一筹。:p
 
国内交规没有shoulder check还有一个原因,中国人不像老外那样,眼睛都凹进去,余光比国人窄很多,中国人往旁边一看镜子,余光就看见盲区了,根本就不用摆头过肩。:D:monster:
 
山南为阳,水南为阴。
春江水暖鸭先知,开春的时候鸭总是在北岸游水,所以他说他高你一筹。:p

其实,也就是嘴硬。:evil:
 
这我没觉得,除非长着像蜻蜓的眼睛 :D
国内交规没有shoulder check还有一个原因,中国人不像老外那样,眼睛都凹进去,余光比国人窄很多,中国人往旁边一看镜子,余光就看见盲区了,根本就不用摆头过肩。:D:monster:
 
后退
顶部
首页 论坛
消息
我的